Protest Tomorrow (Sat. 20th) | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 380 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614083
Today 3
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Protest Tomorrow (Sat. 20th)
 

offline Xanatos from New York City (United States) on 2004-03-19 19:08 [#01110963]
Points: 3316 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Its going to be worldwide
Go to your local protest tomorrow, or start one if there is
none.
fight back

take the streetz


 

offline thecurbcreeper from United States on 2004-03-19 19:53 [#01110987]
Points: 6045 Status: Lurker



end racism?


 

offline hevquip from megagram dusk sect (United States) on 2004-03-20 02:04 [#01111069]
Points: 3379 Status: Regular



what are we protesting?

i will protest by smoking some chronic with my old friend
ben and walking around downtown denver.


 

offline Clic on 2004-03-20 02:11 [#01111075]
Points: 5232 Status: Regular | Followup to hevquip: #01111069



My good friend just moved to Denver.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-03-20 02:13 [#01111078]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



If I wanted to be a hippy I would have signed to Rephlex.

FUCK PROTESTS>>>


 

offline aphextriplet from your mothers bedroom (United Kingdom) on 2004-03-20 03:02 [#01111116]
Points: 4731 Status: Lurker



the lady doth....
zzzzzzzzzzz


 

offline rockenjohnny from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2004-03-20 03:04 [#01111120]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker



i think everyone will be hungover


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-03-20 03:13 [#01111131]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



I was interested until I saw the heading, "Support the
Haitian People". Anyone who tries to cynically get cash for
compensation from Rockstar games (one of my favourite
developers) doesn't get my help...


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-03-20 03:15 [#01111134]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01111131 | Show recordbag



ahahahaha (that was a joke right???)


 

offline big from lsg on 2004-03-20 06:51 [#01111221]
Points: 23727 Status: Regular | Followup to Ceri JC: #01111131 | Show recordbag



what? who?


 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2004-03-20 09:07 [#01111287]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01111131



agreed


 

offline hyakusen from 8=============> on 2004-03-20 09:32 [#01111298]
Points: 7021 Status: Addict



wtf is that protest anyway ?
maybe we should go and say "More bread for Ants ? "

poor agitation, nonsense.

pathetic


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-03-20 10:24 [#01111329]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to big: #01111221 | Show recordbag



Initially, a group representing the views of Haitians (in
itself horribly rascist; I'd feel pretty pissed off if
someone started an organisation claiming to represent the
views of Welsh people...) requested Rockstar remove a line
of dialogue from their game GTA: Vice City. Obviously, they
expected Rockstar to give them two fingers and battle them
in court (where they could possibly get compensation).
Instead, Rockstar said something to the effect, "We're not
in the wrong, but we don't want the hassle of a court case."
and agreed to remove the offending dialogue from future
copies of the game.

However, a week or so later this group then changed their
tack, they wanted compensation as well. "On behalf of all
Haitian people". Call me cynical, but if they get it, I
doubt they'd dole it out equally amongst everyone with any
haitian blood...

Read more here.

My comment, perhaps in poor taste, jokingly insinuated that
all Haitian people are part of a group, and that I
wouldn't support their cause because of what this "entire"
group (in reality, a few dozen people) did. The point being
that the group seeking compensation lumped all haitian
people together in this manner.

On the subject of the protestors we're discussing here,
whilst I felt neutral to them before, I'm now against them,
purely because a protest (and a piss poor one at that), held
me up for 20 minutes this afternoon. As usual, there were no
clear banners indicating what it was about, just a bunch of
attention seeking dolts inconveniancing people for some
extremely vague point. Note to protestors: Contrary to what
applies to showbiz, in real life there is such a thing as
bad publicity. If your protest pisses people off, it: a)
Strengthens the argument of your opposition. and b) is
likely to sway anyone previously neutral to your goals the
other way.


 

offline Xanatos from New York City (United States) on 2004-03-20 16:09 [#01111514]
Points: 3316 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Hundreds of thousands of people in New York City and across
the world today stood up against an injust war which has
cost the lives of thousands of innocent people.

Sorry you were held up for 20 minutes this afternoon.

