| 
          | 
        
        
         | 
                     
	  |           
        
        
           plaster
             from splitska 10 on 2004-11-01 14:28 [#01378501]
         Points: 4173 Status: Regular
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
 there is still a chance that bush wins..and then what. some ppl say that the will initialy move to canada...i'm not  concerned about that stuff cos politics ain't my thing,but  i'm really starting to think what if...
 
  kerry seems like the next JFK to me and it would suck big  time if he looss.
 
  croatia is with you!!!
  <3
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           epohs
             from )C: on 2004-11-01 14:30 [#01378503]
         Points: 17620 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
it'll matter very little in the grand scheme of things.
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Pinguiz
             from Sirap on 2004-11-01 14:31 [#01378505]
         Points: 63 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
If bush wins....
  Fucking big shit.... We're in trouble guys !!
  WARNING !!!!!!
 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           qrter
             from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2004-11-01 14:33 [#01378510]
         Points: 47414 Status: Moderator
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
don't worry, we can huddle together on this mb - Jedi Chris  will protect us.
 
  always remember - its a small minority that ruin things for  the majority. 
 
 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           sneakattack
             on 2004-11-01 14:38 [#01378521]
         Points: 6049 Status: Lurker | Followup to qrter: #01378510
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Exacty!  Jedi Chris is the new foreman in the war on terror!
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           scup_bucket
             from bloated exploding piss pockets on 2004-11-01 14:40 [#01378523]
         Points: 4540 Status: Regular | Followup to qrter: #01378510
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
oh, funny as in weird by the way.
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Aesthetics
             from the IDM Kiosk on 2004-11-01 14:41 [#01378526]
         Points: 6796 Status: Lurker | Followup to plaster: #01378501
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
then we all will die very soon
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Pinguiz
             from Sirap on 2004-11-01 14:43 [#01378528]
         Points: 63 Status: Lurker | Followup to Aesthetics: #01378526
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Very soon ?
  Please let me one more day !!!!!
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           tolstoyed
             from the ocean on 2004-11-01 14:43 [#01378529]
         Points: 50073 Status: Moderator
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
i really don't care what the outcome is going to be...bush  is stupid, but from what i've seen kerry doesn't look that  smarter. 
  and it surely won't affect me in any way, no matter who  wins. and even if it does...i just don't care anymore. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Pinguiz
             from Sirap on 2004-11-01 14:46 [#01378534]
         Points: 63 Status: Lurker | Followup to tolstoyed: #01378529
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Bush or Kerry, the same ? You're right in a certain way, but I think that nothing is  worse than a Bush. So, go Kerry go !
 
  I hope to see, once in my life, someone good pretending to  the higher politic place in the world... [Nice dream] 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Jedi Chris
             on 2004-11-01 14:47 [#01378537]
         Points: 11496 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
I think Bush will win. I think most will vote for him on the  basis of 'better the devil you know' 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           qrter
             from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2004-11-01 14:47 [#01378539]
         Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to scup_bucket: #01378523
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
ah! that's what I thought!
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           pantalaimon
             from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2004-11-01 14:56 [#01378547]
         Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Followup to Pinguiz: #01378534 | Show recordbag
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
i'm hoping Kerry will win too, he seems a LOT smarter than  Bush and he actually seems like he could be a decent  president.
 
  I can't even think of another 4 years of Bush, its too  frightening. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           pantalaimon
             from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2004-11-01 14:57 [#01378548]
         Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Followup to Jedi Chris: #01378537 | Show recordbag
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
I think Kerry will win, record numbers of first time voters  will vote this year and I have a gut feeling they want to  vote to get rid of Bush. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Jedi Chris
             on 2004-11-01 14:58 [#01378549]
         Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to pantalaimon: #01378548
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Do you really think there will be a change in some of the  things that are done? 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Pinguiz
             from Sirap on 2004-11-01 15:01 [#01378553]
         Points: 63 Status: Lurker | Followup to pantalaimon: #01378548
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Yes but Bush and his administration have the control of the  vote's machinery. Remember four years ago, and the vote's  system, which gave to Bush the presidence thanks to fakes  voters and computers' problems...
 
