Creamy Arturia synths | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 587 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614087
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Creamy Arturia synths
 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2003-12-27 10:06 [#01007073]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



I've been trying out some of the Arturia VSTi synths - the
CS40 and Moog Modular - they are gorgeous.

I like smooth creamy dreamy synths like that. It seems like
ragged raspy sounding VSTis are a dime a dozen - they must
be easier to program.



 

offline Spacecadet on 2003-12-27 10:14 [#01007078]
Points: 1790 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #01007073



i think it's to do with the fact that there emulating old
analog synths which sound loads better than digital


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2003-12-27 10:25 [#01007085]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to Spacecadet: #01007078



Yeah the whole digital versus analog thing makes my head
spin - after all, these are DIGITAL instruments, so digital
synthesis can't be all bad as long as it's using the right
algorithms - which just happen to be the ones that emulate
the response of analog instruments...

:: brain explodes ::


 

offline Spacecadet on 2003-12-27 10:58 [#01007109]
Points: 1790 Status: Lurker



hehe yeah, then you get into the whole debate of 'do the
origional synths sound better than the emulations?'


 

offline weatheredstoner from same shit babes. (United States) on 2003-12-27 11:18 [#01007115]
Points: 12585 Status: Lurker



link?


 

offline J Swift from United Kingdom on 2003-12-27 11:26 [#01007120]
Points: 650 Status: Regular | Followup to Spacecadet: #01007109



Yeah, a LOT better - But a lot of ppl prolly wouldn't
appreciate the difference at first.

I'm not a big fan of emulations myself - I download them to
mess about with from time to time though.

There still isn't enough computer power to model a single
analog filter properly without aliasing... It's why software
EQ always sounds crap..


 

offline Spacecadet on 2003-12-27 11:30 [#01007124]
Points: 1790 Status: Lurker



given the choice i'd love to have a full hardware setup with
some nice analog gear but it's not really practical
(financially or physically). a friend of mine still uses his
juno 106 and his mc 202 cos they just sound about 10 times
better than any vsti


 

offline Oddioblender from Fort Worth, TX (United States) on 2003-12-27 11:38 [#01007131]
Points: 9601 Status: Lurker



most of the synths i use in my tracks i bought from pawn
shops. my Yamaha PSR-6, which was about 40 bucks, has a very
Nintendo style sound - real analog and oldschool. my Yamaha
PSS-470 has more of a Genesis sound to it - with 21 tones,
all customizable with spectrum, wave, modulation, decay,
attack and volume control. (not fancy mind you but cool
nonetheless) this was about 50 bucks at a pawn shop.

i like pawn shops.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2003-12-27 11:39 [#01007132]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to weatheredstoner: #01007115



Arturia

Webserver's acting funny - sometimes the images won't load.
Oh well.


 

offline Spacecadet on 2003-12-27 11:41 [#01007133]
Points: 1790 Status: Lurker | Followup to Oddioblender: #01007131



yeh i used to love going round car boot sales, the mc202 my
friend has he got off an old lady for £80 and it handt been
out of the box! it was literally brand new, it had tapes
with beethoven on it that you load into the sequencer. its
kinda funny hearing the ninth symphony on an analog
monosynth :)


 

offline Oddioblender from Fort Worth, TX (United States) on 2003-12-27 11:52 [#01007142]
Points: 9601 Status: Lurker | Followup to Spacecadet: #01007133



hahahah that's great.

my most expensive piece of equipment is my Alesis SR16 -
which was 250 bucks USED at a pawn shop - that's one groovy
drum machine that I take control of.

ttttttaaaaaaaakkkkkkkkkiiiiiinnnnnnngggggg
coooonnnnnnnnnnttttrrrrrrrooooooolllll of the
drumdrumdrumdrum machine


 

offline J Swift from United Kingdom on 2003-12-27 11:55 [#01007143]
Points: 650 Status: Regular



Yeah I managed to pick up a TB303 for £50 a couple of years
back!

Just off a local guitarist who had it in the back of his
wardrobe for the last ten years or so.

To be honest I find it easier justifying spending money on
analog gear than software, cos it holds its s/h value and
sometimes increases... Like I had an MS20 for a while - Got
bored of it, and when I sold it I made about £150 as a
bonus...

It can get addictive buying old synths though! I keep
getting in that trap - Then I spend all my time playing
around with them and never write any music!


 

offline Oddioblender from Fort Worth, TX (United States) on 2003-12-27 12:00 [#01007146]
Points: 9601 Status: Lurker | Followup to J Swift: #01007143



story of my LIFE man. :D


 

offline Spacecadet on 2003-12-27 12:16 [#01007149]
Points: 1790 Status: Lurker | Followup to J Swift: #01007143



sometimes its more fun fucking around with sound than
actually making tunes. we got hold of a sequential circuits
pro one that was broken, all it did was make a constant
drone but we used to fuck about with the lfo and filter and
stuff and just make all these wierd sci-fi doctor who
sounds. it was more fun than any playstation or whatever the
console was at the time


 

offline J Swift from United Kingdom on 2003-12-27 12:39 [#01007162]
Points: 650 Status: Regular | Followup to Spacecadet: #01007149



Yeah funnily enough I'm thinking about getting a Pro One at
the moment.

