Filling up your Tank with Skittles, Taste the Rainbow | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 589 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614087
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Filling up your Tank with Skittles, Taste the Rainbow
 

offline ChildrnsTalkn on 2008-08-28 12:39 [#02232576]
Points: 140 Status: Lurker



wouldn't it be great if you could fill up your tank with
skilttles fuel, and instead of carbon monoxide being
emitted, the smell of oranges and strawbeery would come
out... and lemons



 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2008-08-28 12:41 [#02232578]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



also a visible rainbow out of the exhaust would be nice, if
a bit distracting.


 

offline ChildrnsTalkn on 2008-08-28 12:42 [#02232579]
Points: 140 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zephyr Twin: #02232578



that would be awesome!



 

offline mookster from Oxford (United Kingdom) on 2008-08-28 12:45 [#02232583]
Points: 133 Status: Regular



best thread ever


 

offline noseburger on 2008-08-28 13:35 [#02232615]
Points: 1198 Status: Lurker



no it would be shit. i put petrol in my car. why? BECAUSE
ITS A FUCKING CAR.


 

offline SlipDrinkMats from Thanks (Bhutan) on 2008-08-28 13:40 [#02232618]
Points: 1744 Status: Regular



Imagine if we all travelled around on massive skittles, like
little personal space ships? Though some terrorist would get
hold of one and crash it into Childrentalking's incestuous
love nest, Allah Akhbar! Allah Akhbar! Allah Akhbar!


 

offline Indeksical from Phobiazero Damage Control (United Kingdom) on 2008-08-28 13:45 [#02232623]
Points: 10671 Status: Regular | Followup to SlipDrinkMats: #02232618 | Show recordbag



I imagine some kind of actual nest, fashioned from twigs and
lined with animal carcasses, atop some snow covered
mountain.


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2008-08-28 13:48 [#02232625]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to Indeksical: #02232623 | Show recordbag



you're thinking of sasqtchtalkn


 

offline ChildrnsTalkn on 2008-08-28 13:49 [#02232626]
Points: 140 Status: Lurker | Followup to SlipDrinkMats: #02232618



you lost me in the part where u said massive skittles, like
little personal space ships...



 

offline ChildrnsTalkn on 2008-08-28 13:51 [#02232628]
Points: 140 Status: Lurker



i mean are they massive or are they little, and how would u
know where i live... especially since you live all the way
in chile...



 

offline ChildrnsTalkn on 2008-08-28 13:52 [#02232633]
Points: 140 Status: Lurker



and these skilttles themselves will they be powered by
skittle fuel as well?


 

offline ChildrnsTalkn on 2008-08-28 13:52 [#02232635]
Points: 140 Status: Lurker



or by PETROL FUEL!!!!


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2008-08-28 13:53 [#02232636]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



as long as the tractor beam is a rainbow you can sign me up.


 

offline SlipDrinkMats from Thanks (Bhutan) on 2008-08-28 13:54 [#02232637]
Points: 1744 Status: Regular



A small space ship, even the smallest, if it was capable of
carrying a human passenger, would surely, at the very least,
be the size of a MASSIVE skittle. What's so hard to
understand... SHIT FOR BRAINS?!?!?!


 

offline ChildrnsTalkn on 2008-08-28 13:54 [#02232639]
Points: 140 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zephyr Twin: #02232636



bring in the disco music


 

offline ChildrnsTalkn on 2008-08-28 13:55 [#02232640]
Points: 140 Status: Lurker | Followup to SlipDrinkMats: #02232637



mASSIVE SKITTLE THAT IS SMALL? OMG

omg

this is alien technology



 

offline Indeksical from Phobiazero Damage Control (United Kingdom) on 2008-08-28 13:56 [#02232642]
Points: 10671 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



They're massive in comparison to other skittles but little
in comparison to other spaceships. Also SlipDrinkMats never
mentioned himself coming and attacking your nest but rather
intelligent terrorists with a vendetta against your kindred
sex empire.


 

offline Indeksical from Phobiazero Damage Control (United Kingdom) on 2008-08-28 13:56 [#02232643]
Points: 10671 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



I'm sloooooow.


 

offline SlipDrinkMats from Thanks (Bhutan) on 2008-08-28 13:56 [#02232644]
Points: 1744 Status: Regular | Followup to Indeksical: #02232642



Though I wouldn't rule out making the trip.


 

offline Sano on 2008-08-28 13:58 [#02232645]
Points: 2502 Status: Lurker



Skittles make a fat then you take the fat from people then
convert the fat into car powering energy.


