you know whats sad? | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 335 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614103
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
you know whats sad?
 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2004-05-15 12:50 [#01189692]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



That I feel that I cannot trust any news I read.

-I don't trust the government. I feel they are telling lies.

-I can't trust the media, for obvious reasons, which I don't
think I even need to get into.
-I can't rely on the internet, because while bringing lots
of good points up, it is just full of conspiracy theories
(some that seem possible, and some that don't)

I just feel completely in the dark. There is a war going on,
affecting pretty much the whole world... and I don't even
know what the fuck is going on.

wtf?


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2004-05-15 12:52 [#01189695]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



Mother, should I run for president?
Mother, should I trust the government?
Mother, will they put me in the firing line?
Ooooowaa is it just a waste of time?


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2004-05-15 12:53 [#01189696]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker | Followup to epohs: #01189695



Did Rog's mother ever answer him, then?


 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2004-05-15 12:54 [#01189697]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker



better ask to meet someone who knows.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-05-15 12:55 [#01189698]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zeus: #01189692 | Show recordbag



You are taking stuff that doesn't concern your day to day
life too seriously. Why do you care who lies to you? Who
cares about this 'war'? They messed up...and shit will get
back to normal eventually...these things are what makes us
human, it has always happened and always will.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2004-05-15 12:57 [#01189703]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker



Limbering up to be a CNN newsreader I see, Lee... good job.


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2004-05-15 12:59 [#01189704]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01189698



it does affect me.

it affects my entire outlook on life.

am I to believe that these terrorists are complete psycho
animals who want to destroy us, therefor its justified for
what the country is doing, like spending billions on this
war, when perhaps its all just based on a grudge the current
US admin has, or wants more money, etc.

it does affect us. no, not in a blatent "theres a terrorist
at your front door, its now affecting you" kind of way...
but it sure as hell affects me. things are deeper then the
immediately noticeable.


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-15 13:01 [#01189705]
Points: 21452 Status: Lurker



this guy shares your snarfu, though the site doesn't quite work as good
as I thought it might. Different information sources have
different reputations obviously. If you go back in history
to read, there's little immediate need to politically
distort truth. Um, now the most powerful information sources
are large learned varied groups like slashdot.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-05-15 13:01 [#01189707]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zeus: #01189704 | Show recordbag



If you beleive the 'terrorists' are just psycho animals then
the media has already had it's effect on you.

They aren't terrorists...they are the opposing army in the
war the US started. Both sides aren't respecting the Geneva
convention rules of engagement, both sides are fighting a
dirty war...just because they are muslim and fighting back
doesn't make them terrorists.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2004-05-15 13:04 [#01189711]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker



Allah 0WNZ YHVH (even though they're the same!)


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2004-05-15 13:04 [#01189712]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01189707



i know, but my point is, the media DOES try to make us think
that.

so many conflicting accounts.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-05-15 13:05 [#01189714]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zeus: #01189712 | Show recordbag



Your media does, yes. But if you don't beleive them then
where is your problem?


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-05-15 13:06 [#01189717]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zeus: #01189712 | Show recordbag



At least you have access to media sources to make your own
mind up. Think how the people in previous wars have felt
having no information at all other than directly fed
government propaganda?


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2004-05-15 13:07 [#01189718]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



who should I beleive?

There is a limit to what you can feel, and what is fact. I
want to know the fucking facts. Where do I get it?

Not on tv. Not online. Not from the government. Not from the
"terrorists"

i dont trust anyone right now, and I have no reason to


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2004-05-15 13:07 [#01189719]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01189717



true.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-05-15 13:09 [#01189721]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zeus: #01189718 | Show recordbag



It's funny that you seem to need a source to rely on.
That's a bad way to live your life. You take all the
information available and come up with your own answers.
Whether you are right or not people will always disagree on,
but at least you are being true to your own beleifs.


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2004-05-15 13:10 [#01189722]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01189707



i know it's definately a point of contention, but i'd
definately draw a distinction between the two different
sides in this "war". one side makes it's targets known,
more or less lets them know when they are going to attack,
and tries to only target the people who are directly trying
to kill them. the other tries very hard to keep it's
targets hidden, attacks with no warning if at all possible,
and directly, purposfully attacks civilians.

not at all the same. i'd say one is terrorism the other is
not.

civilian deaths on our part are unwanted, and i do believe
that we try hard to avoid them. while it's very arguable,
and i'm sure i'll get plenty of arguments, i think if we
could completely avoid civilian casualties, and still
accomplish our military goals we would. conversely i
believe the other side would kill as many civilians as they
possibly could.

to equate the two isn't accurate or fair in my opinion.


