In defense of Saddam | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
w M w
...and 346 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614286
Today 7
Topics 127553
  
 
Messageboard index
In defense of Saddam
 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2003-02-12 13:18 [#00552443]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker



He didnt gas the Kurds.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/THO209A.html


 

offline Cheffe1979 from fuck (Austria) on 2003-02-12 13:22 [#00552445]
Points: 4630 Status: Lurker



but he admitted it.


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2003-02-12 13:22 [#00552448]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker | Followup to Cheffe1979: #00552445



LINK ?!


 

offline Cheffe1979 from fuck (Austria) on 2003-02-12 13:27 [#00552460]
Points: 4630 Status: Lurker



that was way before i had internet access. just after the
attacks. it's sure it was him, check the UN pages, they
where there right after.
there is a lot of lie on both sides now. i'm not taking part
for the americans though but there has never been any doubt
in this issue.


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2003-02-12 13:28 [#00552464]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker | Followup to Cheffe1979: #00552460



I wont believe you than !


 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2003-02-12 13:39 [#00552483]
Points: 27799 Status: Regular



he could easily do a runner and no-one would recognise him -
if he stayed in iraq - nearly everyone mirrors his image.


 

offline Cheffe1979 from fuck (Austria) on 2003-02-12 13:40 [#00552485]
Points: 4630 Status: Lurker



you need not believe me. just do some recherche or whatever
it is called in english


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2003-02-12 13:41 [#00552490]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker | Followup to Cheffe1979: #00552485



I did, thats how I found this site, and a bunch of other
sites that say the same..


 

offline Cheffe1979 from fuck (Austria) on 2003-02-12 13:46 [#00552500]
Points: 4630 Status: Lurker



wait 'till panic is over. i remember a shitload of hoaxes
also flying around after 9/11.



 

offline Mickey Mouse from The Moon on 2003-02-12 14:08 [#00552548]
Points: 4130 Status: Addict



BWAHAHAHAHA!

that was a good laugh

*sarcasm tag on*

Yea, Saddam is a harmless teddy bear, filled with love and
joy, he would never hurt his own people. Naaaaaa... he didnt
kill off the people who were running agianst him in the
election before he went into office.... he didnt kill anyone
who disapproved of his power, he didnt gas the kurds,
nope.... all lies... he let others run agianst him in
previous elections..... he didnt go into a war with iran and
use the worse use of millitary command in history to toss
thousands mens lives away....

Saddam is just simply a good leader... and hands out free
money, and always agrees with the UN and listens to what
they suggest.

*sarcasm tag off*


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2003-02-12 14:14 [#00552566]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker | Followup to Mickey Mouse: #00552548



Hey, he couldn't defeat Iran, after a 8 year long war. So
why is he suddenly such a threat !?


 

offline Mickey Mouse from The Moon on 2003-02-12 14:24 [#00552583]
Points: 4130 Status: Addict



I didnt say Iraq WAS a threat to the US in my post Monoid

I expressed my opinion of Saddam being a horrible
leader/commander who could care less about his people.
Saddam has always kicked and dragged his feet with the UN
comes into the picture, they wanted to have one on one
interviews with all iraq scientists who help develop
millitary weaponry... no... just one scientist... its really
ridiculous, but I am not agreeing with what EITHER side is
saying, saddam seems to think that violence is acceptable,
and so does the U.S

I do not condone violence, I think this is all very wrong

And what Cheffe1919 said, do some more research.


 


Messageboard index