How much AFX stuff is good? | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (4)
recycle
Hyperflake
dariusgriffin
DADONCK
...and 335 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614353
Today 74
Topics 127559
  
 
Messageboard index
How much AFX stuff is good?
 

offline TokyoJo from London now, not Tokyo anymore on 2003-02-02 00:55 [#00537295]
Points: 615 Status: Lurker



Just something I was thinking about earlier..

The best Aphex stuff is truly amazing, I think everyone here
would agree. At his best he is in a different ball park,
different game and different stratosphere to most other
musicians out there..

But lets be honest a lot of stuff he has put out is not
really all that great.. there are a lot of mediocre filler
tracks (to avoid an argument I wont say which ones I think
are mediocre). But for sure not all his stuff is amazing...

Anyway, thinking about this got me thinking about how he
says that he has hundreds of records of unreleased stuff,
and doesnt put out his best tunes etc etc..

I reckon the vast majority of what he makes is probably
quite average and it is only very occasionaly that the
lightening strikes and something really inspired and amazing
comes out...

All his bullshit is probably becuase basically he is afraid
he wont be able to top what he has done before, and if he
really did release loads more stuff, most of us would be
sorely dissapointed..

I dont feel strongly about this, just something I been
thinkin' about lately.

Anyone have any opinions..?


 

offline Dolleater from Afrika Bambaataa on 2003-02-02 01:01 [#00537320]
Points: 4819 Status: Addict



Maybe he wants to avoid overkill. So as to not jade us in
the future. Though I wouldnt mind if he released lots of
crap. When he does finally release one of those dope tracks,
it wont matter to me how much crap came before it. I do
agree that he has made some mediocre records. Universal
Indicator Red really didnt stand out as most Afx tracks
usually do.


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2003-02-02 01:05 [#00537329]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



there are several things about AFX that Im not sure i buy...


 

offline TokyoJo from London now, not Tokyo anymore on 2003-02-02 01:11 [#00537339]
Points: 615 Status: Lurker




I dont think he is afraid of jading us or whatever - I dont
think he really gives a fuck about who listens or not - I
think he just doesnt have the tracks..

Like why didnt he release Melodies From Mars or Analogue
Bubblebath 5?

Because, basically, they have their moments but
fundamentally they are not all that good, and he went
through all the motions of making them and getting ready for
release, then realised just before release they were not
good enough.

I have read interviews where he says he doesnt release his
best stuff for fear of being copied. Maybe he just doesnt
really have that much great stuff?


 

offline Spookyluke from United States on 2003-02-02 01:12 [#00537340]
Points: 1955 Status: Lurker



I don't believe anything about him having so many extra
tracks, just as I didn't believe Trent Reznor when he said
he had enough material for a third disc on the fragile. :)

but I think APhex is great--I think a lot of the tracks have
different charms. Maybe some are too ambient for your
tastes, or maybe they have too many layers and such rapid
tempos that it doens't appeal to you? maybe the beats
aren't steady enough. who knows? but the point is, there
are plenty of great afx songs out there--I'd say I like 92%
of his work.

Other proof that he probably doesn't have unreleased stuff:
melodies from mars and abb5 weren't released but somehow we
all have them. :)



 

offline Dolleater from Afrika Bambaataa on 2003-02-02 01:17 [#00537350]
Points: 4819 Status: Addict



AB5 and Mfm were projects that he haulted during the final
stages before releasing it. Im thinking he must have tons of
old tapes and mp3 of songs he felt he needed to keep to
himself for one reason or another.


 

offline Dolleater from Afrika Bambaataa on 2003-02-02 01:20 [#00537355]
Points: 4819 Status: Addict | Followup to TokyoJo: #00537339



I didnt read your post in time :D As far as him holding out
on his "best stuff". Who fucking knows.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2003-02-02 01:23 [#00537361]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to Spookyluke: #00537340



that's sounds a little off to me. most people who make
electronic music are likely going to have tracks, finished
and unfinished, that just don't please and aren't released.


 

offline Spookyluke from United States on 2003-02-02 01:43 [#00537386]
Points: 1955 Status: Lurker



Of course he has unreleased tracks, but I don't think
they're the best of his work. Why would he have a 5 year
hiatus? because he was making good tracks? and then he
releases something like Drukqs (which I like) and says that
he has good tracks too but didn't want to put them out?


 

offline Dolleater from Afrika Bambaataa on 2003-02-02 01:46 [#00537391]
Points: 4819 Status: Addict



Maybe hes reserving them for future Rephlex realeses. Why
would you put out your best work just for the sould purpose
of breaking off a contract.


 

offline Spookyluke from United States on 2003-02-02 01:48 [#00537392]
Points: 1955 Status: Lurker



I just don't think he's sitting on a goldmine of unused
tracks. He's definitely got some fantastic tunes stashed
away, but i don't think he'd keep them unreleased.


 

offline surrounded from it won't be hard anymore to li on 2003-02-02 01:53 [#00537400]
Points: 3787 Status: Regular



No i believe him. I think he really does have tapes full of
brilliant tracks that are unreleased.