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2004-05-15 13:12 [#01189726]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01189721



example: the berg beheading video.

is it real? is it fake? was it terrorists, or was it the US
govt spreading propaganda?

its not something that should be a matter of speculation. I
want to know what fucking happened. If its the terrorists,
then I need to make up my mind on why they did it. If its
the US govt, I need to think WTF is my government doing this
shit for?

Something happened. Its either real, or staged. Its not a
matter of belief. Someone has the real answer, and I dont
like being dicked around


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-05-15 13:14 [#01189729]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to epohs: #01189722 | Show recordbag



One side makes it's targets known

The muslim opposition forces have said everyone involved in
the illegal occupation of their country is the target, which
is fair enough as far as I am concerned.

the other tries very hard to keep it's
targets hidden, attacks with no warning if at all possible,

and directly, purposfully attacks civilians.


That's rubbish. None of the uprising Iraqi people have been
linked with external civilian terrorist activity during this
conflict.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2004-05-15 13:16 [#01189732]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker



Zeus - bbc.co.uk


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-05-15 13:17 [#01189733]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zeus: #01189726 | Show recordbag



The video is real. They found the decapitated body. The
cause of his death, I firmly beleive, is a direct result of
the actions of US solidiers in the Iraqi prison. Let's not
forget that not everyone in prison is a terrorist, there is
a large number who where fighting against what they beleive
is an illegal occupation of their home land.


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-15 13:19 [#01189735]
Points: 21452 Status: Lurker



deceit in an evolved political strategy, culturally or
biologically such as when certain insects fake mating
related chemicals of other species only to eat the lured
wandering males. it's the nature of brains to be able to
trick them with information.


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2004-05-15 13:20 [#01189736]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



I dont doubt it was really berg.

But there is plenty of things that raise suspision on who
did it.

was he dead before hand? is it really who they say it is?
isnt it perfect timing? would the iraqis really do something
like this to look so bad, when they have the US in a
compromising position?

Dont get me wrong, I know berg is really dead, and he was
beheaded.... but by who?

It doesnt add up.


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2004-05-15 13:20 [#01189737]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01189729



i think there's a couple different groups in iraq fighting
us. i think there is the legitimate iraqi resistance, which
i wouldn't say were terrorists, and there are al qaeda
related folks. i'd guess that the people who killed nick
berg weren't iraqi resistance fighters. they were
terrorists who moved in after we destabilized the place, and
are taking advantage of it. i doubt they give two shits
about the people of iraq.


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2004-05-15 13:21 [#01189738]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01189733



i think they would've cut off his head regardless of the
prisoner abuse. they would've just used a different excuse.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-05-15 13:23 [#01189740]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to epohs: #01189737 | Show recordbag



Yes, but the US brought all of this on themselves...even the
hatred al queda hold towards them.


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2004-05-15 13:23 [#01189741]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



btw i fucking hate using terms like 'terrorists' and 'al
qaeda', i just use them cause i don't know of better terms.
i think they're both just tools of rhetoric, and are so
fucking broad that they basically describe nothing.


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2004-05-15 13:24 [#01189745]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker | Followup to epohs: #01189741



agreed


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2004-05-15 13:26 [#01189746]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01189740



see, i kinda disagree with that. i think they created, and
follow a bastardized version of islaam that doesn't allow
them to coexist with any other religions.

they'd be killing us no matter what we do. we move out of
saudi arabia, create hydrogen powered cars, leave the middle
east, become isolationists, it doesn't matter.

there's no doubt in my mind that bush's arrogance has fueled
the flames, but they tried to take down the wtc long before
cowboy dubya took the helm, and they'll still be after us
when he's gone.

it's an ideological difference that doesn't have a whole lot
to do with our actions. at least that's my current
thinking. i could very well be quite wrong though.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-05-15 13:26 [#01189747]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to epohs: #01189738 | Show recordbag



Possibly...but there is possibly more to Nick Berg than
meets the eye, and there is a chance that he wasn't a random
abduction.


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2004-05-15 13:29 [#01189748]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01189747



agreed


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-05-15 13:30 [#01189749]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to epohs: #01189746 | Show recordbag



Then why is the US the only real target they have? There
are plenty more non islamic countries they could target.
The fact is that the US have, and continue to have a very
negative attitude towards Muslims, demonstated by their
complete bias in the Isreali/Pallistinian situation.

You reap what you sow.


