|
|
Anus_Presley
on 2003-05-08 14:31 [#00690014]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker
|
|
they have changed the coverr of Dark Side Of The Moon and it looks shit, and the back looks worrse, why the fuck thay changed it i will neverr know.
|
|
Polynomial-C
from Netherlands, The on 2003-05-08 14:33 [#00690016]
Points: 1362 Status: Regular
|
|
and who is to blame?
|
|
einigriv
from Tervuren (Belgium) on 2003-05-08 14:33 [#00690017]
Points: 436 Status: Lurker
|
|
i have not seen the new cover, but it reminds me of the ugly cover of the reissue of coldcut's "journey's by dj's", just an ugly cover... why change covers in the first place?
|
|
Anus_Presley
on 2003-05-08 14:37 [#00690021]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker | Followup to Polynomial-C: #00690016
|
|
no idea who is too blame, but i'd like someone to tell me theirr name and addrress.
einigriv > i have no idea why, i can't see the point. i think in this case they said it was something to do with it not selling well :| which is total bullshit. anyone who watched that classic albums prrogrram can tell you how long it was in the charrts and it was fucking ages.
|
|
Ophecks
from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2003-05-08 16:01 [#00690178]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
|
I don't see the point either... actually, I LIKE it, but it was unnecessary. It's like changing the cover of Sgt. Pepper or the Richard D. James Album... you just don't do that. It's an institution, man.
|
|
Ctrl Alt Del
from Ft. Worth (United States) on 2003-05-08 16:12 [#00690201]
Points: 2190 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ophecks: #00690178
|
|
exactly, it's one of those things that could have been better but it set a standard and defined itself without being the best it could be. it's classic.
|
|
corrupted-girl
on 2003-05-08 18:31 [#00690339]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular
|
|
any links to it?
|
|
zaphod
from the metaverse on 2003-05-08 18:34 [#00690344]
Points: 4428 Status: Addict
|
|
i dislike dark side of the moon. the floyds early work is where its at.
|
|
corrupted-girl
on 2003-05-08 18:36 [#00690347]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular | Followup to zaphod: #00690344
|
|
no way. their first album sounds like the beatles...
|
|
zaphod
from the metaverse on 2003-05-08 18:36 [#00690349]
Points: 4428 Status: Addict | Followup to corrupted-girl: #00690347
|
|
to each their own. doesn't change the fact that i like their early work more.
|
|
corrupted-girl
on 2003-05-08 18:37 [#00690350]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular
|
|
pfft
|
|
mylittlesister
from ...wherever (United Kingdom) on 2003-05-08 18:37 [#00690351]
Points: 8472 Status: Regular | Followup to corrupted-girl: #00690347
|
|
you make the beatles sound bad :O
:) love the beatles
|
|
Messageboard index
|