read | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
recycle
...and 257 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614087
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
read
 

offline 9000 from Tempe (United States) on 2008-07-17 00:52 [#02222469]
Points: 98 Status: Regular



LAZY_TITLE


 

offline big from lsg on 2008-07-17 01:15 [#02222471]
Points: 23727 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



i dont read pitchfork


 

offline 9000 from Tempe (United States) on 2008-07-17 01:17 [#02222472]
Points: 98 Status: Regular



the article


 

offline Falito from Balenciaga on 2008-07-17 01:37 [#02222474]
Points: 3974 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



i stop reading in the 13th line


 

offline cuntychuck from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2008-07-17 01:52 [#02222476]
Points: 8603 Status: Lurker



pitchfork is for people who do not follow music


 

offline big from lsg on 2008-07-17 02:03 [#02222480]
Points: 23727 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



i dont read pitchfork articles


 

offline 9000 from Tempe (United States) on 2008-07-17 02:45 [#02222483]
Points: 98 Status: Regular



WOOW hahah. cuntychuck tells me i don't follow music haha.
that hurts. get the stick out of your ass and stop being so
goddamn self righteous you prick.


 

offline cuntychuck from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2008-07-17 02:47 [#02222484]
Points: 8603 Status: Lurker | Followup to 9000: #02222483



delete the dupeaccount.


 

offline 9000 from Tempe (United States) on 2008-07-17 02:49 [#02222486]
Points: 98 Status: Regular



why? i've done nothing to deserve to be deleted. you insult
me, i'll say something back. ya dig?


 

offline cuntychuck from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2008-07-17 02:56 [#02222487]
Points: 8603 Status: Lurker | Followup to 9000: #02222486



first of all, read my fucking sentence you insufferable
waste of human life. i was making a general, pessimistic,
prejudical statement - not particularily aimed at you but at
anyone who waste precious seconds reading a magazine that
tries to dictate ones music taste.


 

offline Falito from Balenciaga on 2008-07-17 02:59 [#02222488]
Points: 3974 Status: Lurker | Followup to cuntychuck: #02222487 | Show recordbag



as you dictate that the magazine is "for people who do not
follow music"


 

offline cuntychuck from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2008-07-17 03:00 [#02222489]
Points: 8603 Status: Lurker | Followup to Falito: #02222488



yes, but i am the authority on this.


 

offline 9000 from Tempe (United States) on 2008-07-17 03:03 [#02222490]
Points: 98 Status: Regular



well. that general, pessimistic, prejudical statement can
easily be misinterpreted seeing how i, an insufferable waste
of human life, post an article that is on
pitchforkmedia.com, while you, a self righteous prick with a
stick up his ass, posts that general, pessimistic,
prejudical statement...... my fault, i suppose.


 

offline penexpers from Toronto (Canada) on 2008-07-17 03:05 [#02222491]
Points: 4030 Status: Regular



Jesus. I came here just to post this link and when I saw the
title 'read' I thought it might well be this, and it was. It
is a good read, but unbalanced.


 

offline cuntychuck from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2008-07-17 03:05 [#02222492]
Points: 8603 Status: Lurker | Followup to 9000: #02222490



yeah, its your fault.


 

offline PS on 2008-07-17 03:07 [#02222493]
Points: 1876 Status: Lurker



Hey, Pitchfork isn't so bad.


 

offline cuntychuck from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2008-07-17 03:08 [#02222494]
Points: 8603 Status: Lurker | Followup to PS: #02222493



LAZY_TITLE


 

offline PS on 2008-07-17 03:08 [#02222495]
Points: 1876 Status: Lurker



I'm going to try and condense it, so everyone can read.


 

offline 9000 from Tempe (United States) on 2008-07-17 03:10 [#02222496]
Points: 98 Status: Regular



thats what i'm saying. i mean, its not like its the fucking
bible and EVERYONE MUST AGREE WITH IT. they are wrong about
a lot of stuff, but right as well. i mostly just go there
for their news.


 

offline 9000 from Tempe (United States) on 2008-07-17 03:11 [#02222497]
Points: 98 Status: Regular



the drukqs review is shit. i never trust their reviews
because the people who do them are idiots.


 

offline PS on 2008-07-17 03:17 [#02222499]
Points: 1876 Status: Lurker | Followup to cuntychuck: #02222494



But, hey, that's just like, his opinion, man! Also, that
review is over seven years old, they've improved a bit since
then. Though I admit, reading their reviews is still a
chore.


 

offline cuntychuck from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2008-07-17 03:19 [#02222500]
Points: 8603 Status: Lurker



good man 9000, then we agree. but you are still a dupe
account, dont you have any guts man?


 

offline 9000 from Tempe (United States) on 2008-07-17 03:20 [#02222501]
Points: 98 Status: Regular



don't know what you mean.


 

offline cuntychuck from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2008-07-17 03:36 [#02222507]
Points: 8603 Status: Lurker | Followup to 9000: #02222501



but i do, and thats whats important.


 

offline big from lsg on 2008-07-17 05:06 [#02222515]
Points: 23727 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



it's pretentious, i sometimes try but just the first
paragraph always makes me want to die already


 

offline 1up from greater manchester (United Kingdom) on 2008-07-17 05:33 [#02222516]
Points: 2302 Status: Regular



interesting article.

some stupid comments have been made in this thread. let's
all give up reading and burn all our
books/magazines/internets because they're all made up of
opinions. plus i am so self opinionated that only my opinion
counts!

yeah right.


 

offline belb from mmmmmmhhhhzzzz!!! on 2008-07-17 09:43 [#02222554]
Points: 6387 Status: Lurker



that was some of the most irritating writing i've ever come
across


 


Messageboard index