Is this justifiable? | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
dariusgriffin
belb
...and 666 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614087
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Is this justifiable?
 

offline swift_jams from big sky on 2009-02-06 14:17 [#02270580]
Points: 7577 Status: Lurker



To write the perfect song, the writer must keep it to
him/herself. If one writes a song that they are happy with,
then it's good. It's perfect, right? But the moment someone
who doesn't like it hears it, it loses it's beauty. So long
as it sounds good to you and you are enjoying the process of
hearing "creativity in action", for lack of a less faggy
phrase.

Don't get me wrong, some songs are fun to share. But the
good ones, the REALLY good ones, should remain unheard by
anyone other than the producer.

Or am I totally insane?


 

offline RussellDust on 2009-02-06 14:21 [#02270583]
Points: 16078 Status: Regular



I bet you're glad that your fave artists and bands only let
you hear the 'fun' tracks...


 

offline thatne from United States on 2009-02-06 14:26 [#02270586]
Points: 3026 Status: Lurker



no


 

offline swift_jams from big sky on 2009-02-06 14:29 [#02270589]
Points: 7577 Status: Lurker | Followup to RussellDust: #02270583



Well they were fun enough to discover and enjoy. :]



 

offline swift_jams from big sky on 2009-02-06 14:30 [#02270590]
Points: 7577 Status: Lurker | Followup to thatne: #02270586



What I'm thinking is, if theres a style song you want to
hear, but can't find, then don't try to find it. Where's the
good in listening to someone else make what you want? Why
not make for yourself what you want and be happy with that?


 

offline Raz0rBlade_uk on 2009-02-06 14:32 [#02270593]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



i think some songs should just be kept for yourself. you can
enjoy them so much more that way.

in your warm cocoon of denial and vanity.


 

offline Tractern from Brighton (United Kingdom) on 2009-02-06 14:33 [#02270595]
Points: 4210 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



RDJ said something like "I don't release my best stuff, cos
I will get ripped off." in an interview for the Guardian, I
think it was.

Maybe that was in a similar vein to what you are saying.


 

offline -crazone from smashing acid over and over on 2009-02-06 14:35 [#02270601]
Points: 11234 Status: Lurker | Followup to swift_jams: #02270580 | Show recordbag



You're totally right! I keep most of my songs for myself.. I
like them but others don't :-D


 

offline swift_jams from big sky on 2009-02-06 14:37 [#02270603]
Points: 7577 Status: Lurker | Followup to Tractern: #02270595



Not so much worried about it getting ripped off, cause I'm
not interested in making music for money. But yes, similar.
I think he was very smart to say that.


 

offline swift_jams from big sky on 2009-02-06 14:37 [#02270604]
Points: 7577 Status: Lurker | Followup to Raz0rBlade_uk: #02270593



It's a nice little place to be! :D


 

offline mohamed from the turtle business on 2009-02-06 14:38 [#02270607]
Points: 31229 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



i keep my music for myself cos i think that the sound i like
its too rough to be shared


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2009-02-06 14:41 [#02270610]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to swift_jams: #02270580 | Show recordbag



you need to reassess your definition of "perfect." If it's
truly "the perfect song" (not that such a thing exists), it
would be universally accepted as perfect, above and beyond
individual tastes and opinions.


 

offline swift_jams from big sky on 2009-02-06 14:43 [#02270611]
Points: 7577 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zephyr Twin: #02270610



Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhh...point made and understood.

Forgive me for sounding "out there" with this, but who's to
say that perfection has to be understood by all. Why can't
something be perfect to just one person and let that be good
enough?


 

offline swift_jams from big sky on 2009-02-06 14:45 [#02270613]
Points: 7577 Status: Lurker



It goes deeper than music too I guess. To not worry about
what other people think and be happy with yourself in every
aspect. If one person can do that, they have achieved the
ultimate. If everyone could do that, the world would rock.


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2009-02-06 14:45 [#02270614]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to swift_jams: #02270611 | Show recordbag



Yeah, I considered that. I think "perfect" in its
purest/strictest sense would mean that on every level, no
matter whom you polled, the song would be regarded as
absolutely flawless. But I will not deny you the right to
define perfection in music as you see fit. :)


 

offline swift_jams from big sky on 2009-02-06 14:51 [#02270618]
Points: 7577 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zephyr Twin: #02270614



Thank you gentleman. :]


 

offline cx from Norway on 2009-02-06 15:31 [#02270624]
Points: 4537 Status: Regular



It's really very simple..
All taste and experience originates ultimately in the brain,
so there's a unique taste and experience to every stimuli,
in every individual brain.
A song then, will be experienced and judged uniquely by
everyone who hears it, even if people agree on certain
points and opinions, the experience is ultimately unique to
each person..

