You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
Now online (2)
steve mcqueen
Roger Wilco
...and 395 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614102
Today 15
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
consciousness acceleration
 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2008-06-08 19:56 [#02214480]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular



good vid


 

offline chaosmachine from Ottawa (Canada) on 2008-06-08 20:28 [#02214481]
Points: 2330 Status: Lurker




Pink Ranger|Credit Cards|Loans|Remortgages|Credit Cards


 

offline oyvinto on 2008-06-08 20:37 [#02214482]
Points: 8197 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



i don't see what's good about it


 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2008-06-08 21:50 [#02214494]
Points: 27795 Status: Regular | Followup to cygnus: #02214480



ur a gullable minded tosser. u think theres a shortcut to
everthing. probably including quality of your fucking music.
so if we need any fucking proof youre wrong it is that.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2008-06-08 23:05 [#02214498]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to oyvinto: #02214482



lol


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2008-06-08 23:16 [#02214500]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



Dobbin bravely comes out AGAINST consciousness, as usual.
Fight the good fight, soldier.


 

offline Gwely Mernans from 23rd century entertainment (Canada) on 2008-06-08 23:35 [#02214501]
Points: 9856 Status: Lurker



I immediately see stuff like this as irrelevant the second
they use terms like chakra and karma and whatever to explain
their point. You can't use spiritual theories as grounds of
explaining things.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2008-06-09 02:13 [#02214514]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Most people just don't know what consciousness is.


 

offline Raz0rBlade_uk on 2008-06-09 02:25 [#02214518]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



*flashes forward to clip of narrator with constipation
grabbing tight to the toilet*


 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2008-06-09 02:26 [#02214520]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular | Followup to Gwely Mernans: #02214501



everythings pure consciousness - i think the chakra system
is supposed to symbolize different levels of consciousness.
i dont know much about it. dont know much about karma either


 

offline Raz0rBlade_uk on 2008-06-09 02:31 [#02214521]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Followup to cygnus: #02214520 | Show recordbag



I hear you saying all this romanticised stuff, but what do
you say about a small child or baby getting raped then shot
in the head?


 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2008-06-09 12:02 [#02214676]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular | Followup to Raz0rBlade_uk: #02214521



the baby and the other person co-created the experience. the
experience happened. what more could one say? the human
body's like a tool for experience. it is made of pure
consciousness in order to experience things


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2008-06-09 12:17 [#02214681]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to cygnus: #02214676 | Show recordbag



Is your consciousness touching the ground?


 

offline Gwely Mernans from 23rd century entertainment (Canada) on 2008-06-09 12:17 [#02214683]
Points: 9856 Status: Lurker | Followup to cygnus: #02214676



isn't that just being objective about an issue outside of
you like that, all the while being romantically involved
with your own spirituality.

i think Raz0rBlade_uk threw that at you because it's not
something you can objectively comment on when for arguments
sake, you're on a spiritual subject that fascinates you that
can't be applied that scenerio because it's outside of you.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2008-06-09 13:06 [#02214699]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to cygnus: #02214676



Spinoza said that mind and matter were attributes of
substance. By substance he meant not matter, but beingness.
So consciousness permeates all being. It's as accurate to
say that the experience created the people as that the
people created the experience. The world of man is substance
dreaming about humans.


 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2008-06-09 13:46 [#02214721]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular | Followup to fleetmouse: #02214699



yeah. all that vid says is that time and space are energies
enabling forms to take physical "particularized" shapes, and
that since time is compressing - physical manifestations,
events, "possibilities" are manifesting into space
"quicker" - since there is less time.

i dont know why you brought up the thing about the baby
being raped and shot in the head to be honest, i dont see
what it has to do with what that vid was talking about i
have to admit


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2008-06-09 14:50 [#02214740]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



Well TBH I think those videos are the worst kind of
bafflegab and dreck but I think it's important not to
dismiss spiritual matters and metaphysics just because
people talk nonsense about them. Read the Tao Te Ching
(Feng and English trans.) for Best Metaphysics. This video
is just narration for a laser show at the Shirley McClain
planetarium.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2008-06-09 18:45 [#02214796]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



If you're actually interested in consciousness,
phenomenology is a good way to go. Try Merleau-Ponty first.
His use of language isn't as cryptic as Husserl or
Heidegger, so you won't need an “introduction to
phenomenology” book. Husserl's “Cartesian Meditations”
is also good if you want to take it from the start, but
already there, certain language difficulties could arise.


 

offline Raz0rBlade_uk on 2008-06-10 01:46 [#02214840]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Followup to cygnus: #02214721 | Show recordbag



it's because it has nothing to do with anything you talk
about is the exact reason i brought it up. all these ideas
of consciousness and natural progression to a higher plane
of existence are very hard to understand when you look at
the harsher realities of the world.


