what if bush wins? | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
recycle
Roger Wilco
...and 297 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614154
Today 6
Topics 127544
  
 
Messageboard index
what if bush wins?
 

offline plaster from splitska 10 on 2004-11-01 14:28 [#01378501]
Points: 4173 Status: Regular



there is still a chance that bush wins..and then what.
some ppl say that the will initialy move to canada...i'm not
concerned about that stuff cos politics ain't my thing,but
i'm really starting to think what if...

kerry seems like the next JFK to me and it would suck big
time if he looss.

croatia is with you!!!

<3


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2004-11-01 14:30 [#01378503]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



it'll matter very little in the grand scheme of things.


 

offline Pinguiz from Sirap on 2004-11-01 14:31 [#01378505]
Points: 63 Status: Lurker



If bush wins....

Fucking big shit.... We're in trouble guys !!

WARNING !!!!!!



 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2004-11-01 14:33 [#01378510]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator



don't worry, we can huddle together on this mb - Jedi Chris
will protect us.

always remember - its a small minority that ruin things for
the majority.



 

offline sneakattack on 2004-11-01 14:38 [#01378521]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker | Followup to qrter: #01378510



Exacty! Jedi Chris is the new foreman in the war on terror!


 

offline scup_bucket from bloated exploding piss pockets on 2004-11-01 14:40 [#01378523]
Points: 4540 Status: Regular | Followup to qrter: #01378510



oh, funny as in weird by the way.


 

offline Aesthetics from the IDM Kiosk on 2004-11-01 14:41 [#01378526]
Points: 6796 Status: Lurker | Followup to plaster: #01378501



then we all will die very soon


 

offline Pinguiz from Sirap on 2004-11-01 14:43 [#01378528]
Points: 63 Status: Lurker | Followup to Aesthetics: #01378526



Very soon ?

Please let me one more day !!!!!


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-11-01 14:43 [#01378529]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



i really don't care what the outcome is going to be...bush
is stupid, but from what i've seen kerry doesn't look that
smarter.
and it surely won't affect me in any way, no matter who
wins. and even if it does...i just don't care anymore.


 

offline Pinguiz from Sirap on 2004-11-01 14:46 [#01378534]
Points: 63 Status: Lurker | Followup to tolstoyed: #01378529



Bush or Kerry, the same ?
You're right in a certain way, but I think that nothing is
worse than a Bush. So, go Kerry go !

I hope to see, once in my life, someone good pretending to
the higher politic place in the world... [Nice dream]


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2004-11-01 14:47 [#01378537]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker



I think Bush will win. I think most will vote for him on the
basis of 'better the devil you know'


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2004-11-01 14:47 [#01378539]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to scup_bucket: #01378523



ah! that's what I thought!


 

offline pantalaimon from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2004-11-01 14:56 [#01378547]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Followup to Pinguiz: #01378534 | Show recordbag



i'm hoping Kerry will win too, he seems a LOT smarter than
Bush and he actually seems like he could be a decent
president.

I can't even think of another 4 years of Bush, its too
frightening.


 

offline pantalaimon from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2004-11-01 14:57 [#01378548]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Followup to Jedi Chris: #01378537 | Show recordbag



I think Kerry will win, record numbers of first time voters
will vote this year and I have a gut feeling they want to
vote to get rid of Bush.


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2004-11-01 14:58 [#01378549]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to pantalaimon: #01378548



Do you really think there will be a change in some of the
things that are done?


 

offline Pinguiz from Sirap on 2004-11-01 15:01 [#01378553]
Points: 63 Status: Lurker | Followup to pantalaimon: #01378548



Yes but Bush and his administration have the control of the
vote's machinery. Remember four years ago, and the vote's
system, which gave to Bush the presidence thanks to fakes
voters and computers' problems...

I don't trust the american vote's system. Easy to control
it. Easier for the President than for the candidate, isn't
it ?


