 |
|
You are not logged in! F.A.Q Log in Register |
 |
|
 |
 Now online (2)dariusgriffin recycle ...and 391 guests Last 5 registered Oplandisks nothingstar N_loop yipe foxtrotromeo Browse members... |
 |
Members 8025Messages 2614102 Today 15 Topics 127542 |
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
which one dya like? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Buzz |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
IMPULSE TRACKER used it for about 4 years! only windows 2000/XP stopped me from using it. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I've got a demo of Renoise but havn't had time to get my head around it at all yet |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
someone post me a link need one |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
http://www.renoise.com It is THE tracker |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I've only used Noisetracker 2.0 and ProTracker 1.1 and 1.3b. Swithching to a PC stopped me from using those. Four lovely channels, 2 left and 2 right. You wanted the drums to be centered in stereo? Well you had to sacrifice half of the tracks. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
The ones that get my thumbs up thru out history were : Protracker (Amiga 500-600, etc) Fast Tracker II (Dos PC Pent 90-133) Mad Tracker (Windows PC Pent 200) Modplug (Windows PC Pent 200) Renoise (a PC decent!) |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I'm still learning how to use it, but renoise looks good so far in my limited dabblings with it. My only complaint is the choice of filename- everyone knows .rns files are used by reason! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I dont think I would be want to try and learn how to use a tracker now days with the software variety nowdays. But I was using it back then and I still have a few of my old skills! It seemed to become popular recently when people discovered Vsnares uses a tracker! haw haw! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I dont think I would be want to try and learn how to use a tracker now days with the software variety nowdays. But I was using it back then and I still have a few of my old skills! It seemed to become popular recently when people discovered Vsnares uses a tracker! haw haw! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
argh, double post.. delete that would ya!? and this one too! ;P |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
cubase 4eva |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
cubase rewired |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Fasttracker II! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
impulse tracker you fools!! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Madtracker! I can't wait until MT3 comes out! Check the progress, and be amazed. It will be a VST-supporting (and possibly direct-x) tracker! Use MadTracker! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
sorry i was such a cock yesterday... thanks for all those links, ill check renoise in a minute... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
thats ok, i like cocks i mean..er.... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I knew it. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
yeah, ive gotten sick of waiting for MT3 though. been a registered user for over 3 years and still no vsti support. think i'll stick to project5 and fruity for now. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
buzz! I don't see what advantage other trackers have over it. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i used only modplug tracker..... made three short tracks.......and forgot about it (don't know why, it was funny) |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
f a r b e t t e r s o u n d q u a l i t y ! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
yeah....ive gotta say. madtracker is the best sounding tracker ive used, and ive used just about all of em. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Shinier GUI, you mean? More magic pixie dust? Sorry, but this argument doesn't make sense on its own, especially without data to support it... in my opinion and experience it's also untrue. (no offense/flamewar/arrogance intended) Many of the synths do sound relatively crappy on their own, but that's what effects are for. I find it extremely silly and annoying when the occasional VSTi I use has effects included, I like it much more if they're on their own. It sort of makes sense for hardware synths to have effects built in, but it's one of the most annoying and stupid things that can be done in music software to directly use design and interface concepts etc. from music hardware. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
From what I've heard (I mean, the tracks I've heard, not other people's opinions) other trackers such as Renoise have far better sound quality than Buzz. I mean, even Fasttracker on the Amiga had a sound you could love, even if it was your typical old videogame sound. Buzz on the other hand has to have one of my least favourite basic sounds. I've never heard a track that sounds "proffessional" made in it... As to the UI, no I like it, but Audiomulch does a similair thing that I like more. I'm not a tracker expert by any means- just learning them for completions sake, so it's just my opinion. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
The thing is, Buzz doesn't HAVE a "basic sound". There are some 200 generators (synths, samplers etc.) and 400 effects, by dozens of developers, all of which do their work differently. (that, I think, is also why it's so hard for people to get into it quickly; too much choice, it's hard to find out which machines are good and which aren't without a lot of messing around trying them out) But please, explain what you mean by "better sound quality" and "professional". |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Messageboard index
|
|||||||||
