Hardware Help Please | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 413 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614087
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Hardware Help Please
 

offline darkpromenade from Australia on 2008-03-06 20:19 [#02182485]
Points: 2777 Status: Regular



Due to some changes in my household, I need to clear some
space in our small home. I am thinking of getting ride of
some of my bulkier old hardware and replace it with a single
workstation. When I get together with the boys to make a
racket, I currently use a Kawai k4r , a Q-80 Sequencer, an
old Akai S01 sampler, two el-cheapo Behringer effects
units, an Alesis HR-16B (might keep this), a distortion
pedal, 3 cheap mikes and a 16 channel mixer.

What I'd like to do is get rid of the rack-mounted gear and
replace it all with a single unit.

It needs to sequence, with midi outs (preferably two, so I
can sync with my mates gear), have some-type of in-built
synth (nothing flash, I'm used to the 16-bit sound of the
K4), an in built sampler that I can preferably load .wavs
into, on-board effects (again, nothing flash but the more
the better) and multiple audio outs (at least 2 stereo outs)
and audio in's (so I can route external audio through the
onboard effects).

The more natural and easier to use the interface is the
better.

We don't make great sounding music (think noisy, improv,
simple beats, angry-acid with a human touch) so it dosn't
need to be great sounding.

New or second-hand, the cheaper the better at the moment.

Any ideas?

Cheers


 

offline tragedy from Gloucester (United States) on 2008-03-06 20:25 [#02182486]
Points: 4423 Status: Lurker



try this


 

offline darkpromenade from Australia on 2008-03-06 21:26 [#02182496]
Points: 2777 Status: Regular | Followup to tragedy: #02182486



ummm, no thanks.........

what were you looking for when you found that?


 

offline tragedy from Gloucester (United States) on 2008-03-06 21:31 [#02182499]
Points: 4423 Status: Lurker | Followup to darkpromenade: #02182496



no i was looking for that.


 

offline darkpromenade from Australia on 2008-03-06 21:46 [#02182501]
Points: 2777 Status: Regular



you must be very happy then :)


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2008-03-06 22:46 [#02182502]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker



i'm not old enough to watch that. can someone please tell me
what's in it?


 

offline darkpromenade from Australia on 2008-03-07 00:55 [#02182522]
Points: 2777 Status: Regular | Followup to goDel: #02182502



A whole lot of loving...... :)

Now, please, back on topic.....

Workstations that will be suitable for me..... anyone?


 

offline sheffieldbleep from Sheffield (United Kingdom) on 2008-03-07 01:18 [#02182523]
Points: 2466 Status: Lurker | Followup to darkpromenade: #02182485



wouldn't bother with a workstation, just get something like
this with this and this.


 

offline darkpromenade from Australia on 2008-03-07 01:48 [#02182524]
Points: 2777 Status: Regular | Followup to sheffieldbleep: #02182523



yeah, i've thought about the pc route......... it might be
the most simple approach, but the guys I play with arn't
really software people and we tend to swap around on each
others gear as we play...........

and i've always made "better" sounds on hardware (better is
a relative term here, given that what I make hovers
somewhere between horrible and awful).... i think "more
satisfying" sounds is a more accurate term.

Thanks for your suggestion though..... really appreciate
it....... better than a large woman rubbing lotion on
herself self(please see tradgedy's link above).


 

offline darkpromenade from Australia on 2008-03-07 01:49 [#02182525]
Points: 2777 Status: Regular



herself selfherself selfherself selfherself selfherself
selfherself selfherself selfherself selfherself selfherself
selfherself self


 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2008-03-07 08:38 [#02182611]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



this is what you want

this is US only but you can probably find one there or to...


 

offline hedphukkerr from mathbotton (United States) on 2008-03-07 09:48 [#02182651]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular | Followup to glasse: #02182611



damn, not to be presumptuous or anything, but it looks like
you hit the nail on the head with that one.


 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2008-03-07 10:43 [#02182682]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Followup to hedphukkerr: #02182651 | Show recordbag



A Kurzweil 2000 might be another option too


 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2008-03-07 11:31 [#02182718]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Followup to glasse: #02182682 | Show recordbag



K2000 that is


 

offline darkpromenade from Australia on 2008-03-07 13:29 [#02182762]
Points: 2777 Status: Regular | Followup to glasse: #02182611



Wow, both of those suggestions look spot on. And not too
expensive.

