bleep: how much have you spent? | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
w M w
Tony Danza
...and 213 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614114
Today 11
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
bleep: how much have you spent?
 

offline Chris Ochre on 2004-06-12 16:15 [#01236859]
Points: 570 Status: Lurker



out of curiosity, how much have folks here spent on bleep?
did you mostly buy out of print stuff or did you grab a few
new releases too?


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-06-12 16:19 [#01236863]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



hmm...a complex equation leads me directly to the answer of
£0.00


 

offline weatheredstoner from same shit babes. (United States) on 2004-06-12 16:19 [#01236864]
Points: 12585 Status: Lurker



I've only bought an Prefuse EP. I'd probably buy more in the
future (ep and lp) if I find out that the physical album has
only a front/back artwork. I hate dropping $15 on an album
that has only a single sleeve.


 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2004-06-12 16:21 [#01236865]
Points: 27795 Status: Regular



£0.99

just wanted to see how it worked


 

offline Chris Ochre on 2004-06-12 16:26 [#01236868]
Points: 570 Status: Lurker | Followup to weatheredstoner: #01236864



wow - so artwork is a major factor in your decision to buy?


 

offline Chris Ochre on 2004-06-12 16:28 [#01236871]
Points: 570 Status: Lurker | Followup to earthleakage: #01236865



heheh. that curious? I must say I've never bought anything,
and although curious, I probably won't until they offer
something better than mp3s. like flacs or something. needs
to be a tad cheaper too imo. £1 per track is just too much
imo.


 

offline bob from Nottingham (United Kingdom) on 2004-06-12 16:31 [#01236873]
Points: 4669 Status: Lurker



i haven't bought anything from there. dont have any plans to
either. as i never download stuff for free anyway, i dont
see the point. i'm a fan of owning the finished product. i
get a lot of pleasure from having records on a shelf.


 

offline Chris Ochre on 2004-06-12 16:34 [#01236874]
Points: 570 Status: Lurker | Followup to bob: #01236873



even if bleep charged 25p per track? huh wouldja wouldja?
huh?


 

offline ISayNothing from Mt. Pus (Sweden) on 2004-06-12 16:34 [#01236875]
Points: 575 Status: Regular



i am a bit critical to buying things that does not have a
physical form, as digital music.
i rather buy the cd, then rip it.



 

offline bob from Nottingham (United Kingdom) on 2004-06-12 16:37 [#01236878]
Points: 4669 Status: Lurker | Followup to Chris Ochre: #01236874



no. still wouldn't bother. i like going out and buying my
records from my local dealer.

i dont mind paying 10 or 12 quid for an album. my bank does
though.


 

offline Chris Ochre on 2004-06-12 16:37 [#01236879]
Points: 570 Status: Lurker | Followup to ISayNothing: #01236875



i'm very curious as to how bleep's selling...


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2004-06-12 16:42 [#01236884]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



I bought Ultravisitor because it was cheaper than getting
the CD. Also got the RDJ album - pure impulse buy. Don't
think I'll be doing it again soon - maybe some rare stuff
someday but I won't be making a habit of it. Too xpensive.

In gereal I prefer eMusic - 22 cents a track, Lame VBR mp3s,
obviously no copy protection. Flac would be better but Lame
VBR is so good the difference is marginal.


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2004-06-12 16:44 [#01236885]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to fleetmouse: #01236884



i thought that bleep used LAME encoded VBR MP3's?


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2004-06-12 16:46 [#01236887]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to oscillik: #01236885



Yes they also do - they're just 4 times the price of
eMusic's tracks.


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2004-06-12 16:47 [#01236889]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to fleetmouse: #01236887



ahhh i see

well anyways, i wont buy from bleep until they start
encoding in AAC in at least 160kbps


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2004-06-12 16:49 [#01236890]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to oscillik: #01236889



You want a worse file format - lower bitrate and DRMed? Are
you holding out for higher prices too?


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-06-12 16:50 [#01236893]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to oscillik: #01236889 | Show recordbag



I won't buy from bleep until I can't get the stuff for free
any more. If I like MP3 I buy something I can use as either


a) a drinks mat
b) a dinner mat

when I get bored.