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2008-08-28 14:09 [#02232653]
Points: 21452 Status: Lurker



I like reices pieceiesiies ieeieei


 

offline ChildrnsTalkn on 2008-08-28 14:34 [#02232669]
Points: 140 Status: Lurker | Followup to Indeksical: #02232642



he said imagine if we all

and he also said, massive skittles... like little personal
spaceship

if they're massive skittles then they are in no means small
and personal spaceships.

i'm just rationalizing it how he phrased his statement. it
makes perfect sense. now if you assume he's comparing it to
the titanic, then yes its small, but he said massive
skittle. to compound my argument even further, imagine if
you compare the titanic to planet earth, does that make the
titanic small and personal? no i think not, therefore your
attempt at rationalizing his statement is poor

and yes you're slow
taste the rainbow



 

offline SlipDrinkMats from Thanks (Bhutan) on 2008-08-28 14:39 [#02232674]
Points: 1744 Status: Regular



I said like small personal spaceships.



 

offline ChildrnsTalkn on 2008-08-28 14:42 [#02232678]
Points: 140 Status: Lurker | Followup to SlipDrinkMats: #02232674



i bet at this point you wish you never mentioned the word
massive XD


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2008-08-28 14:46 [#02232681]
Points: 21452 Status: Lurker



Teach me more about the grammar of skittles and spaceships.
I'm ready to learn!


 

offline SlipDrinkMats from Thanks (Bhutan) on 2008-08-28 14:50 [#02232683]
Points: 1744 Status: Regular



This reminds me of when one was at school and when you, in a
moment of weakness, humoured an unpopular buffoon who in
turn made out that you were the idiot and that you ended up
agreeing with him.


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2008-08-28 14:51 [#02232684]
Points: 21452 Status: Lurker



School is a very healthy ecosystem.


 

offline ChildrnsTalkn on 2008-08-28 14:56 [#02232685]
Points: 140 Status: Lurker | Followup to w M w: #02232684



this has nothing to do with grammar, its just understanding
the meaning of words, and how to use them in context. if he
simply stated small personal space ship then his idea would
come across accurately ...

at least in regards to skittle technology.



 

offline SlipDrinkMats from Thanks (Bhutan) on 2008-08-28 14:58 [#02232686]
Points: 1744 Status: Regular | Followup to ChildrnsTalkn: #02232685



How big is a fucking skittle and how big would you say a
fucking space ship was? What is your fucking problem?


 

offline ChildrnsTalkn on 2008-08-28 15:09 [#02232694]
Points: 140 Status: Lurker | Followup to SlipDrinkMats: #02232686



you said massive skittle! i'm picturing a freight, for only
one person... but then you contradicted yourself by saying
small, so maybe its inbetween the size of an SUV or i dont
know... a suitcase maybe... you never really specified...

anyways i gotta go now. i'll be back later to discuss this
further if you'd like...


 

offline SlipDrinkMats from Thanks (Bhutan) on 2008-08-28 15:12 [#02232698]
Points: 1744 Status: Regular



I said a big skittle which would make a small
spaceship. You're wilfully misreading what I wrote. I
dare say that if the skittle was big enough it could be
regarded a fucking Mother Ship but I had in mind a personal,
commuter style "run about" ship.


 

offline AMPI MAX from United Kingdom on 2008-08-28 16:38 [#02232714]
Points: 10789 Status: Regular



flid


 

offline belb from mmmmmmhhhhzzzz!!! on 2008-08-28 17:29 [#02232727]
Points: 6387 Status: Lurker



i take it nobody gets banned anymore no matter how fucking
spesh they are so what's the routine? jedi crisp certainly
wouldn't have stood for this nonsense


 

offline horsefactory from 💠 (United Kingdom) on 2008-08-28 17:45 [#02232728]
Points: 14867 Status: Regular



best trolling


 

offline PORICK from fucking IRELAND on 2008-08-28 17:47 [#02232729]
Points: 1911 Status: Lurker



i nearly had an aneurysm reading this shit


 

offline Fah from Netherlands, The on 2008-08-28 18:33 [#02232731]
Points: 6428 Status: Regular | Followup to Indeksical: #02232643



Dear mr. Samsical

I would like to take this well-placed opportunity to thank
you kindly for arranging my humble self a fine compilation
of pornographic soundtracks.

God bless you,

Lord Cornelis von Massifstache


 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2008-08-28 19:31 [#02232737]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



So, it would be large for a skittle, yet small
for a spaceship.

Spaceships can be very large like a star destroyer, but can
also be small enough for just one person. Kinda like boats.
There are battleships, tug boats, speed boats, and canoes.

If a skittle were only the size of the canoe, it would still
be massive compared to the sizemore a normal skittle
*warmphles*, but still small compared to a flagship that
carries many peepholes and possible many ships.
fff....fffff.....fffff.....feetholes

So we would fly around in our personal ship sized skitttles
and fly around and we could dock on a larger skittle master
ship while eating normal skittles in space cause they are
astronaut safe unlike apple juice *warmph..ph..lez*


 

offline SlipDrinkMats from Thanks (Bhutan) on 2008-08-28 19:45 [#02232740]
Points: 1744 Status: Regular | Followup to glasse: #02232737



Thank you for your voice of (near) reason.


