[music theory] song structure | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
big
...and 457 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614125
Today 4
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
[music theory] song structure
 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2004-08-14 03:38 [#01304302]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



ehm.. I don't have any education in music, but I'd like to
know if there are any rules to song-structure.. I usually
just do what I feel like when introducing new themes and
such, and I can't help but think that it could be
"wrong"... I know of other artists that were really good,
but they were also missing something, and suddenly, when
they got signed they had to change their song-structure
because some executive or professional said so...


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2004-08-14 04:13 [#01304320]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular



what you are doing is completely correct - use your
intuition and follow no rules.

the reason labels try to make artists change their
song-structure is generally to make it more commercial or
"appealing to wider audiences" by following guidelines
depending on the type of music. pop music, for instance,
usually follows a verse-chorus-verse pattern. the reason
they follow guidelines is because that's what traditional
pop and rock music did in the early days of commercial
music, and why change a winning formula that has been
embraced by the consumer masses who are by now programmed to
accept these formulas?


 

offline uzim on 2004-08-14 06:12 [#01304367]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker



who cares about rules?
as long as it sounds good... =)


 

offline hevquip from megagram dusk sect (United States) on 2004-08-14 06:14 [#01304368]
Points: 3381 Status: Regular | Followup to uzim: #01304367



that's just what i was gonna say...

...as long as it sounds good...to you. that should be why
you're making music, for yourself. and if you're extra
special, other people will like it too.


 

offline _awt_ from Malmö (Sweden) on 2004-08-14 06:27 [#01304373]
Points: 2202 Status: Regular



i have been thinking the same thing lately.. my music/sound
tech teatcher forces me to make music that has the typical
pop structure.. and i hate it =D

it's pretty boring and as said above it's only like guide
lines so when someone gives it a first listen they will know
exactly when the chorus will hit in even thou they never
heard the song before.

im fed up with the rules of music and sound, im debating
with my teatcher quite allot when it comes to different
rules like chords and harmony rules and so on.. i think the
older generation of musicisians and sound dudes are very
closed minded (like open minded but the other way eh)
and closed mindedness wont take music to any new levels at
all..

this doesnt mean that learning about music and production
techniques are a bad thing just try to keep in mind that
rules are made to be broken and allways follow the ear+heart
instead of someone elses ways of doing things (even if it's
a super duper star producer)

good day


 

offline Torture Garden from Feelin' 2Pacish on 2004-08-14 08:48 [#01304408]
Points: 974 Status: Lurker



I've thought a lot about this too and I don't disagree with
the "if it sounds good then do it" idea. But when
considering harmony, you can't just chuck it out the window
completley, If something sounds good then it's probably
already been known for a while.
However, new things can be discovered but it's easier to try
new ideas when you have knowledge of what has already been
thought out. I feel like rules should be learned before
they're broken.
I think what you're doing is correct though, in terms of
song structure, it's wide open nowadays.


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2004-08-14 09:02 [#01304409]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular | Followup to Torture Garden: #01304408



before you leave for another month, who is the saxophonist
in your avatar?


 

offline Torture Garden from Feelin' 2Pacish on 2004-08-14 09:20 [#01304411]
Points: 974 Status: Lurker



It's Anthony Braxton. I'd advise you to start from the
beginning of his discography, they're some real gems all
through his career though.


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2004-08-14 13:46 [#01304616]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Nothing I love more than a well written pop song, of
standard structure. The bridge is so often the key. I like
symmetry and order.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2004-08-14 20:05 [#01304907]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



yeah.. I know about that "if it sounds good.." and all that,
but most of the time, when I play it to other peolpe, I
realize it only sounds good to me, 'cause they go "ah, you
should change it there, and that part is too long" and stuff
like that, and people react at the same places 95% of the
time.. I have, however, been making more experimental stuff
lately, and then people just don't seem to care about
song-structure...


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2004-08-14 20:19 [#01304911]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular



that just further proves my theory that i explained in the
above post. most people are used to hearing things a
certain way, but you must do what you think is best for your
art and stay true to yourself, even if it isn't what people
expect.


 


Messageboard index