Bush Gaffe | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
Roger Wilco
...and 133 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614154
Today 6
Topics 127544
  
 
Messageboard index
Bush Gaffe
 

offline Peloton from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-07-16 08:44 [#00781526]
Points: 651 Status: Lurker



From Todays Gaurdian:

President George Bush, whose malapropism has spawned dozens
of websites and books, uttered one of his most extraordinary
gaffes yet when he told reporters that the US had invaded
Iraq because Saddam Hussein had refused to allow weapons
inspectors in.

Pressed during an Oval Office press conference on the now
infamous assertion that Iraq had sought to buy uranium ore
in Africa, he said: "The larger point is, and the
fundamental question is, did Saddam Hussein have a weapons
programme? And the answer is, absolutely. And we gave him a
chance to allow the inspectors in, and he wouldn't let them
in.

"And, therefore, after a reasonable request, we decided to
remove him from power, along with other nations, so as to
make sure he was not a threat to the United States and our
friends and allies in the region."

The comment, made on Monday, received little coverage in the
US media. Although it did raise some eyebrows at the
Washington Post, which, in understated style noted: "The
president's assertion that the war began because Iraq did
not admit inspectors appeared to contradict the events
leading up to the war this spring."

Saddam had in fact allowed weapons inspectors back in to
Iraq on November 27 last year for the first time in four
years and they remained there, albeit in a largely fruitless
search, until the US and Britain decided to invade.

The White House did not return calls seeking comment.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2003-07-16 08:50 [#00781541]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to Peloton: #00781526



You won't see much coverage of this from American media
giants because they like the Republican agenda of
deregulation, allowing them to merge into one giant blob of
hungry protoplasm.

ALL ONE MIND HAPPY ALL THE TIME


 

offline Peloton from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-07-16 08:59 [#00781567]
Points: 651 Status: Lurker



jeez! Can your avatar become any more hideous?

: )


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2003-07-16 09:03 [#00781576]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator



wow, is Bush off the wagon again..?

peloton: it is a match made in heaven.


 

offline manicminer from Paris (France) on 2003-07-16 09:08 [#00781581]
Points: 1423 Status: Lurker



He's the gaffe-master!

Seriously, Americans, how can you tolerate being led by
someone who obviously has such little intelligence? Reagan?
Bush? What next? Arnold fucking Schwarzenegger?

Seriously, I love you people, your country, your culture.
Yours is home to some of the world's greatest minds. So how
the hell did such an idiot become the leader of your
country?

I might not agree with much of what Blair says/does, but at
least he has a modicum of intellect. At least when he
speaks he actually seems to have some kind of knowledge.

If the President/Prime Minister/whatever of my country was
as moronic and unintelligent as George W Bush I'd be really
embarrassed. As it is, I am just worried that the
(supposedly) most powerful man on the planet is an utter,
utter fool.

I accept that I have said nothing that hasn't been said
about Bush a thousand times before.


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-07-16 09:58 [#00781622]
Points: 836 Status: Regular



I second that.

My Canadian-born cousin has been living in Illinois for the
past 5 or so years.

Normally she has no problem bashing the insular and
uneducated mindset of her fellow citizens regarding
knowledge of Canada (tremendous lack thereof).

Unfortunately, when her and I sat down and discussed
"Dubya", she had nothing to say but great things about him.
It's a shame that the US has the power to brainwash their
citizens so effectively. Outsiders looking in can't figure
out how the hell they can be so oblivious to the stupidity
of their government.

America really is unlike any other nation in the world. I
just wish I could figure out their agenda.


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2003-07-16 10:09 [#00781638]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to catharsis: #00781622



well, not to be nasty, but it does sound like your cousin
isn't very smart..

plenty of Americans see how dumb their president is.

don't forget he didn't become president by election..


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2003-07-16 10:12 [#00781644]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



i think what it boils down to, is that politics are such a
shity job, that any really intellegent person knows better
not to do it.

the only people who do it, are insecure and who want to
feel better about themselves, and have some sort of power.



