[spam] new tune! | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
steve mcqueen
...and 93 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614145
Today 17
Topics 127544
  
 
Messageboard index
[spam] new tune!
 

offline jkd from Twitch City (Canada) on 2005-04-10 16:05 [#01560061]
Points: 1138 Status: Lurker



since sharing is good, sharing is nice, here's a tune that
i'm working on. enjoy!

LAZY_TITLE!

(for all you morning people, i apologize for the excessive
use of exclamation marks!)

comments, criticism, yadda yadda



 

offline chaosmachine from Ottawa (Canada) on 2005-04-10 16:17 [#01560115]
Points: 2330 Status: Lurker



as i learned the hard way, don't post any new music on xlt
within a 3 day radius of any autechre event.


 

offline ToXikFB on 2005-04-10 16:18 [#01560118]
Points: 4414 Status: Lurker | Followup to chaosmachine: #01560115



Well said :)


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2005-04-10 16:31 [#01560175]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular



oh the trebly sound hurts my ears and i'm not into the
atonal 80's breakdown. it's not a bad start for a song.
better production would really help this track. could use a
lead melody.


 

offline Skink from A cesspool in eden on 2005-04-10 16:37 [#01560196]
Points: 7483 Status: Lurker



Hey, that is quite nice. I think the glitches become a
little annoying though.


 

offline jkd from Twitch City (Canada) on 2005-04-13 15:57 [#01564097]
Points: 1138 Status: Lurker



radar indicates we are now beyond the 3-day radius. thanks
for the comments so far. :)

r40f: which trebly sound? my hearing is exceptionally bad,
and i have really shit speakers, so i hadn't noticed. yeah,
i'm not too sure whether i like the breakdown or not either.
what else about the production could be improved? (this is
one area i am not very good at, but i'd like to work on
improving my production skills.)

skink: maybe i did go a bit overboard with them. also,
they're on the whole mix; perhaps only gitching the melody
or the drums would work better.

if anyone else would care to have a listen that would mean a
lot to me. thanks :)



 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2005-04-13 16:14 [#01564108]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to jkd: #01564097



the "tink" sound that's part of the "drumkit". i guess the
closest thing it sounds like is a hi-hat, but with the
treble turned up all the way so that it hits my ears at the
same frequency as when a huge, huge blast of feedback has
just made my ears completely raw and tinny. maybe others
won't be bothered as much by it, but my from personal
experience it reminds me of pain. ;)

the atonal breakdown at 1:35-2:00 kind of ruins the vibe. i
think the glitchy drums could be a bit more subtle, but i
like them all right.

the problem is there's a chord progression, yes, but no real
interesting melodic lead. listen to HAB-era aphex, for
example. there are many synths and some of them sort of
play chord progressions and some harmonize and give it an
actual distinctive melody. you need an interesting melody
so that it doesn't get boring. yes, there is some riffing
around towards the end, but nothing sticks out and carries
the piece.

the drums and the overall mix need fixing. maybe that one
synth is too loud. there's not enough bass and the tink
sound drives me nuts.

i hope i don't sound too harsh - i'm just trying to help.


 

offline vlari from beyond the valley of the LOLs on 2005-04-13 16:16 [#01564109]
Points: 13915 Status: Regular



The first 1/3 of the track was really nice, and I sat
hoping for a really big lush development (strings and
perhaps some beefy drumsounds/patters), but the break where
you introduce the atonal hi-pitched c64-esque sound breaks
off the mood imo.

The cutups got a bit excessive as skink stated, but applied
to the drums I would think you'd get an effective/cool
result. I would do some lazy slide/portamento-ish pad sound
after you (hopefully) clean up the break part, and do some
nice harmonisation with that. The track got potential, and
as I said the beginning is very good.

Good luck with your work on it.


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2005-04-13 16:19 [#01564110]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



While it wasn't bad it was a bit standard-IDM, I can't hear,
to be honest, a single original element, nor an attempt to
produce anything other than an inoffensive bit of IDM-lite.
I think r40f above makes some valid points.


 

offline jkd from Twitch City (Canada) on 2005-04-13 16:24 [#01564112]
Points: 1138 Status: Lurker



maybe i'm just perverse, but i'm enjoying having my track
torn apart quite a bit. lots of valid criticism and
suggestions. thanks for taking the time to listen and
reply.

any other comments wecome.



 

offline big from lsg on 2005-04-13 16:33 [#01564121]
Points: 23730 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



i think it'd be awesome if the beat was more in the track or
mix and the melody more floating in space above it
that should be accomplished with reverb, delay, panning and
volume :)


 


Messageboard index