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2004-11-01 15:06 [#01378556]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to Pinguiz: #01378553



If Kerry wins, I think it will be just another face. I think
the policies will remain the same! :D


 

offline pantalaimon from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2004-11-01 15:06 [#01378557]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Followup to Jedi Chris: #01378549 | Show recordbag



Bush is a dangerous extremist, Kerry, just doesn't seem like
that at all. I don't think Kerry would rush to war like
Bush, I don't think Kerry will speed up development of
nuclear weapons like Bush does and will keep on doing, I
don't think Kerry could be anywhere near as bad as Bush with
regard to the environment.

To quote Kerry "we should be leading the world on nuclear
proliferation"

So in answer to your question, yes I do think some things
will change for the better. Not all, and I understand why
you asked that... and you do have a point to a certain
extent.

I think the underlying fact here is that Bush is so bad, you
could have Mickey Mouse in office and he'd do a better job.


 

offline Pinguiz from Sirap on 2004-11-01 15:07 [#01378558]
Points: 63 Status: Lurker | Followup to pantalaimon: #01378557



:)

<3


 

offline happy cycling from berlin on 2004-11-01 15:08 [#01378559]
Points: 2786 Status: Regular



if bush wins i heard he might close down xltronic


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2004-11-01 15:11 [#01378560]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to pantalaimon: #01378557



And Donald Duck in charge of the military!!! :D

lol


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2004-11-01 15:15 [#01378561]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular



i sincerely hope bush doesn't win. i will be voting
tomorrow, but not for bush and not for kerry.


 

offline pantalaimon from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2004-11-01 15:17 [#01378563]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Followup to r40f: #01378561 | Show recordbag



Effectively a vote for Bush then? Or are you in an already
decided state?

The ellectoral college thing is confusing, whats wrong with
a popular vote? Something that Bush lost by 500'000 votes in
2000.


 

offline Peter File from the future!!! Ooooh chase me! on 2004-11-01 15:17 [#01378564]
Points: 2020 Status: Lurker



Whoever wins... we lose


 

offline pantalaimon from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2004-11-01 15:18 [#01378566]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Followup to Peter File: #01378564 | Show recordbag



ah but we lose by a far greater margin if Bush wins :)


 

offline Pinguiz from Sirap on 2004-11-01 15:19 [#01378568]
Points: 63 Status: Lurker | Followup to r40f: #01378561



Maybe i'm gonna say something bad, but why don't you vote
for Kerry if you don't want Bush ?

I think it's unfortunately the unique way...


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2004-11-01 15:20 [#01378569]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



i just can't wait until the election is over, and everyone
likes america again.


 

offline pantalaimon from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2004-11-01 15:21 [#01378571]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Followup to Pinguiz: #01378568 | Show recordbag



probably because he's in an already decided state, in which
case a vote for Kerry is as pointless as voting for Bush or
Nader.


 

offline pantalaimon from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2004-11-01 15:24 [#01378578]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Followup to epohs: #01378569 | Show recordbag



start a revolution ;)


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2004-11-01 15:27 [#01378586]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to pantalaimon: #01378563



i've definitely already decided who i'm voting for. and it
is a myth that voting for a third party candidate is like
voting for bush. what, third party candidates aren't
allowed to run? you have to be a puppet of the major
corporations and lobbyist groups to qualify to be
president?

if the democrats lose, it will have been their own fault.
they would love to blame a third party candidate for getting
1% of the votes - that's stupid. why don't they win by a
large margin? a landslide? because people are generally
disenfranchised with the democrats. it's obvious that
they're largely the same party as the republicans.

and i totally agree that the electoral college is rubbish.
there have been better voting systems proposed, but don't
hold your breath. the two major parties love flawed voting
systems so that people become cynical and don't care
anymore, allowing them to get away with gross corruption,
like what happened in florida and what i'm sure you'll see
again this year.

so why vote at all? because it's the very least anyone can
do.