 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2003-07-16 10:22 [#00781664]
Points: 27795 Status: Regular



politics attracts a lot of mini hitlers as does teaching -
people who feel inadequate etc.


 

offline herbwest from Seattle (United States) on 2003-07-16 10:50 [#00781726]
Points: 418 Status: Lurker



my very american ass can tolerate bush's incompetence
because, unlike many other nations in the world, we're not
stuck with our crappy leader. if we've a shite president we
can kick him out and essentially start over every four
years. in bush's case about sixteen months. soon, the
democratic challengers will really start campaigning. in
the process making bush and his ilk defend every stupid
decision the've made. the dems certainly aren't innocent in
this mess, but at least it might raise some awareness about
the real motives behind the iraq fiasco.


 

offline GIR from Easton on 2003-07-16 11:58 [#00781853]
Points: 828 Status: Addict



im sorry manic, but isnt your minister mr. tony blair? shut
the fuck up.

I didnt vote for Bush. I protested. I was active. Shut the
fuck up.


 

offline GIR from Easton on 2003-07-16 12:01 [#00781856]
Points: 828 Status: Addict



mistake, this wasaimed at catharsis...i must be a fucking
ignorant american....youre not stereotyping...oh no...its
perfectly justified.


 

offline manicminer from Paris (France) on 2003-07-16 12:12 [#00781865]
Points: 1423 Status: Lurker | Followup to GIR: #00781853



OK, I am sorry. I realise that my original post probably
appeared to stereotype all Americans as supporters of
Bush.......

Of course, that isn't my opinion at all. I realise that
many of you disagree with most of what Mr Bush says and
stands for, and that many of you share my opinion on his
"intellect".

I was merely stating that I can't believe that someone so
stupid has managed to attain such a position of power in
what is supposed to be a democracy. In my opinion it
beggars belief, that's all.


 

offline GIR from Easton on 2003-07-16 12:17 [#00781874]
Points: 828 Status: Addict



it happens...has happened before....manipulation...but i
wouldnt really be surprised if someone else was running the
white house...his seemingly idiotical expressions are a bit
too convenient.


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-07-16 21:04 [#00782575]
Points: 836 Status: Regular | Followup to GIR: #00781874



I'm sorry, I should have used the word "some" Americans -
the portion that still support Bush even amongst all his
stupid antics.

I didn't mean to lump you in with the blinded ones - I get
carried away when I get talking about that dumbass. Accept
my apologies mate.


 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2003-07-16 21:10 [#00782578]
Points: 27795 Status: Regular



if you think bush is running the country you're more stupid
than he is


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-07-16 21:33 [#00782599]
Points: 836 Status: Regular | Followup to earthleakage: #00782578



I know ... it's a big conspiracy...bla...bla...bla....

But you think those guys running the show in the background
would at least choose a president that could fucking talk
properly.

IF they closed their eyes and pointed in a random direction,
they would undoubtedly be pointing at a more intelligent
person.


 

offline GIR from Easton on 2003-07-16 22:06 [#00782637]
Points: 828 Status: Addict



agreed

*shakes hands, hugs,and pats cath's ass*


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-07-16 22:41 [#00782661]
Points: 836 Status: Regular



Hey now.


 

offline alnuit on 2003-07-17 04:31 [#00782805]
Points: 1113 Status: Lurker | Followup to Peloton: #00781526



Hail to the retarded thief!!


 

offline joakimlinden from Skövde (Sweden) on 2003-07-17 04:59 [#00782821]
Points: 462 Status: Regular



The problem in American politics right now seems to be that
money = votes. Unlike many other countries there are limits
as to how much money one is allowed to use in a campaign,
and from who the money comes.
Bush, for the presidential election, recieved multi million
dollar contributions from the oil industry and other
environmental-unfriendly corporations.
You be the judge, but to me that would constitute a conflict
of interest, clearly shown at the infamous Kyoto agreement
that the americans refused to sign, mainly because of
"homeland" economical reasons.