 

offline Chris Ochre on 2004-06-12 16:52 [#01236896]
Points: 570 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #01236884



cheers fleetmouse. even oggs would be better wouldn't they?
if warp are so keep on the righteous path away from drm they
could go to town with licence free oggs.


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2004-06-12 16:53 [#01236898]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator



I will probably buy ska006 when Skam ever puts that up.


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2004-06-12 16:54 [#01236900]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to fleetmouse: #01236890



a 128kbps AAC is better quality than a 160kbps MP3

therefore 160kbps AAC's are my encoding standard for my
personal library. and also they're not all DRM'd, only the
ones you buy from the Apple Store are DRM'd


 

offline Neto from Ecatepec (Mexico) on 2004-06-12 16:55 [#01236901]
Points: 2461 Status: Lurker



i bought the HAB ep's, that's all


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2004-06-12 16:55 [#01236902]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to Chris Ochre: #01236896



The problem with Oggs is that hardware players that can
handle them are rare as hens teeth.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-06-12 16:56 [#01236905]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to Neto: #01236901 | Show recordbag



I downloaded them off someone to see whether they were worth
buying and I didn't think they were. I will stick with the
vinyl, which I accidently superglued to my face back in the
summer of 98.


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2004-06-12 16:57 [#01236908]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01236905



ah, that's where superglueing your lips comes from.


 

offline Chris Ochre on 2004-06-12 16:58 [#01236910]
Points: 570 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #01236902



oh yeah. won't work in those overpriced shiny ipod things
will they?


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2004-06-12 16:58 [#01236911]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to oscillik: #01236900



160k mp3s suck. VBR mp3s use as many bits per frame as the
frame requires to faithfully encode that snippet of music -
so they can range from as low as 64 bits to as high as 320
if there's lots of treble.


 

offline aquagak from Berlin (Germany) on 2004-06-12 16:58 [#01236912]
Points: 4397 Status: Regular



£0.00


 

offline clint from Silencio... (United Kingdom) on 2004-06-12 16:58 [#01236914]
Points: 3447 Status: Lurker



I'm pretty happy with the bitrate/format etc, its the
quality I rip all my CDs anyway. I've spent a few quid
getting the odd remix etc, I'm sure I would use it more if I
had broadband.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-06-12 16:59 [#01236916]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to qrter: #01236908 | Show recordbag



Yes...I admit it...I have a superglue fetish :(

You know when a street trader offers to sell you 20 little
tubes on a blister pad for £1.50 and you just can't turn
them down. YOU HAVE TO BUY IT.

Then you have to find uses for it. That is where my
problems begin.


 

offline clint from Silencio... (United Kingdom) on 2004-06-12 17:07 [#01236925]
Points: 3447 Status: Lurker



Yea I only use a superglue tube once and discard it. It
sucks tho, it blatently one tube of decent stuff watered
down.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-06-12 17:08 [#01236927]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to clint: #01236925 | Show recordbag



It still sticks though...sticks like it's selling nails
AHAHAHAHAHA.no


 

offline Chihiro from twins land on 2004-06-12 17:18 [#01236948]
Points: 4650 Status: Regular



Well... I have quite a few tracks out of Bleep. But they
are almost all hard to find tracks.. Like some good old AFX
stuff. Otherwize, i baught tracks from albums that i lost a
few times. Or albums on wich i only like a few tracks or
so... Like Broadcast, or The Routine comp. And more... But
i haven't spent much (yet). And if i will in the future.. It
will only be hard to find stuff... (especially for me, as i
live in "///////" and some stuff isn't as easy to find as in
England... )... Or a track or two to see if the album is
good or not...

My two last tracks that i baught were out of "Choose your
own adventure" by Team Doyobi... amazing stuff... i'll
definnetly order the album.


 

offline Chris Ochre on 2004-06-12 17:38 [#01236998]
Points: 570 Status: Lurker | Followup to Chihiro: #01236948



cool. i imagined folks not wanting to wait for mail order
might feel inclined to order more.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-06-12 17:38 [#01237000]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



i only payed for two tracks so far.


