a cataclysmic flaw in logic | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (5)
recycle
belb
DADONCK
Hyperflake
big
...and 294 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614312
Today 33
Topics 127557
  
 
Messageboard index
a cataclysmic flaw in logic
 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-02-05 02:00 [#00541418]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular



I really don't see why this is being overlooked. I'll try
not to make this too dense of a post, as the premise is
pretty basic:

-bush cops out w/ an old crowd-pleaser, going to war with
daddy's enemy saddam.

-bush notes saddam's links to terrorist sects like al-queda

(which isn't true at all. an alliance between alqeda and
hussein is as likely as one between pope john paul and the
los angeles clippers)

-depite the presence of nuclear, biochemical weaponry in
other countries allied with the usa, et. al. bush demands
that saddam allow inspectors in and disarm.

-saddam shows resistance, again and again.

-bush then threatens war with saddam, should he choose to
keep his secret arsenal, thus prompting it to be USED
AGAINST THE UNITED STATES

it's like a suicidal homicide attempt on a national level.
utterly futile. even if we do end up winning this war,
(chances are great) we will definately suffer devastating
loss. this affects me directly because I am located at a
main target for nuclear target-practice. so is our
government.. I dont' know. do you see what I'm talking
about?


 

offline Dolleater from Afrika Bambaataa on 2003-02-05 02:02 [#00541420]
Points: 4819 Status: Addict | Followup to theo himself: #00541418



I hear yah.


 

offline bill_hicks from my city is amazing it is calle on 2003-02-05 02:36 [#00541453]
Points: 4286 Status: Lurker



Nonsense. saddam has complied with every request that the UN
have made. Bush still wants a war. There is NO threat to
America from Iraq or any other countries in the world.
America are the threat. They won't be happy until they get a
Macdonalds and a K-Mart opened in Baghdad. Oh, and there's
the oil as well.

So, sleep easy tonight. You are safe.


 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-02-05 02:39 [#00541457]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular



oh right.. I forgot about that magical anti-nuke shield of
pixie dust that is protecting our proud american soil

nonsense? u've got to be kidding me .. this has been going
on since 1998.. saddam has NOT complied with every request..
that is just SO off


 

offline Jarworski from The Grove (United Kingdom) on 2003-02-05 02:48 [#00541469]
Points: 10836 Status: Lurker



I don't really care...


 

offline bill_hicks from my city is amazing it is calle on 2003-02-05 08:11 [#00541883]
Points: 4286 Status: Lurker | Followup to Jarworski: #00541469



that's just ridiculous.


 

offline Jarworski from The Grove (United Kingdom) on 2003-02-05 08:33 [#00541911]
Points: 10836 Status: Lurker | Followup to bill_hicks: #00541883



I'm a ridiculous person. I won't care until bombs start
dropping on my house, and then I'll probably just sigh and
die.


 

offline bill_hicks from my city is amazing it is calle on 2003-02-05 08:35 [#00541913]
Points: 4286 Status: Lurker



Apathy is worse than wanting a war. Apathy kills.


 

offline Jarworski from The Grove (United Kingdom) on 2003-02-05 08:36 [#00541915]
Points: 10836 Status: Lurker



Tell it to the hand cause the face ain't listening


 

offline DJ Xammax from not America on 2003-02-05 08:39 [#00541921]
Points: 11512 Status: Lurker



We're better off dead anyways.


 

offline DJ Xammax from not America on 2003-02-05 08:40 [#00541923]
Points: 11512 Status: Lurker | Followup to DJ Xammax: #00541921



Haha twice as good coming from Dougal.


 

offline euphonicfilter from illadelphia (United States) on 2003-02-05 08:42 [#00541932]
Points: 2443 Status: Addict



bush is a fucking mo-mo - everyone knows that to start with

second - americans want oil for their big cars and other
bullshit that goes vroom - bushyfuck wants this war so his
friends w/ their hands grasped firmly around oils cock
waiting to suck will get some load in their mouths (or money
in their pockets whichever)

third - has the UN inspected our country lately? what about
the crazy shit our country has for no reason? hmmmmm?

lastly - the whole thing is bullshit brainwashing for the
morons who watch CNN and go to starbucks - the middle age
fucks of this country who wear dockers and think that a
billy joel concert is "cool" - we're screwed everyone

america is a fucking joke


 

offline DJ Xammax from not America on 2003-02-05 08:46 [#00541938]
Points: 11512 Status: Lurker | Followup to euphonicfilter: #00541932



Yeah...