The rackmount version of either with a small footprint midi
input device could be very cool.

Thanks dude, I think you've found the best value for money
hardware answer. Now I just have to find one to ship to Oz.


 

offline vlari from beyond the valley of the LOLs on 2008-03-07 13:32 [#02182763]
Points: 13915 Status: Regular



i love happy endings


 

offline darkpromenade from Australia on 2008-03-07 13:36 [#02182766]
Points: 2777 Status: Regular



Now, what about the newer "groovebox" equipment? Are any
modern manufacturers making the type of gear I am after?
The above units have all of the technical requirements i
would like, but the interface, particularly for the
sequencer, might be an issue. The step-sequencer style of
interface has always seemed quite simple to use. Anyone got
any more ideas?


 

offline darkpromenade from Australia on 2008-03-07 13:38 [#02182767]
Points: 2777 Status: Regular | Followup to vlari: #02182763



..............and the story continues (hopefully)!


 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2008-03-08 11:14 [#02183037]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Followup to darkpromenade: #02182766 | Show recordbag



I am trying to remember how the step sequencer on my ASR-X
Pro works. I am pretty sure instead of a grid you have to
put 1/4 or 1/8 and then hit the note. With that it was
generally easier to record a pattern real time, then go back
and use the step-sequencer and job/param functions to touch
it up. I prefer grid-style step sequencing myself much more
intuitive.

I'm not too familiar with the Electribes, MPCs and those
kind of boxes. I'm sure many of them offer grid style
sequencing and some, but not all, include sampling. Prob
have to just pull up some spec sheets, google some forums,
and maybe just walk in a guitar center and see what they
have on the floor to tinker around with.


 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2008-03-08 11:41 [#02183054]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Followup to glasse: #02183037 | Show recordbag



But yea, with the ASR series you basically had a "sequence,"
which is like a performance or multi on other workstations
and contains your 16 patches or kits, 2 insert FX and a
global reverb (I can't remember if you had multiple patterns
within a sequence or if your sequence was the pattern. I'm
not at home so can't go check.)

Then in song mode you would string those sequences together
to form a song. The one thing there was that if you were
running different FX on each sequence it would not
transition seamlessly from one sequence to the next. You
had to resample the pattern with the FX, assign the loop to
a pad and then reprogram as a triggered loop.


 

offline dave_g from United Kingdom on 2008-03-08 12:14 [#02183066]
Points: 3372 Status: Lurker



I use a mpc 1000 with the unofficial JJOS which has a grid
edit in it. I really like it. However no synth engine as
such.
There is a new mpc, the mpc5000, which does have a DSP synth
inside it. It's pretty new, so I couldn't say if it's good,
bad or ugly.

If you have the money, get the mpc 4000. It's the flagship
mpc for sure. It can do 24bit/96khz sampling and has grid
edit and so much good stuff.
It's quite big, but is a great box to have. No synth engine
as such, but multisamples and decent programs mean who
cares.
(I use a rackmount S5000 sampler as a synth with good
multisamples and apply envelopes,etc and its as good as a
synth)

An alternative, which a lot of people seem to like is the
Roland MV8800.
But I've never used one.

So, I think mpc 1000, 2500 are good budget ones, then if you
have the dosh get a mpc4000 or mpc5000 or mv8800. Personally
if I had room/cash I would get the 4000, but I think they've
stopped making them now(?)
Hopefully this is the sort of thing you're after.



 

offline darkpromenade from Australia on 2008-03-08 19:52 [#02183265]
Points: 2777 Status: Regular



Thanks for the input......

I just spent some time looking at the MPC range on youtube.
Either the MPC1000 or 2000 look good. I can live without a
synth i have to. The only thing I would miss is the ability
to process external audio through effects. The mpc5000 does
this, but the cost is crazy! I like being able to transfer
files via usb aswell.

Maybe I can keep my effects rack and sell the rest..... food
for thought.