All nations have these problems ofcourse, even my little
Sweden, but...when we're talking about the largest military
and economic power in the world there are some obvious
concerns to people outside of America as well since their
policies affects us all.

I recently saw a documentary about the invasion of Panama in
the 80's by Bush senior. In the U.S. media the whole deal
was portrayed as cheering crowds and clean precision bombing
of "military" targets (which where provoked into shooting at
American forces in the first place). When infact hundreds of
civilians where killed, some whole families where run over
in their cars by big U.S. tanks, crushing them into a bloody
pulp.
Journalists trying to reach the fighting area where banned
and some loose their film, one was shot in the head(!).
Later, human rights organisations have found massgraves with
young boys and old men buried in a haste, some with
bulletholes in their heads...
The UN did at the time strongly condemn this military
action, but in the U.S. media that was only reported in a
few second report by Dan Rather late in the night.

The purpose of the invasion of Panama was NOT to remove the
rouge elements that Bush senior warned about but rather to
knock out their military capabilities, to whatever cost it
would come to, so that the hundred year old signed agreement
with the Panamanians and the U.S. about the canal returning
to Panamanians in the year 2000 would be invalidated -
becaus


 

offline joakimlinden from Skövde (Sweden) on 2003-07-17 05:00 [#00782822]
Points: 462 Status: Regular



Got cut off... : )

The purpose of the invasion of Panama was NOT to remove the
rouge elements that Bush senior warned about but rather to
knock out their military capabilities, to whatever cost it
would come to, so that the hundred year old signed agreement
with the Panamanians and the U.S. about the canal returning
to Panamanians in the year 2000 would be invalidated -
because they no longer where able do defend it...

This is the way U.S. does foreign policy: Killing of
thousands of people for the sake of economical and
strategical interests - it has NOTHING to do with altruistic
reasons such as removing brutal dictators or things like
that.

This is politics in America, and the people are often not
toldthe real story about it. You who say that "leave the
politics to the powerhungry low selfasteem jerks" are infact
authorizing more military campaigns like these. And that's
just the military, the U.S. also uses money as a weapon in
many parts of the world.

The American people can stop this, if they know about all
that is done in their name. Who would have any reason to
attack America if they didn't feel attacked themselves?


 

offline alnuit on 2003-07-17 05:11 [#00782826]
Points: 1113 Status: Lurker | Followup to joakimlinden: #00782822



Good point. But just ONE question.

Why in the name of bleeding Jesus would the American people
care?

The are among the richest people in the world enjoying a
standard of living many times higher than the rest of the
world's. They relish the money that their government makes
in their name through legitimate or ilegitimate means. Just
WHY would they care? Frankly, they would much rather turn a
blind eye towards the evil and enjoy the money.

Infact a troubling thing that I noticed even in the anti-war
protests this time was the number of people that said "We
want good roads and better medical services and not war" and
"No more American sons for the war".......even their
anti-war efforts were selfish and self-serving.

Very few people pointed out that war was wrong..or that they
wanted the econoimic oppression that their government
carried out to stop...all they said was how they wanted more
and better, when in the first place that was the reason that
the war was being waged....


 

offline merg from The New New York (Berlin) (Germany) on 2003-07-17 05:13 [#00782828]
Points: 1708 Status: Regular | Followup to earthleakage: #00781664



Oy, I might be a teacher soon! :-(


 

offline alnuit on 2003-07-17 05:16 [#00782833]
Points: 1113 Status: Lurker | Followup to merg: #00782828



Not you Merg...you are too nice to be Hitler...or even
mini-Hitler...though your geographical antecedents might
just make it easier if you decided to change at any point
:P

j/k


 

offline merg from The New New York (Berlin) (Germany) on 2003-07-17 05:20 [#00782838]
Points: 1708 Status: Regular | Followup to alnuit: #00782833



geographical antecedents

That's easy for you to say! :-)


 

offline alnuit on 2003-07-17 05:21 [#00782839]
Points: 1113 Status: Lurker | Followup to merg: #00782838



Dude I was just kidding...don't take it seriously...awright
?


