Propagandhi | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
dariusgriffin
...and 277 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613461
Today 4
Topics 127500
  
 
Messageboard index
Propagandhi
 

offline roygbivcore from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2002-06-10 06:01 [#00257973]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker



Is this some real fuckin punk rock or what?!
HUH?! HUH?!?!


 

offline Spookyluke from United States on 2002-06-10 06:02 [#00257976]
Points: 1955 Status: Lurker



Is some real fuckin' something that's for sure. ;)


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-06-10 06:05 [#00257981]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker



ugh i'll stick with the clash, TSOL, and joy division,
THANKS


 

offline Spookyluke from United States on 2002-06-10 06:10 [#00257987]
Points: 1955 Status: Lurker



Joy Division aren't punk. :(
Ian Curtis rocked (at least with only a few exceptions)! :)


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-06-10 06:12 [#00257990]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker



different sort of punk, obviously nothing like propagandhi


 

offline Spookyluke from United States on 2002-06-10 06:14 [#00257993]
Points: 1955 Status: Lurker



Yah, phew!
I hate all that pansy punk. "Closer" is a record that
defies all categorization as anything other than Joy
Division at their best!


 

offline roygbivcore from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2002-06-10 06:16 [#00257996]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker



dude, propagandhi is one of the few bands around that isn't
"pansy punk" they'll fuckin whoop your ass, download fuck
the border and yuou'll be like "oh shit, i'm wrong, i'm a
big DUMMY!!!!"


 

offline Spookyluke from United States on 2002-06-10 06:19 [#00257999]
Points: 1955 Status: Lurker



No, I will not be like, "oh shit, I'm wrong; I'm a big
dummy!" They're not good--no talent hacks!


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-06-10 06:24 [#00258005]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker



sorry but 90s punk is a major insult to my intelligence,
with the exception of goldfinger and reel big fish because i
like their melodies and funny lyrics :)


 

offline sine707 from Frankfurt (Germany) on 2002-06-10 10:07 [#00258150]
Points: 1285 Status: Regular



"How To Clean Everything" by Propagandhi beats all NOFX
releases in general IMO. It's an awesome album.


 

offline aron from saskatoon (Canada) on 2002-06-10 15:40 [#00258354]
Points: 3756 Status: Lurker



yeah, nofx and propagandhi are 2 of my favorite punk bands!
'today's empires, tomorrow's ashes' is a wicked album!


 

offline The_Funkmaster from St. John's (Canada) on 2002-06-10 15:44 [#00258359]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker



there is really way too much talk here about punk... don't
you all know that punk sucks?


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-06-10 20:50 [#00258799]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker



the punk etho is integral to the electronic movement

but punk music from the early 90s on out has been awful, i
must say. i do like nofx tho, at least their early and mid
career albums/songs.


 

offline roygbivcore from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2002-06-11 05:00 [#00259540]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker



wait wait wait
goldfinger and reel big fish AREN'T insults to your
intelligence? they're terrible!


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-06-11 05:16 [#00259559]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker



they're amusing and catchy, i haven't listened to them in
several years but i've always hated other punk bands besides
them and nofx. the rest just aren't as interesting. they
just copy each other.


 

offline dave from saskatoon (Canada) on 2002-06-11 05:50 [#00259616]
Points: 1135 Status: Regular



man i still think nofx is the bsest fucking punk band
around
Propagandhi is really good too but i think nofx is the best
because they dont care about money and shit



 

offline Spookyluke from United States on 2002-06-11 05:57 [#00259629]
Points: 1955 Status: Lurker



pfft. There's nobody who doesn't care about money--anyone
who claims not to care about money doesn't know what they're
talking about. Money is essential to living. It's
impossible not to care about money.


 

offline dave from saskatoon (Canada) on 2002-06-11 06:03 [#00259640]
Points: 1135 Status: Regular



well they turned down like a 40 thousand dollar record deal
with virgin or somthing because they dident want to go
mainstream


 

offline The_Funkmaster from St. John's (Canada) on 2002-06-11 06:04 [#00259643]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker | Followup to dave: #00259616



heh, I love that picture!!! :)

BUT, punk still sucks!!! :)


 

offline Spookyluke from United States on 2002-06-11 06:06 [#00259647]
Points: 1955 Status: Lurker



Yah, but if they accepted it, they would have lost their
"underground" appeal and thus more money.

Punk is completely lame--terrible songs, cliched beats, two
chords. Not to mention the completely terrible lyrics!


 

offline The_Funkmaster from St. John's (Canada) on 2002-06-11 06:06 [#00259649]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker | Followup to dave: #00259640



well that's pretty stupid... why would signing a deal with a
big record label make you mainstream? If you have control
over what is being written you write what you want to
write... and, if you did have a big label putting more
promotion behind you, isn't that a good thing? You know,
trying to get the music out to as many people as possible...
I understand all the stuff about credibility and shit, but
still...


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-06-11 06:22 [#00259685]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to The_Funkmaster: #00259649



but you lose control over what is (and isn't) released, just
ask the last emperor and a million other underground rappers
(and rockers) who mistakenly signed with a major only to
never see their new material ever released.


 


Messageboard index