 

offline Falito from Balenciaga on 2008-06-10 01:55 [#02214841]
Points: 3974 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



"are very hard to understand when you look at
the harsher realities of the world"

-yes my son,is natural to fear the unknow,as much as you
fear as much as you love,so dont worry and be happy.



 

offline Raz0rBlade_uk on 2008-06-10 02:02 [#02214843]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Followup to Falito: #02214841 | Show recordbag



thanks daddy!


 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2008-06-10 02:31 [#02214849]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular



they aren't hard to understand!

whats happening is time is compressesing, and therefore the
"past" and the "future" are get smashed together. "now" and
"then" are getting smashed together. the "time" it takes for
a thought to be manifested in physical reality is faster,
because there is less "time".

or, maybe what is happening is that we are manifesting our
thoughts into physical reality at higher densities and with
much more speed, and the result of that is that less "time"
is needed, so time seems to fly by. time thins out.there is
less of it

what it means for beings of consciousness such as us is that
we can change the 'harsh realities' of the world at the
speed of our thought when we embrace an accelerated
consciousness.


 

offline Raz0rBlade_uk on 2008-06-10 02:34 [#02214850]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Followup to cygnus: #02214849 | Show recordbag



easier said than done i imagine


 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2008-06-10 02:47 [#02214851]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular | Followup to Raz0rBlade_uk: #02214850



That's exactly the point. What you imagine is what you will
experience. All experiences are valuable as you have and
will use the energies of time and space in order to create
those experiences. Thoughts do not exist within time/space -
they have to be demonstrated in physical reality. They are
"proven" by being demonstrated, and therefore ARE. Youll
imagine "easier said than done" - then prove it by the
condition actually being easier said than done. LOL

SOme people think that in 2012 - time and space will no
longer be necessary tools for bringing thought into physical
manifestation. That's what the vid is about.

Heres some footage from my favorite video game ever
vid


 

offline Raz0rBlade_uk on 2008-06-10 03:32 [#02214855]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Followup to cygnus: #02214851 | Show recordbag



what if i were to imagine that what you imagine IS NOT what
you experience?


 

offline BoxBob-K23 from Finland on 2008-06-10 07:32 [#02214874]
Points: 2440 Status: Regular | Followup to cygnus: #02214851



god hand IS higher consciousness

what an awesome game that is


 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2008-06-10 11:59 [#02214907]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular | Followup to Raz0rBlade_uk: #02214855



then i think you would experience that. assuming the
theory's correct; why wouldnt you? if the theory's
incorrect, then i dont know. there are lots of theories

BoxBob: God Hand is my religion


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2008-06-10 15:35 [#02214959]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to cygnus: #02214907 | Show recordbag



That's useless: Assuming any theory is correct
implies that what the theory predicts is correct. The
question is whether the theory is correct or not; why should
it be?

To determine that, you first have to know what, exactly, it
is the theory is claiming.

What does it mean when you say that time is compressing?
What is time, and how does it compress? If time was
compressing, and you were a being in time, how would you
determine its compression? If time compresses, that
doesn't mean that there is “less” time, but that the
same amount of time takes up less of whatever it was it used
to take up. What is time taking up?

How and in what way does a thought manifest in physical
reality? Is a thought ever not in physical reality?
What “realm” contrasts physical reality? How can you
manifest a thought with higher density and how does
this relate to time? Are thoughts only in time until you
manifest them in physical reality? How do they cross the
realms?

If you manifest your thoughts at a higher speed, this
doesn't mean that time compresses, it just means that the
process of manifesting your thoughts take less time, but why
should time be a measure of these processes, and why should
it be so essential to this “insight?”



 

offline PORICK from fucking IRELAND on 2008-06-10 15:46 [#02214963]
Points: 1911 Status: Lurker



what a fucking terrible video.

these videos always feature those fucking droning voices of
posturing ASSHOLES who specialise in making this muck up.

cygnus, come on now


 

offline noseburger on 2008-06-10 15:51 [#02214965]
Points: 1198 Status: Lurker



cod


 

offline Falito from Balenciaga on 2008-06-11 00:50 [#02215085]
Points: 3974 Status: Lurker | Followup to Raz0rBlade_uk: #02214855 | Show recordbag



what if i were to imagine that what you imagine
IS NOT what you experience?


that your intentions affect to me depends the love vibration
that i carry on my thoughts,then my experience.

probably thats why voodoo works...