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2008-03-09 02:55 [#02183334]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker



You can process your external audio through the mpc1000's
effects/


 

offline darkpromenade from Australia on 2008-03-09 03:40 [#02183341]
Points: 2777 Status: Regular | Followup to Taxidermist: #02183334



ok, really? only a single stereo input yeah? and in
real-time, as the thing is playing samples etc? and can you
have separate fx for the external audio and the samples that
are being played?



 

offline dave_g from United Kingdom on 2008-03-09 06:40 [#02183362]
Points: 3372 Status: Lurker | Followup to darkpromenade: #02183341



There are 3fx engines in the mpc1000.
The first two are assignable and have a selection of
effects, which you can use in a send/return chain using the
internal programs or external inputs.
The third is a "mastering" section, which provides 4 band
semi parametric EQ and a compressor.

You can use "input thru" to process the external stereo (or
mono) signal.
If you feed it out of the main stereo outs you can also send
it to fx unit 1 or 2.
If you use any other outputs you cannot do this.
However for any setting you can also apply a low/band/hi
pass filter to the external signal and also apply realtime
pitch shifting.

So, if you use fx 1 for the internal sounds and fx 2 for the
external sounds you're sorted.
Alternatively you could use fx 1 and 2 for internals and
just use say the low pass filter and/or the pitch shifter on
the external signals.

You can also assign the Q link knobs for hands on knobby
control of most parameters.


 

offline darkpromenade from Australia on 2008-03-09 13:26 [#02183438]
Points: 2777 Status: Regular | Followup to dave_g: #02183362



Thanks for the clarification. That sounds great. Very
small footprint as well.

I've seen some youtube footage of the MPC 1000, but
unfortunately its mostly of wankers making bad R&B


 

offline dave_g from United Kingdom on 2008-03-09 14:01 [#02183453]
Points: 3372 Status: Lurker | Followup to darkpromenade: #02183438



If you do get the mpc1000, I would recommend the first thing
you do is purchase the JJOS for it. This is a 3rd party OS.
The new version JJOS2 is under development and not stable,
but the JJOS1 is very stable, better than the akai OS both
in terms of stability and also features.

After using the JJOS I think why didn't akai do it this way!
All I can say is just get it asap. No point getting into the
plain old akai system when the JJOS1 is far superior.
have a look here for more info
http://www7a.biglobe.ne.jp/~mpc1000/
It's perhaps a bit overwhelming, but after a few hours on
akai os you can appreciate things like global program edit
and grid edit.

The only problem with the mpc1000 was with the pads
degrading. This is now fixed. It's a great little box. You
could easily use it for a whole track.
here are some good vids
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ZTY8vlKO9hg
http://youtube.com/watch?v=0uwN-d7LXTA&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4jAllTGFUM&feature=related



 

offline darkpromenade from Australia on 2008-03-09 22:53 [#02183597]
Points: 2777 Status: Regular | Followup to dave_g: #02183453



The alternate OS looks good, but the online manual is
shocking

Whats the difrerence between the blue modles and the black
ones? Are the blue ones older one's, and therfore more
likely to have pad problems? and can you fix the pad issue?

Thanks for answering all my questions.


 

offline dave_g from United Kingdom on 2008-03-10 11:47 [#02183739]
Points: 3372 Status: Lurker | Followup to darkpromenade: #02183597



The blue ones were the original ones. I don't think you can
get them now. Their model code is MPC1000.
Black was the new colour, called MPC1000BK. The latest black
ones should have the new good pads, these are called
MPC1000BK-N.
The barcode sticker underneath has one of these
designators.
Possibly the box too(?)

I have the black one with the older "crap" pads, but I
haven't experienced problems with them yet. There is a kit
to make the old blue and black ones upto the latest and
greatest standard by replacing the old pads. The problem
with the pads was due to the frankly shocking decision on
how to make them. The BK-N model uses the tried and tested
method with all the pads on a single sheet. The older
mpc1000s have seperate pads, which degrade over time due to
stupid design.
If you buy a new one now you should be ok. It's worth
checking though, because the pad "upgrade" kit costs money!

As for the JJOS instructions, they are shocking due to the
translation from Japanese to English creating some sort of
Jenglish dialect.
there is lots of info on the mpc-forums.com website
once you play around with it you won't have any problems.
some features are a bit hidden, but you will think "it would
be ace if I could do xyz" and then find that is a shift key
and some button to do it or on some menu you've never really
explorered.