 

offline horsefactory from 💠 (United Kingdom) on 2004-06-12 17:41 [#01237010]
Points: 14867 Status: Regular



£0.00 ($0.00)


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2004-06-12 18:13 [#01237047]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



I´ve bought a few bits/bytes of off there, stuff I have on
vinyl. Does a scale exist by which you can measure just how
gay Oscilik is?


 

offline Aesthetics from the IDM Kiosk on 2004-06-12 18:16 [#01237049]
Points: 6796 Status: Lurker



£ 0.00

they are too expensive for something that you can´t keep in
your hands



 

offline deepspace9mm from filth on 2004-06-12 18:35 [#01237079]
Points: 6846 Status: Addict



About 20 squid actually. I really shouldn't drink lots and
squander my money on the in-ter-net.


 

offline weatheredstoner from same shit babes. (United States) on 2004-06-12 18:43 [#01237090]
Points: 12585 Status: Lurker | Followup to Chris Ochre: #01236868



No, because I'll still buy it if the music is great, but if
there is minimal artwork, then i'll get it through the
cheapest source - which may be bleep.


 

offline nacmat on 2004-06-12 19:04 [#01237105]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker



0$


 

offline somejerk from south florida, US (United States) on 2004-06-12 19:54 [#01237221]
Points: 1441 Status: Lurker



i buy records and cds. if i want mp3s, thats what slsk is
for..


 

offline brokephones from Londontario on 2004-06-12 23:05 [#01237451]
Points: 6113 Status: Lurker



$0


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2004-06-12 23:15 [#01237464]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker



i've bought both the habs and squarewindow and am waiting
for the gescoms to be put online


 

offline uviol from United States on 2004-06-12 23:27 [#01237469]
Points: 2496 Status: Lurker | Followup to somejerk: #01237221



I tend to agree. I didn't think I was so old-fashined.. but
the idea of paying for digital music downloads seems
ridiculous to me, especially when hard-copies are
available.
I don't particularly like music downloading at all, legal or
otherwise. It cheapens the product. Even if it's
out-of-print, I'd rather undertake the challenge of trying
to track it down. I find artwork and packaging to be a
crucial part.. in some cases inexorably linked to the music
contained inside. It greatly influences the way I interpret
the music, whether I like it or not. I guess I've just had
'the medium is the message' crammed down my throat one too
many times.


 

offline notmyname from France on 2004-06-13 03:26 [#01237589]
Points: 683 Status: Lurker



i know that warp does everything they do to keep on
releasing good music, that they respect their artists but i
think that the bleep thing is really disapointing... they
have lots of cds & 12" that should be re-released & the only
thing they do, is to put them online & sell them at, almost,
the same price of a cd. i feel like being cheated (i never
use P2P)

think of black dog 2nd LP, Gescom keynell, AFX HAB & the
lovely seefeel cds... its shame that it's not avaliable
anymore.
of course i know that if they don't re-release those hard 2
find records its for $$$ reasons, not because their nasty.
but it's still a pity.

(0£ / $ spent on bleep)


 

offline JAroen from the pineal gland on 2004-06-13 03:27 [#01237591]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular



id buy it, if it was lossless


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2004-06-13 03:36 [#01237607]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker | Followup to notmyname: #01237589



hey wait, are they doing a bleep-rerelease of the older
(pre-warp) black dog stuff? what?


 

offline notmyname from France on 2004-06-13 03:46 [#01237626]
Points: 683 Status: Lurker



no: what i mean was instead of re-release old deleted cds,
they sells mp3 online instead

the black dog i was talking about is the one with
"mahanttan", spinnes its called i think



 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2004-06-13 03:47 [#01237628]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker



spanners. didnt know it was deleted... stupid warponians,
that album is too good to be deleted


 

offline notmyname from France on 2004-06-13 06:39 [#01237763]
Points: 683 Status: Lurker



yeah, spanners, bought it last month at amazon :)
lovely cd, i'm sure a re-release on a 2cd set (bonus one
with peel session, outakes, remixes or whatever ) could sell
pretty well in 2004, but warp seems to seek for their future
(lex, new artists) not their past & i respect that


 


Messageboard index