To disregard all other opinion is both a strength and a
weakness really. Humans do not exist solely in their own
head. While in many ways they do, there is also the
intersubjective consciousness. We are at all times
influenced by others, and this influences our taste in art..
If we're not influenced by words, we are at least influenced
by others music.
While ultimately my experience of music is completely
unique, it carries remnants of many other musicians before
me.
Consciousness and taste are not things that are developed in
solitude, and this is why we have intersubjective
consciousness..

But even so, the person who hears the song is ultimately the
only judge capable of judging the song for them, as such
their opinion is the only one that matters to their
experience of the song..

I feel that it's a bit selfish to not share songs that you
like. What if Autechre never shared Uviol, what if Radiohead
never shared pyramid song and (horror) if Bola never shared
Forcasa 3!
Nope sir, the best thing you can do as a musician is to
realize that there's going to be a ton of negative, and
maybe many more positive comments, but that ultimately those
comments should not ruin YOUR experience of the track, and
as such the track loses no beauty.. There is no objective
beauty or quality to music, only intersubjective.


 

offline Exaph from United Kingdom on 2009-02-06 16:09 [#02270626]
Points: 3718 Status: Lurker



its all very simple... the word perfect is subjective.


 

offline Guybrush from the white room on 2009-02-06 16:11 [#02270627]
Points: 2556 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



this is an all time high for words/bullshit ratio


 

offline freqy on 2009-02-06 17:08 [#02270631]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



maybe one day we could share the part of the brain that
enjoys music, then we'd be able to see strict Christian
choir singers getting down in the sweaty mosh pits to death
metal.


 

offline swift_jams from big sky on 2009-02-06 17:10 [#02270632]
Points: 7577 Status: Lurker | Followup to freqy: #02270631



I like your style. Guybrush's, not so much.


 

offline Guybrush from the white room on 2009-02-06 17:20 [#02270633]
Points: 2556 Status: Lurker | Followup to swift_jams: #02270632 | Show recordbag



You are a total arse.


 

offline AMPI MAX from United Kingdom on 2009-02-06 17:21 [#02270635]
Points: 10789 Status: Regular | Followup to Guybrush: #02270633



no he isn't


 

offline AMPI MAX from United Kingdom on 2009-02-06 17:24 [#02270636]
Points: 10789 Status: Regular



speaking as a person who makes music for oneself: pass it on
or not, just don't be a wanker about it.


 

offline swift_jams from big sky on 2009-02-06 17:55 [#02270644]
Points: 7577 Status: Lurker | Followup to AMPI MAX: #02270636



Bam! :D


 

offline swift_jams from big sky on 2009-02-06 17:55 [#02270645]
Points: 7577 Status: Lurker | Followup to Guybrush: #02270633



But we need good attitudes, not bad ones. :[


 

offline AphexAcid from Sweden on 2009-02-06 17:58 [#02270647]
Points: 2568 Status: Lurker | Followup to swift_jams: #02270580



It's not so much about the music, as it is about the
attitude.

If you have a detached and relaxed outlook on music, then it
would follow that you could listen simply for the sake of
enjoyment - no matter how 'perfect' or 'pure' a piece of
music may be.

If we're clear as to the premises of Why we listen, we
wouldn't make such a fuzz about it, either, and the
consequences that follow (the ridiculous outrages, the
elitism, etc, etc).

It's never been about 'understanding' anything.
Understanding may 'heighten' the joy by interpreting it
intellectually, but by the end of the day we just like how
it sounds...

Now as for me, I'd agree with ampi max.


 

offline AphexAcid from Sweden on 2009-02-06 17:59 [#02270648]
Points: 2568 Status: Lurker



*the above message is not directed specifically to
swift_jams.


 

offline swift_jams from big sky on 2009-02-06 18:25 [#02270656]
Points: 7577 Status: Lurker



I love the things I am reading in here, thank you all for
contributing.


 

offline recycle from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2009-02-06 22:03 [#02270696]
Points: 40062 Status: Addict



jon, until you email me, im like mad at you and stuff


 

offline swift_jams from big sky on 2009-02-06 22:31 [#02270704]
Points: 7577 Status: Lurker



It would help if I knew your email address!


 

offline recycle from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2009-02-06 22:32 [#02270705]
Points: 40062 Status: Addict



www. look in my profile dot
cum


 

offline recycle from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2009-02-06 22:32 [#02270706]
Points: 40062 Status: Addict



i just sprayed you an email about 2-3 weeks ago, never heard
back
thought maybe you had another lover :(


 

offline swift_jams from big sky on 2009-02-07 02:20 [#02270722]
Points: 7577 Status: Lurker



Chances are it was because I lost my old password for that
email address. I'll shoot you one right now though.


 

offline yoyoyoyo from Sweden on 2009-02-07 05:23 [#02270736]
Points: 3200 Status: Regular



ITS AN OUTRAGE!


 


Messageboard index