[hardware] midi knobs and the such? | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
big
recycle
...and 562 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614087
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
[hardware] midi knobs and the such?
 

offline hedphukkerr from mathbotton (United States) on 2007-12-02 14:22 [#02149837]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular



i know i can find them on google quite easily, but id like
to know what you guys would reccomend for a midi box.

basically i just want something that is usb and has a bunch
of knobs (and sliders possibly as well). a keyboard is not
necessary.

something like this looks quite tasty, but i just
have no idea what brands are quality and such.


 

offline SlipDrinkMats from Thanks (Bhutan) on 2007-12-02 14:25 [#02149839]
Points: 1744 Status: Regular



God I hate you.


 

offline hedphukkerr from mathbotton (United States) on 2007-12-02 14:45 [#02149844]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular



...confused...


 

offline sadist from the dark side of the moon on 2007-12-02 15:01 [#02149848]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker



the uc-33 is probably the most popular one. along with this
one LAZY_TITLE

i highly recommend the behringer one because it's a total
bargain and it has everything that you want from a midi
controler. the encoders are fun too when you have something
like reason or ableton which sends feedback to them so they
adjust the ledrings to the pc.

if you need sliders you can also go for this LAZY_TITLE
never used it but has fine opinions too. motorized faders
must rock.

a much more prof thing is this one LAZY_TITLE
autechre used them on their sets lately. very solid but
pricey.

also check out the novation zero sl LAZY_TITLE
which rocks with it's automap function - you click any
plugin on the screen and all the values are automatically
signed to the knobs.


 

offline hedphukkerr from mathbotton (United States) on 2007-12-02 15:10 [#02149850]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular | Followup to sadist: #02149848



oh man, fuckin sexy.

thanks. if noone gives a better recommendation it looks like
ill be asking for that behringer for xmas :)


 

offline sadist from the dark side of the moon on 2007-12-02 16:06 [#02149866]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker



just quadruple check if you don't really need the faders -
it's the only minus in the behriger and if you want to play
live with it faders are just much better for volume
control.

besides that the behrigner has all you need and even more -
just search the internet for tips and tricks made by the
huge fanclub behind it. use google for it.

then you'll find for example the trick to make "accelerating
knobs" which is totally awesome - you turn a knob very slow
and you need like 2 total turns to reach the highest level.
but when you turn a knob quickly it just slams the full
value in immediately. great for sends.


 

offline hedphukkerr from mathbotton (United States) on 2007-12-02 16:23 [#02149870]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular | Followup to sadist: #02149866



thats great that there are all sorts of tweakable settings.
ive been using an m-audio o2 (8 knobs, 1 fader) and it just
is not cutting it anymore.

i dont think id need the faders. the only thing i really use
it for is a cross-fader, and i can do that on a knob just
fine. either that or i find i really need the one fader and
can just hook my o2 up as well. tada!


 

offline sadist from the dark side of the moon on 2007-12-02 17:42 [#02149904]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker



depends on how much control you need.

the bitstream3x has a tiny crossfader. or you might get a
LAZY_TITLE if you don't need more knobs.


 

offline freqy on 2007-12-02 17:48 [#02149906]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag




that b control looks topa notcha. look at the price!!!!!!

i want one now!!



 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2007-12-02 18:58 [#02149921]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to sadist: #02149904



how much control do you need sadist? Behringer things are
shit!


 

offline hedphukkerr from mathbotton (United States) on 2007-12-02 19:01 [#02149923]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular | Followup to JivverDicker: #02149921



in what way are they shit?


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2007-12-02 19:04 [#02149926]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to hedphukkerr: #02149923



Behringer copy good midi controllers with shitty components.



 

offline lupus yonderboy from 1970. (United Kingdom) on 2007-12-02 19:26 [#02149943]
Points: 1985 Status: Lurker



Behringer mixers are shit, their midi stuff is fine. the b
control is grand but its motorized fades are noisy and it
feels a bit cheap...but on the other hand -it is cheap=]


 

offline pulseclock from Downtown 81 on 2007-12-02 23:16 [#02150011]
Points: 6015 Status: Lurker



this is a keyboard, but it's got so much to it
man. that b-control looks fucking useful though, i think im
gettin that soon.


 

offline pulseclock from Downtown 81 on 2007-12-02 23:17 [#02150012]
Points: 6015 Status: Lurker



bad link

new link


 

offline hedphukkerr from mathbotton (United States) on 2007-12-03 00:25 [#02150023]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular | Followup to pulseclock: #02150011



that things more expensive than the behringer and has
fewer knobs.... for the moment im sticking with my original
choice.