I once read an article about warp's 10th anniversary, and
one of those warp-people also said so. "He litterally has
hundreds of unreleased tapes. And the label will say '3
months in 1998' or something like that. And it's full of
brillant tracks trust me! Windowlicker was also just
something old that he still had lying around."

Well... i don't know, maybe that guy just wanted to help
create a myth. But that's what he said and i believe it... i
want to believe it ;-)


 

offline Spookyluke from United States on 2003-02-02 01:54 [#00537401]
Points: 1955 Status: Lurker



I don't ;)
I like to think I'm not missing out :D


 

offline flea from depths of your mind (New Zealand) on 2003-02-02 02:00 [#00537406]
Points: 9083 Status: Regular



I kind of disagree..I think it's a matter of personal
taste..one man's filler is another man's gem..and vice
versa..I mean so many here consider SAWII to be a work of
genius..me I see it as a wholelotta filler with maybe two
redeemable tracks.....same goes for Mike and Rich...on the
other hand..a lot of people here diss..Classics....Caustic
Window..AB3...Ventolins..and that just leaves me dumbfounded


 

offline surrounded from it won't be hard anymore to li on 2003-02-02 02:03 [#00537412]
Points: 3787 Status: Regular | Followup to flea: #00537406



"one man's filler is another man's gem"

true! I couldn't even name one track that everyone
either hates or loves.


 

offline Spookyluke from United States on 2003-02-02 02:05 [#00537415]
Points: 1955 Status: Lurker | Followup to flea: #00537406



The thing with that stuff is I like some mellow stuff; but
mostly I like the in your face kinda stuff.
So I can see it from both sides. Some of my favorite aphex
tracks are from classics :D
flaphead is pure gold!


 

offline Spookyluke from United States on 2003-02-02 02:05 [#00537416]
Points: 1955 Status: Lurker | Followup to surrounded: #00537412



Ventolin! :D


 

offline surrounded from it won't be hard anymore to li on 2003-02-02 02:09 [#00537421]
Points: 3787 Status: Regular | Followup to Spookyluke: #00537416



well i love it, but i'm sure i'd be able to find someone
here who hates that song ;-)


 

offline Spookyluke from United States on 2003-02-02 02:11 [#00537424]
Points: 1955 Status: Lurker



Oh--i thought you meant a song that everyone would feel
either strongly for OR strongly against ;)

I love it :D
Brilliant track.
COme on you slags isn't my cup of tea, though.


 

offline flea from depths of your mind (New Zealand) on 2003-02-02 02:13 [#00537425]
Points: 9083 Status: Regular | Followup to surrounded: #00537412



exactly I mean my pick of the tracks from his CDs makes
every one go wha?

for example on Windowlicker my favourite track is Equation
on Come to Daddy it's Funny Little Man and Bucephelous
Bouncing Ball
on RDJA its Peek 824545801 and Yellow Calx..on ICBYD its
Ventolin and ICCT Hedral

I mean most of the time I just listen to the albums as one
flowing continuing whole and each track is an essential
piece of the puzzle..as far as I am concerned..the albums I
love..I love..no fillers for me..


 

offline nacmat on 2003-02-02 04:26 [#00537511]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker



its true that somethings are not even average... I mean,
compare gak, or bradley´s robot with other things released
by other electronic artists in those years...

gak is 1994?
compare it with bluff limbo (uziq)
or with diversions ep (orbital)
or many many other better releases of 1994

I am not saying it is bad... but, in 1996 what is better
than RDJ album?? nothing, or at least for me, nothing tops
the level of that release (all over the electronic releases
of that year that I know)

thats the difference... many things where better than
bradley´s robot in that year

get me?



 

offline nacmat on 2003-02-02 05:41 [#00537551]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker



for me the next releases are under the average quality of
the electronic releases of their years.

Power-Pill - PAC-MAN
GAK - GAK
Bradley Strider - Bradley's Beat
Bradley Strider - Bradley's Robot


 

offline nacmat on 2003-02-02 05:41 [#00537554]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker



I like them... and sometimes enjoy them, but I think muche
better things were done those days


 

offline revpersona from Plainfield (United States) on 2003-02-02 14:14 [#00538027]
Points: 3167 Status: Lurker | Followup to nacmat: #00537511



Orbital's 'In-Sides' tops RDJ album IMO. It was also
released in 96'.


 

offline nacmat on 2003-02-02 18:35 [#00538234]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker | Followup to revpersona: #00538027



well does a matter of taste... anyway we are talking about
two masterpieces...

bradleys robot is from 96 too... is it on that level??

of course not


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2003-02-02 21:26 [#00538353]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Yeah, I think he's a bit inconsistent. Some really weak
efforts that you don't get with Autechre or Tom or some
others... but a nice large amount of really brilliant stuff,
too. His worst stuff seems to come out under aliases OTHER
than ''Aphex Twin'', which is good...

As for the ''he hasn't released his truly GREAT tracks'', I
think that's bullshit, personally. Why any artist would NOT
want to release their best stuff is just perplexing... must
be either a pisstake or a quote taken out of context, I just
can't believe he'd do THAT.


 


Messageboard index