do you evar call your girlfriend Chocopoops? | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
-crazone
dariusgriffin
...and 281 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613457
Today 3
Topics 127500
  
 
Messageboard index
do you evar call your girlfriend Chocopoops?
 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2012-02-06 00:40 [#02428658]
Points: 21423 Status: Regular



Cuz if you luv her, you want to eat her delicious chocolate
poops amirite?

Also, here is another sermon from my new religion,
youtubgion. In this sermon, father stefbot gives an eye
jerking teary jerky eyed tear jerking, or he jerks your eyes
out or something, talk about.. the snuffalupa-pottymi; their
growing rectal power and the meaning in our lives about
peanut butter types of economics and voluntary
nonharmingtons:
LAZY_TITLE

See you later, Chocopoops!


 

offline Geoffrey Mills on 2012-02-06 01:41 [#02428660]
Points: 498 Status: Regular



monoid will know so don't worry too much


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2012-02-06 16:57 [#02428678]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



For $25 USD I will watch that video and write a concise
response. Paypal the fee to fleetmouse@gmail.com


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2012-02-06 19:07 [#02428683]
Points: 21423 Status: Regular



Yo yo yo, I'm virally advertising choice wMw-approved memes
for your benefit, but if you want to continue taking the
blue pill as an arrested development, state indoctrinated,
ad brainwashed, food poisoned stockholm syndrome corporate
slave, that's you're decision yo. Alex Jone's tactics are to
take all keywords under his own umbrella without infighting.
Even if they're ridiculous, like believing in a new world
order on mars, they can currently be profited from to
continually build a war chest to fight the real corruption.
Intermittently, he blasts holes in true corrupt matrix with
intelligence, a high vocabulary and a near photographic
memory. The whole operation is of course a fusion of
spreading info and making money doing it, the latter part
necessary in our current system to be effective because of
the power of the competing state monopolized sewer stream
propaganda. In Tyler Durden we trusted. Other people like
stefbot have different tactics. They can't be taxononmically
classified with Time Cube and UFO tards or something, many
of which might be cointelpro aimed to discredit legitimate
operations which you apparently bought into.
War on general purpose computing:
http://weev.livejournal.com/402016.html


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2012-02-06 22:42 [#02428696]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



You have excellent language skills and lots of native
intelligence but you don't know nearly enough about
philosophy and economics to recognize why molyneux is an
evil vegetable.

This will bring you up to speed on vital issues in
modern philosophy.

This will explain why free market libertarian
dogmatism is something empirically falsified and no longer
believed in even by conservatives.

I have these as hard copies, otherwise I'd upload them for
you.



 

offline AMPI MAX from United Kingdom on 2012-02-07 00:20 [#02428698]
Points: 10789 Status: Regular



stefbot is gay


 

offline AphexAcid from Sweden on 2012-02-08 10:00 [#02428781]
Points: 2568 Status: Lurker



fleetmouse, have you read any Voegelin or
John Gray?

you seem like a perceptive person, do you have any other
book-recommendations?


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2012-02-08 15:50 [#02428798]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



Those two books look good. I've never heard of Voegelin.
Looks challenging because he's an intellectual heavyweight
I'd probably disagree with. Why are the reviewers mentioning
Rush Limbaugh? Jesus.

I thought John Gray was the women are from mars men are from
venus guy. There's another writer whose essay I read
recently who talked about how conservatism is actually a
radical revolutionary and utopian movement despite its name,
I forget who. Maybe Bill Chocopoops.

Have you read The True Believer by Eric Hoffer? It repeats
itself a lot for such a short book but it's good anyways.



 

offline freqy on 2012-02-08 15:56 [#02428800]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag




i wonder what he does when he gets ripped off ?

i need to know.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2012-02-08 16:46 [#02428801]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



No one would ever rip anyone off in an anarchist utopia. Why
would they want to, they're incredibly wealthy because the
government isn't taxing and oppressing them. Besides, people
are always rational actors so you just have to tell your
mugger about Austrian economic theory.


 

offline freqy on 2012-02-08 17:25 [#02428802]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag




thank you brother.

I am transformed, I now have no need for violence, I wear
protective herbs.

