yay america! | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 121 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614201
Today 5
Topics 127548
  
 
Messageboard index
yay america!
 

offline hedphukkerr from mathbotton (United States) on 2007-09-18 03:08 [#02120975]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular



land of the free


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-09-18 03:13 [#02120977]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Britney spears hired an assassin to kill kevin federline
(k-fed).


 

offline Aesthetics from the IDM Kiosk on 2007-09-18 03:19 [#02120980]
Points: 6796 Status: Lurker



Cool speech!

Poor guy, nobody backed him up.. (except one female as far
as I could hear)


 

offline Gwely Mernans from 23rd century entertainment (Canada) on 2007-09-18 03:29 [#02120985]
Points: 9856 Status: Lurker



while the raw sense of injustice is felt in these students,
they really should just shut the fuck up and let the police
escort them out, or else they might get tasered. and I'll
bet that really hurts. what was he thinking, everyone else
would jump the cops and create a revolution? hah.


 

offline forck_02lynix from brooklyn on 2007-09-18 10:39 [#02121144]
Points: 4000 Status: Regular



i didn't watch that video but yay america!


 

offline vlari from beyond the valley of the LOLs on 2007-09-18 10:42 [#02121146]
Points: 13915 Status: Regular



yo


Attached picture

 

offline recycle from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2007-09-18 10:44 [#02121151]
Points: 40075 Status: Regular | Followup to vlari: #02121146



The girls will diggit'


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2007-09-18 10:46 [#02121153]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Gwely Mernans: #02120985 | Show recordbag



My POV. Shouting at police and struggling while they are
trying to cuff you (regardless of whether or not their doing
so is right) is likely to end up with you getting a shoeing
and a charge of resisting arrest. I got the impression this
kid was more interested in being some sort of
martyr/embarressing Kerry than actually having his question
answered. I've asked politicians difficult questions at
conferences before, but it hasn't (as yet) resulted in my
being arrested. Probably something to do with the way I ask
questions, but there we go.


 

offline forck_02lynix from brooklyn on 2007-09-18 10:51 [#02121158]
Points: 4000 Status: Regular | Followup to Ceri JC: #02121153



i agree with you there, it was due to his resisting arrest.
but on the other hand he wasn't really saying anything that
should have prompted his removal from the mic. freedom of
speech?


 

offline rad smiles on 2007-09-18 11:03 [#02121163]
Points: 5608 Status: Lurker



didn't warrant a fuckin' tasering


 

offline recycle from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2007-09-18 11:03 [#02121164]
Points: 40075 Status: Regular



EVERYTHING AND I MEAN EVERYTHING
WARRANTS A GOOD OLE TASERING !!!!

EVERYTHING.


 

offline rad smiles on 2007-09-18 11:04 [#02121165]
Points: 5608 Status: Lurker



hey did you ever see that clip of that cnn anchor being
tasered


 

offline rad smiles on 2007-09-18 11:04 [#02121166]
Points: 5608 Status: Lurker



i mean as a demonstration


 

offline bogala from NYC (United States) on 2007-09-18 11:08 [#02121167]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular



soon as he mentions skull and bones. Unbelievable.


 

offline rad smiles on 2007-09-18 11:08 [#02121168]
Points: 5608 Status: Lurker



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HlSO8-4FxCQ


 

offline bogala from NYC (United States) on 2007-09-18 11:12 [#02121172]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular



they should change it to freedom of polite and politically
correct speech


 

offline rad smiles on 2007-09-18 11:14 [#02121175]
Points: 5608 Status: Lurker



in five years that'll seem fun


 

offline mimi on 2007-09-18 17:36 [#02121357]
Points: 5721 Status: Regular



i got a stun gun


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2007-09-18 17:49 [#02121359]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



I blame the kid for believing that freedom of speech and the
constitution of the united states actually means anything,
anymore. They're no more a part of the United States of
America than Iraq is. You have to be very careful if you are
going to come out swinging with your questions, these days.


 

offline Indeksical from Phobiazero Damage Control (United Kingdom) on 2007-09-18 17:50 [#02121360]
Points: 10671 Status: Regular | Followup to mimi: #02121357 | Show recordbag



Have you got anyone with it yet?


 

offline rad smiles on 2007-09-18 17:53 [#02121361]
Points: 5608 Status: Lurker



its only safe to be subversive


 

offline PORICK from fucking IRELAND on 2007-09-18 19:12 [#02121369]
Points: 1911 Status: Lurker | Followup to mimi: #02121357



of course you do, you fucking yank dyke.


 

offline PORICK from fucking IRELAND on 2007-09-18 19:19 [#02121374]
Points: 1911 Status: Lurker



ps - ceri - you're a fucking fascist cunt.

the student did nothing to warrant an arrest. so what that
he resisted arrest? the arrest was unwarranted. therefore he
was absolutely in his right to wave his arms about and
question their motive for arresting him.

go fuck yourself.


 

offline chogoogohc on 2007-09-18 20:17 [#02121388]
Points: 32 Status: Regular



This guy has a lot to say and hes not being heard entirely
and being tazzed lol

that suckz


 

offline rad smiles on 2007-09-18 20:28 [#02121394]
Points: 5608 Status: Lurker



yeah its hilarious!


