Calgary is in the Stanley Cup final? | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
recycle
...and 212 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614106
Today 3
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Calgary is in the Stanley Cup final?
 

offline The_Funkmaster from St. John's (Canada) on 2004-06-03 03:50 [#01220624]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker



Damn, didn't have a clue till today... not much hockey
coverage over here!

They better win... Canada needs to take the stanley cup
back!


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-06-03 03:51 [#01220626]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



i hope the other team takes it!! they're really good!


 

offline The_Funkmaster from St. John's (Canada) on 2004-06-03 03:52 [#01220627]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker | Followup to tolstoyed: #01220626



quiet you... Tampa Bay can't win... they're in Florida, and
hockey is a winter sport with ice and shit... Florida can't
win it, they just can't!!


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-06-03 03:53 [#01220629]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



yeah, tampa bay are excellent!!


 

offline azatoth233 from tku (Finland) on 2004-06-03 03:53 [#01220630]
Points: 387 Status: Regular



im hoping calgary will win the cup..but it's gonna be close


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2004-06-03 21:28 [#01221927]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



OLEG SAPRYKIN SCORES IN OVERTIME!!!1

Fuck me. Those last few minutes were INCREDIBLE, the Flames
looked like the Oilers circa the mid 1980's. Had the Bolts
on the ropes a few times during this game. I swear they had
the puck in Tampa's zone for like 4 minutes at one point.

One more win and the Cup is back home.


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2004-06-03 21:40 [#01221939]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular



this is so insane... just one more boys, just one more!


 

offline chaosmachine from Ottawa (Canada) on 2004-06-03 21:43 [#01221941]
Points: 2330 Status: Lurker



calgary outplayed lightning by a mile.. great game, unlike
game 4 which was total crap.

calgary is gonna own the cup on saturday.


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2004-06-03 21:57 [#01221949]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular | Followup to chaosmachine: #01221941



yeah Tampa was very lucky to get to overtime... but i
thought tampa was going to do it in ot because they really
had calgary on the ropes for the first few shifts of ot...


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2004-06-03 22:05 [#01221951]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular



man.. these games are annoying.. people honk till 5am when
the flames win! like.. come on.


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2004-06-03 22:08 [#01221954]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular



give them a break, it'll all be over by early next week (at
the latest), and everyone will be so much more pleasant for
the next little while... it's been so long, and in context,
the story is just to feel-good... but yeah... i'm really
glad i live in edmonton right now... it's probably the
equivalent of an entire citiesworth of frathouse kids :P


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2004-06-03 22:12 [#01221957]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular



...and they're little flames flags they stick in their car
windows.. they keep forgetting and they roll down their
window and it falls off and I almost hit THEM because their
flags almost hit my car.. and man.. oh man..


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2004-06-03 22:19 [#01221960]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular



hilarious... people are so cute...


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2004-06-03 22:21 [#01221963]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular



and then there's the flames girls.. wooty woot woot.. mm..
yea..


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2004-06-03 22:22 [#01221965]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular



calgary's gone bananas!


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2004-06-03 22:26 [#01221971]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular



BANANAS!


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2004-06-03 22:30 [#01221974]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Man, the more I think of this, the more it blows my mind. SO
MANY YEARS without a series win, without a playoff berth,
and then BAM, Stanley Cup Champion.

But I'm getting ahead of myself, I'm so excited. Please God
let them win in Calgary on Saturday.

Winning goal
|
V


Attached picture

 

offline PigeonSt from Detroit on 2004-06-04 00:22 [#01222027]
Points: 1780 Status: Regular



no, go ning


 

offline REFLEX from Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) on 2004-06-04 00:38 [#01222053]
Points: 8864 Status: Regular



The mentality of a canadian hockey fan is the fuckin worst.
god i hate fucking hockey.

idiots fucking cheer for one team then when their team loses
they all of a sudden have another team. everyone in edmonton
wanted edmonton to win, then when calgary starts winning
people are driving around everyday.. TONS of them with
calgary flames flags on their cars..... holy fuck these
people are STUPID.


 

offline aron from saskatoon (Canada) on 2004-06-04 00:42 [#01222055]
Points: 3756 Status: Lurker



thoes damn flags.


