Artz, Musicz, Personalz | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (3)
recycle
Hyperflake
belb
...and 324 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614187
Today 32
Topics 127546
  
 
Messageboard index
Artz, Musicz, Personalz
 

offline deepspace9mm from filth on 2005-02-13 15:54 [#01497384]
Points: 6846 Status: Addict



Hello xcllnt people, i have a question to ask of you if you
do the creative thing.

If you make the arts or the musics, just how "personal" is
it to you? Just something nice to look at or listen to or
well, i dunno, something that actually means something to
you?

I suppose this is a bit of a therapy thread, i've been
having a bit of a hissyfit trying to reconcile the stuff
that i make and the stuff i actually feel or think... i'm
having quite a hard time articulating what i mean here, but
if you make something without any kind of intentional
reference from how you actually feel, do you feel
dissatisfied, even if other people like your work? Or do you
think whatever's in you just kind of comes out anyway, even
if it's not intentional?

The whole creative-crisis thing strikes me as being of the
realm of spoilt angsty wank, but i feel like i'm in a bit of
a fucking mess at the minute. I'm really not liking anything
i make at the moment because it doesn't feel like "me". It's
hard to describe. The worst thing is, the art course i'm on
at the moment demands certain criteria to pander to the
moderators, but the guidelines they set makes the whole
thing feel like a fucking waste of time. I want to pass and
get off to uni because it's the only route out of ShitVille
i can realistically see, but at the same time i want to make
something that actually feels worthwhile. Ahhh, i dunno.

Sorry for such a long post and Thread Of Jizz, but i was
just wondering if anyone's had the same kind of experience
and shit.

BLOG


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2005-02-13 16:04 [#01497401]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



Making stuff is a feedback loop where you do a thing and it
speaks to you and you do more and see what it says and it's
a dialogue between the present you and the immediate past
you which is now entombed in the thing you are making. This
is how soul gets into things.

So I don't see how something you're doing can ever be NOT a
personal expression - even if you don't enjoy doing it that
will be present in the work and you'll respond to that in
the feeback loop of making it.

I'd say jerk off your professors into a cup and drink it and
smile and be glad you didn't have to drink it right from the
bell end. Soon you will be free of them and you will graft
their heads onto farm animals.


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2005-02-13 16:07 [#01497404]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to deepspace9mm: #01497384



I'm having a kind of shitty period too - I'm having a lot of
trouble finding something to write about, something that I
actually WANT to write about.

to me it's the most major of problems - if you haven't got
anything to say you'd just as well stop completely.

normally what I make isn't very personal, but when I write
it for me it's essential that it has some kind of personal
interest for me.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-02-13 16:09 [#01497406]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



I basically try to make stuff I like... sometimes it turns
out good and sometimes not.


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2005-02-13 16:11 [#01497407]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to fleetmouse: #01497401



it can easily be something that's not a real personal
expression - apart from the trap of emulation, you can make
something that's technically proficient but has no "heart"
to it.

you also pretty quickly learn the tricks on how to ellicit a
quick emotional response from your audience and it can be
another trap to fall into - simply building something around
those tricks (which in a way is pandering to success).

you might learn from it, but it can also just cost a lot of
energy and reap little.


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2005-02-13 16:12 [#01497408]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator



to me the whole thing is quite different for music. it
doesn't have all these "storytelling capabilities" (at least
not automatically).

it's much easier to recognise when you're doing something
you like or not, I find.


 

offline deepspace9mm from filth on 2005-02-13 16:18 [#01497415]
Points: 6846 Status: Addict | Followup to fleetmouse: #01497401



You're right, you're right, you're right. If you're making
it then it's naturally going to be an expression of how you
feel at the time even if it's not a conscious thing, i think
i'm bogged down in trying to separate aesthetics from Tha
Personalz when they're naturally connected anyway.

Motivating my bad self into prof-wanking is another matter,
mind. Be it of the Acceptable Artz kind or that of an
altogether more sticky world.

Thanks though, You Have Helped And Made Me Think A Bit.


 

offline deepspace9mm from filth on 2005-02-13 16:25 [#01497421]
Points: 6846 Status: Addict | Followup to qrter: #01497408



It's easier to instantly like or dislike what you're doing
with music, yes (and easier to edit)... for me at least it
takes weeks to decide if something visual is actually worth
the time i put in.

