PSYCHOLOGY OF SOUND | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 431 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614212
Today 16
Topics 127548
  
 
Messageboard index
PSYCHOLOGY OF SOUND
 

offline celloncllone from anywhere but in (Germany) on 2003-05-09 11:52 [#00691561]
Points: 849 Status: Regular



I think in idm more than any other musical genre people pay
attention to good music. based on that assumption i think
this would make a nice thread, and the question is; What is
it about music/sound itself...that is so strongly related to
intelligence, and at the same time mathematics, and of
course in early years of life, mental development?

What i'd like to get out of this is everyones opinion, but
also any links u might have to math-music/intelligence-music
(psychology-music topic), maybe software that we can have a
play with, and so on....appreciate it.


 

offline Co-existence from Bergen (Norway) on 2003-05-09 11:55 [#00691565]
Points: 3388 Status: Regular



Music is the 'incarnation' of the Soul and All There Is.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2003-05-09 11:56 [#00691569]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to celloncllone: #00691561 | Show recordbag



No, I think what you just typed is utter rubbish. People
listen to what they like...end of story. It was only called
IDM because you couldn't dance to it, and if you can't dance
to it you sit, and sitting is what intellectuals do more
than people with lives.


 

offline steve mcqueen from caerdydd (United Kingdom) on 2003-05-09 12:14 [#00691617]
Points: 6574 Status: Addict



"in idm more than any other musical genre"

your a fascist. go and have spliff and hopefully you won't
keep needing to explain things.


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2003-05-09 12:21 [#00691629]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker



IDM didnt make me smarter :( !


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2003-05-09 12:24 [#00691638]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to Monoid: #00691629 | Show recordbag



It made me dumberer. I now can't hold conversations with
people either and spend more than two hours a day on the
internet reading stupid comments about how intelligent
people think they are for listening to stupid bleepy tunes.


 

offline steve mcqueen from caerdydd (United Kingdom) on 2003-05-09 12:26 [#00691640]
Points: 6574 Status: Addict



word.


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2003-05-09 12:37 [#00691668]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker | Followup to ecnadniarb: #00691569



However..... i'm good at sitting !


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2003-05-09 12:40 [#00691676]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to Monoid: #00691668 | Show recordbag



Then maybe you need to listen to more IDM, then you too can
become one of the elite of the world. Suddenly you will
find every possible branch of mathematics opening up to you
because you undertand it unique complexity as it has been so
cleverly been transformed into beats by a gang ofhigh school
drop outs and social misfits. :D


 

offline celloncllone from anywhere but in (Germany) on 2003-05-09 12:47 [#00691692]
Points: 849 Status: Regular



wtf? lol. oh my fucking god.

who the fuck even implied that idm makes people smarter?
because i certainly didn't. who implied that people feel
more intelligent for listening to idm? because i fucking
didn't.

because i was fuckin intelligent before i listened to that
shit. if those of you who go all out first shot calling
people fascists for putting intelligence in the same
sentence as idm would have read my initial post properly you
would have seen that all i fukcing wanted was a positive
contribution towards figuring out how music works.

and last time i checked, idm did stand for Intelligent Dance
Music.

so for some of the wanna-be intellectuals here who, as any
good wanna-be intellectual does, feels the need to act like
some fuckin god talking about how "there is no intelligence
involved, its jst to dance to".

well, if thats all u do to music, then u obviously dont get
what music is about.


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2003-05-09 12:49 [#00691701]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker | Followup to celloncllone: #00691692



......I gotta piss


 

offline celloncllone from anywhere but in (Germany) on 2003-05-09 12:50 [#00691706]
Points: 849 Status: Regular



and dont worry, i do mean u ecnadniarb.

phh, yea so basically i listen to idm because i want to feel
elite, and ecnadniarb listens to idm because its so easy to
dance to, right?
get real fuckhead, we all listen to idm becauase its
something different that makes you appreciate music more.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2003-05-09 12:50 [#00691707]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Maybe you should read other peoples posts as well...I said
people like listening to what they like listening to. Music
can create an emotional response which is what drives people
to listen to it. And this bleepy music isn't called IDM,
that was just a stupid label given to it by ignorant people,
following on from the whole intelligent drum and bass scene
etc.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2003-05-09 12:52 [#00691716]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



"we all listen to idm becauase its
something different that makes you appreciate music more"

Is that the royal we?

I personally used to listen to loads of different types of
music because I liked listening to it, including the bleepy
shit. How does this one genre make you appreciate music
more?


 

offline celloncllone from anywhere but in (Germany) on 2003-05-09 12:58 [#00691725]
Points: 849 Status: Regular



because i too was one of those mainstream-mtv, top 10
lovers, til i got my hands on a björk cd, which got me
listening to some more electronic stuff, finally aphex twin,
autechre, boc, after a few months on pure
experimental/ambient electronica, i started exploring other
genres, and now because i have learned to appreciate music
more, i listen to all kinds of shit i would have never done,
like a lot of mediterranian style bands, "radio tarifa",
then theres more acid jazz and trip hoppy type stuff like
bonobo and quantic, and i would have never discovered all
that great music if it wasnt for that sorry to use that term
again but the IDM phase, so call it bleepy shit, whatever, i
dont use the wors to make me feel smarter, ist a fuckin
term, and its there to be used

need anymore justification, or not happy ecna?