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2004-11-01 15:32 [#01378596]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to Pinguiz: #01378568



it's fine to ask a question like that. the answer is that
kerry isn't the only alternative to bush. even though there
is next to no coverage, ralph nader is running as an
independent candidate, and there are also smaller parties
that have candidates running. there are many choices, but
they have no real way of getting heard by lots of people.

not to mention, nader is kept from appearing in debates,
kept off ballots, etc. the people in charge don't like real
dissent.


 

offline pantalaimon from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2004-11-01 15:32 [#01378598]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Followup to r40f: #01378586 | Show recordbag



its a shame it's effectively a 2 party system, you can't
even vote for Nader in some states.


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2004-11-01 15:35 [#01378603]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to pantalaimon: #01378598



but rest assured, i live in new york, so no matter who i
vote for, kerry will win the state. it isn't a "swing
state". however, even if i did live in a swing state, i
still wouldn't vote for bush or kerry.


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2004-11-01 15:56 [#01378637]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to pantalaimon: #01378598



"Ralph’s own party, the Green Party, would not endorse his
run this year. That’s because those of us who want to
build a third party in this country know that the only way
to do this is to build bridges with those who believe in the
issues Nader believes in. But not one of those people will
sacrifice the chance to remove George W. Bush from the White
House on Tuesday. The choice here is clear: do we join with
our friends, or do we piss on them?
After the debacle of 2000, the Democrats got smart
and abandoned the conservative wing of their party. That’s
why 8 of the 9 Democrats in the primaries this year were
from the liberal wing. Ralph should take credit for that and
declare victory. It’s so sad that he doesn’t realize the
good he’s accomplished. But for reasons only known to him,
he’s more angry at the Democrats than he is at Bush. He
has lost his compass. I worry he has lost his mind. But he
still gives a great speech!
And Lila Lipscomb, the mother from Flint who lost
her son in Iraq, she still grieves -- as do the mothers of
1,120 others (not to mention the mothers of the 100,000
Iraqis who have died because of Bush’s war). That’s what
this election is about. Not Ralph proving some point. Almost
none of us on his 2000 advisory group are supporting him
this year. His total lack of respect for his best friends
should tell all of you something about what he really thinks
of you, too."

-Michaael Moore


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2004-11-01 16:04 [#01378649]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to evolume: #01378637



"In my last message to Michael the Second I mistakenly
believed that your views had not changed, with an exception
or two, "It’s that your circles have changed. Too much
Clinton, not enough Camejo," I observed. Now on "The Rose
Show" you, the great freedom fighter, urged us to withdraw,
urged rejection of the opportunity for millions of Americans
to vote for a candidacy of their choice and a good agenda
for their future.

So the anti-war Michael supports the pro-war Kerry; the
anti-Patriot Act Michael supports the pro-Patriot Act Kerry;
the pro-tax on corporations Michael supports the low tax on
dividends and capital gains Kerry. What ever happened to the
great resister?

Do you think any of the corporate lobbies are quaking in
anticipation of a Kerry win, e.g. the military industrial
complex (to use Eisenhower’s warning phrase), the
pharmaceutical, nuclear power, banking, securities,
insurance, petrochemical, agribusiness, biotechnology, real
estate and fossil fuel industries. The corporate government
in Washington is the permanent government – as you well
know. "

-- ralph nader, in response to michael moore (excerpted)


 

online recycle from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2004-11-01 16:07 [#01378653]
Points: 40066 Status: Lurker



bush will win

p.s. i love bush


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2004-11-01 16:29 [#01378683]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to r40f: #01378649



oh Nader, fuckin' wake up!


 

offline pantalaimon from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2004-11-01 16:39 [#01378699]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Followup to recycle: #01378653 | Show recordbag



are you his wife?


 

offline plaster from splitska 10 on 2004-11-01 16:49 [#01378712]
Points: 4173 Status: Regular



i have a feeling bush will win...it's all to weird and
stuff.