May your path lead to wisdom, and in wisdom, know ye peace.
: )



 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2012-02-08 19:43 [#02428816]
Points: 21423 Status: Regular



Businesses would still compete to solve disputes between
people, ie. instead of a single-player, state, power/force
monopoly, there would be free market forces in the business
of solving disputes, each trying to convince the customers
with their own ingenuity that they won't become corrupt/evil
because people wouldn't want to economically support that.
People could voluntarily choose to pay this or that business
to solve their dispute, constantly chiseling improvements
due to their selection of competing businesses.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2012-02-08 22:32 [#02428825]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



I still hold out faint hope that you're trolling,
chocopoops.


 

offline AphexAcid from Sweden on 2012-02-09 13:34 [#02428894]
Points: 2568 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #02428798



yeah, there's two John Gray's.
i'll check out that book recommendation. thanks!


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2012-02-09 15:33 [#02428902]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



You might also like Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature by
Richard Rorty if you have a high tolerance for epistemology
and analytic philosophy. Not really relevant to what we're
discussing in this thread but still an amazing read. Skull
crackingly dense.

(BTW w M w I have The True Believer in PDF if you want...
email fleetmouse at gmail dot com if you're interested. You
might experience, as the French say "le shock of self
recognition")


 

online dariusgriffin from cool on 2012-02-09 15:38 [#02428904]
Points: 12394 Status: Regular



ew wtf are you a libertarian now


 

online dariusgriffin from cool on 2012-02-09 15:39 [#02428905]
Points: 12394 Status: Regular



sorry that's not nice i don't know how to handle it listen
to fleetmouse prob


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2012-02-09 20:33 [#02428918]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to AphexAcid: #02428894



Oh man I saw another book by the same John Gray you're
talking about, called Straw Dogs, and had a look through
it... the dude's been driving around in the Volvo of Despair.

I mean granted we can be a pretty fucked up bunch of monkeys
but we're more flexible than other monkeys and we have this
thing called culture that to a great extent makes us what we
are, and what we are is largely the stories we tell
ourselves, and this guy wants to tell us Trent Reznor
lyrics.

I subscribe to Vonnegut's Bokononism - "Live by the foma
that make you brave and kind and healthy and happy." (foma -
harmless untruths; lies that, if used correctly, can be
useful)


 

offline Raz0rBlade_uk on 2012-02-10 10:32 [#02428954]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



I used to agree with Molyneux (heck, I was even a donator to
the man!), but I've since realised that (despite his good
intentions) he is actually pretty crazy. There's a website
dedicated discussing Stefan and philosophy here. I
highly recommend you look at that series of articles as it
tackles his book: UPB (Stef's pride and joy - a logical
mess).


 

offline Raz0rBlade_uk on 2012-02-10 10:34 [#02428955]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Followup to Raz0rBlade_uk: #02428954 | Show recordbag



*Stefan and his philosophy


 

offline AphexAcid from Sweden on 2012-02-10 13:09 [#02428973]
Points: 2568 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #02428918



Hey, did you find Straw Dogs on the internet or in a book
shop? I've been eager to read something from it.

"We're more flexible than other monkeys and we have this
thing called culture that to a great extent makes us what we
are, and what we are is largely the stories we tell
ourselves."

I'd maintain that "culture" isn't evidence of the factuality
of anything, at all. Our 'flexibility' is inherent in the
concept that we hold of ourselves and have no objective
basis in anything outside of ourselves. It is
self-referential. In phenomenal-experiential nature we are
merely an integrated part of that phenomenality.

Thanks for the book recommendation. I've sent you a couple
of my recommendations on your e-mail.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2012-02-10 18:02 [#02429026]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to Raz0rBlade_uk: #02428954



The world is lousy with failed academics who decided to pick
on those less able to defend themselves - the uneducated,
the young, the naive. If you know sweet fuck all about
philosophy or anything else for that matter, then demagogues
like Molyneux, Ayn Rand, or even god forbid Lyndon LaRouche
are going to sound pretty impressive.

And if you do know something then debunking Molyneux is like
drinking from a firehose of liquid shit, distasteful and
hardly worth the effort.


 

offline misantroll from Switzerland on 2012-02-10 18:05 [#02429028]
Points: 2151 Status: Lurker



I always call my girlfriend hot pussied whore and she likes
it even more with hot milk !