I'm really inspired by acts like Download at the moment -
I'd really love to get a setup where I could almost work
live and record everything down - Maybe edit later.. So I'm
not always bogged down programming things and doing the same
old stuff all the time...

I'd like to have a bunch of drum machines, samplers and
modular synths, and just work direct with them - Then do an
album of improvised electronic stuff... That's my dream
right now!


 

offline Spacecadet on 2003-12-27 12:41 [#01007163]
Points: 1790 Status: Lurker | Followup to J Swift: #01007162



yes, i think it's a nicer way of making music, more fluid
and natural. like painting with sound


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2003-12-27 18:30 [#01007394]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to J Swift: #01007143 | Show recordbag



That's my problem actually, I just tweak sounds all day long
and keep writing little riffs that I never really build
upon... I'm a fucking sound crazy tweakfreak at heart, but I
know there's some composer in me somewhere too. :)


 

offline J Swift from United Kingdom on 2003-12-27 20:19 [#01007456]
Points: 650 Status: Regular | Followup to Zephyr Twin: #01007394



Absolutely - I started buying music gear back in about
'93/94 - Before that I used to mess around with my parents'
DX-11 and an old Casio SK sampler...

But yeah, been buying gear and making music for about 10
years now! And up until this year I NEVER had any interest
in making proper tunes - Just used to love making loops and
messing with sounds... Used to HATE trying to put an entire
track together though!

But early this year I sent some loops off to a few labels,
got some good feedback, and that kind of finally got me in
the right frame of mind to actually complete something!

And getting into software like Renoise & Fruity loops has
helped a lot aswell! Logic used to do my head in...

I think it's just a matter of trying all sorts of software &
equipment out until you finally find something you can work
with... And I'm only just getting there now! But in the
process I've learnt loads about synths and sound engineering
- Probably a lot more than if I had been writting proper
tunes 'cos I've ALWAYS been focused on making melodies &
sounds & beats and things..


 

offline J Swift from United Kingdom on 2003-12-27 20:20 [#01007460]
Points: 650 Status: Regular



Oh yeah, the only time I've ever been really happy making
music was back with the 303, 202, drum machine and
sampler... It just feels like you're messing around, then
before you know it you've got a proper track going..


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2003-12-27 21:08 [#01007496]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to J Swift: #01007456 | Show recordbag



Yeah, it'll probably take me just as long before I'm really
ready to make some tracks that are worth a damn... For now,
I just can't get enough of thick, fat, SOUND! straight from
my EX5 to my ears. ;)


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2003-12-28 00:12 [#01007630]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



Now this is interesting - mostly I also twiddle about with
sounds and short loops. I have a backlog of at least a
hundred "song ideas"...

*** What are some of the compositional strategies you use to
build something up into a full track? ***

I've played a lot of "traditional" music on guitar,
keyboard, bass, so I have a strong feeling that chord
progressions and structure are important, but I don't want
my music to be trapped in traditional structures...

I also don't want to get trapped into a building-block
structure with typical electronic buildups and
breakdowns....

Help me to reinvent music!!! :D


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2003-12-28 00:16 [#01007632]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



"I also don't want to get trapped into a building-block
structure with typical electronic buildups and
breakdowns...."

That's exactly the problem I'm having.. but alas I'm no
genious so I doubt I'll be reinventing song formulae any
time soon.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2003-12-28 00:25 [#01007641]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zephyr Twin: #01007632



I used to think Autechre was reinventing musical
structures... now I realize they are mostly playing with
their dicks structurally. Brilliant musicians in other ways
mind you.

You know who has interesting structures is FSOL. Especially
on Dead Cities, where it's almost classical... there are
movements rather than verse-chorus-verse bits. Think I'll
sit down with a pencil and map out the parts next time I
listen...


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2003-12-28 00:30 [#01007644]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



FSOL... I know I've asked about them before, but what does
it stand for again?


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2003-12-28 00:33 [#01007646]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zephyr Twin: #01007644



Future Sound Of London.


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2003-12-28 00:41 [#01007650]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to fleetmouse: #01007646 | Show recordbag



ah, why thank you. :)


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2003-12-28 00:43 [#01007654]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zephyr Twin: #01007650



Their site is full of stuff related to their last album,
which is full of 60s / hippie textures, but the rest of
their stuff isn't like that. Get on slsk and hunt up the
Dead Cities album - it's the bees' knees, the cat's pajamas,
etc. etc.


 

offline hevquip from megagram dusk sect (United States) on 2003-12-28 01:05 [#01007660]
Points: 3379 Status: Regular



i only have and use hardware and i can spend ALL day just
turning everything on and making patches or editing sounds.
i get so distracted doing that, i hardly get around to
sequencing anything.


 

offline J Swift from United Kingdom on 2003-12-28 07:57 [#01007794]
Points: 650 Status: Regular | Followup to fleetmouse: #01007630



Yeah absolutely - I used to love making loops and things,
but I hated putting arrangements together with Cubase/Logic
- Hate the building block approach - I always ruin the best
loops trying to write full arrangements like that...