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2004-05-15 13:32 [#01189751]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker | Followup to epohs: #01189746



its not bushes fault that this all started. hes just an
idiot at the helm, and has steered us in the wrong direction
ever since.

it probably has alot to do with the US tightening its grip
around the world, globalization, and israel... to name a few
things.

some religion, some politics.



 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-05-15 13:33 [#01189752]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zeus: #01189751 | Show recordbag



Bush is as much a religious extremist as the people he is
attempting to fight.


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2004-05-15 13:33 [#01189753]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01189749



because we're the bigest and most visible example of
christian capitalism. going after us gives them legitimacy
and draws a lot of attention and support for their cause.

if they're able to run us financially into the ground and we
fall, they'll be going for europe next.


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2004-05-15 13:34 [#01189755]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01189752



yes he is. hes called the war on terror, a crusade, and
declared war on iraq, from a church.

he is just as bad.

and an idiot.


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2004-05-15 13:36 [#01189759]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



this is exactly why dogmatic religion is dangerous and bad.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-05-15 13:37 [#01189764]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to epohs: #01189753 | Show recordbag



You are saying they are anti christian then, which isn't the
same as anti anything that's not Muslim. It is not just a
religious thing, it goes back to the US treatment of muslim
nations during the cold war. The whole reason al queda was
set up in the first place.


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2004-05-15 13:38 [#01189767]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01189764



i'm saying they are anti-any_religion_thats_not_their's even
more moderate versions of islaam.


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2004-05-15 13:39 [#01189769]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



godammit, why do i keep spelling islam with two As?


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-15 13:41 [#01189770]
Points: 21452 Status: Lurker



I respect "terrorism" (or getting what you want with force I
suppose) as a political strategy provided it's only used as
a last resort for a revolution of an ethically
superior/better/necessary nature. I don't know what's at the
heart of this war... oil? That translates indirectly to gold
I suppose since countries want the oil to sell? Or it's
because oil is a disappearing scarce resource on earth? If
it's about oil, whichever markets are responsible for
selling oil must have a major role in the war. Or it really
is about "terrorism" and the us is just retaliating as a
group over that WTC attack. It's probably just a small
handful of greedy individuals that are responsible for the
whole thing. How much money does one need? What is there to
buy, expensive houses and cars? They aren't worth taking the
effort to be so greedy. There's probably lots of humble
mostly innocent people on both "sides" that don't want any
part in politics aside from obtaining their daily bread
shelter and entertainment of some sort. Eh, I don't
understand it and am just typing because I'm bored.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-05-15 13:42 [#01189771]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to epohs: #01189767 | Show recordbag



Then why have they got no problems with China and Japan...

They live their lives to extremist interpretations of the
qu'ran, but they have never stated they are against every
religion. The even formally stated that they only have a
problem with the US and if all non US partners in this war
would withdraw they would have no problems with them.


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2004-05-15 13:47 [#01189773]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01189771



of course they said that. they want other nations to let
them go about their business until they are done fucking us
up.

but, i think once they are done destroying america they'll
move onto another target. probably europe. then they'll
move on do some of the eastern countries probably. they
won't have to worry about israel, because after taking down
the us israel doesn't have a fucking chance.

they've already got groups in southeast asia that are
fighting the governments there. it just doesn't get as much
attention/support as fighting us so they aren't designating
as much effort there yet.


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-15 13:52 [#01189778]
Points: 21452 Status: Lurker



I guess it comes down to: which side/system in the conflict
has produced the worst way of life for the average person?
This is the side that should be stopped from taking over and
spreading if possible.


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2004-05-15 13:54 [#01189780]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to w M w: #01189778



humanity is the problem.

next time you hop an interstellar frigate back to poshnu can
i be a stowaway?


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-15 13:59 [#01189787]
Points: 21452 Status: Lurker



You can ride shotgun.

(literally).


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-15 14:00 [#01189790]
Points: 21452 Status: Lurker



Some people have just made war their entertaining hobby
perhaps.


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2004-05-15 14:02 [#01189793]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to w M w: #01189787



hot damn! YES !

*packs bags*

n00die mags - check
toothbrush - check
flip flops - check
lifetime supply of maddog 20/20 - check


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-05-15 14:03 [#01189796]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to w M w: #01189778 | Show recordbag



the best way of life at the expense of whom though.


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2004-05-15 14:04 [#01189797]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to w M w: #01189790



most definately. war is the world's favorite passtime.

as soon as the second person showed up on earth they
probably spent 1/4 of their day eating, 1/4 sleeping, 1/4
fucking, and the last bit fighting.


 


Messageboard index