  I don't trust the american vote's system. Easy to control  it. Easier for the President than for the candidate, isn't  it ? 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Jedi Chris
             on 2004-11-01 15:06 [#01378556]
         Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to Pinguiz: #01378553
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
If Kerry wins, I think it will be just another face. I think  the policies will remain the same! :D 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           pantalaimon
             from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2004-11-01 15:06 [#01378557]
         Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Followup to Jedi Chris: #01378549 | Show recordbag
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Bush is a dangerous extremist, Kerry, just doesn't seem like  that at all. I don't think Kerry would rush to war like  Bush, I don't think Kerry will speed up development of  nuclear weapons like Bush does and will keep on doing, I  don't think Kerry could be anywhere near as bad as Bush with  regard to the environment.
 
  To quote Kerry "we should be leading the world on nuclear  proliferation"
 
  So in answer to your question, yes I do think some things  will change for the better. Not all, and I understand why  you asked that... and you do have a point to a certain  extent.
 
  I think the underlying fact here is that Bush is so bad, you  could have Mickey Mouse in office and he'd do a better job. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Pinguiz
             from Sirap on 2004-11-01 15:07 [#01378558]
         Points: 63 Status: Lurker | Followup to pantalaimon: #01378557
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
:)
  <3
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           happy cycling
             on 2004-11-01 15:08 [#01378559]
         Points: 2788 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
if bush wins i heard he might close down xltronic
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Jedi Chris
             on 2004-11-01 15:11 [#01378560]
         Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to pantalaimon: #01378557
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
And Donald Duck in charge of the military!!! :D 
  lol
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           r40f
             from qrters tea party on 2004-11-01 15:15 [#01378561]
         Points: 14210 Status: Regular
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
i sincerely hope bush doesn't win.  i will be voting  tomorrow, but not for bush and not for kerry. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           pantalaimon
             from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2004-11-01 15:17 [#01378563]
         Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Followup to r40f: #01378561 | Show recordbag
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Effectively a vote for Bush then? Or are you in an already  decided state?
 
  The ellectoral college thing is confusing, whats wrong with  a popular vote? Something that Bush lost by 500'000 votes in  2000. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Peter File
             from the future!!!  Ooooh chase me! on 2004-11-01 15:17 [#01378564]
         Points: 2020 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Whoever wins... we lose
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           pantalaimon
             from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2004-11-01 15:18 [#01378566]
         Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Followup to Peter File: #01378564 | Show recordbag
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
ah but we lose by a far greater margin if Bush wins :)
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Pinguiz
             from Sirap on 2004-11-01 15:19 [#01378568]
         Points: 63 Status: Lurker | Followup to r40f: #01378561
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Maybe i'm gonna say something bad, but why don't you vote  for Kerry if you don't want Bush ?
 
  I think it's unfortunately the unique way...
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           epohs
             from )C: on 2004-11-01 15:20 [#01378569]
         Points: 17620 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
i just can't wait until the election is over, and everyone  likes america again. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           pantalaimon
             from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2004-11-01 15:21 [#01378571]
         Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Followup to Pinguiz: #01378568 | Show recordbag
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
probably because he's in an already decided state, in which  case a vote for Kerry is as pointless as voting for Bush or  Nader. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           pantalaimon
             from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2004-11-01 15:24 [#01378578]
         Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Followup to epohs: #01378569 | Show recordbag
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
start a revolution ;)
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           r40f
             from qrters tea party on 2004-11-01 15:27 [#01378586]
         Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to pantalaimon: #01378563
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
i've definitely already decided who i'm voting for.  and it  is a myth that voting for a third party candidate is like  voting for bush.  what, third party candidates aren't  allowed to run?  you have to be a puppet of the major  corporations and lobbyist groups to qualify to be  president?
 
  if the democrats lose, it will have been their own fault.   they would love to blame a third party candidate for getting  1% of the votes - that's stupid.  why don't they win by a  large margin?  a landslide?  because people are generally  disenfranchised with the democrats.  it's obvious that  they're largely the same party as the republicans.
 
  and i totally agree that the electoral college is rubbish.   there have been better voting systems proposed, but don't  hold your breath.  the two major parties love flawed voting  systems so that people become cynical and don't care  anymore, allowing them to get away with gross corruption,  like what happened in florida and what i'm sure you'll see  again this year.
 
  so why vote at all?  because it's the very least anyone can  do. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           r40f
             from qrters tea party on 2004-11-01 15:32 [#01378596]
         Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to Pinguiz: #01378568
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
it's fine to ask a question like that.  the answer is that  kerry isn't the only alternative to bush.  even though there  is next to no coverage, ralph nader is running as an  independent candidate, and there are also smaller parties  that have candidates running.  there are many choices, but  they have no real way of getting heard by lots of people.
 