 

offline Jarworski from The Grove (United Kingdom) on 2003-02-05 08:47 [#00541942]
Points: 10836 Status: Lurker | Followup to euphonicfilter: #00541932



Whatever :P


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2003-02-05 08:47 [#00541944]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Followup to Jarworski: #00541469 | Show recordbag



I don't care either, I just want some cookies.


 

offline euphonicfilter from illadelphia (United States) on 2003-02-05 08:48 [#00541946]
Points: 2443 Status: Addict



well none of you nancies live in this country

yippee


 

offline euphonicfilter from illadelphia (United States) on 2003-02-05 08:48 [#00541948]
Points: 2443 Status: Addict



its hard when everyone laughs at you cause your dumb...and
you know your dumb but no one around you changes

ahhhhhhhhhhhhh - i think i wanna go to war w/ the US


 

offline euphonicfilter from illadelphia (United States) on 2003-02-05 08:50 [#00541950]
Points: 2443 Status: Addict



theo where do you live in NYC?

i was there two weeks ago for four days and spent $300 on
vinyl record discs

yay for visa


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-02-05 15:08 [#00542434]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular



how do you know it "isn't true at all" that there are links
between iraq and al-queda?

the us gov. says so, so they must be lying? its propoganda
(i agree, of course it is) but that doesn't mean it must be
100% lies

bill hicks: iraq has certainly NOT "complied with every
demand"

and what do you mean no country on earth poses a threat to
the U.S.?
apparently, terrorist organizations that are supported by
various governments do

and yes, of course nobody poses a threat to the EXISTANCE of
the US... nobodys claiming that theres a risk of the US
being wiped off the face of the earth... that doesn't mean
theres "no risk period", and no concern or issue

do you people who have strong opinions on this topic ever
bother to know both sides? do you bother to ALSO regularly
check out journals/publications that AREN'T left wing anti
american? maybe even ones that have a *gasp* right wing or
pro american or even pro-war stance?

im NOT saying they're right, but if youre not even
acknowleging the other HALF of the information available on
the issue (since non of us can personally inspect iraq, or
are global defense analysts)... you would be putting your
decision making at a huge disadvantage thats all

it seems incredibly arrogant to base your entire opinion on
ONE side's propoganda

im not saying you ppl personally, i dont know any of you

BUT: in my experience most ppl with strong opinions on the
matter dont know wtf they're talking about, whether they're
for or against any issue, especially one as emotionally
charged as war

im sick of hearing the same propoganda regurgitated again
and again that you can find on the FIRST FUCKING PAGE of
search results on yahoo

how bout some debth, or bredth of info and ideas to support
your strong opinion?

how bout some constructive ideas instead of over-simplified,
intellectually hollow generalizations like "americans want
SUV maaaan! its all about oil maaaaaan!" or teh good old
making fun of bush strategy "look how stupid he is! the
entire


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-02-05 15:10 [#00542437]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular




how bout some constructive ideas instead of over-simplified,
intellectually hollow generalizations like "americans want
SUV maaaan! its all about oil maaaaaan!" or teh good old
making fun of bush strategy "look how stupid he is! the
entire american defense establishment, plust the countless
others, must all be as moronic as him!"

