Communication model | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 354 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614103
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Communication model
 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2010-09-26 07:21 [#02394104]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker



What communication model do you recommand?


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2010-09-26 09:12 [#02394105]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker



C#

depends on what you want to get out of your model. do you
really need a model? or do you see it as some sort of
metaphysical necessity?


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2010-09-26 09:21 [#02394107]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker | Followup to goDel: #02394105



A bit more clarity of course. This model would not be
'necessary' but it would help me and the person i am talking
to, a lot. It would also be a bridge to more convidence, if
you could change/advance your personality in restructuring
the way you talk.


 

offline -crazone from smashing acid over and over on 2010-09-26 09:54 [#02394113]
Points: 11234 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



a mouth and some ears


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2010-09-26 09:54 [#02394114]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker



read neil strauss' the game. i think i've told you before,
but i'll just do it again. because you clearly haven't
followed my instructions.

bad monoid! bad!


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2010-09-26 10:14 [#02394115]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker | Followup to goDel: #02394114



The world's most legendary Pick-Up Artist? Hahahaha


 

offline wavephace from off the chain on 2010-09-26 10:20 [#02394116]
Points: 3098 Status: Lurker



probably tweets (twitter) maybe?


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2010-09-26 10:20 [#02394117]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker | Followup to Monoid: #02394115



:-)

everything comes from and leads to sex!

WOOHOOOO


 

offline EVOL from a long time ago on 2010-09-26 10:24 [#02394120]
Points: 4921 Status: Lurker | Followup to goDel: #02394117



i thought it was poop?


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2010-09-26 10:25 [#02394121]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker | Followup to goDel: #02394117



I admit that sex is my goal, however i am not only having
problems with the other gender, but basically...with the
whole humanity


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2010-09-26 10:29 [#02394122]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker | Followup to Monoid: #02394121



consider it as a good inbetweener for all those "deep"
philosophy books you read. you might actually have a new
insight that'd actually help you forward in the real world
of communication. instead of the profound abstractions which
will only draw you further away from the actual world.


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2010-09-26 10:37 [#02394123]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker | Followup to goDel: #02394122



I think such books are worthless, after you read them, you
will probably be same loser as you were before, so you buy
even more books


 

offline EVOL from a long time ago on 2010-09-26 10:41 [#02394125]
Points: 4921 Status: Lurker | Followup to goDel: #02394114



that book ruined my game, which was the no game game, now i
have zero game. it's too late to expand on that atm. if any
of that even makes sense?


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2010-09-26 10:43 [#02394126]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker | Followup to EVOL: #02394125



How did it ruin your game...?


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2010-09-26 10:53 [#02394127]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker | Followup to EVOL: #02394125



so what i guess you're trying to say is that you went from
unconscious incompetence to conscious incompetence.
and failed to follow through to go to conscious competence.

and somehow the book is to blame? sounds like a good book to
me. ish


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2010-09-26 10:54 [#02394128]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker | Followup to Monoid: #02394123



so instead you wind up asking for a communication model on a
forum? well, at least it's free. Has someone told you you
generalize too much?


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2010-09-26 10:59 [#02394130]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker | Followup to goDel: #02394128



Do you think i do that? Sorry dude, didnt mean to anger you


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2010-09-26 11:18 [#02394132]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker



Please take a look at this. And tell me what you think.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_sides_model


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2010-09-26 14:42 [#02394157]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker | Followup to Monoid: #02394132



first: i'm not angry
second: science probably doesn't get you laid
third: who cares what people think? if it helps you, it
helps you.


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2010-09-26 15:03 [#02394159]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker | Followup to Monoid: #02394132



forth: sounds like a lame model for pointing out there are
different subtexts to communication. and that all those
subtexts can be summed into 4 categories. if it helps you,
feel free to use it. to me, it looks like just another
psychological model for something the scientist doesn't know
how to handle. and i suspect some psychologists to be the
aspergers of this world. go figure.


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2010-09-26 18:41 [#02394174]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker | Followup to goDel: #02394159



Getting laid is not my primary goal, tho it is a goal of
course. What that wikipedia page describes is not the full
theory, but only a tiny part of it.
I know after you read it sounds lame, but try to apply it in
real life, i think it helps.
I was also interested if there is something 'newer' out
there, because those books were written in the 80s. I also
wanted to show it to, cuz i like you guys.


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2010-09-26 22:49 [#02394187]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker



The question is, do you want to waste all your energy with
manipulating people, or do you have to wish to personally
grow and give the other person the chance to do it with
you!



 

offline kei9 from Argentina on 2010-09-27 07:38 [#02394212]
Points: 434 Status: Regular



hey monoid, do you use any instant messagin thingy? you seem
to be a nice fellow and Id like to talk to you over the
keyboard


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2010-09-27 11:35 [#02394221]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker | Followup to kei9: #02394212



No, sorry I am posting this from my mobile phone cuz i dont
have (want) a computer at home anymore.


 

offline khrimson from the fridge on 2010-09-27 12:08 [#02394223]
Points: 1757 Status: Regular



pee to pee


 

offline EVOL from a long time ago on 2010-09-28 04:01 [#02394304]
Points: 4921 Status: Lurker | Followup to goDel: #02394127



nah, more like, unconscious competence to conscious
incompetence.


 

offline misantroll from Switzerland on 2010-09-28 20:57 [#02394378]
Points: 2151 Status: Lurker



pear to pear


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2010-10-05 19:08 [#02394979]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker



I want to rehabilitate this book by Neil Strauss cuz 'my
professor' told me so and i am convinced. I am going to read
it with the stuff i read so far about this subject matter in
the back of my head. So, thank you


 

offline detheel on 2013-11-02 22:57 [#02463964]
Points: 240 Status: Addict



I want to rehabilitate this DUBturbo


 


Messageboard index