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2004-06-04 01:14 [#01222073]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Followup to REFLEX: #01222053 | Show recordbag



Bandwagon yo, motherfucker!

It's not so much the hockey team as it is the country, and
our national pride... we're taking our game back... an ''us
vs them'' mentality (not that I buy into it, I've actually
defended the US on the boards here before).

Anybody that's watched CBC, Canada's news leader, knows that
the media here HATES the United States. The top story every
evening here in Canada is always ''The US Fucked Up'' or
''George Bush is a Dickhead''. Did you see Daryl Sutter's
(Flames coach) little tantrum? He suggested that the NHL
heads in America are actually CONSPIRING to make Canada's
team lose! It's getting intense, boys.

Ironically, most of the players on the Tampa Bay Lightning
are Canadian...


 

offline The_Funkmaster from St. John's (Canada) on 2004-06-04 01:28 [#01222078]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker | Followup to REFLEX: #01222053



blah, what a dumb attitude... just like Ophecks said, it's
our national pride... and with Edmonton, I imagine it's just
down the road from Calgary, so if Edmonton is put out,
people there are most likely to cheer for Calgary... cause
just because your #1 team is put out, doesn't mean you stop
watching...

and mainly, it's a fucking game... it's all just for fun!


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2004-06-06 15:02 [#01225632]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Well, that was intense... double overtime. And it was
controversial. Maybe Calgary should be Stanley Cup Champions
right now? Looked like it could have been a goal... or maybe
an optical illusion, a trick of the eye. Could be the
perspective. But nobody can say for sure, even the
professionals in charge of deciding these things had
inconclusive findings...

Oh well, 'tis all yesterday's news. Game seven tomorrow
night.


Attached picture

 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2004-06-06 15:03 [#01225633]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular



i still believe in them...


 

offline DaWeeze from WANTED IN 16 STATES! on 2004-06-07 22:40 [#01228352]
Points: 5213 Status: Addict



I thought I'd jump on this before Ophecks and his Canadian
mafia came on...

So...

THE CUP STAY WITH US. U-S. US!!! MUHAHAHAHAHAHAH!

(Though most of the Lightning are Canadians by birthright,
so does it matter?)


 

offline Smyrma from Beloit, WI (United States) on 2004-06-07 23:57 [#01228372]
Points: 2478 Status: Lurker



Most of the players in the whole league are Canadian, aren't
they? So Canada should be happy when any team wins the
Cup.

Honestly, even though I'm a pretty big hockey fan, I lost
interest in these playoffs after my team (the Blues) got
their asses kicked. I wasn't surprised that they lost; but
it just made me not want to watch hockey. I've been more
into the NBA playoffs.


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2004-06-07 23:58 [#01228374]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Grrrr... you knew as soon as Tampa scored the first goal,
that it was over. That's the way the NHL works nowadays.

But there's a bright side... Tampa is more Canadian than
most teams in the league. Brad Richards (Conn Smythe winner,
from just north of where I am), Dave Andreychuck, Vincent
Lecavalier, Danny Boyle, Martin St. Louis, Cory Stillman,
Darryl Sydor... lots of good Canadian boys.

And it was great to see Andreychuck lift the Cup for the
first time in his 22 year career... crazy great. This guy
has something like 20 seasons of 20 or more goals, fuckin'
nuts. One of the worst skaters in NHL history, with some of
the best hands and hockey sense. 634 goals, got to be a lock
for Hall of Fame now that he's captained a team to a Cup...


Attached picture

 

offline Smyrma from Beloit, WI (United States) on 2004-06-08 00:06 [#01228376]
Points: 2478 Status: Lurker



Get out there and score second, boys

You might have thought that the hero of Game 5 was Martin
Gelinas of the Flames, who scored the first goal 2:13 in.
Surely you've heard how important the first goal is. Hockey
fans are bombarded with statistics showing that the team
that scores first wins in the playoffs a vast majority of
the time, usually something like 75 percent.

