The Nature Of Death | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
dariusgriffin
...and 88 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613457
Today 3
Topics 127500
  
 
Messageboard index
The Nature Of Death
 

offline Zen Storm from St. Charles (United States) on 2002-04-26 19:36 [#00195629]
Points: 1044 Status: Lurker



What I always have found as weird is the fact that during
man's ealiest roots, if you died, you were just left there.
No one cared, there was no emotion toward death, everything
just moved on. Scienctists found the earliest signs of
funerals, where tribes left flowers where people in their
tribe had died. It was the beginnings of sadness.


 

offline Cabbog from Chautauqua (United States) on 2002-04-26 19:38 [#00195630]
Points: 2294 Status: Regular



Hmmm..


 

offline Zen Storm from St. Charles (United States) on 2002-04-26 19:39 [#00195631]
Points: 1044 Status: Lurker



yes yes


 

offline Cabbog from Chautauqua (United States) on 2002-04-26 19:42 [#00195634]
Points: 2294 Status: Regular



How do they know there was no emotion towards death?


 

offline Zen Storm from St. Charles (United States) on 2002-04-26 19:47 [#00195637]
Points: 1044 Status: Lurker



bodies were found on randomly scattered amonf the land,
sometimes even used as bait to lourer other animals in for
the kill. There was no bond between people due to lack of
language, but eventually people were burried, and graves
were created


 

offline smokehammer from Saigon (Vietnam) on 2002-04-26 20:09 [#00195645]
Points: 1463 Status: Lurker



emotional purpose and social function were important then...
everyone had a role.
Elders walked off into the wilderness and were never seen
again.

Now many people serve no purpose to anybody or anything,
except to consume..consume..consume...

Burial was, i believe initially, a way of preventing disease
and the nuisance of vermin, the ceremony thing was much
later... hmmm



 

offline Zen Storm from St. Charles (United States) on 2002-04-26 20:26 [#00195652]
Points: 1044 Status: Lurker



Actually roles were not then as they are now. People did
not stay int he same roaming tribes, they would work at
times to kill animals for food, but did not have committment
to each other. They were nomads, burial did not serve the
purpose of preventing disease as they did never stayed in
the same region. Also, vermin would not be a nuisance
because there were dead animals all around, and vermin such
maggots don't exactly take over anything. They just eat and
return to the ground, not much trouble.


 

offline smokehammer from Saigon (Vietnam) on 2002-04-26 20:30 [#00195659]
Points: 1463 Status: Lurker



OK bro'
sorry to ruffle the thread

I bow to your superior knowledge on corpses etc


 

offline Zen Storm from St. Charles (United States) on 2002-04-26 20:32 [#00195661]
Points: 1044 Status: Lurker



i wasn't trying to be mean hammer, I was just responding to
your comments. I just thought this topic was really
interesting, it kinda feels like sadness and other emotions
are just socially constructed


 

offline smokehammer from Saigon (Vietnam) on 2002-04-26 20:43 [#00195671]
Points: 1463 Status: Lurker



I don't think emotions are socially constructed
but socially constructed situations for the expressions of
emotion are...
"hate week" 1984
I guess thats all a control thing, and TV and the media
plays an important role nowadays. Like when the Queen Mother
died and everyone had to pretend to be sad.
Shops were closing for mourning everywhere, but Its hard to
imagine myself getting so wound up in the whole celebrity
side-show thing.
then again blah blah I'm jibbering again :)


 

offline REFLEX from Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) on 2002-04-26 21:39 [#00195768]
Points: 8864 Status: Regular



when queen mom died and everyone pretended to be sad? I
didnt see that. I could have honestly cared less about her
old ass dyin. Shes just a person, more important people die
every fuckin day.

Emotions are largly based on socially constructed occurances
throughout life.


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-04-27 01:45 [#00195963]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular



neadrothals buried their dead too (or it may have been some
other near-human species, i dont remember)

interesting, isn't it?

we always consider oursevles HERE

...and animals down HERE

most people dont realize there were species OTHER than
humans (and which did not even evolve into us) that buried
their dead, made tools, wore (basic) clothes, had fire,
shelter, etc

freaky....


 

offline korben dallas from nz on 2002-04-27 01:53 [#00195975]
Points: 4605 Status: Regular



Hey Zen Storm .. Elephants show a period of mourning
(sadness?) following the death of a relative (member of the
tribe or whatever its called for elephants) .. don't know
about Dolphins though. [despite them having a more developed
brain than homo sapiens !!! - larger and more convoluted!]

While flowers might be an indication of sadness and such, i
think its a bit of a leap to say that without flowers or
burying ritual = no sadness?

Just a thought anyway..


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-04-27 01:56 [#00195976]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular | Followup to korben dallas: #00195975



good point...
ya i saw this documentary on elephants and death..
..when the tribe(?) of elephants passes the skelaton of a
dead elephant...
...they get all quiet and sombre and depressed..
..they very gently handle the bones and
such

good point about the flowers too...
...even cats/dogs can show sadness when someone they are
close to leaves
(and there are cases of dogs saving peoples
lives.....suggesting they can understand that people can be
hurt/die?...who knows)


 

offline korben dallas from nz on 2002-04-27 01:59 [#00195980]
Points: 4605 Status: Regular



Science and induction - leaves a lot to be desired!


 

offline korben dallas from nz on 2002-04-27 02:02 [#00195983]
Points: 4605 Status: Regular



Behaviourists have a big thing against ascribing/attributing
emotions to actions to animals, which makes sense from the
behaviourist point of view [as they only look at
behaviour/expressed actions - and so emotions and such seem
irrelevant in light of this paradigm].

However, this doesn't go to say, that this is the case.

What is truth and knowledge anyway .. :)


 


Messageboard index