  not to mention, nader is kept from appearing in debates,  kept off ballots, etc.  the people in charge don't like real  dissent. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           pantalaimon
             from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2004-11-01 15:32 [#01378598]
         Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Followup to r40f: #01378586 | Show recordbag
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
its a shame it's effectively a 2 party system, you can't  even vote for Nader in some states. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           r40f
             from qrters tea party on 2004-11-01 15:35 [#01378603]
         Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to pantalaimon: #01378598
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
but rest assured, i live in new york, so no matter who i  vote for, kerry will win the state.  it isn't a "swing  state".  however, even if i did live in a swing state, i  still wouldn't vote for bush or kerry. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           evolume
             from seattle (United States) on 2004-11-01 15:56 [#01378637]
         Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to pantalaimon: #01378598
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
"Ralph’s own party, the Green Party, would not endorse his  run this year. That’s because those of us who want to  build a third party in this country know that the only way  to do this is to build bridges with those who believe in the  issues Nader believes in. But not one of those people will  sacrifice the chance to remove George W. Bush from the White  House on Tuesday. The choice here is clear: do we join with  our friends, or do we piss on them?
           After the debacle of 2000, the Democrats got smart  and abandoned the conservative wing of their party. That’s  why 8 of the 9 Democrats in the primaries this year were  from the liberal wing. Ralph should take credit for that and  declare victory. It’s so sad that he doesn’t realize the  good he’s accomplished. But for reasons only known to him,  he’s more angry at the Democrats than he is at Bush. He  has lost his compass. I worry he has lost his mind. But he  still gives a great speech!
           And Lila Lipscomb, the mother from Flint who lost  her son in Iraq, she still grieves -- as do the mothers of  1,120 others (not to mention the mothers of the 100,000  Iraqis who have died because of Bush’s war). That’s what  this election is about. Not Ralph proving some point. Almost  none of us on his 2000 advisory group are supporting him  this year. His total lack of respect for his best friends  should tell all of you something about what he really thinks  of you, too."
 
  -Michaael Moore
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           r40f
             from qrters tea party on 2004-11-01 16:04 [#01378649]
         Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to evolume: #01378637
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
"In my last message to Michael the Second I mistakenly  believed that your views had not changed, with an exception  or two, "It’s that your circles have changed. Too much  Clinton, not enough Camejo," I observed. Now on "The Rose  Show" you, the great freedom fighter, urged us to withdraw,  urged rejection of the opportunity for millions of Americans  to vote for a candidacy of their choice and a good agenda  for their future. 
 
  So the anti-war Michael supports the pro-war Kerry; the  anti-Patriot Act Michael supports the pro-Patriot Act Kerry;  the pro-tax on corporations Michael supports the low tax on  dividends and capital gains Kerry. What ever happened to the  great resister? 
 
  Do you think any of the corporate lobbies are quaking in  anticipation of a Kerry win, e.g. the military industrial  complex (to use Eisenhower’s warning phrase), the  pharmaceutical, nuclear power, banking, securities,  insurance, petrochemical, agribusiness, biotechnology, real  estate and fossil fuel industries. The corporate government  in Washington is the permanent government – as you well  know. "
 
  --  ralph nader, in response to michael moore (excerpted)
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           recycle
             from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2004-11-01 16:07 [#01378653]
         Points: 40956 Status: Addict
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
bush will win
  p.s. i love bush
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           evolume
             from seattle (United States) on 2004-11-01 16:29 [#01378683]
         Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to r40f: #01378649
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
oh Nader, fuckin' wake up!
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           pantalaimon
             from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2004-11-01 16:39 [#01378699]
         Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Followup to recycle: #01378653 | Show recordbag
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
are you his wife?
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           plaster
             from splitska 10 on 2004-11-01 16:49 [#01378712]
         Points: 4173 Status: Regular
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
i have a feeling bush will win...it's all to weird and  stuff.
 