Also, I bet the purpose of the protest was pretty clear,
there were plenty of banners here, and there were probably
100000 of them in Rome today. Had you been able
to deduce what the protest was about, I'm sure you would
have been against the point that was being made. I think
that's what you meant by 'extremely vague point.'


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-03-20 16:12 [#01111515]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01111329 | Show recordbag



A joke ain't funny if you have to explain it in two
paragraphs :P


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-03-20 16:46 [#01111535]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Xanatos: #01111514 | Show recordbag



Honestly, the protest I was held up by was vague to
the point of being meaningless and with respect, you weren't
at this one, so you aren't really at liberty to comment on
it in any authoratative capacity. There were no banners and
had I not seen this thread/caught the tail end of the news
this afternoon I wouldn't of known what it was about. One
poorly handmade banner saying "World Peace (unintelligible
word)" is not exactly specific...

"Sorry you were held up for 20 minutes this afternoon."
Regardless of whether the protestors care about any
inconveniance caused to me, it doesn't do them any favours
to annoy the general populance. By all means go down to your
government's admin centre and protest en masse, but a
gathering of 30 or so people holding up traffic, winding up
shoppers does nothing for your cause. I'd be just as annoyed
if it was a loads of military personnel's families doing a
"support for the troops" rally that held me up.

Ecnadniarb: I knew some people here (like Virginpusher)would
get it. Just because I had to explain it meticulously to the
un1337 like yourself... :P


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-03-20 16:46 [#01111536]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Ceri JC: #01111535 | Show recordbag



*"no mass of banners..."


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-03-20 16:50 [#01111539]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



And on the subject of these protests; what specifically do
protestors (in general) actually suggest is the best course
of action? Surely they don't want us to pull out troops
now while we're rebuilding their critical
infrastructure (by that I mean pipelines, bridges etc. not
political systems)?


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-03-20 16:51 [#01111540]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01111539 | Show recordbag



Oh yes rebuilding an excellent infrastructure of US
companies and the odd UK one etc. to rape Iraqs economy.

Control should be handed over to the UN or me.


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2004-03-20 16:54 [#01111542]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



actually, im going to a protest to protest all the
protesting.

i even made the super coolest and most poignant sign that
anyone there will have: "someone please beat me down"


 

offline k_maty on 2004-03-20 16:57 [#01111545]
Points: 2362 Status: Regular



ya.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-03-20 16:57 [#01111546]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01111540 | Show recordbag



I saw footage yesterday of a unit of Royal Engineers
rebuilding a bridge that linked Basrah to the next town that
was the main source of food. The local people were genuinely
happy about it. This isn't a "cash for oil" situation or our
big contractors doing repairs (which admittedly we're
responsible for), it's our soldiers doing work that
undeniably improves the quality of people's lives and they
are doing it for free. Are you suggesting we should take
them home? What about forces personnel who volunteered as
field doctors/to give blood in the recent hotel bombing,
should they come home too? Saying our forces are purely
doing bad there is a rather black and white view of it.
Certainly, having armed soldiers patrolling creates a tense,
hostile atmosphere, but to say they are not doing any good
there is nonsense.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-03-20 17:01 [#01111548]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01111546 | Show recordbag



I didn't say our forces were doing a bad job, you just
interpreted my post that way. Byt let's not fool ourselves
into thinking that our forces would still be there, or
indeed have been there in the first place, had it not have
been for the natural resources we can now pillage.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-03-20 17:04 [#01111550]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01111548 | Show recordbag



I won't deny the oil at least heavily influneced the
situation (even if I don't strictly agree that it was the
main motivation for going to war). My point is that now,
regardless of whether or not they ought to of gone to war, I
believe that it would now be better for Iraq if they stay
there till it's up and running again.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-03-20 17:07 [#01111555]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01111550 | Show recordbag



Of course it was the main reason...followed by wanting to
get a foothold in the middle east to bully surrounding
nations and revenge to rectify what is regarded as GB1's
biggest presidential failure.