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2003-05-09 12:58 [#00691726]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



"so for some of the wanna-be intellectuals here"

how the fuck can you use that in an attack at me? your the
fool who just typed

"that is so strongly related to
intelligence, and at the same time mathematics, and of
course in early years of life, mental development?"


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-05-09 13:00 [#00691728]
Points: 21456 Status: Regular



well it's obvious how it's related to math I guess. You can
measure, count, etc.. you can use chaos theory etc. math is
just numbers obviously. but we seem to still not know much
about the nature of our brains to help us answer why we like
music.


 

offline celloncllone from anywhere but in (Germany) on 2003-05-09 13:02 [#00691729]
Points: 849 Status: Regular



ecna, i am an intellectual, not a wanna-be.
the difference is easy, a real intellectual doesnt feel the
need to debase every other persons opinion no matter how
invalid in their view. the wanna-be on the other hand feeds
their ego wanna-be self by doing exactly that


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2003-05-09 13:03 [#00691732]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



If you go down that route, everything that is quantitive is
related to maths, so that means basically everything, which
in turn means music is nothing special. Personally I think
(and it is just a personal opinion) that sound
interpretation is all about emotions.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2003-05-09 13:04 [#00691736]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to celloncllone: #00691729 | Show recordbag



No a real intellectual has no need in proclaiming themselves
to be one.


 

offline celloncllone from anywhere but in (Germany) on 2003-05-09 13:07 [#00691738]
Points: 849 Status: Regular



wow, finally i get the response i needed, thank you ecna,
thats all i wanted, see how easy that is.

and when u think about it, yes thats right, music in the
mathematical sense is nothing special, but i want more on
peoples opinions about emotions tho.

how can it be, when 10 people hear a certain track, a high
percentage feel the same emotion, u get the same response,
how much individual interpretation is actually going on? or
is it a pre-perscribed emotion that is attached to a certain
sound?


 

offline Donutman from Perth (Australia) on 2003-05-09 13:08 [#00691741]
Points: 234 Status: Lurker | Followup to ecnadniarb: #00691736



Totally agree.


 

offline ambsace from canaDUH. on 2003-05-09 13:11 [#00691745]
Points: 6326 Status: Lurker



yikes. threads like this frighten me.

and make me run away with my tail between my legs.


 

offline celloncllone from anywhere but in (Germany) on 2003-05-09 13:20 [#00691758]
Points: 849 Status: Regular



hey donut, u visit www.overclockers.com.au much?



 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-05-09 15:22 [#00691928]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker



oh man, not to repeat myself, but i answer your very
interesting
question in great detail in this paper i
wrote (click on the one in the top right)

here

i quote varese, cage, telefon tel aviv, mark bell, etc...
lemme know what you think!


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-05-09 15:41 [#00691979]
Points: 21456 Status: Regular



It must have something to do with memory. That is why
symmetry is interesting perhaps. Have you noticed that?
Especially symmetry that is all weird and fucked up and
toppled over, lopsided, top heavy etc... do you know what I
mean? It makes your brain go, oh yeah I remember that, and
that and that, whoh, I can't keep up, which is maybe why
fast squarepusher beats are interesting. Of course there's
more, uh, innate appeal such as human voice/lyrics I
guess... I mean you can form actual ideas with words which
is a whole other realm than mere pattern recognition.


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-05-09 15:42 [#00691983]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker



y'all are so goddamn complacent it sickens me.


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-05-09 15:44 [#00691990]
Points: 21456 Status: Regular



I tried to read your paper, but my computer detected
malicious script and then the internet shut down.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2003-05-09 15:45 [#00691991]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



What do you gain from the academic analysis of others work?


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-05-09 15:46 [#00691993]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to w M w: #00691990



i routinely shut down the internet to amuse myself

p.s. anyone who can't read the .doc file on the site, tell
me and i'll convert it to .rtf or html for you.


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-05-09 15:46 [#00691995]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to ecnadniarb: #00691991



personally i enjoy using my brain, it's "a kick" to
understand and appreciate things.


 

offline steve mcqueen from caerdydd (United Kingdom) on 2003-05-09 15:47 [#00691996]
Points: 6574 Status: Addict



i'm not complacent. i just can't be arsed to read your paper
cos its in word format.


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-05-09 15:47 [#00691998]
Points: 21456 Status: Regular



an understanding of the seperate parts of the others work?


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-05-09 15:48 [#00692002]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker



fine, i'll make an html version and stick it on the site
later


 

offline steve mcqueen from caerdydd (United Kingdom) on 2003-05-09 15:57 [#00692015]
Points: 6574 Status: Addict



wicked! i'll read it now. your "SAWII/'music for 18
musicians' comparison" was decent, as i remember.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2003-05-09 16:00 [#00692016]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to titsworth: #00691995 | Show recordbag



I can see how you might understand the theory in how the
sounds are made, but I can't see how you can gain a better
understanding of the music through reading about it.