 

offline joakimlinden from Skövde (Sweden) on 2003-07-17 05:27 [#00782844]
Points: 462 Status: Regular | Followup to alnuit: #00782826



Well... This is part of the problem:
What do you think the eternally growing industrial military
complex costs the americans, and the people that it's
produce is used on?
One of those missiles that where fired from ships in the
gulf costs millions.

The latest figures from March 2003 shows this:
Military spending for the U.S. in 2004 is estimated (will
probably be higher) to reach $399.1 BILLIONS.
Compare this to the worlds second largest military power,
russia:
$65 billion.

Many independent news sources in the U.S. have pointed out
that ordinary Americans have to live on less money than ever
before, while the wealthy ones have more money than ever
before.
Schools have to scrap certain classes because there simply
is no money left after the military has gotten it's share.

And the way things go now there will be almost no money from
the taxpayers to pay for the public transportation, roads
and stuff like that. Bush's administration has plunged the
country into the biggest budget deficit (if that is spelled
correctly) in the history of America, they have to borrow
huge amounts of money just to keep the country going...

There is more to be said about this, and I don't have the
full picture right now - but shortly I can say that the
endless privatisations of corporations that used to be there
for the public has driven up prices to unprecedented levels.
This will probably be the downfall of the republicans.



 

offline merg from The New New York (Berlin) (Germany) on 2003-07-17 05:27 [#00782845]
Points: 1708 Status: Regular | Followup to alnuit: #00782839



breakdown in comms here...that's a commonly used joke by
people who can't be bothered to think up anything original,
see? When someone uses long words you say "That's easy for
you to say!" as an ironic twist on its usual meaning...yeah?
:-)


 

offline alnuit on 2003-07-17 05:45 [#00782857]
Points: 1113 Status: Lurker | Followup to joakimlinden: #00782844



This will probably be the downfall of the
republicans.


word.


 

offline alnuit on 2003-07-17 05:46 [#00782859]
Points: 1113 Status: Lurker | Followup to merg: #00782845



Oh...O.K....

:) On a messageboard where you don't get to see people's
faces...it is better to be safe rather than sorry...


 

offline merg from The New New York (Berlin) (Germany) on 2003-07-17 06:24 [#00782905]
Points: 1708 Status: Regular | Followup to alnuit: #00782859



Just assume that a) I'm never nasty to people unless they
really BEG for it and b) I always make poor jokes :-)


 

offline alnuit on 2003-07-17 06:34 [#00782923]
Points: 1113 Status: Lurker | Followup to merg: #00782905



Those should be easy to remember. Quite similar to
me...anyways...cheers.


 

offline merg from The New New York (Berlin) (Germany) on 2003-07-17 06:34 [#00782926]
Points: 1708 Status: Regular



It's the only way to be! :-)


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-07-17 07:22 [#00782999]
Points: 836 Status: Regular | Followup to joakimlinden: #00782844



Shit...thanks for the info. Apparently ExxonMobil (it's
Esso here in Canada), were among those to front G.W.Bush a
fistfull of dough for oil interests.

Exxon is challenging the overwhelming body of scientific
knowledge concerning the correlation between the greenhouse
effect and burning of fossil fuels. Those filthy bastards.

America is not a democracy anymore. It may be considered a
democratic country, but if I dress up like a girl, does that
make me one?


