|
|
Q4Z2X
on 2003-05-11 14:53 [#00694494]
Points: 5264 Status: Lurker
|
|
i don't know if anyone has ever noticed/discovered this before, but if open up the track, like spinning plates from amnesiac (a song that is kinda "reversed" sounding to begin with) in a wav editor and reverse it, it sounds very similar the track "i will" from their upcoming hail to the thief album. pretty neat..
|
|
corrupted-girl
on 2003-05-11 14:53 [#00694495]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular
|
|
really? that's strange.. hm
|
|
Jarworski
from The Grove (United Kingdom) on 2003-05-11 14:54 [#00694496]
Points: 10836 Status: Lurker
|
|
Aye, they confirmed this in NME last week.
Prefer it backwards meself ;)
|
|
Q4Z2X
on 2003-05-11 14:55 [#00694497]
Points: 5264 Status: Lurker
|
|
i like I will better kind of ..
|
|
titsworth
from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-05-11 14:57 [#00694503]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker
|
|
yea click here for more info on this
|
|
Jarworski
from The Grove (United Kingdom) on 2003-05-11 14:59 [#00694505]
Points: 10836 Status: Lurker | Followup to titsworth: #00694503
|
|
Why, that's an interesting looking site you've linked there young Travis! Who created that trove of information???
|
|
Q4Z2X
on 2003-05-11 15:03 [#00694512]
Points: 5264 Status: Lurker
|
|
shit. i should have looked up about this beforehand. they shouldn't have let anyone know this, though, so the only people who would know would be the fans who had for some reason reversed spinning plates and heard i will, or reversed i will and heard like spinning plates..
|
|
titsworth
from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-05-11 15:11 [#00694522]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to Jarworski: #00694505
|
|
does the fact that i linked my own site somehow cheapen the information? excuse me if i'm incorrectly assuming your sarcastic tone. sometimes i answer legitimate questions with links to things i've written and it's treated as some kind of advertisement.
|
|
Jarworski
from The Grove (United Kingdom) on 2003-05-11 15:12 [#00694524]
Points: 10836 Status: Lurker | Followup to titsworth: #00694522
|
|
Naw I just breaking your balls a little, I remember someone asking who's site it was when you linked it before and you got slightly exasperated ;D
|
|
Anus_Presley
on 2003-05-11 15:16 [#00694529]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker | Followup to Q4Z2X: #00694494
|
|
no shit sherlock
|
|
titsworth
from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-05-11 15:17 [#00694531]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to Jarworski: #00694524
|
|
yea the 19 page paper i did on steve reich and SAW2.. i'm sure you'd want credit for it also if you spent as much time as i did on that. but i see your point though :) as long as people enjoy the information/analysis that's what really matters
|
|
Morton
from out (Netherlands, The) on 2003-05-11 15:39 [#00694546]
Points: 10000 Status: Addict | Followup to Q4Z2X: #00694494
|
|
nice find man :) i hope i'll like their next album..
|
|
Q4Z2X
on 2003-05-11 18:38 [#00694722]
Points: 5264 Status: Lurker | Followup to Anus_Presley: #00694529
|
|
i didn't find it that obvious, by actually reversing the song, like i did right when i got the cd because the track was so backwards sounding, and now doing it again and realizing that it's basically the same as "there there" after now hearing it, not just reading it on a website that tells everything about the songs..
|
|
surrounded
from it won't be hard anymore to li on 2003-05-11 18:48 [#00694744]
Points: 3787 Status: Regular | Followup to Q4Z2X: #00694722
|
|
did you know he also sung the song backwards? Apparantly thom spent weeks figuring out how to sing the lyrics backwards. And then they reversed that recording too, so the words sounded "normal" again...
I remember reading he said the lyrics were "too intense" for him to sing them in a normal fashion.
|
|
Q4Z2X
on 2003-05-11 19:06 [#00694796]
Points: 5264 Status: Lurker | Followup to surrounded: #00694744
|
|
that's pretty interesting. in reverse, the vocals sound really strange as well.
|
|
skeeves
from Brisbane (Australia) on 2003-05-11 22:09 [#00694963]
Points: 83 Status: Lurker
|
|
That site was awesome, im a big radiohead fan and you just made my day by giving me a plethora of useful facts. Does anyone know if the leaked tracks of Hail to the thief are very different from the studio version? There there sounds pretty similar...
|
|
The_Funkmaster
from St. John's (Canada) on 2003-05-11 22:12 [#00694964]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker
|
|
my God Titsworth, it must've taken forever to do that site... I have enough trouble updating my album database... I put in a field for notes about each album, and it has never gotten filled in... :)
|
|
mimi
on 2003-05-11 22:17 [#00694967]
Points: 5721 Status: Regular
|
|
this backwards shit, reminds me of twin peaks.
|
|
LeCoeur
from the outer edge of the universe (United States) on 2003-05-11 22:43 [#00694977]
Points: 8249 Status: Lurker | Followup to The_Funkmaster: #00694964
|
|
ehheheh
tis a great site full of FUN radiohead factoids.....
like you i can't imagine the effort it took.....oyeeeee vey
|
|
Q4Z2X
on 2003-05-12 15:31 [#00695721]
Points: 5264 Status: Lurker | Followup to Q4Z2X: #00694722
|
|
i suck.. i meant to put "i will" not "there there" on that..
|
|
Messageboard index
|