 

offline sadist from the dark side of the moon on 2007-12-03 01:43 [#02150029]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker | Followup to JivverDicker: #02149921



i need a hell of control live but i make my own controllers
for few years now so i can have as much control as i want.

oh and really - i wouldn't touch anything by behringer where
sound is going through but all their midi related gear is
top notch for the price. and i have never heard of a broken
bcr2000.

this new white version of the bcf is meant to make less
noise.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2007-12-03 05:45 [#02150081]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to hedphukkerr: #02149923 | Show recordbag



Well, for starters, the rotaries are about as tight as a
wizard's sleeve...


 

offline hedphukkerr from mathbotton (United States) on 2007-12-03 12:37 [#02150256]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular | Followup to Ceri JC: #02150081



and what in the hell does that simile even mean? :P


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2007-12-04 02:42 [#02150468]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



wizard's sleeve n. Clown's pocket. A particularly
capacious sausage wallet. As in, "I can't feel a bloody
thing. You must have a fanny like a wizard's sleeve.
"


 

offline hedphukkerr from mathbotton (United States) on 2007-12-04 02:43 [#02150470]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular | Followup to Ceri JC: #02150468



wow, that explained absolutely nothing.

clown's pocket?? sausage wallet?? are you just pulling my
chain or are you brits really just that weird?


 

offline Fah from Netherlands, The on 2007-12-04 02:51 [#02150473]
Points: 6428 Status: Regular



all the breakcore kings use uc-33


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2007-12-04 03:34 [#02150480]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker



Go for the uc33. You could easily buy an equally priced
graphing calculator that will give you about as much musical
functionality as the behringer unit.


 

offline hedphukkerr from mathbotton (United States) on 2007-12-04 03:40 [#02150481]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular | Followup to Taxidermist: #02150480



oh snap... if taxi says it... now im in conflict again.


 

offline hedphukkerr from mathbotton (United States) on 2007-12-04 04:01 [#02150488]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular



so just to tally up, ive got three positive votes for the
uc33, with 2 for and 1.5 (i still have no idea what ceri
means) against the behringer...


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2007-12-04 04:24 [#02150496]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to hedphukkerr: #02150470 | Show recordbag



On Behringer hardware, the knobs tend to have a great deal
of free play in them; they are akin to a loose vagina.


 

offline hedphukkerr from mathbotton (United States) on 2007-12-04 04:57 [#02150501]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular | Followup to Ceri JC: #02150496



i got it!

loose vagina: finally an analogy i can understand.


 

offline pulseclock from Downtown 81 on 2007-12-04 07:40 [#02150524]
Points: 6015 Status: Lurker



hahah,

so trying to use the behringer is like trying to make a
woman with a loose vagina have an orgasm.

futile.



 

offline Fah from Netherlands, The on 2007-12-04 07:50 [#02150525]
Points: 6428 Status: Regular | Followup to pulseclock: #02150524



i wasn't going to agree with this statement if my BCR didn't
bail out during my last live set, next performance I'm going
to bash it to bits with a bat


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2007-12-04 08:11 [#02150527]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



got a thousand dollars?


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2007-12-04 08:37 [#02150534]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to Zeus: #02150527 | Show recordbag



that thing looks impressive.


 

offline sadist from the dark side of the moon on 2007-12-04 08:48 [#02150540]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker | Followup to Taxidermist: #02150480



wtf ? explain


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2007-12-04 08:50 [#02150541]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



I think it would work best with hardware, as you can
customize it, and assign it however you like... but all the
software that it is compatible with, that automaps the
functions... you can't customize it, which is really lame.

For instance, in Logic, when I bring up Sculpture, logic's
physical modeling synth, there are hundreds of parameters.
You cant set it so your most frequently used settings are on
the first page... its just a default mapping, so one setting
could be on page 3 of the mackie's layout, and another could
be on page 20, and you'll have to scroll back and forth.
really lame.

(this is how the older version on the mackie c4 worked...
the one in the picture is the pro model that just came out,
so it could be different, but I highly doubt it)

so yeah, id only use it to control hardware. Its perfect for
that (imo). Endless pages of MIDI assignments with updating
displays that you can label.

the knobs are also buttons, so you can push them in.


 

offline Skink from A cesspool in eden on 2007-12-04 08:53 [#02150542]
Points: 7483 Status: Lurker | Followup to sadist: #02150029



You make your own controllers? Pics please.


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2007-12-04 15:33 [#02150686]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker



I'm going to play the devils advocate here and make two more
suggestions.

The bitstream 3x which I have used before. Its got some
great features, pretty much anything you could want in a
midi controller, and the body of the actual unit is very
strong. The only downpoints I found were some of the buttons
felt cheap. The unit itself is metal, and most of the knobs
had a solid consistency. The arpegiator and lfo were a bit
more complicated to set up than I liked tho.