For me, moving over to Renoise made all the difference cos
you just work one section at a time - There's no visuals
just one pattern after another... So I could get REALLY into
arrangements then..

FSOL are geniuses - Max on Dead Cities is the kind of track
I'd love to write... They use all sorts of things to get
away from the old Cubase syndrome...

Back then they were using Atari's running Creator for midi
sequencing - Recording down to ADAT - Editing with Pro Tools
- Going back down to DAT - Sync'ing it back with more Atari
sequences, etc... They were definetly trying to get away
from anything too linear..


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2003-12-28 08:31 [#01007797]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to J Swift: #01007794



So you think the visual, linear Cubase grid - the project
window - is the trap? Interesting. Maybe the mind is drawn
into creating more rigid organization and symmetry when
working visually like that - a neatness trap.


 

offline Spacecadet on 2003-12-28 09:50 [#01007829]
Points: 1790 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #01007797



yes yes, very tempting to copy paste copy paste etc


 

offline J Swift from United Kingdom on 2003-12-28 10:21 [#01007839]
Points: 650 Status: Regular



Definetly - Everyone used to talk about this thing called
"Cubase syndrome" back in the Atari ST days - It affects the
way some people "hear" their own music, being able to see it
all in lines like that.

It definetly messes me up! If I want a really minimal looped
sounding tune, I just end up with a boring looking
arrangement - So then I stop appreciating the music side of
things and start focusing on the boring looking arrangement
- Then I end up adding things that aren't neccessary... So
in the end I always get frustrated...

Yeah, with Renoise I make a loop - Then copy it and make a
few changes - So my tune's maybe 8 bars by now - Then double
up again, maybe think about dropping something in or out,
just going with my ideas...

Then before you know it you've got the body of a finished
track - Just have to add an intro and an ending usually!

I've never found it easier...

Although I'm mainly messing about with Fruity Loops at the
moment - Will have to see if I can get similar results in
that - Or maybe work between the two or something...


 

offline Spacecadet on 2003-12-28 10:29 [#01007840]
Points: 1790 Status: Lurker | Followup to J Swift: #01007839



i normally fold my laptop screen down when listening back so
i cant see the structure. it helps alot


 

offline Rambling Madman from the future (United Kingdom) on 2003-12-28 11:48 [#01007917]
Points: 1492 Status: Regular



I think this thread sums up where I'm coming from perfectly,
it's almost scary.... I have the same exact problems
myself.

I fall into that organization trap alot (could be the main
reason I get so stressed with FL) it's just too confined, I
need to work in an empty space & just throw ideas about
without following a grid, tempo & as a result my music has
become highly programmed, not good.
I used to make quite a bit of experimental trip hop using my
SP808 & found sound, fairly minimal but very querky (how I
like it), these days my stuff is more on a VS tip. I love to
sit & programe beats for hours but it does drive me insane!

As for FSOL! thier music has been my main inspiration for
many years


 

offline Spacecadet on 2003-12-28 12:01 [#01007937]
Points: 1790 Status: Lurker



the korg electribes are smart little boxes for creating
stuff on the fly and such. i used to have one and i'd just
record my knob twiddling onto minidisc, change the deleays
tempos etc just messing around really. i think i'll dig it
out and chop it up and stuff. could be very interesting


 

offline Spacecadet on 2003-12-28 12:02 [#01007938]
Points: 1790 Status: Lurker | Followup to Spacecadet: #01007937



the sounds not the electribe :)


 

offline J Swift from United Kingdom on 2003-12-28 12:16 [#01007947]
Points: 650 Status: Regular



Well sound trackers certainly sorted me out arrangement
wise.

I find what I'd do is slowly build up sections, add a bit
here, take off a bit there, over days/weeks sometimes - So
I'd have a track 1:20, then next week it may be 3:30, then I
might edit a bit out, add a bit, etc...

It's like you get really into the tune because you're always
relying 100% on your ears - There's no visual cues
whatsoever to throw you.

Definetly, I'm loving Fruity Loops at the moment for drum
programming and making loops and things... But I'm definetly
heading back towards tracker territory if I find the
arrangements fall back into old traps..

Yeah, just before I discovered Renoise I was thinking about
going back to hardware sequencing - Maybe something like the
electribe - Maybe get an Akai MPC or something..


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2003-12-28 12:16 [#01007948]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to Spacecadet: #01007938 | Show recordbag



hahaha, we all know you have it in for that lil groove box!
what did it ever do to you?!


 

offline Rambling Madman from the future (United Kingdom) on 2003-12-28 12:20 [#01007952]
Points: 1492 Status: Regular | Followup to Spacecadet: #01007937



Was it an ER1, I am thinking of getting one soon, how come
you got rid of it?


 

offline Spacecadet on 2003-12-28 18:06 [#01008255]
Points: 1790 Status: Lurker | Followup to Rambling Madman: #01007952



yeah it was the er-1 it's a quality bit of gear, i sold it
to a mate cos the alpha dial was a bit dodgy so i gave it
him for about £80


 


Messageboard index