So in conclusion, get the MPC1000BK-N and get the JJOS. You
can try the free 3.08 version or whatever it is and you get
goodies like grid edit and global program edit, but this
lacks a lot of other nice things.
Oh and I suggest you get a RAM upgrade. The akai RAM is a
ripoff. you just need to buy a 256mb laptop ram PC133 card I
think and it will cost not a lot and you get 128mb to play
with then. some info here
http://mpc-forums.com/viewtopic.php?t=26775
I think the CF cards can be upto 2gig in size and you can
also use a hard disk if you want. I think the mpc2500 lets
you install a CD burner too, but you might want to check
that.


 

offline sheffieldbleep from Sheffield (United Kingdom) on 2008-03-10 12:38 [#02183758]
Points: 2466 Status: Lurker | Followup to darkpromenade: #02182485



have you looked at the machinedrum?


 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2008-03-10 15:06 [#02183795]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



Everyone wants a machinedrum but they are $$


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2008-03-10 16:07 [#02183833]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker



I don't want a machine drum. In the whole interface vs sound
arena, they kill for interface, but they sound thin and
digital. I can't see why I wouldn't just end up using a
computer instead if I wanted my music to sound thin.

If you want my advice, go to the music store and try out all
the different machines they have for a few hours each, and
don't buy something until you say to yourself "fuck I need
this". If you can't find the device you are looking for post
an add on craigslist asking for people that would be kind
enough to let you try theirs. You will usually find a couple
zealots that think that it would be worth their time just to
convince another person to fall in love with their workhorse
of choice.

Everything is going to cost you at least $500 unless you get
lucky. That kind of money isn't worth spending on advice you
get online from people that have no idea of how your work
flow functions or what you really need.


 

offline darkpromenade from Australia on 2008-03-10 16:44 [#02183860]
Points: 2777 Status: Regular



The machine drum is out of my price range. I'm going to
have enough trouble keeping my wife happy with a 2nd hand
MPC (not really, she's cool, but just at the moment blowing
money on "toys" isn't a good idea).

I am going to visit my local store in the next few weeks and
have a play around with some gear...........


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2008-03-10 16:51 [#02183864]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker



Do what I do. Buy it with a sheepish look on your face, and
as soon as she says something negative about it snap at her
and tell her its your money you are spending. Those
conversations always seem to end with 'as long as you are
happy' and then a kiss. Its kind of nice.


 

offline lupus yonderboy from 1970. (United Kingdom) on 2008-03-10 16:56 [#02183870]
Points: 1985 Status: Lurker




can you do step recording on an MPC 1000. . . like
programming an alesis sr16 ?


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2008-03-10 16:57 [#02183872]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker



Yeah, you can do realtime or programed. The one weak point
of a mpc1k is that its a bit awkward to do the step
sequencing. The JJ os fixes that.


 

offline lupus yonderboy from 1970. (United Kingdom) on 2008-03-10 17:03 [#02183875]
Points: 1985 Status: Lurker | Followup to Taxidermist: #02183872




and you can do this down to 96 resolution or higher? can you
edit note velocities also?


 

offline darkpromenade from Australia on 2008-03-10 17:12 [#02183879]
Points: 2777 Status: Regular



I don't do "sheepish" or "snapping".

She'll be right. If I sell the gear I have now and it costs
$500 or less then it will be ok.

She really is supportive of all of my hobbies. And I don't
tell her what to spend her money on. We are financially
independant of each other, although that will change in
August.


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2008-03-10 17:15 [#02183881]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker | Followup to darkpromenade: #02183879



That was meant to be a joke, but you should always have a
serious discussion before making any large purchases like
this.


 

offline darkpromenade from Australia on 2008-03-10 17:17 [#02183883]
Points: 2777 Status: Regular | Followup to Taxidermist: #02183881



:)



 

offline lupus yonderboy from 1970. (United Kingdom) on 2008-03-10 17:45 [#02183894]
Points: 1985 Status: Lurker




on the jj os i mean? =]


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2008-03-10 18:10 [#02183897]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker | Followup to lupus yonderboy: #02183894



I don`t know from firsthand experience. I have this nasty
little goblin on my shoulder that makes me too paranoid to
install it as it may become an issue in the event I want it
serviced by an authorized akai repairman.