"First goal vital to playoff success," read a headline on a
column last month on the NHL Web site. Writer John Kreiser
showed that while the team that scores first in the last few
regular seasons has won between 66 and 69 percent of the
time, in the playoffs, where there are no ties, the figure
rises to 73-77. TV announcers talk about this all the time
and accompanying graphics back up the point. Coaches talk
about it too.

The conclusion is obvious, right? That first goal is really
important.

Horse feathers! shouts reader Scott Van Essen, who wrote me
on this subject a few weeks ago and did not actually use
that Marxist phrase. Van Essen, who calls himself "a pretty
smart guy [with] two degrees in physics from a pretty tough
school, with a really strong math background," calls this
first-goal business "the most obnoxiously used meaningless
statistic ever."

Aside to baseball fans in Southern California: This guy has
clearly never listened closely to Ross Porter.

"It's presented as though scoring the first goal is somehow
more important than scoring all of the other goals," Van
Essen writes. "Now, I'll admit that there is a psychological
advantage to being ahead, but I'm going to say it's pretty
minimal. I'm pretty sure that at this stage in the playoffs,
no team is going to crumble just because they suddenly find
themselves down one-zip.

[continued]


 

offline Smyrma from Beloit, WI (United States) on 2004-06-08 00:07 [#01228377]
Points: 2478 Status: Lurker



"In a game as low scoring as hockey, that first goal (or any
goal) is representing one half or one third of your expected
final score. So it's not that there's something mystical
about scoring that first goal giving you an advantage, it's
that scoring any goal is a huge chunk of your expected
offensive output, which your opponent has not yet managed to
put on the board. So yeah, you have a huge advantage over
your opponent, but it's not because you scored first, it's
because you scored at all, and your opponents haven't."

Van Essen also points out that the commentariat is mixing up
cause and effect by putting so much emphasis on the first
goal. "The team that scores first is likely to be the better
team," he writes. "That doesn't mean that they're the better
team because they scored first. It [likely] means they
scored first because they're the better team."

He sums up the whole problem by calling it "nothing more
than statisticians mining through piles of data, finding
interesting correlations, and then presenting them as though
they are causal relationships."

This all makes sense to me so I did a little mini-study to
see if I could back up the logic with some numbers. I mined
through the pile of data that is the 40 playoff games that
the Lightning and Flames have combined to play, including
the five in which they've played each other, and you'll
never believe what I found.

The team that has scored the first goal of the game is 33-7,
a winning percentage of .825, even better than the overall
trend of the last few years. But get this: The team that
scores the second goal of the game is 31-6. That's an .838
winning percentage! (There have been three 1-0 games.)

We're all looking at the wrong goal! Coaches are giving the
wrong speech! They're saying, "Let's get out there and get
that first one, boys," when they should be saying, "Let's
get out there and score second!"

OK, OK, you caught me doing the same thing. But I think my
little study backs up Van Essen's point. It


 

offline Smyrma from Beloit, WI (United States) on 2004-06-08 00:07 [#01228378]
Points: 2478 Status: Lurker



OK, OK, you caught me doing the same thing. But I think my
little study backs up Van Essen's point. It's not the first
goal that's so important, it's any goal. I'd wager that if
you look at the record of the team that scores any goal, the
third, fourth, whatever, you're going to find that it has a
pretty lopsided winning record. (And conversely, the team
that scores no goals has a really bad record.)

If anyone wants to undertake this study -- look at the
records of the teams in all playoff games this year who have
scored the first, second, third and so on goals -- I'll
offer a year's subscription to Salon for the results. Talk
to me before you start.

And as for you hockey teams, you should do what I've been
saying for years: Get out there and score any goals!


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2004-06-08 00:19 [#01228383]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Hockey needs more goals... the goalie equipment now is twice
as large, and half as heavy as it was back in ye olde days
of the deer hair pad. Watch any video of '80s hockey, and
it's jarring how small the goalies look in their net. Get
rid of this bullshit right now.

I'm not one of those people that dislikes smart defensive
play, the trap and the left wing lock... but I AM one of
those people that like watching pretty goals, not pucks
being swallowed into massive jerseys with mountainous
shoulder pads.

