|
|
WooferAttack
from Milano (Italy) on 2003-05-06 00:20 [#00685742]
Points: 12920 Status: Lurker
|
|
Why these tracks? Which are the purpose of these useless tracks? Bah...
\/\/.
|
|
DiaZoHeXagoN
from The city of angels (United States) on 2003-05-06 00:31 [#00685744]
Points: 2659 Status: Lurker
|
|
for the goodness of bits
really I wonder that myself
|
|
Bob Mcbob
on 2003-05-06 03:19 [#00685862]
Points: 9939 Status: Regular
|
|
actually, i really like richards' bits...
|
|
tibbar
from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-05-06 03:20 [#00685863]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker
|
|
i think there is a "CH" missing somewhere ;)
|
|
dave_g
from United Kingdom on 2003-05-06 03:29 [#00685869]
Points: 3372 Status: Lurker
|
|
bits are some of my favourite tracks. they serve as a snippet of sound which is great, but would be terrible if used in a full song. ive got loads of 5 or 6 second sequences and noises ive made which i cant include in any stuff, perhaps ill do a cd of bits (or would that be a sample cd?).....also the bits manage to delimit the various tracks very well, better that silence.
|
|
Bob Mcbob
on 2003-05-06 03:33 [#00685870]
Points: 9939 Status: Regular | Followup to dave_g: #00685869
|
|
not sure if they were meant to be snippets, seemed to me like proper songs, only much shorter
|
|
dave_g
from United Kingdom on 2003-05-06 03:35 [#00685871]
Points: 3372 Status: Lurker | Followup to Bob Mcbob: #00685870
|
|
perhaps i'll try a high quality time stretch on my sampler when i get home, see what i end up with :)
|
|
WooferAttack
from Milano (Italy) on 2003-05-06 03:42 [#00685873]
Points: 12920 Status: Lurker
|
|
"bit or not to bit... this is the problem"
|
|
Messageboard index
|