 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2004-11-01 16:50 [#01378713]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to evolume: #01378683



come on, man - give a reasonable explaination why people
shouldn't vote for nader. moore couldn't - the best he
could do was to try and attack him personally to attempt to
discredit him and call him insane. that's juvenile. you
should bear in mind that moore has a personal history with
nader that seems to be much less than best buddies. it's
even in his book, "stupid white men".

besides, the things he says there just aren't true. nader
left the green party to run as an independent. the people
who have left his campaign total about 70, and even they say
to vote for him in non-swing states.


 

online recycle from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2004-11-01 18:17 [#01378804]
Points: 40066 Status: Lurker | Followup to pantalaimon: #01378699



no im a man, and my wife has bush and i love it

bush = happiness

end


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2004-11-01 20:18 [#01379105]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to r40f: #01378713



there is a reason why republicans worked so hard to get
Nader on the ballot in swing states. they want liberals to
waste their votes on a candidate that doesn't have a chance
in Hell of winning.

why shouldn't you vote for Nader? Because it is just
throwing your vote away. You might as well write-in your
vote for Mrs. Piggy or Donald Trump. You'd be making a
statement against the system, and it won't make you look
like a naive hippy.

!!


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-11-01 20:20 [#01379111]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



i actually like bush a bit more nowdays...i used to really
dislike him.


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2004-11-01 20:41 [#01379145]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to evolume: #01379105



well, i disagree. i think throwing your vote away is voting
for somebody you don't think should be president just
because they're supposedly not as bad as the other guy.

and i'm no hippie, friend. don't take this all so
personally.


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2004-11-01 21:53 [#01379204]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to r40f: #01379145



Nothin' personal dude. I was kinda out of line with the
"naive hippy" comment but i was trying to make a point. you
know, talking politics is like talking religion. everybody
is very adamant about their personal beliefs.

i agree that Kerry is not the perfect candidate. But he is
a Helluva lot better than Bush in my opinion, and he is the
only candidate that has a chance to remove this crooked
administration. I wouldn't want to risk giving Bush any
chance to win, especially if it comes as close as it did in
2000, and a couple Nader votes could have given Kerry a
large enough margin to make stealing another election
impossible for Bush.

even if you are in a state that is definitely going to Bush,
by voting Kerry, and giving him a larger lead in the popular
vote, i believe you can help make a Kerry victory less
disputable in the inevitable post-election debacle to come.

so in summary, i don't think you, specifically, are a naive
hippy.


 

offline weatheredstoner from same shit babes. (United States) on 2004-11-01 22:19 [#01379208]
Points: 12585 Status: Lurker | Followup to r40f: #01379145



What evolume said is true, rf. I would honestly approve of
what you are doing in any other circumstance, however this
election isn't your typical election. I hate the 2 party
system as much as you but lets be real about this for a
moment: If you want Bush out of office with no chance of
becomming president again, you have to vote Kerry .

And its not even a matter of throwing away your vote on
another party, its about everyone working together to reach
a common goal, and that goal is to get rid of Bush.
If we succeed, then next election we give more votes to a
third party (provided the next republican nomnee isn't
Hitlers zombie corpse running for office).

I applaud you for voting with your heart, but the fact that
you live in a Bush state should mean that you have to
balance the scales all the more...


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2004-11-01 22:29 [#01379211]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



FOUR MORE YEARS


Attached picture

 

offline weatheredstoner from same shit babes. (United States) on 2004-11-01 22:35 [#01379213]
Points: 12585 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #01379211



I hope theres a car battery under that box!


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2004-11-01 23:02 [#01379219]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular



evolume and weatheredstoner - i understand totally where
you're coming from. i have friends who are voting for kerry
for those very reasons. and i respect your personal
decisions - we can vote for whoever and i'm not judging. i,
on the other hand, am sticking to my guns on this. i know
i'm making the right choice for the reasons i have already
outlined in my above posts.

and also, as i said before, i am not in a state bush will
win, i'm in a kerry state.

i know that politics is a touchy topic and i usually avoid
it on here - no hard feelings, guys!


 


Messageboard index