three reasons why music is about to die | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
big
...and 346 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614154
Today 6
Topics 127544
  
 
Messageboard index
three reasons why music is about to die
 

offline uviol from United States on 2003-07-15 19:59 [#00780756]
Points: 2496 Status: Lurker



1. Bands like Coldplay and Wilco who know they are hailed
by critics and embrace the image, and ones like Radiohead
who are too creative for their own good and know it.
2. The new breed of 'anti-packaged-pop'
pseudo-singer/songwriter types i.e. Michelle Branch, Vanessa
Carlton, who also embrace the image and become obnoxious in
the process.
3. The overabundance of published mediocrity, i.e. too many
small labels and producers. (I'm guilty here, I admit)

I think there' s been a complete role reversal. The indie
has just become the mainstream, the mainstream is frowned
upon. The indie has become self-aware and is compromising
itself. I find myself more drawn to the mainstream these
days simply as a backlash against the plethera of bogus
profundity on the market. Oh yeah, like Coldplay is THAT
much more talented than Good Charlotte.

Music will die soon not just because the sonic palette has
been exhausted by the emergence of electronic music, but
because of the bastardization of innovation in our society.
When I recently realized that more of my friends like
so-called 'indie' or 'underground' stuff than not, and that
my brothers friends are trying to get all hip in the pop
punk scene and downloading stuff off of Kazaa when they
should be playing nintendo or listening to age-appropriate
mainstream stuff, I knew there was something wrong. When I
was 11 I wasn't downloading mp3s!! I wasd playing Mario
Bros.!! I understand that I need to change with the times,
but I think there's more at stake now.

Okay, I just brought up two points and didn't resolve
either. I'm quitting now.


 

offline dariusgriffin from cool on 2003-07-15 20:02 [#00780757]
Points: 12428 Status: Regular



OK, but you're mainly talking about the music industry, not
about music in itself..


 

offline horsefactory from 💠 (United Kingdom) on 2003-07-15 20:06 [#00780761]
Points: 14867 Status: Regular



i disagree.
what you're talking about is the death of commercial music,
which is something that i wouldn't care about, even if it
did happen.
besides, music, like any other art form, is infinite and
only limited by the artist's imagination; you can't say that
imagination is about to die.
i don't think the sonic palette has been exhausted either,
far from it in fact. that's a hard thing to say because you
can't imagine a sound until you have heard it, so there
could be an endless amount of other sounds out there that we
can't comprehend because we haven't heard them.



 

offline epohs from )C: on 2003-07-15 20:06 [#00780763]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



i doubt the music industry will die. there's just too much
money to be made. it will change significantly though,
whether it wants to or not.

actual music is in no danger of disappearing.


 

offline uviol from United States on 2003-07-15 20:07 [#00780765]
Points: 2496 Status: Lurker | Followup to dariusgriffin: #00780757



Good point..
you're right. Although I suppose I was thinking along the
lines that since the music industry influences the output so
much that there will inevitably be a negative shift in
artistic production as well.
However I think you were right in noticing that discrepancy.
Music, in and of itself, isn't necessarily about to die.


 

offline roygbivcore from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2003-07-15 20:10 [#00780768]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker



whats wrong with wilco

when did they get big


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2003-07-15 20:10 [#00780769]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



First of all, mainstream is whatever they're trying to shove
down your neck-hole that week. So Wilco, Radiohead and
Coldplay are mainstream... or was that last week?

Secondly, if more people like smaller acts then that's a
good thing and testifies to the power of the internet as a
self organizing phenomenon that promotes by word of mouth
and free samples through merit alone.

Thirdly, not only has the sonic palette not been exhausted -
the only limit is imagination - but timbre is only one
element in the phenomenon called music. New styles are
constantly evolving and hybridizing.

Finally, of course the media giants will attempt to co-opt
and mass market anything that seems like it could get
popular and appeal to the masses. But why bother paying
attention to those fading dinosaurs? Nirvana didn't stop
being good when they sold it to the mullets.


