the warmth of saw85-92 | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
Monoid
...and 290 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613477
Today 3
Topics 127503
  
 
Messageboard index
the warmth of saw85-92
 

offline spintriae from United States on 2002-08-16 23:22 [#00353066]
Points: 13 Status: Lurker



when i hear the endless, futile debate of analog vs.
digital in music, it never fails to come to mind that aphex
for one has openly gone strictly digital for some of his
greatest material. among the best electronic music ever
created, if not the best of just about any genre alive in
the digital age. so it's apparent that it's the man that
makes the machine. but the more i listen to some of
richard's earlier material, it's becoming incresingly clear
that there is indeed a warmth and beauty about analog that
digital can't match. and it's quite infectious. even the
cheesiest dance music with that sound and feel rarely fails
to turn me on.

i'm really curious as to what equipment was used on
saw85-92. that album is so fucking beautiful. a little
complex in terms of technique like most of richard's work,
but not so much in the vein of instrumentation. i can hear a
lot of the same drum and synth patches throughout, but
rightly so as they feel so appropriate. i'd love to know
what this kid was playing with.


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-08-16 23:23 [#00353070]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker



hold me, spintriae


 

offline phiz from Liverpool (United Kingdom) on 2002-08-16 23:25 [#00353072]
Points: 2622 Status: Lurker



deffinately, you can hear and feel the old synth sounds on
the early stuff, the old machines when pushed can create
some lovely sounds, i've got a roland cr8000 drum machine
that gives some great beats that digital drums can't match.


 

offline spintriae from United States on 2002-08-16 23:28 [#00353076]
Points: 13 Status: Lurker



*grabs titsworth's cock*


 

offline USACID from Death Valley (Zambia) on 2002-08-17 05:00 [#00353642]
Points: 788 Status: Lurker



damn how can u hear warmth with all the tape noise??????? i
think rich should re-edit, release AB3&4, SAW, Classics,
everything pre-i care b/c u do


 

offline USACID from Death Valley (Zambia) on 2002-08-17 05:02 [#00353644]
Points: 788 Status: Lurker



i mean i like the analog sound don't get me wrong, but the
tape hiss from the early aphex kills my ears!!!!!!!!!!!!


 

offline zaphod from the metaverse on 2002-08-17 05:05 [#00353646]
Points: 4428 Status: Addict | Followup to USACID: #00353644



nah man, the tape hiss and bad sound quality adds to the
warmth. especially on xtal. it sort of smudges the music,
but this is a good thing in the case of ambient works.


 

offline princo from Shitty City (Geelong) (Australia) on 2002-08-17 05:06 [#00353647]
Points: 13411 Status: Lurker | Followup to USACID: #00353644



i love it, it has character :)


 

offline zaphod from the metaverse on 2002-08-17 05:06 [#00353648]
Points: 4428 Status: Addict | Followup to princo: #00353647



exactly. thats what makes this album sound so unlike any
other.


 

offline princo from Shitty City (Geelong) (Australia) on 2002-08-17 05:09 [#00353654]
Points: 13411 Status: Lurker



yeah, its suppose to be of his earliest works, capturing RDJ
at the beginning...

there not ment to be re-edited. that would be cheating! ;)



 

offline spintriae from United States on 2002-08-17 09:00 [#00353827]
Points: 13 Status: Lurker



the tape hiss is great. it's very atmospearic. i listen to a
lot of lo-fi indie rock and it's inspired me as a musician
not to spend so much time on a crystal clear track.

zaphod had a great point about xtal. the machines sound like
they're breathing. then kicks in the pulse. the less than
perfect mixing job makes each individual sound more subtle
for the better of the song as a whole.


 

offline diablo on 2002-08-17 11:18 [#00353864]
Points: 3242 Status: Lurker



I agree the tape hiss is fine, it sounds dusty and
atmospheric. I read an interview with him years ago and he
was saying why bother with expensive filters when you can
just trim the top end and stick on loads of reverb! (thats
kinda punk)

It sounds to me like lots of Roland 808 / 909 (drums) and
obviously the 303 but I dunno about the rest.

(obviously he can afford those expensive filters now!)


 

offline The_Funkmaster from St. John's (Canada) on 2002-08-17 21:50 [#00354134]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker | Followup to spintriae: #00353076



"*grabs titsworth's cock*"

hey, you're gonna fit right in here... welcome!! :)



 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-08-17 22:04 [#00354142]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker



hey hey, there's enough for me to go around fellas


 

offline The_Funkmaster from St. John's (Canada) on 2002-08-17 22:09 [#00354145]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker



*Grabs titsworth cock*

Damn man, there's still a good two feet left...


 

offline Darth manchu from Cambridge (United Kingdom) on 2002-08-17 23:12 [#00354179]
Points: 1897 Status: Regular



I find the earlier stuff a little hit and miss, esp on ab3.


While there is the undesputed warmth of the tracks due to
the means of recording, they can been seen as a little dull
occasionally. Not to detriment the classics, (most of saw1,
a few tracks off ab3 inc. 11, and AB itself) but there is a
lot of simple, 4/4 kicks and formulaic 303 baselines.


 


Messageboard index