snarfu isln't not snarfu | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
big
Monoid
...and 273 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613477
Today 3
Topics 127503
  
 
Messageboard index
snarfu isln't not snarfu
 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-08-19 20:39 [#00356096]
Points: 21427 Status: Regular



I don't understand why certain people can be so into music,
yet against progression. Look at this:

http://pitchforkmedia.com/record-reviews/v/vonschirach_otto
/8000-bc.shtml

Here's someone with enough "credibility" to have their
review published in a site with a lot of hits. Why does this
person care about music if they're going to give 8000 bc a
5.2??? Oh, ok, let's devolve and see how many MORE
combinations of sounds based on big clumsy units grouped in
8's can be made. If that's your goal, you only need a
handful of songs to meet your needs.


 

offline flea from depths of your mind (New Zealand) on 2002-08-19 21:43 [#00356242]
Points: 9083 Status: Regular



hmm..he is talking about the tracks being
indistinguishable..classic knee jerk reaction of one who
obviously doesnt listen to this style..

*shrugs*

who cares..the review exudes enough gobsmacked
bewilderedness to motivate a listen from those curious
enough about it


 

offline flea from depths of your mind (New Zealand) on 2002-08-19 21:56 [#00356253]
Points: 9083 Status: Regular | Followup to flea: #00356242



hmm..my bad..I just read the review to Escal Frio by the
same reviewer..he hates it even more..but he seems to know
his genre..but once again.his NEGATIVE review of that album
has me very interested in Escalo Frio


 


Messageboard index