....what if you didn't happen to have such a stupid
president?
damn, that would be pretty inconvenient to the anti-american
media wouldn't it...

we all know that oil is very important to the US and oil
companies are very powerful.... does that mean that threats
from nations or groups associated witih oil must be PURELY
fictional, any security concerns PURELY contrived
propoganda??

of course they are!
look how stupid bush is!

people with loud opinions without knowing their shit just
annoys me thats all..... even if they they HAPPEN to be
right

.....of course im not talking about you guys in particular,
i hope i didn't sound that way


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-02-05 15:12 [#00542440]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular



...but yeah, it would be nice if we weren't going to war,
but i have a funny feeling its going to happen no matter
what lol


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2003-02-05 15:14 [#00542442]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



you got it all wrong
nice try though

honestly, keep bitching
maybe they will listen to you

for now, just hush

cause your opinion means ____


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-02-05 15:18 [#00542446]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular | Followup to elusive: #00542442



ouch


 

offline danbrusca from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2003-02-05 15:38 [#00542457]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker | Followup to bill_hicks: #00541453



"saddam has complied with every request that the UN have
made."

You're surely taking the piss?


 

offline xian_ecci from los angeles on 2003-02-05 16:33 [#00542544]
Points: 251 Status: Regular | Followup to bill_hicks: #00541453



hicks, i am sincerely interested:
please ckeck all that apply:

o the WTC I, II, & USS Cole bombings were conjured up by
the US government to incite hstility towards the Arab
world.
o Saddam Hussein is not a dictator that invaded Kuwait
(or was put up to it by the US.
o The US. is actually an aggressor to numerous countries,
killing thousands undocumented, because our press is really
not free at all but run completely by the government.
o Bush is on a holy quest to destroy Islam.
o Democracy is a hoax that the common man is debilitated
by-- we are all enslaved by rulers.
o Our government and our people contribute money and
supplies to impovershed countries only in order to overcome
their people and strip them of their heritage.
o America does not really allow immigrants into this
country except to use for cheap labor. There really is no
diversity, and various ideas are not accepted.
o Our imagery of weaponry will ineviatbly be manipulated
to bring truth to any claims they make.
o Next to your piano, you have your own satelittes and
reconnissance equipment monitoring 24 hours a day to surmise
any threats to the world.

i don't want to put words in your mouth.



 

offline ecnadniarb on 2003-02-05 16:52 [#00542560]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



I think the reason Bush hates Saddam so much is because they
are very similar in their goals, objectives and
personalities. Only difference is Saddam is more
intelligent than Bush.


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2003-02-05 16:53 [#00542561]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



xian you are funny.
not.
where are you from?


 

offline Cfern from Sacto (United States) on 2003-02-05 17:00 [#00542573]
Points: 1384 Status: Lurker



"no country on earth poses a threat to
the U.S.?"

uh how bout that one time when 3000 people were killed when
new york was attacked on sept. 11th...
america has a right to defend it's self.... whats so
great about saddam? the guy has been murdering his
civilians for years... he is the one causing the sactions
not the the us.... if he would just step down then his
people would have much less suffereing

yes there will be a war yes there will be civilian
casualties.... when has there been a war without civilan
casualties? never...

just because you've got a latte, dsl and american idol.....
that doesn't mean you can have a war with civilian
causalites..

and finnally saddam is giving the families of all the
sucide bombers in isreal money... this is reason alone to
stop him



 

offline xian_ecci from los angeles on 2003-02-05 17:01 [#00542574]
Points: 251 Status: Regular | Followup to elusive: #00542561



NYC, currently LA via virginia.

sorry i couldn't get my humour up.
should we get back to music?


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2003-02-05 17:06 [#00542582]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



uh how bout that one time when 3000 people were killed when

new york was attacked on sept. 11th...

oh yes, the al-queda organnisation was responsible, an
organisation bankrolled by the US during the cold war, to
drive the Russians out of Afghanistan, with the promise of
helping to rebuild if they were successful. They did it,
the US turned it's back.

"whats so
great about saddam? the guy has been murdering his
civilians for years..."

So you think it is about time that Bush had a go at
murdering innocent civilians instead?

"yes there will be a war yes there will be civilian
casualties.... when has there been a war without civilan
casualties? never... "

It is not a war any more than the attack on the WTC can be
classed as a war. It is an agressive attack by a hostile
nation.

"and finnally saddam is giving the families of all the
sucide bombers in isreal money... this is reason alone to
stop him"

Why? Is it the families fault? And don't be foolish enough
to think there haven't been US funded killings on foreign
soil...