 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           r40f
             from qrters tea party on 2004-11-01 16:50 [#01378713]
         Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to evolume: #01378683
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
come on, man - give a reasonable explaination why people  shouldn't vote for nader.  moore couldn't - the best he  could do was to try and attack him personally to attempt to  discredit him and call him insane.  that's juvenile.  you  should bear in mind that moore has a personal history with  nader that seems to be much less than best buddies.  it's  even in his book, "stupid white men".
 
  besides, the things he says there just aren't true.  nader  left the green party to run as an independent.  the people  who have left his campaign total about 70, and even they say  to vote for him in non-swing states. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           recycle
             from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2004-11-01 18:17 [#01378804]
         Points: 40956 Status: Addict | Followup to pantalaimon: #01378699
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
no im a man, and my wife has bush and i love it
  bush = happiness
  end
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           evolume
             from seattle (United States) on 2004-11-01 20:18 [#01379105]
         Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to r40f: #01378713
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
there is a reason why republicans worked so hard to get  Nader on the ballot in swing states.  they want liberals to  waste their votes on a candidate that doesn't have a chance  in Hell of winning.
 
  why shouldn't you vote for Nader?  Because it is just  throwing your vote away.  You might as well write-in your  vote for Mrs. Piggy or Donald Trump.  You'd be making a  statement against the system, and it won't make you look  like a naive hippy.
 
  !!
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           tolstoyed
             from the ocean on 2004-11-01 20:20 [#01379111]
         Points: 50073 Status: Moderator
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
i actually like bush a bit more nowdays...i used to really  dislike him. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           r40f
             from qrters tea party on 2004-11-01 20:41 [#01379145]
         Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to evolume: #01379105
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
well, i disagree.  i think throwing your vote away is voting  for somebody you don't think should be president just  because they're supposedly not as bad as the other guy.
 
  and i'm no hippie, friend.  don't take this all so  personally. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           evolume
             from seattle (United States) on 2004-11-01 21:53 [#01379204]
         Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to r40f: #01379145
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Nothin' personal dude.  I was kinda out of line with the  "naive hippy" comment but i was trying to make a point.  you  know, talking politics is like talking religion.  everybody  is very adamant about their personal beliefs.
 
  i agree that Kerry is not the perfect candidate.  But he is  a Helluva lot better than Bush in my opinion, and he is the  only candidate that has a chance to remove this crooked  administration.  I wouldn't want to risk giving Bush any  chance to win, especially if it comes as close as it did in  2000, and a couple Nader votes could have given Kerry a  large enough margin to make stealing another election  impossible for Bush. 
 
  even if you are in a state that is definitely going to Bush,  by voting Kerry, and giving him a larger lead in the popular  vote,  i believe you can help make a Kerry victory less  disputable in the inevitable post-election debacle to come.
 
  so in summary, i don't think you, specifically, are a naive  hippy.   
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           weatheredstoner
             from same shit babes. (United States) on 2004-11-01 22:19 [#01379208]
         Points: 12585 Status: Lurker | Followup to r40f: #01379145
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
What evolume said is true, rf.  I would honestly approve of  what you are doing in any other circumstance, however this  election isn't your typical election. I hate the 2 party  system as much as you but lets be real about this for a  moment: If you want Bush out of office with no chance of  becomming president again, you have to vote Kerry . 
 
  And its not even a matter of throwing away your vote on  another party, its about everyone working together to reach  a common goal, and that goal is to get rid of Bush. 
  If we succeed, then next election we give more votes to a  third party (provided the next republican nomnee isn't  Hitlers zombie corpse running for office).
 
  I applaud you for voting with your heart, but the fact that  you live in a Bush state should mean that you have to  balance the scales all the more...  
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           fleetmouse
             from Horny for Truth on 2004-11-01 22:29 [#01379211]
         Points: 18042 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
FOUR MORE YEARS
 
  
         
	  | 
        
         | Attached picture | 
	
	 | 
	  | 
	 
	  
  
	  | 
	
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           weatheredstoner
             from same shit babes. (United States) on 2004-11-01 22:35 [#01379213]
         Points: 12585 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #01379211
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
I hope theres a car battery under that box!
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           r40f
             from qrters tea party on 2004-11-01 23:02 [#01379219]
         Points: 14210 Status: Regular
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
evolume and weatheredstoner - i understand totally where  you're coming from.  i have friends who are voting for kerry  for those very reasons.  and i respect your personal  decisions - we can vote for whoever and i'm not judging.  i,  on the other hand, am sticking to my guns on this.  i know  i'm making the right choice for the reasons i have already  outlined in my above posts.
 
  and also, as i said before, i am not in a state bush will  win, i'm in a kerry state.
 
  i know that politics is a touchy topic and i usually avoid  it on here - no hard feelings, guys! 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
         
         
Messageboard index 
              
         
	 
	  |