 

offline lupus yonderboy from 1970. (United Kingdom) on 2008-03-10 22:28 [#02183939]
Points: 1985 Status: Lurker | Followup to Taxidermist: #02183897




fairplay. . . thanks=]


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2008-03-10 22:56 [#02183951]
Points: 21452 Status: Lurker



What you need is a quantum invertedly fluctuated
despangulator.


 

offline dave_g from United Kingdom on 2008-03-11 04:47 [#02184034]
Points: 3372 Status: Lurker | Followup to Taxidermist: #02183897



I can't believe you haven't got the JJOS. I think akai would
be shocked if your MPC didn't have it. There are so many
people with it on the mpc-forums that you're in the minority
(probably).

The latest JJOS1 is so stable. It has less bugs than akai
OS, more features and the bits that are the same that have
been tweaked have been improved and made much more usable.
akai program mode was pants. you could only tweak one pad at
a time.
JJOS global program edit you can grab whole bunches of pads
and tweak them together. If you want to apply a filter to
all or an envelope or whatever it is so much faster you just
think "why the hell didn't akai do it this way from the get
go?"

You can edit velocities in akai and JJOS. in akai you have
to use the step edit mode, Like this
In JJOS you can do this and grid edit. in grid edit you move
your crosshairds over the note you want hit overdub to enter
edit mode and press edit to tweak all the parameters.
to do a whole load of notes you can do this in the SEQ EDIT
screen and scroll to velocity and you can do scaling, add or
subtract offsets, set them all to a certain value, etc etc
You can also do transposing, shift timing, copy and move
bits all sorts on this screen. Its the same for both OS's.

The thing that JJOS can do that akai os can't is much better
handling of midi. the killer feature is the midi grid edit
lets you draw curves and things for say pitch bend or mod
wheel, etc to drive external synth.
you select area you want to curve over, use the two sliders
to set start and stop levels and twist wheel to get a smooth
curve or one with gaps, etc like the density control for the
curve say. hard to explain but easy to figure out and
appreciate. JJOS is just SO MUCH BETTER in so many ways. do
yourself a favour and DOUBLE the usefulness of the box.


 

offline darkpromenade from Australia on 2008-03-11 19:53 [#02184402]
Points: 2777 Status: Regular



Having loaded the JJOS, you can't re-load the Akai OS,
right?


 

offline dave_g from United Kingdom on 2008-03-12 10:51 [#02184557]
Points: 3372 Status: Lurker | Followup to darkpromenade: #02184402



You can re-install the akai os the same way you
install the JJOS. It's dead easy.


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2008-03-13 18:59 [#02185011]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker



Actually with the new version you get a choice as to which
OS you want it to load on startup.

I understand the benefits and all of it. Done a lot of
research and after careful deliberation decided that it
doesn't change the fact that loading third party operating
systems will void any responsibility akai has with my
machine. That's a bad thing.


 

offline dave_g from United Kingdom on 2008-03-14 09:28 [#02185137]
Points: 3372 Status: Lurker | Followup to Taxidermist: #02185011



Not quite correct there. The option to boot OS1 or OS2 lets
you choose which JJOS to load. JJOS1 is the current stable
one.
JJOS2 is the new under development super dooper one, which
adds lots of features found on "proper" samplers like full
ADSR envelopes and tons of new exciting stuff.
JJOS1 is compatible with legacy akai OS, but the new JJOS2
programs are slightly incompatible.

When your warranty runs out you should install it because by
that point whatever goes wrong you have to pay no matter
what is installed.
I'm glad you're happy with the akai os, but once you've
taken a bite of the forbidden JJ fruit, there's no turning
back!
Seriously though, the day the warranty runs out at least
stick the freebie 3.08 JJ on there.


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2008-08-23 00:26 [#02231103]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker



I am too detatched from this website to know if there was
any follow up to this. Anything happen? Happy/unhappy new
owner of an mpc? I like to hear good stories.


 


Messageboard index