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2012-02-10 18:07 [#02429029]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to AphexAcid: #02428973



If those sorts of "soft" values aren't facts and aren't
fully determined by facts then pessimism is just as
epistemically unjustified as optimism. The question is,
which do you prefer?

What we think of ourselves affects us profoundly. I don't
have a reference handy but a recent study showed that people
perform better if they've just been shown something that
reinforces the concept of free will than if they've been
shown something that reinforces determinism. So even if free
will is in some sense an illusion we're pragmatically
justified in believing it.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2012-02-10 18:08 [#02429030]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to misantroll: #02429028



avi or it didn't happen


 

offline misantroll from Switzerland on 2012-02-10 18:16 [#02429032]
Points: 2151 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #02429030



think I heard that expression in a cinema snob review and
then use it everyday since !


 

offline Raz0rBlade_uk on 2012-02-10 18:26 [#02429033]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Followup to fleetmouse: #02429026 | Show recordbag



Indeed, it may seem a little futile, but for those who have
been sucked into such cult-like brain spheres may find such
critiques as a useful aid in finding their way out. I'm not
sure if this was entirely the case with me, but I definitely
found reading critiques of Molyneux to be quite validating
once I started to disentangle myself from those ideas.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2012-02-10 19:18 [#02429054]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to Raz0rBlade_uk: #02429033



I think it's best handled by previous members, then, who
have enough invested in the project that they get something
out of writing a critique.

The thing about Stef is he's relatively young so he
potentially has decades more to spew this crap. That's sad.
I can see him turning into a Canadian LaRouche. I don't
think he's nearly as crafty and evil as that though. Does
Stef ever talk about "Zionism" *wink wink*? "International
bankers"? Just curious.


 

offline Raz0rBlade_uk on 2012-02-10 20:12 [#02429060]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Followup to fleetmouse: #02429054 | Show recordbag



As in, is he a bit alex jones? No. Not so much. He went on
his show once, but I think that was just more to get himself
some exposure.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2012-02-11 17:11 [#02429118]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



I wonder if Alex Jones charges some of his guests to appear
the same way he charges banner advertisers of quack remedies
and survival gruel on infowars.com. He's providing his
guests with ready access to a large audience of people with
the critical thinking skills of algae.


 

offline cx from Norway on 2012-02-11 17:56 [#02429119]
Points: 4537 Status: Regular



I'm fairly certain he's sticking to it for the money. All he
has to do is show confidence in the videos and books, and
with his charisma it all sounds great when he says it.

The basis of his argument is that taxation is immoral and
that all economic transactions (and interaction in general)
should be voluntary, and no amount of arguing could persuade
him otherwise. It's so easy to fight back anyone when you
only have one argument to make, and that the argument is
100% true under all circumstances.

Basically parents should educate their kids to be
responsible and moral, and society should in the end be a
completely voluntary thing where everyone is responsible
enough and smart enough to always make the right decision.
His program is itself an ironic argument against what he's
saying, because without laws there would be manipulation and
lying at best, probably extortion and violence at worst, and
he himself is lying and manipulating for economic gain.

I like some of the stuff he's said, and he's certainly good
at observing wrongdoings in society, like education and
oppression, but his solutions and his one trick pony
argument just fails as far as I can tell.


 

offline anirog on 2012-02-11 18:03 [#02429121]
Points: 762 Status: Regular



wMw i'm still concerned about the "der" issue.

In a for loop a program will end if the file is "der"

Much of thought is based on this notion.

Once the object is in "the place there" the action is
complete.

Doing it is secondary to being there.

For example the for loop can error out if the file
previously existed.

What happened to while.

Is this the frustrated code?

While we were there we did it.

Or while we are there we may choose to do it.

Seems it always do it until we are there.

Some sort of creationism perhaps?

However doing it does not = being there.

Doing it over and over and it's still not there.

No room for a non linear form of thought.

Is this the work of the venture capitalist programmers?


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2012-02-15 02:28 [#02429292]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



I had to stop reading Straw Dogs. All I'm getting from it is
that Gray is pessimistic and likes to muse about his
pessimism. Did I mention the pessimistic musings? Also, did
you know that people are animals? Remarkable!


 

offline PoopHeadshot on 2012-02-15 07:25 [#02429299]
Points: 14 Status: Regular



yes.

n she calls me creamcome


 


Messageboard index