It's the trap of falling into a style i'm not comfortable
with that's the problem i think, it's easy to make something
look good but a lot harder to make something that feels
good. It's the second i can't quite grasp, and if i actually
made the change, stopped painting altogether and actually
made art that i thought might have any kind of meaningful
effect, then i wouldn't pass the course and have a proper
route out of a place that has too many bad memories. Suck.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-02-13 16:30 [#01497429]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to deepspace9mm: #01497415 | Show recordbag



to me it seems like you're just having a "creational block,"
which is something that most likely will pass in a few days.
You need to do something you normally don't do; you need new
experiences to draw inspiration from. If you feel your music
lacks your emotions and as you say, you don't feel like it's
"you," you probably just need to awaken yourself again by
challenging your routines and doing something out of the
ordinary.

I noticed an increase in creativity after the year I spent
in civil duty, now that I've returned to uni... I'm reading
lots of interesting stuff and learning lots of new stuff
that adds to "me," and how I look at things. This somehow
inspires me to make more music that I feel is good enough to
[spam] to you people!


 

offline Raz0rBlade_uk on 2005-02-13 16:39 [#01497434]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Followup to deepspace9mm: #01497384 | Show recordbag



I understand what you are saying and I feel I can relate to
it.
I have a theory that whatever you make at the time it is
made is reflected on how you are feeling at the time you
make it.
If what you make feels wrong and messed up then it's
reflecting how you feel inside. This can be the ruin of what
you do unless you learn to control it. If you feel like shit
then you can make shit unless you can control these
emotions, directing these emotions into what you create.
This isn't desensitising your emotions but reflecting them
into something that people can see and feel.


 

offline Dannn_ from United Kingdom on 2005-02-13 16:40 [#01497437]
Points: 7877 Status: Lurker



I know what you means exactly. I've tried to answer but it
never really comes out right. I think sometimes the
important thing is to only have a framework in your head and
then feed off what you produce as you produce it, because if
you make the art in your head and then pour it out its not
very satisfying.

The whole 'whatevers in you just comes out' argument seems
to work, but often I leave a painting half finished and then
I just can't come back to it, because either in its half
finished state its already 'exorcised' whatever it was and
it feels like finishing it is just aesthetic work, or
because the process of making it was unpleasant in itself,
or the state of mind that I started it in isn't there
anymore. Whichever it is, it's never satisfying to leave
something unfinished.


 

offline Dannn_ from United Kingdom on 2005-02-13 16:43 [#01497445]
Points: 7877 Status: Lurker



I don't think feeling shit results making shit art, often
it's completely the opposite.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2005-02-13 16:45 [#01497447]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Dannn_: #01497445 | Show recordbag



yeah.. like the blues


 

offline deepspace9mm from filth on 2005-02-13 16:48 [#01497449]
Points: 6846 Status: Addict | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01497429



I don't think so to be honest, i've had enough creative
blocks to recognise them as they turn up. I've got a whole
sketchbook full of kerayzee ideas, it's just putting them
into practice that's the problem. It's what comes from being
on a very visual-oriented course when what i actually want
to express isn't anything to do with the image.

There's a lot to be said for changing routines and situation
to get new ideas though, i'd agree completely on that one.
It's not getting stuck in a situation-rut that i fear, it's
getting stuck in a style-rut just to get the piece of paper
that's my ticket out of here. 4 months left, and i think
i've made just about all the "nice" paintings i can possibly
stand.

I didn't mean this to be a "me me me" thread by the way, i
was just wondering if anyone had felt similarly.


 

offline weatheredstoner from same shit babes. (United States) on 2005-02-13 16:55 [#01497453]
Points: 12585 Status: Lurker | Followup to deepspace9mm: #01497449



yes i think most of us have the same experience.

I think what we'd all like to do is impress ourselves,
really. I think there are a lot of people that go "oh boy i
made something" only to turn around a month later and go,
"oh it was really just boring tripe". The stuff that is
truely good, will stay truely good for years and years, if
not forever.


 

offline deepspace9mm from filth on 2005-02-13 17:00 [#01497455]
Points: 6846 Status: Addict | Followup to Dannn_: #01497437



Aye, it's a real cunt forcing yourself to finish a painting
when the moment has passed, i know what you mean (partly why
a lot of the stuff i do has a load of encrusted texture on
it, there's usually about 4 or 5 different semi-finished
paintings under there).

