Gap between pros and amatures | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 195 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613460
Today 3
Topics 127500
  
 
Messageboard index
Gap between pros and amatures
 

offline Laserbeak from Netherlands, The on 2002-05-30 18:47 [#00242931]
Points: 2670 Status: Lurker



What do you think of the gap between the level of amatures
and professional musicmakers? Do you still think there's
still much difference? And what do you think will happen
with this gap in the future?


 

offline Amonbrune from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-05-30 18:51 [#00242936]
Points: 7327 Status: Addict



This gap will always give way to the pros. Say in like 15
years, the gap will have gone on pretty much to
professionals. And then during their time there will be
another gap. I think it will go on and on...always giving
way to professionals...and learning.


 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2002-05-30 18:52 [#00242940]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular



this can't really apply to a music genre where an artist can
release a track they made when they were like 9 messing
around with a keyboard they found in a junkyard


 

offline Amonbrune from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-05-30 18:53 [#00242941]
Points: 7327 Status: Addict



I bet they could if they used their new knowledge and
screwed up past stuff. I think that would be a very
interesting conceptual peice for a cd.


 

offline Co-existence from Bergen (Norway) on 2002-05-30 19:00 [#00242944]
Points: 3388 Status: Regular



So how to define "professional musician"? Record contract?
Living off what one makes of the music? Hey, I'm confused
here?!?


 

offline Laserbeak from Netherlands, The on 2002-05-30 19:04 [#00242946]
Points: 2670 Status: Lurker | Followup to Co-existence: #00242944



Professional = someone who makes money out of what they're
doing(music)

Amature = someone who makes music for fun and doesn't get
payed for it(puts it for free on the internet)


 

offline DirtyPriest from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2002-05-30 19:06 [#00242949]
Points: 5499 Status: Lurker



Discipline and practise.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-05-30 19:08 [#00242950]
Points: 24578 Status: Lurker



which made van gogh an amateur painter - shows the inanity
of having such distinctions -


 

offline Laserbeak from Netherlands, The on 2002-05-30 19:16 [#00242955]
Points: 2670 Status: Lurker | Followup to marlowe: #00242950



But what about the technological aspect? In the old days
only professionals could afford a synth. Amatures didn't
have as much freedom as they have now...


 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2002-05-30 19:22 [#00242966]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular | Followup to Laserbeak: #00242955



that's why the gap between amateur and pro is getting
smaller. it's becoming easier to duplicate the music you
listen to.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-05-30 19:35 [#00242975]
Points: 24578 Status: Lurker



i didn't realise beethoven used a synthesizer


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-05-30 19:36 [#00242976]
Points: 24578 Status: Lurker



if the distinction between an amateur and a professional is
whether an A'n'R man decides you're marketable, then it
ain't a distinction i'm willing to recognise


 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2002-05-30 19:40 [#00242980]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular



well said, marlowe!


 

offline Amonbrune from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-05-30 19:52 [#00242985]
Points: 7327 Status: Addict



Marlowe: I would consider van gogh a professional.


 

offline Amonbrune from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-05-30 19:54 [#00242987]
Points: 7327 Status: Addict



Professional = someone who has mastered their art and can
without any help realize their vision or what they want to
acheive efficiently and effectivly.



 

offline Amonbrune from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-05-30 19:55 [#00242988]
Points: 7327 Status: Addict



and also get paid for it


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-05-30 20:04 [#00242997]
Points: 24578 Status: Lurker



well, van gogh never got paid for his art, so he wasn't
technically a professional - i am not disagreeing with you
that he was a master-- he's one of my favourite artists ---
personally, i think the term professional is putrid and
comes with a nasty stigma -- reminds me of white shirts,
arrogant personalities, and a sociopathic obsession with
money -- but that's just me i guess


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2002-05-30 20:54 [#00243064]
Points: 11005 Status: Regular



Well well, you have to have a good understanding of the
technology first, and of course talent, theres lots of
shitty electronic music out there especially on those MP3
PORTALS.



 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-05-30 21:01 [#00243071]
Points: 24578 Status: Lurker | Followup to Monoid: #00243064



monoid - you are narrowing the definition of music-maker
there, are you not? not all music-makers make electronic
music, shocking as that may seem...

and whats this about talent? i would say there were
'professionals' with little talent, and 'amateurs' with
immense talent - so i believe talent should not be included
in the comparison....


 

offline nanotech from Sukavasti Amitaba Pureland (United States) on 2002-05-30 21:03 [#00243072]
Points: 3727 Status: Regular



heh, the gap between pro's and amatures is mu-ziq
records...almost all the stuff on that label falls into this
void.


 

offline license from out of nowhere on 2002-05-30 21:08 [#00243075]
Points: 865 Status: Lurker



I think what we're talking about is rather the distinction
between the "dilettante" and the "master".
I don't consider money in my evaluation of art or the artist
that create it.
then again, I think that we have a tendency to polarise -
these are two extremes, and it's easy (and quite dangerous)
to fall into black and white thinking.
most of the artists I enjoy I consider neither dilletantes
or masters, just artists.
it's all about art to me.


 

offline Laserbeak from Netherlands, The on 2002-05-30 21:21 [#00243099]
Points: 2670 Status: Lurker



Shit I wrote amateurs as amatures
sorry for that
And I don't mean anything negative by the word "gap". "gap"
is the only the general difference. What it was, what it is
now and what it will be...

something to add: amateurs have more room for
experimentation since they can afford to take risks.


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-05-30 21:41 [#00243141]
Points: 21423 Status: Regular



computers are getting better at doing what they do, it would
be very hard to create autechre tracks in the days of kings
quest 1.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-05-30 21:52 [#00243174]
Points: 24578 Status: Lurker | Followup to w M w: #00243141



no shit


 

offline ouchbot on 2002-05-30 22:01 [#00243197]
Points: 91 Status: Regular



The Gaps shrinking. Some experimental amatuers are making
better music than experimental PROFESSIONALS. Mainly
because professionals think in terms in terms of machines
that cost thousands, while amateurs hunt and scour and
investigate and use anything they can lay their hands on.
There's some amazing VST plugin out for free that would be
too beneath the professional, and they they sometimes
surpass the lates whizbang tool, in extracting strange ,
beautiful and complex tones out of the computers.

Most amateur pop and hiphopsters are making better music
than TOP40 shit.


 

offline license from out of nowhere on 2002-05-31 01:46 [#00243429]
Points: 865 Status: Lurker



in my opinion, it's more about taste than skill
anymore.


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2002-05-31 03:10 [#00243486]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to license: #00243429



Exactly, anyone can replicate Ae or Aphex templates,
especially with software that is made to emulate their
'sound'. Why people are 'sucessfull' is because they do
what they feel, Confield is brave, whether you think it is
shit or not. Make music for youself, copying is good to
learn technique but please don't ask for praise.....


 


Messageboard index