And there is the Remote zero SL with automapping led's that
label what the knobs are. I heard its a bit complicated to
set up, but is great to work with when you have it running
proper.

Out of all four choices, I would go with the bitstream.


 

offline hedphukkerr from mathbotton (United States) on 2007-12-04 15:42 [#02150687]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular | Followup to Taxidermist: #02150686



the more im looking at it the more attractive the bitstream
is looking. its got as many knobs and the other two i was
looking at, plus the faders, and a cross fader, joystick
touchpad, as well can what looks like some interesting
automatable feature.

unfortunately it seems possibly a bit out of my (read:
parent's xmas fund) economic range. maybe ill check ebay and
see how much they are there, or can anyone reccomend some
good online shops?


 

offline hedphukkerr from mathbotton (United States) on 2007-12-04 15:43 [#02150688]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular | Followup to hedphukkerr: #02150687



oh its not a touch pad but a joystick. still awesome.


 

offline sadist from the dark side of the moon on 2007-12-04 17:11 [#02150703]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker



LAZY_TITLE this is like my first self made midibox ever
- you can see the rough edit because i made every hole in
the front panel by myseld with a driller :>
LAZY_TITLE this is the second version with the
frontplate designed in autocad and ordered to be laser cut
in white plexy - glass. the buttons are lit which you can
see in the next pic LAZY_TITLE

i don't have any more actual pics of version two because it
is disassembled at right now because i am doing version 3
with it's parts. version 3 will be generally an upgrade to
number 2 but the frontpanel has been redesigned as i came to
several conclusions when live playing. i will have 10
channels now, still 3 lit buttons, 5 potentiometers per row
and a slider.



 

offline sadist from the dark side of the moon on 2007-12-04 17:15 [#02150704]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker



i have to admit that i probably never used any midi
controller not even a keyboard in my studio. i mean for
making tracks envelopes and stuff are like totally
sufficient and i get just annoyed by binding every knob to a
function that i totally loose my workflow. this automap
function of novation looks very sweet but i haven't seen
anywhere if it's compatible with floops which still is the
heart of my music making process.


 

offline freqy on 2007-12-04 17:58 [#02150724]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag




love youre home made midi desks. , awesome..

that white one looks better than any ive seen
beats my kenton freak.on looks ....

how do they behave? are they quite accurate?

:)



 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2007-12-04 18:10 [#02150729]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to sadist: #02150703 | Show recordbag



those midi controllers you made are ace... the pic of the
second one lit up looks great. The design looks very
professional. Be sure to post pics of the generation 3
controller once it's finished!


 

offline hedphukkerr from mathbotton (United States) on 2007-12-04 18:16 [#02150734]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular



agreed, that second controller (and the first as well for
all its 'see-the-guts' aesthetic) are both amazing looking.
how long did it take you to design/complete them? how much
experience with soldering did you have prior? and most
importantly ^ ^, how much was their net cost?


 

offline sadist from the dark side of the moon on 2007-12-05 12:35 [#02151010]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker



wowzers the topic fell so deep during the day that i forgot
about it.

so the cost... well i spend until now maybe like 250 dollars
or so which is already a uc-33 but you have to see it that
way - i have like 3 times the amount of control the uc-33
has, most of the parts are used in the further editions and
lots of money was spend on hardware like soldering irons and
such which cannot be really counted as cost of the midibox
itself.

the assembly time of the first box was like one day - the
second version a week but the second one was about half a
year of planning, testing parts and different supliers of
frontplates.

now after two years i'm feeling much more comfortable with
the system because it gets cheaper and faster to do it - i
have all companies i need (prototype boards, frontplates,
parts) and the whole building process is quite automated
now.

when i started making them the only electronical klowledge i
had was on which side to hold the soldering iron to not burn
yourself actually.

the whole midification system is from www.ucapps.de - the
most popular system i know - the forum and feedback is great
and just check all the options.

the design of the frontplate took me like an hour in autocad
- i mean come on it's 8 channels with 7 pots one slider and
three buttons :> version 3 will be more advanced


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2007-12-05 15:09 [#02151058]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to sadist: #02151010 | Show recordbag



It gives a person with little-to-no electromechanical
knowledge, such as myself, great hope to learn that someone
who began as a novice created something so well-built. You
say you've got all the companies you need now; was it an
arduous process finding retailers/wholesalers who could hook
you up with all the parts you need? Once again, nice work
and remember to post pics of your next creation!