 

offline xian_ecci from los angeles on 2003-02-05 17:15 [#00542592]
Points: 251 Status: Regular | Followup to ecnadniarb: #00542582



'So you think it is about time that Bush had a go at
murdering innocent civilians instead?'

what innocent civilian has he murdered?

as much of a Donkey Bush might be, do you really think his
drive is to kill Iraqi civilians?

'It is not a war any more than the attack on the WTC can be

classed as a war. It is an agressive attack by a hostile
nation.'

you can call it what you want. we all have visions of a
peaceful world, and are frustrated because it does not
exist.
remaining a threat is as much a burden as it is such a
priviledge.

'And don't be foolish enough
to think there haven't been US funded killings on foreign
soil... '

it's possible-- can you tell us about any?

then it's also possible these actions were done in stead of
killing civilians.



 

offline ecnadniarb on 2003-02-05 17:20 [#00542599]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Innocent civilians will die in the event of an attack on
Iraq.

I still don't think you can call it a war. The US stance
isn't even accepted by the United Nations. The US are
trying to bully support. If they want the oil they should
just say they want the oil. None of this weapons of mass
destruction shit when they aren't doing anything about
Isreal or Korea, both more active risks than Iraq has been
in the past decade.


 

offline danbrusca from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2003-02-05 17:21 [#00542602]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker



Up until today I had been pretty much against going to war
in Iraq, but have to admit I've been swayed the other way by
Colin Powell.

It seems there's lots of evidence saying that Iraq is hiding
things. True, a lot of it seems circumstantial, but the
volume of it is piling up. You have to look at the balance
of probabilities. Is it more likely that Iraq's telling the
truth and that all this evidence is made-up, incorrect,
taken out of context etc, or is a regime with a long history
of deception simply staying true to form?

If Iraq has destroyed all these weapons, why are they no
written records? Why are their no witnesses? Chemical
weapons don't simply walk out into the desert and quietly
self-destruct of their own accord...

If Iraq is hiding them, it must want them really bad. The
question is, what does it want them for? Do we wait until it
uses them (again) before we do anything?

Anyway, the debate about whether or not we go to war seems
pretty much redundant now. Right or wrong, our troops will
probably be going in soon enough and we should all be behind
them.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2003-02-05 17:24 [#00542606]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



heh, You could have applied that 'evidence' to the Pope
opening up a string of mobile peadomobiles for Catholic
priests to indulge themselves.


 

offline Refund from Melbourne (Australia) on 2003-02-05 17:27 [#00542614]
Points: 7824 Status: Lurker



"if you want peace you must prepare for war"

bush is taking this quote a bit too seriously


 

offline xian_ecci from los angeles on 2003-02-05 17:36 [#00542634]
Points: 251 Status: Regular | Followup to danbrusca: #00542602



'Anyway, the debate about whether or not we go to war seems

pretty much redundant now. Right or wrong, our troops will
probably be going in soon enough and we should all be behind

them. '

Blind faith is not the point. The point is you can argue it
freely, and have a public opinion.
I'm against military action. And public opinion is the only
thing that's kept Rumsfeld and the cabinet from pushing on
earlier. Personally, I think it's a step in the right
direction that the UN has deliberated like this, however
economically/ strategically-jaded they may be. It is
unprecedented.

Flag waving is crap. But idealism in of itself is just as
futile.


 

offline steve mcqueen from caerdydd (United Kingdom) on 2003-02-05 17:40 [#00542644]
Points: 6574 Status: Addict



why is this thread called "a cataclysmic flaw in logic"?


 

offline xian_ecci from los angeles on 2003-02-05 17:46 [#00542655]
Points: 251 Status: Regular | Followup to steve mcqueen: #00542644



come on- you're steve mcqueen.
play your part.


 

offline TonePu5her from lincoln !UK! (United Kingdom) on 2003-02-05 18:00 [#00542665]
Points: 3640 Status: Regular



Either way people are going to die.

Make love not war.


 


Messageboard index