It's odd though, even though i do find painting quite
cathartic when i'm actually in the process of doing it, when
i look at it a few days later i just have to question what
the point of it is. So some fellow buys a painting to hang
on their wall, yeah, fine... i feel like it's nice for them
to find something they like but it's all a bit cheap,
pandering to an audience that already wants that kind of
art. I want to make something that people find without
expectations, something actually "found" and surprising
instead of sought out with the intent of looking at in a
certain way.


 

offline Dannn_ from United Kingdom on 2005-02-13 17:25 [#01497471]
Points: 7877 Status: Lurker



Well an audience for art is always a problem because you
won't make anything youre proud of by 'pandering' (word of
the day). I've never made anything I would call art which
was made for anyone else to look at. In fact I think to me
it's vital that I never plan to show anyone it. A lot of
paintings I did I broke up and threw away when they were
done, partly because I never have any particular use for
them after making them and because it was intrinsic in the
making of them that they were made for me only. But I also
would like to exhibit, so I don't really know what I'm
talking about. Dunno mate.


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2005-02-13 17:32 [#01497476]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to deepspace9mm: #01497421



well, like I said, you quickly learn tricks with which to
wow people. I think this works for every discipline - if you
have some talent and/or understanding you'll quickly grip
those basic tricks.

you can then quite easily churn out something that to an
outsider seems quite heartfelt, but it is more or less
"factory work" to you.

the style that feels good, as you call it, is so hard to
grasp because it constantly changes and is what your being
an artist is all about - constantly refinding that.

I think it's genuinely the hardest part, constantly
re-establishing what is you want to do. I don't mean in that
in the silly way that you sit before a blank piece of paper
and first have to formulate what is that you want to do, but
it can be a central problem.

like I said, I have this same problem and I'm actually
getting a lot of crap at school for it. they say they don't
get to see what my ambition is. which is right, because I
don't have much of an idea what is either. and that's where
I think my school is failing up to now - there is little
education in forming and finding your ideas and subjects.

and I also find I use "and/or" too much. but at least I
don't say "dude".


 

offline deepspace9mm from filth on 2005-02-13 17:36 [#01497479]
Points: 6846 Status: Addict | Followup to Dannn_: #01497471



That's the curse... it's hard to exhibit or make a living
from something you love if the only audience is you. I've
done the whole painting-destroing thing too, nearly set fire
to the house burning a load in the back yard, and weirdly
enough it felt just as good as making them. That's mostly
why the whole art-market thing seems like such a bugger to
me, it's all concerned with what "they" think, not the
people that i'd actually like to connect with. Never mind
the bizarre cycles of fashionable opinion and cashflow.

What a fucking conundrum.


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2005-02-13 17:39 [#01497483]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to deepspace9mm: #01497479



I think you should talk to Dan, Xltronic's Own Disillusioned
Artist.


 

offline deepspace9mm from filth on 2005-02-13 17:51 [#01497496]
Points: 6846 Status: Addict | Followup to qrter: #01497476



I think that's a problem with a lot of schools... either
there's very little focus on ideas full stop, or there's the
expectation that you should find a conceptual niche and
stick with it, regardless of what your goal is. If you've
found one that's at least more than fleeting anyway.

The "factory work" thing is pretty much exactly what i was
trying to say, and i must admit i'm rather grateful to see
somebody else in the same position, slightly shit as it is.
I had wondered if it was some kind of introverted
wank-spiral that had gone as yet unrecognised in my angsty
head.

Also, i can't believe i said "dude".


 

offline deepspace9mm from filth on 2005-02-13 17:53 [#01497497]
Points: 6846 Status: Addict | Followup to qrter: #01497483



We can dance around pyres of venetian snares records
together and then regale each other with tales of broken
creativity.

Yes, this sounds most amusing.


 

offline dariusgriffin from cool on 2005-02-13 18:08 [#01497510]
Points: 12428 Status: Regular



I'm becoming more and more radical, thinking that art should
be catharsis and only catharsis. It sucks.


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2005-02-13 20:47 [#01497681]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to dariusgriffin: #01497510



ha ha you suck


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2005-02-13 20:47 [#01497683]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to deepspace9mm: #01497496



I think it's a common trap - it's where technicality starts
to hinder you.


 


Messageboard index