 

offline pidgin from St Kilda on 2007-12-05 15:13 [#02151063]
Points: 542 Status: Lurker



TOP TIP

Make sure it's knobs you actually want and not
pads/triggers/toggles.

I have a korg padkontrol and it's great because it has two
knobs, 16 pads (assignable as pads or as switches) and a
kaoss-type x-y pad for BROCKING OUT!

it could do with maybe 2 more knobs but................


 

offline sadist from the dark side of the moon on 2007-12-05 16:51 [#02151116]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zephyr Twin: #02151058



the front panel of version 3 will be home tuesday so i hope
i can make a small tutorial of the building here aswell :>
damn now when my picture posting abilities died...

i don't want to kill your enthusiasm but i highly recommend
to go for it slowly and read alot on the ucapps site and not
panic around if actually nothing works.

the thing is - that these are electronics and the idea of
"what you see is what you get" just doesn't work.

i mean - trouble shooting can be a bitch at times - probably
costed most of the time on the box. you just solder
something bad and you might loose a week on finding the
solution.

at least - what's very good - there is lots of room for
mistakes with this project so even when you fuck something
up soldering it shouldn't do any harm to your gear and
everything can be redone.

another bitchy thing is searching for parts. you see not
even electronical parts because they are easy to get but
mechanical.

for example pots... my god i have tested like 15 different
and still haven't found the perfect ones. you know what i
always admired in professional stuff is - that you go to one
knob and you feel the resistance of it on your fingers. you
go to the second one and it's nearly identical. you go to
the same gear of your friend and it's still the same. i have
probably no pot that works like another.

the thing is - nobody in a company can tell you if they are
suited for oyur needs or don't. you have to test it - buy a
few, use them than decide. if you're lucky, you'll find the
perfect match fast if not you loose a lot of time jealous
about other people's uc-33's.


 

offline sadist from the dark side of the moon on 2007-12-05 16:56 [#02151118]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker



also buttons - those backlit buttons look nice but they are
far from perfect. first they are plastic so they don't
really feel comfortable. second they are rather used as
on/off switches in printers so they aren't very durable. but
they were THE ONLY lit switches i could find in poland at
this size. yep. forget about rubber buttons and such.

so again - not that i want to kill anyones dreams but just
be aware that such a box costs time, money and a lot of
sweat and the effect might not be what you wanted.

as i said - now after a few years i'm in the comfortable
position that i know everything around that box - okay i'm
maybe not yet able to do programming stuff with it (for
example the lcd can show you a lot of different things),
just add buttons, pots and so on but i can asseble them fast
and accurate.

i hope that when the parts will be here i will shake this
baby in like 2 days max. i hope.


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2007-12-05 16:58 [#02151120]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to sadist: #02151116 | Show recordbag



Thanks for the in-depth reply, I appreciate it.

I wasn't so much planning on following in your foot-steps
exactly, but had been considering taking on a
circuit-bending project on some old casiotone keyboards I've
got lying around. I actually saw an auction on ebay for
various wires, dip-switches and pots that would surely have
been useful, and have been kicking myself in the arse for
not bidding. Tinkering with the circuits of an already-built
item seemed like a good place for the uninitiated, like
myself, to start. :)


 

offline sadist from the dark side of the moon on 2007-12-05 17:02 [#02151122]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker



searching for retailers isn't that difficult - the question
is about the price. with the frontpanel company i was lucky
as hell - i found a company that makes advertising signs out
of plastic and they gave me a very good price. the front
panel for version 2 cost me like 20 bucks or so and was very
acurate shaped (the laser they have has like 0.1 mm
accuracy.) - the material is great too. it's shinny,
antistatic and let's light through so i hope i will find a
few bright leds for v3 to install it beyond the surface.
that will be a hammer :>

i also was lucky to find someone who made the prototype
boards (boards that you solder on all the resistors,
capacitors, chips and so on) - most of the companies wanted
me to order like 100 pieces so it would be affordable for
them and suddenlt i stumbled accross a company in my
hometown who make even 1 piece and like for no money at all
and very accurate.

the company that i get my parts was very easy to find but
they are quite pricey. but they have some nice parts there
like those buttons or those black potentiometer-caps.
arturia uses the same for their hardware gear and they have
the diameter of normal mixer-caps.


 

offline sadist from the dark side of the moon on 2007-12-05 17:04 [#02151123]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zephyr Twin: #02151120



yes and no - circuit bending is like so much fun but it's
all about trial and error. you never really actually now
what you have just done. you pick a potentiometer, solder
some cables - wow it makes breakcore now but why?

making things that actually "work" from scratch requires
much more thinging. as well as the troubleshooting i
mentioned above. something doesn't work - what now ?


 


Messageboard index