 

offline optimus prime on 2003-07-15 20:12 [#00780770]
Points: 6447 Status: Lurker



i think music itself is just getting better and better. and
fuck the music industry.


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2003-07-15 20:15 [#00780771]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



the sheer amount of information in all mediums has been
growing wildly since the invention of the printing press.
making it harder and harder to wade through the stuff
you don't find interesting, and stumble across the
things you do.

this applies to movies, music, books, ect...


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2003-07-15 20:17 [#00780774]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to epohs: #00780771



That is why people form information hives - critical
collectives - such as this one.


 

offline roygbivcore from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2003-07-15 20:18 [#00780777]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker



i like underground music cause i feel like i've earned it,
rather than having it shoved in my face


 

offline roygbivcore from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2003-07-15 20:20 [#00780778]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker



it's kind of like how dogs like people food more than dog
food, you know?


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2003-07-15 20:20 [#00780779]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #00780774



*nods*


 

offline uviol from United States on 2003-07-15 20:24 [#00780788]
Points: 2496 Status: Lurker



These are excellent points. I think I tried to make one too
many and screwed myself in the process.

I think my main concern lies in the idea of the death of
innovation. I mean this on multiple levels.
Part of this concern is that the innovators we DO have will
cease to be innovative because of the attention.
Fleetmouse, your example of nirvana is well taken, although
I suspect there will be a large number of bands who are not
so lucky. Bands like Coldplay and increasingly Radiohead
annoy me because they seem like they have stopped creating
music that happened to me innovative and started to try to
create innovative music. It's so self-consious and
obnoxious and all these new fans are latchinbg onto them
like they are the geniuses of the world and that they are
geniuses for listening to them.
The socond part of my concern has to do with a problem in
music itself. I think that there will always be innovators
and those who think creatively. I mentioned (precariously)
that the sonic palette had been exhausted. Maybe yes, maybe
no.. but I think there's an inverse relationship between
technology and music these days. As technology has advanced
lighting fast, music has been exhausted. There may be a few
new timbres hidden away in Richard D. James lost Stomper
file, but before long we will be reduced to an exclusively
remixed and revivalist musical scene that consists only of
remixing, covering, and doing old styles with new
juxtapositions.

*whew*
I wonder how many new posts there have been since I started
this.. Fleetmouse is the last one that appears here.. so I'm
not intentionally ignoring anyone :-)


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2003-07-15 20:25 [#00780790]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to roygbivcore: #00780778



Yeah, and how crazy poor old ladies like cat food more than
human food.


 

offline roygbivcore from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2003-07-15 20:26 [#00780791]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker



CAUSE THEY GET HUMAN FOOD SHOVED IN THEIR FACE


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2003-07-15 20:28 [#00780794]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to roygbivcore: #00780791



rofl


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2003-07-15 20:45 [#00780812]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #00780794



I'm still waiting for the big backlash against
electric/electronic instruments and the return to flutes,
bongos and zithers at corner pubs. :-)

Thing is, you can't see in advance where the future
innovations will come from, otherwise you'd be the
innovator. I'm sure people who listened to Bach and Vivaldi
in their day couldn't anticipate Beethoven or Stravinsky.

Interesting what you say here:

but before long we will be reduced to an exclusively
remixed and revivalist musical scene that consists only of
remixing, covering, and doing old styles with new
juxtapositions.


It's like the "grey goo" end of the world nightmare proposed
by people who fear nanotechnology running out of control.

I think the endless postmodernist remixing and genre bending
has to do with Total Cultural Availability - it's a novel
stage, technologically, that pretty much anything ever
created is available at the push of a button and people are
taking advantage of it and exploring the possibilities. But
I expect the fad will pass as people get tired of suckling
at the techno-tit.


 

offline uviol from United States on 2003-07-15 21:04 [#00780827]
Points: 2496 Status: Lurker



Thing is, you can't see in advance where the future
innovations will come from, otherwise you'd be the
innovator.

