new ambient/classical piece | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in
Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
big
belb
...and 375 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614103
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
new ambient/classical piece
 

offline Dozier from United States on 2003-11-07 22:21 [#00940644]
Points: 2080 Status: Lurker



for some reason i'm really happy with this. check it out,
or not.
beware, it's a 9meg file (6:27 long @ 192k)

here

 

offline weatheredstoner from same shit babes. (United States) on 2003-11-07 22:48 [#00940649]
Points: 12585 Status: Lurker



i dont want to be a buzzkill, but I didn't enjoy it.

 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2003-11-08 02:29 [#00940695]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker



++ downloading ++

 

offline Skink from A cesspool in eden on 2003-11-08 03:38 [#00940724]
Points: 7483 Status: Lurker



Downloading now.

 

offline Skink from A cesspool in eden on 2003-11-08 03:48 [#00940728]
Points: 7483 Status: Lurker



Hmm, i don't think this is bad at all, it just sounds like a
sketch. It really needs alot more melody lines and it needs
space although you start to manage that like a minute and a
half from the end.

Overall i like what you were trying to achieve but i think
it needs more work, what i will do though is keep an eye out
for your future work as i am interested in the progression i
think you will make.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-11-08 04:14 [#00940739]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Do you use reason? ;)

Sorry Dozier, I know it's ambient, but it's a little too
repetative and lacking in range for my tastes :/



 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2003-11-08 04:19 [#00940743]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker



well I liked it! Sounds like you used mainly
soundfonts to me, and I didn't think it was overly
repetative at all, and I usually deplore repetativity.


 

offline nobsmuggler from silly mid-off on 2003-11-08 06:25 [#00940888]
Points: 6265 Status: Addict



it got some good qualitys to it but needs polishing on the
reverb


 

offline Dozier from United States on 2003-11-08 18:16 [#00941607]
Points: 2080 Status: Lurker



thanks for the feedback

weatheredstoner & ceri: i definately appreciate your
honesty, thanks for taking the time to listen. and no, i
don't use reason. floops.

skink: i do agree with you. problem is i lack talent, but
we'll see what happens :)

paul: i'm glad you liked it, you know i like your work, so i
appreciate it. they pretty much are all soundfonts, i can
rarely get away from using them, unless i'm doing something
that i want to sound artificial.

nob: polishing which way? is there too much or not enough or
what?

thanks to everyone for taking the time!

 

offline kochlear from aud-stim.com on 2003-11-08 18:20 [#00941615]
Points: 2311 Status: Addict



i like this song alot. that beat is crazy awesome. i'm
also pretty stoned, and this is an excellent mellow chill
out track.


 

offline Dozier from United States on 2003-11-08 18:21 [#00941617]
Points: 2080 Status: Lurker | Followup to kochlear: #00941615



haha thanks man! i don't mind that at all. maybe that's how
i should market it... :)


 

offline nobsmuggler from silly mid-off on 2003-11-09 05:21 [#00941888]
Points: 6265 Status: Addict | Followup to Dozier: #00941607



it needs to be a bit brighter imo

 

Messageboard index