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2008-08-28 20:07 [#02232741]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular



Tarzan cartoon, Talking heads and Rakim, Change the subject


 

offline ddrummondd on 2008-08-28 20:26 [#02232745]
Points: 558 Status: Regular



how many ppl have sampled once in a lifetime


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2008-08-28 20:40 [#02232748]
Points: 21452 Status: Lurker



skittles, UFOs and feetholes. 4 life


 

offline SlipDrinkMats from Thanks (Bhutan) on 2008-08-28 21:25 [#02232766]
Points: 1744 Status: Regular



you can't beat the First Related Video 20 seconds to comply


 

offline ChildrnsTalkn on 2008-08-28 22:15 [#02232778]
Points: 140 Status: Lurker | Followup to glasse: #02232737



i understand what you're saying. you're assuming he is
comparing it to a normal sized skittle, which is most likely
the case, but you have to ask yourself this question. what
is the point of comparing this 'massive' sized skittle in
order to express the need for a 'small' personable space
craft. it is redundant.

he could've just said imagine me on a skittle the size of
a small spacecraft.


see how theres no need to point out that it is massive?

-----

my point of comparing the titanic to planet earth is just
simply this, and i'll repeat it again. there is no such
thing as a massive, small space craft, regardless if you're
comparing it to something that is made of it's smaller
parts.

no one goes around saying, hey look at my car, its a small
car, because its made of steel and steel can be found in
large fucking slabs, deep within the earths crust... i'm
just making this shit up but you get my point.





 

offline SlipDrinkMats from Thanks (Bhutan) on 2008-08-28 22:40 [#02232781]
Points: 1744 Status: Regular | Followup to ChildrnsTalkn: #02232778



but you get my point

No. What is "redundant" is you. I said a massive skittle,
"like (a) little personal space ship". The "little" in
question is a diminutive, it doesn't necessarily denote
size, per se. Now fuck off back to "class", which is where
you fucking Americans seem to spend the first 30 years of
your life not learning anything.



 

offline ChildrnsTalkn on 2008-08-28 22:49 [#02232783]
Points: 140 Status: Lurker | Followup to SlipDrinkMats: #02232781



hey you are great... but i gotta go to my bed (happens to be
small) or big (depending on how you want to look at it)
sounds good right about now. gah nite!



 

offline SlipDrinkMats from Thanks (Bhutan) on 2008-08-28 23:20 [#02232784]
Points: 1744 Status: Regular



I don't want to look at your bed, certainly not with your
man-sister sprawled on top of it eating kitty litter.


 

offline darkpromenade from Australia on 2008-08-28 23:31 [#02232785]
Points: 2777 Status: Regular



someone please post the picture.....

dan, your avatar looks like a homage to soviet
fish-wrestlers.


 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2008-08-28 23:49 [#02232787]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



ffs

(slip i am only defending you because you happen to be
right, however, you can take your americans this and that
and kindly shove it right .. up .. there, yes there it is.)

now then,

Imagine if we all travelled around on massive skittles,
like
little personal space ships?


there is no contradiction here. as a skittle, it is
massive. we can get get from the statement that it is in
fact a skittle. what we know about skittles is that they
are not large enough for people to be on much less
traveled around on, so a skittle that had those capabilities
would have to be much larger than a normal skittle. in this
case massive.

as a space ship it is described as being little and
personal. it is little compared to other space ships, which
we know can be very large. this is its property as a space
ship, and it does not contradict its property as a skittle,
which is that it is massive.


 

offline ChildrnsTalkn on 2008-08-29 06:48 [#02232809]
Points: 140 Status: Lurker | Followup to glasse: #02232787



theres honestly nothing to defend, it was poorly worded
description of the skittle. to the degree that it made it
funny.

and yes it is contradicting in essence. it is assumed if you
are talking about a skittle as being anything other than a
normal skittle, it will be large, you dont have to point out
that it is a massive skittle, for one because he is not a
skittle-ologist. we all know the size of a skittle, it is a
skittle in the shape of a small personable space ship. i
mean if he kept going about the size of the skittle he might
as well go into detail about what skittles really mean in
his life, which is something i think he should do. what do
you think?



 

offline Indeksical from Phobiazero Damage Control (United Kingdom) on 2008-08-29 06:50 [#02232810]
Points: 10671 Status: Regular | Followup to ChildrnsTalkn: #02232809 | Show recordbag



How come no one else had a problem with it apart from you?


 


Messageboard index