Look at the size of that fivehole on Gerry Cheevers down
below... that doesn't exist anymore, because pads are
designed to compress that thing to the size of a fucking
fist. You go into the butterfly, and goalie pads
automatically converge and shut the door. Trappers are also
cavernous. I'm sick of it, it's not a protection matter
anymore. JS Giguere was the worst, the Michelin Man. Martin
Brodeur is one of the few goalies that look reasonable in
net now. He says he can't move wearing the gear Garth Snow
and other gorillas wear.


Attached picture

 

offline PigeonSt from Detroit on 2004-06-08 00:21 [#01228384]
Points: 1780 Status: Regular



good article

told ya the ning would rise up!


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2004-06-08 00:22 [#01228385]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular



it's a shame they lost, but i'm still very proud of them...
i've been waiting for years to see the flames even make the
playoffs again, and the fact that they got so far with
relatively little star power is a testament to just how well
they played as a team... i hear people talking about how
lucky they are that they had kiprusoff and iginla... and as
true as that is, they made it to one win from the stanley
cup because every player that stepped onto the ice for them
played absolutely phenomenal, doing all the important little
things that go unnoticed like blocking shots, and beating
out icing calls, and forechecking like motherfuckers... i've
never been so excited to watch hockey in my life, and i will
look back on this season fondly... hopefully there will be
more success in the future for these guys....


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2004-06-08 00:23 [#01228386]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Giguere and his abyss... do something about this, Bettman.
There's no room.


Attached picture

 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2004-06-08 00:27 [#01228395]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular | Followup to Ophecks: #01228386



as much as i agree about the crazy size of pads... it would
really help if they decided to crack down on all the cross
checking, holding, hooking, tripping, and all the other
bullshit that players get away with purely because everyone
does it... there's no more brilliant stick work because no
one can move five steps without being latched on to or
otherwise impeded...


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2004-06-08 00:30 [#01228397]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Unfortunately, it's going to take a minor miracle for
Calgary to do this again... they're a hardworking, gutsy
crew, but that only takes you so far. Traditionally, teams
like that don't win. They CAN'T win, they never have and
this year is no exception. They can get to the finals, and
then lose to powerhouse talents like Tampa. Florida,
Carolina, Minnesota (against the Penguins), Washington...
all total failures after their Cinderella run. Let's face
it, this was a Cinderella run. I hope I'm wrong... they've
got some young up and comers, like Phaneuf. But they don't
have the monster D-Man that you need to win championships,
nor the elite offensive forces. And none of their young guys
are elite offensive players.


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2004-06-08 00:33 [#01228402]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular



i disagree about their d-men... they have one of the best
defensive corps in the league... Regehr is their monster...
i mean they did phenomenally against some top offensive
teams without some of their top d (denis gauthier, and toni
Lydman)... that said, i really don't think they will get to
the cup finals again... but so long as they remain
competitive i will be happy...


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2004-06-08 00:33 [#01228405]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Followup to DeadEight: #01228395 | Show recordbag



That's also true, that definitely needs to be rectified. But
I think that's not as big a problem as these pads, though...
Gretzky said the same and I totally agree. There's always
been dirty stickwork and clutching and grabbing, but for
some reason they really focus on it NOW that the scoring is
so low. Watch a Broadstreet Bullies game circa 1975, those
guys made today's teams look like angels.

Players are bigger, faster and stronger now... conditioning
and equipments has made the game tighter and faster. We'll
never see firewagon 80's hockey again, regardless of the
rules, regardless of officiating. Coaches are too informed,
and more work than ever goes into planning strategies,
studying teams, preparing mentally and physically.


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2004-06-08 00:35 [#01228407]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Followup to DeadEight: #01228402 | Show recordbag



Regehr is average offensively, and will never be anything
more. 30 points maximum ceiling on him. You need a
Niedermayer or a Blake or a Bourque or Lidstrom to be your
best D-man, not a Regehr. Someone that can put up 70 points
a year. No team ever wins without one, EVER. He's awesome,
but he's not the key, he's a different kind of monster.


 

offline J198 from Maastricht (Netherlands, The) on 2004-06-08 00:59 [#01228424]
Points: 7342 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



omg this thread is getting me all excited aboot
canada!11111

2 days to go!1111111111111111111111111



 


Messageboard index