Very true. I think this is a great quotable quote :*). I
suppose I am admitting my shortsightedness and naivete a bit
when I throw up my hands and say that there's nowhere else
we can go. I also realize there's more to innovation than
raw sound. But, on the other hand, it seems to me that so
many 'radical movements' in music over the past few
centuries, and especially in the past ten or so decades,
have been characterized by either new changes in technology,
or, an entirely new 'sound' or 'vibe', or both.
For example, before computers, musicians were at the mercy
of their acoustic instruments that provided one sound or a
series of related sounds. They could push these to the
extreme, yes, but they still had limitations. When the
computer came along and allowed us to work with sound in an
exponentially greater way, we were no longer confined to a
set of timbres because by working on the most basic level of
wave editing, we could theoretically create any sound
possible.
Violins and orchestraes were used for ages.. when the guitar
became popular, people used those and innovated them further
by making electric guitars which spun off whole new worlds
of music like rock as we know it. The mid seventies 80s
signaled a big change too because the electronic keyboards
and synthesizers created sound no one had ever heard before;
literally. But now, hearing new sounds *really* just means
hearing a new style or new juxtaposition. This is what
leads me to think that even though there is room for
progress, it's not the type of truly exciting progress we;ve
seen in decades past.
Your mention of postmodernism is perfect summation, not
just of my point, but yours too. The availablity of pretty
much anything is hard to make heads of tails of. I truly
hope it is just a fad like you said. Maybe there *will* be
a techno backlash. I'm rpiming myself for those zithers. :)


 

offline uviol from United States on 2003-07-15 21:05 [#00780828]
Points: 2496 Status: Lurker



oops. as you could have guessed, that was *not* supposed to
be all in italics. sorry. forgot to end my html tag.


 

offline roygbivcore from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2003-07-15 21:08 [#00780832]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker



p.s. coldplay is boring and for stupid people


 

offline BlatantEcho from All over (United States) on 2003-07-15 21:42 [#00780861]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker



I think the problem that drowns a lot of music is "the
scene"

especially in indie-rock, etc.

I mean, the Used are pop now, Taking Back Sunday is pop, not
because it's good music that people like, but becuase other
people NOT in the scene have heard it, and like it.

Now you can't go to a Used show without screaming girls and
feel like a tool (never been to a show of theres yet, but
these are the show reports I read)

So now I can't like the used, and the fringe fans won't
support them, and talk shit, because outsiders like them.

FUck that, there is no scene, emo, all that shit can eat me.
It's music, if you are making your own music, cuz you love
music, more power too you.

The only thing that should be labeled is PRODUCED CORPORATE
MUSIC. Where 10 different people write songs for an artist
and bid to get them on the CD. That is fucking the worst.

The scene though, it chokes music, and kills a lot of
energy, I hate it very much.


 

offline spent from New Zealand on 2003-07-15 22:41 [#00780897]
Points: 25 Status: Regular



Haha, my feelings exactly rgbv.
Let's face it, whether you like it or not, America owns the
industry, and melodic pop pith like coldplay and wilco might
be somewhat popular in England there, but the yanks could
give a toss about it.


 

offline spent from New Zealand on 2003-07-15 22:45 [#00780907]
Points: 25 Status: Regular



Bands have been selling out for years. It's not a new
phenonmina.
Indie only becomes mainstream when your taste in music is
stagnant.


 

offline epsy from Afghanistan on 2003-07-15 22:53 [#00780918]
Points: 59 Status: Lurker



saying music is going to die is a really broad statement.
Watch any vh1 show that looks back at music in 1989 and
you'll see people like paula abdul, vanilla ice and new kids
on the block. By the looks of things on the outer crust, you
could have easily said the same back then. Yeah we have mp3
technology blah blah blah, but as long as there are good
people with good intentions running good labels like hymen,
ant-zen, praxis, etc there will always be good music.
Whether there's any money to be made or not.


 


Messageboard index