 

offline Raz0rBlade_uk on 2008-06-11 03:38 [#02215102]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Followup to Falito: #02215085 | Show recordbag



you so crazy


 

offline mohamed from the turtle business on 2008-11-18 18:21 [#02253330]
Points: 31229 Status: Regular | Followup to cygnus: #02214520 | Show recordbag



are you experiencing anticipatory events and if so - would
you tell out on the internet?


 

offline cyrstal dude from LA all day! (United States) on 2008-11-18 19:01 [#02253341]
Points: 900 Status: Addict



sometimes when i smoke a lot of weed, a whole dipset mixtape
flies back in five minutes.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2008-11-18 19:27 [#02253347]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



where is illfates

surely he


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2008-11-18 19:59 [#02253348]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to cygnus: #02214520



"everythings pure consciousness - i think the chakra system
is supposed to symbolize different levels of consciousness.
i dont know much about it. dont know much about karma
either"

Look it up in books and the internet. find differing views
and weigh it all up in your own mind. Then question it
again. Then you can post some more shit that is truly what
you think you think.


 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2008-11-18 20:16 [#02253349]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular | Followup to JivverDicker: #02253348



you think so?


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2008-11-18 20:19 [#02253350]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to cygnus: #02253349



Yes, that's why I typed it.


 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2008-11-18 20:25 [#02253351]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular | Followup to JivverDicker: #02253350



i typed the original post in this thread like months ago,
since then ive read lots of u.g. krishnamurti
you read this guy?


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2008-11-18 20:29 [#02253352]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to cygnus: #02253351



No I haven't. I'm not the one posting daft shit. (I am 99%
of the time)


 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2008-11-18 20:40 [#02253360]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular | Followup to JivverDicker: #02253352



youre so edgy i can shave with your posts


 

offline rockenjohnny from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2008-11-18 21:15 [#02253365]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker | Followup to cygnus: #02253351



i like this, thanks.


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2008-11-18 21:26 [#02253369]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to cygnus: #02253360



You don't need to shave, you're part native american. Has
revspersona recieved your machinedrum?


 

offline Mr Brazil from Oh Joan, I love you so... on 2008-11-18 21:54 [#02253373]
Points: 1970 Status: Lurker



.


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2008-11-18 23:00 [#02253382]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker



people


 

offline wimp on 2008-11-19 00:28 [#02253383]
Points: 1389 Status: Lurker



hey cygnus, which UGK books have you read?


 

offline cx from Norway on 2008-11-19 00:57 [#02253385]
Points: 4537 Status: Regular



I just want to drop my consciousness thesis..

First off, I really loved fleetmouse's way of saying it,
substance dreaming about humans, however, during that
dreaming, how does one define what is real and what isn't?
Does the substance become human, or is it all just a dream?

Without consciousness in the universe, nothing would mean
anything.
So all these values we as humans add to the world, do they
shape the universe, or are they just local phenomena in the
brain that do not mean anything, and how can we separate
these when we are subjective ourselves?

Second off, nobody knows the mechanism for which
consciousness works off.
If there is a physical mechanism, then when we know this we
can start to manipulate it to become smarter in any way we
see fit, assuming there is a mechanism of course.

Consciousness in the end is nothing more than an association
box.
You get some stimuli, the brain cross checks stored
memories, releases chemicals, gives you an emotion, a
thought, and off you go.
That's why we're all so different, because there's no
concrete real way to see anything.

I actually don't believe much in philosophy, I do believe it
can help us to eloquently phrase certain things we learn,
but most of it isn't necessarily /truth/
Truth is something we cannot touch I think, not even with
science.
On one end of the spectrum, truth is everywhere, I am
looking at this monitor, and thus truth is it exists, on the
other end of the spectrum, I can't really in any way /prove/
that this monitor exists.
I can show someone else, but I can't prove that they are
conscious to see it too.

I can never prove anyone elses consciousness, one can only
do that through ones own experience, and even then it is
questionable..
And then you see that the problem of consciousness isn't
just definition, it's also the barrier between language and
abstract thinking.. Well im running out of space now, bbl


 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2008-11-19 02:43 [#02253395]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular | Followup to wimp: #02253383



ive read mind is a myth, mystique of enlightenment, sage and
the housewife (the most brutal one of all),thought is your
enemy, and 3 other ones i think. thought is your enemy is a
pretty brutal one, too. they are all very brutalizing and
will engage you. i sat immobile, in some sort of vegetative
state for close to half a day after i read "No Way out" -
the books are just napalm

i reccomend "no way out"


 

offline mohamed from the turtle business on 2008-11-19 18:27 [#02253650]
Points: 31229 Status: Regular | Followup to cx: #02253385 | Show recordbag



seriously, the fact that we're all here watching this
moniotor makes me think

A) we're all the same
B) we're all well tuned
C) nothing else


 


Messageboard index