 

offline joakimlinden from Skövde (Sweden) on 2003-07-17 11:11 [#00783442]
Points: 462 Status: Regular



Another documentary, about Chevron, called Drilling and
Killing contains the following:
"In a interview with Democracy Now!, a Chevron official
acknowledged that on May 28, 1998, the company transported
Nigerian soldiers to their Parabe oil platform and barge in
the Niger Delta, which dozens of community activists had
occupied. The protestors were demanding that Chevron
contribute more to the development of the impoverished oil
region where they live. In the interview, Chevron
spokesperson Sola Omole was asked:

Q: Who took them in, on Thursday morning, the Mobile Police,
the Navy?
A: We did. We did. Chevron did. We took them there.

Q: By how? A: Helicopters, yes, we took them in.

Q: Who authorized the call for the military to come in?

A: That's Chevron's management.

Soon after landing in Chevron-leased helicopters, the
Nigerian military shot to death two protesters, Jola
Ogungbeje and Aroleka Irowaninu, and wounded several others.
The eleven activists were detained for three weeks. "


 

offline GIR from Easton on 2003-07-17 11:49 [#00783506]
Points: 828 Status: Addict



i wouldnt go as far too say we are the only fake democracy
around here. Look at half the nations in Africa. The reason
the US gets so much attention is because its the biggest and
most threatening. Most people tend to violently attack and
put small facts way larger and more important than they
should be because its from "the country with all the
power"....the funny thing is I haven't seen another country
besides the ones we've invaded stand up against our
"horrible, horrible aggression" Is it because we'd wipe the
floor with you? I don't think so. A war alone with China
would probably wipe out half of our population(war of
attrition)....what are you waiting for? Plus there is the
paradox of power...If the US gives aid, they are accused of
meddling in other nation's affairs. However, if they refuse
to give aid, they are accused of hoarding the power, and are
shown as greedy businessmen.....this is the display
occurring now I suppose. All will be better when bush is out
of office.

Just do me a favor and stop making overused generalizations
about the American populous based on 1.5% of its population,
ok? I don't hate Germany for being led by the Nazi party, I
dont accuse Brits of all having crooked teeth and constantly
sipping tea. We are not ignorant, we currently fighting the
problem....why aren't all of you joining in? Flood the media
with questions. They cant ignore all of us. They already had
one(a Mr.Glick) publicly denounce Bush's administration
policies on national television.


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2003-07-17 13:06 [#00783648]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular



Please don't generalize all American's into one mindless,
brainwashed, gluttonous mob of capitalist pig-dogs.

more than half of Americans voted against George Bush in the
last election. My state, Washington state, voted against
him in the electoral college. and if you drive around
Seattle, you will see more signs protesting George Dubya's
policies than supporting them. If your view of Americans is
contrary to this, you should be taking account of the bias
of your own news sources.



 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-07-17 20:52 [#00784426]
Points: 836 Status: Regular



I'm not talking about Americans as a populous, I'm talking
about the fucking idiot who runs the country. When I say
America is not a democracy, I'm talking about government
structure - it has nothing to do with its citizens. Who
knows.....perhaps Al Gore should have won ;).

I realize that many of you are smart enough to be skeptical
of everything the US government tells you. In fact I'm sure
most of the people on this mb are smart enough to figure it
out. I just feel sorry for the remainder of Americans who
believe the garbage coming out of Washington.

I love my fellow Canadians, but I think our government is a
bunch of morons too. I'm skeptical of everything; I don't
believe anything until I know the agenda behind the
statments.

It doesn't matter whether you voted for Bush or not - didn't
you pay attention to the last election? You may as well
have voted for a rubber chicken.



 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-07-17 20:54 [#00784429]
Points: 836 Status: Regular



I'm such a cynical bastard.


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2003-07-17 20:56 [#00784430]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker



HARRRRRRRRRRRR HAHAHAHAHAHA OH FUCK. HE'S SUCH A HALF WIT.


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-07-17 21:26 [#00784459]
Points: 836 Status: Regular



Oh Anus (rolleyes).


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-07-17 22:32 [#00784547]
Points: 836 Status: Regular



I apologize for my foul language BlantantEcho. I'll try to
be nice from now on. :)


 


Messageboard index