Western nations have sat by and wtch genocide take place in
nations that economically have nothing to offer us.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-03-20 17:19 [#01111578]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01111555 | Show recordbag



*Puts on Devil's Advocate Horns*
A republican would argue there are many regimes to topple in
the name of democracy, we can only focus on one at once,
otherwise it would drag on for years. Why not go for one
where not only do the people get freedom, but we get some
natural resources into the bargain?

My Dad's theory is that America wanted to give a Muslim
state a kicking for September 11th, and Saddam's regime was
the one that was easiest to justify...


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-03-20 17:22 [#01111586]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01111578 | Show recordbag



Even though we had given Afghanistan a kicking? Where were
the strong helpful westerners in Rwanda? Why is Mugabe
allowed to slaughter white people in Zimbabwe?

No economic gain...money rules.


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2004-03-20 17:24 [#01111590]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker



I was at work, but I saw it go by one block away. Looked
like a good couple thousand


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-03-20 17:25 [#01111592]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01111586 | Show recordbag



Yes, even my most conservative friend agrees Zimbabwe's was
the most "deserving" regime to be toppled next.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-03-20 17:30 [#01111598]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01111592 | Show recordbag



The point is though, simply, we won't. I didn't agree with
the war in Iraq...and I don't agree with nations thinking
they should police other nations. The UN was set up to
handle these types of situations and the US along with it's
slaves (sorry I mean allies) decided to wage an unjust
war...which has not only made them look like the lying scum
they are, but also caused more outrage in the Muslim world
and increased the threat of reprisal attacks tenfold.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-03-20 17:31 [#01111600]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01111598 | Show recordbag



Let's be frank: America pretty much is unstoppable. Arguing
with it isn't really an option...


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-03-20 17:32 [#01111602]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01111600 | Show recordbag



Until they piss China off...and that's what they are scared
of.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-03-20 17:34 [#01111603]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01111600 | Show recordbag



Let's not forget that the war on Iraq didn't begin until
they received assurances from China that they wouldn't be
getting involved. The US are shit scared of the Chinese.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-03-20 17:44 [#01111612]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01111603 | Show recordbag



Rightly so... I'm sure you know what Liverpool's chinatown
is like.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-03-20 17:47 [#01111615]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01111612 | Show recordbag



I love Chinatown...I got a lot of friends there...can be a
little rough sometimes though.


 

offline hevquip from megagram dusk sect (United States) on 2004-03-20 18:07 [#01111633]
Points: 3379 Status: Regular



we had some people in downtown denver protesting today.


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2004-03-21 11:30 [#01112179]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular



like someone else was saying in this thread (didn't read the
whole posts) protesting just pisses a lot of people off....
particularly, in my experience, the people who are pretty
important to convince of your cause...... and not in a good
way..... i think people who organize stuff like that for a
cause could do things that are a lot more effective..... but
i guess getting people to come out and have fun at a protest
is relatively easy....

and protesting is relatively easy for those people..... its
not terribly constructive

"im upset!"

okay... great..... ill keep that in mind next time i invade
a country
i just hope you dotn figure out a more effective way of
stopping me...


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-03-23 15:17 [#01115171]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Very interesting read, from an anti-war individual:
www.stopthecoalition.com.


 

offline Dolleater from Afrika Bambaataa on 2004-03-23 15:22 [#01115178]
Points: 4819 Status: Addict



Im glad the war is over.


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2004-03-23 15:35 [#01115201]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Stop War and Racism all in one punch!!

AWESOME!

Why not just take out AIDS and Poverty while yer at it, ya
inconsiderate, fucks!


 

offline Dolleater from Afrika Bambaataa on 2004-03-23 15:36 [#01115206]
Points: 4819 Status: Addict | Followup to elusive: #01115201



But it worked!


 

offline acrid milk hall from United Kingdom on 2004-03-23 15:42 [#01115221]
Points: 2916 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01115171



very interesting read ceri. thanks for bringing it to my
attention. stands to reason though. seems as though every
movement throughout human history has been hi-jacked by a
few corrupt individuals with an axe to grind. undermining
valid points left/right + centre.
2 clichés seem very apt in these circumstances:

life is shades of grey, irs never as simple as black and
white.
one rotten apple destroys the whole batch.

sigh.


 


Messageboard index