 

offline steve mcqueen from caerdydd (United Kingdom) on 2003-05-09 16:02 [#00692017]
Points: 6574 Status: Addict



you can read about what emotions/impulses caused the
musicians to make it.. what more explanation could you want?


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2003-05-09 16:07 [#00692026]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



But reading someone elses anaysis of a peice of music I can
tell what the composer was feeling at the time he wrote the
peice? Sorry I don't beleive that for one minute.


 

offline wizards teeth from Newcastle (United Kingdom) on 2003-05-09 16:08 [#00692027]
Points: 1070 Status: Regular



Do you lot think that advances in technology have caused a
great deal of hatred between us all?

If only the simplest of music existed, for example Rodger
Whitaker’s whistling style, a man hitting a drum randomly
or silence, there would be less arguments and less ability
for shit pop producers to make money by brainwashing kids to
buy poor music like Blazing Squad.

If computers did not exist and the concept of values and
perceptions did not exist, people (or animals) could not
produce music that could be objectively or subjectively
analysed or evaluated by anyone or anything with the ability
to do so. Hence there would be no need for this site to
exist or the concept of dancing to exist, if people only
dance to music that is. My friend purchases, Yes! Purchases
Ronan Keaton records with money. Are my values, as
determined by my cultural beliefs causing me to belittle Mr.
Keaton without justification? Or am I justified because he
is shit? Or is he really not shit, and I only perceive him
as shit due to the values instilled by other artists I have
appreciated more because I have been influenced via peer
pressure or tainted my chemistry when listening to this
music? If I had first took drugs at a Boyzone Concert, would
I be Ronan Keaton's biggest fan? I hope not, I would have
moved onto smack if that were the case.



 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-05-09 16:56 [#00692092]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to ecnadniarb: #00692016



read the paper i wrote and tell me if you get anything out
of it. it's just a general description of the genre, i don't
pretend to be explaining exactly what was going through a
certain artist's mind as he wrote or recorded a piece.
that's not the point. if you need the html version it should
be up in a few minutes.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2003-05-09 17:01 [#00692098]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



I read the wrong one but I didn't agree with what you had to
say.


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-05-09 17:02 [#00692101]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to ecnadniarb: #00692098



which one did you read and what didn't you agree with? some
of it *i* probably don't agree with anymore; the only one
i've read recently is the one i just wrote.


 

offline steve mcqueen from caerdydd (United Kingdom) on 2003-05-09 20:01 [#00692381]
Points: 6574 Status: Addict



"But reading someone elses anaysis of a peice of music I can

tell what the composer was feeling at the time he wrote the

peice? Sorry I don't beleive that for one minute."

my point was that you CAN read some things that give you a
better understanding about where things are coming from. If
you read about a band/musicians cultural background,
personality(s) and all the other things that shape the music
that they make, you have a far better chance at
understanding what they are trying to communicate through
their music... why they found it necessary to make it, in
essence.



 

offline jenf from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-05-09 21:40 [#00692447]
Points: 1062 Status: Lurker



intelligent people say fuck? :o


 

offline jenf from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-05-09 21:42 [#00692449]
Points: 1062 Status: Lurker



hehe i thought 'ntelligent' people were all coprophiliacs
...


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-05-09 21:42 [#00692450]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to ecnadniarb: #00692098



good response motherfucker. it's easy to destroy but not so
easy to create. when you have some intelligent criticism get
back to me.


 

offline Donutman from Perth (Australia) on 2003-05-10 00:02 [#00692625]
Points: 234 Status: Lurker | Followup to celloncllone: #00691758



Never. It's the first time I've looked at it, and I can't
really figure out what it is.

Anyway, if there's a guy called Donutman there, then it's
not me.


 

offline Donutman from Perth (Australia) on 2003-05-11 10:29 [#00694199]
Points: 234 Status: Lurker



I was actually hoping for a response to this comment
cellon...



 

offline Ataxia_Din from Sirius B (United States) on 2003-05-11 11:30 [#00694291]
Points: 6 Status: Lurker



The Sound of Chaos.

Is sound behind the creation of crop circles?

Ultradia

GeoMusic

Fibonacci Numbers and The Golden Section in Art, Architec...

Reverse Speech



 

offline The_Funkmaster from St. John's (Canada) on 2003-05-11 11:44 [#00694318]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker



well, for me, good music gives me some kind of emotional
response... if all that is in a song is all this technical
wizardry, I don't want to listen to it... sure it might be
interesting to hear a few times, but if there is no
emotional connection with the music it just doesn't stand up
for me... I listen to IDM, but I also listen to pure pop
music... I enjoy both equally... I don't care how
intelligent the composer was, what they know about math,
blah blah blah... I don't care how intelligent the music
sounds, I just care about how it affects me...


 


Messageboard index