 

offline J198 from Maastricht (Netherlands, The) on 2007-09-19 01:46 [#02121461]
Points: 7342 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



these cops were obviously clueless as how to act
professionally and responsibly.

kerry should have stepped in and asked 'what the FUCK are
you guys doing? i just said i'll answer his question'


 

offline Wolfslice from Bay Area, CA (United States) on 2007-09-19 04:31 [#02121476]
Points: 4911 Status: Lurker



I think the police were within their rights to escort him
off the premises, especially if the owner of the
building/heads of the school gave them specific instruction
to remove troublemakers. That's not shitting on free
speech-- that's controlling events so shit like this doesn't
happen. He probably wouldnt have even been charged with
anything.

He should have just walked out calmly without making such a
big fucking mess, I liked the guy until he started freaking
out.


 

offline PORICK from fucking IRELAND on 2007-09-19 04:56 [#02121485]
Points: 1911 Status: Lurker | Followup to Wolfslice: #02121476



what the fuck did he do to warrant being dragged outside?

His question wasn't even long - as my friend said, he's been
at conferences where the questions spill over 10 minutes,
and it's usually waffle that could've been done without.

this guy was saying things that were actually relevant to
his question.

this is where newsbites, short attention spans and general
fucking idiocy leads.


 

offline Wolfslice from Bay Area, CA (United States) on 2007-09-19 05:07 [#02121486]
Points: 4911 Status: Lurker | Followup to PORICK: #02121485



He was obviously more concerned with making an idiot out of
Kerry and putting on a show rather then getting a straight
answer out of him. Don't pretend you can't see that,
douchebag.

It's the proprietor of the establishment's prerogative as to
whether he wants to allow this sort of behavior.
Understandably, he did not, so the kid was escorted outside.
He should have just gone calmly.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2007-09-19 05:42 [#02121496]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Wolfslice: #02121486 | Show recordbag



Bang on the money Wolfslice. The kid definately went the
wrong way about asking the question, the way he says, "I'm
going to ask my question, but I'm going to preface it, he's
been talking for two hours" came across as a bit cocky and
if I'd been holding a conference, I'd have probably been no
more patient with him. If you look closely, you can see the
SS guys confering when the kid starts going off on one, then
they tell one of the police to take action.

As J198 says though, I'm surprised Kerry didn't order the
police to stop. This sort of "hushing up" of people usually
backfires and it'd be much better of him to of said
something like, "Well, obvbiously I wish more of the
electorate had had your point of view and no, I wasn't in
the Skull an Bones society" and tried to laugh it off,
rather than be seen as complicit with the Police's actions.

If the police tried to march me out of a conference, I'd be
pissed off, but I wouldn't struggle/shout. What did he think
the best result would be? That the police would say, "Go on
then, have your little song and dance, hog the mike, fill
your boots."?! If he'd walked out calmly with them, he'd
still have put egg on Kerry's face. I don't understand what
thrashing about on the floor and shouting until they tasered
him into submission achieved.

Anyone see the old chap get arrested under terrorism charges
shouting a question at a Labour conference last year? That
was much more upsetting than this. The old man concerned
wasn't some wanky dissident who snuck in to the conference
with the sole intention to make a scene, he had been a
lifelong member of the party and was asking a serious
(albeit awkward) question.


 

offline PORICK from fucking IRELAND on 2007-09-19 05:53 [#02121498]
Points: 1911 Status: Lurker | Followup to Wolfslice: #02121486



No, I didn't see that.. And anyway, if he did -- why does
that warrant being pulled from the mic?

He did absolutely nothing to warrant being taken from the
microphone, and he was right to resist arrest.

Why would you just go peacefully ceri? If it's the police
who are in the wrong, why not make a scene? Why bend over
backwards for them, just so they can illegitimately silence
you?


 

offline Gwely Mernans from 23rd century entertainment (Canada) on 2007-09-19 09:43 [#02121575]
Points: 9856 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #02121496



Well said, might I also had that in all likeliness, those
policed were republicans. They're sneaky like that.


 

offline Gwely Mernans from 23rd century entertainment (Canada) on 2007-09-19 09:44 [#02121576]
Points: 9856 Status: Lurker | Followup to Gwely Mernans: #02121575



add*



 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2007-09-19 09:57 [#02121577]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



well,

get your fucking shit straight before jumping to
conclusions.

read some first-hand-reports.

sigh,
you would think, how often stories like this break, that you
might have learned by now to at least wait a while for all
the facts and accounts to roll in before jumping a bandwagon
and forming a crazed opinion.

but no, it happens over and over.


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2007-09-19 09:59 [#02121578]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



PORICK,

you are missing so many levels, :(

and with a senator in the room? umm, if you are getting
arrested or pulled from a private event ... and you start
going batshit crazy ... what did you think was going to
happen.

read some more first-hand-accounts from people who actually
witnessed it, my friend.

stop getting riled up over a topic in which you are missing
facts.


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2007-09-19 10:01 [#02121579]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



PORICK,

if you don't understand why his mic was cut ... then again,
you are missing a few more than a bit of information.


 

offline PORICK from fucking IRELAND on 2007-09-19 12:20 [#02121631]
Points: 1911 Status: Lurker



elusive,

I read that article on the police report - I don't see what
it's meant to clear up..? In any event, the report was an
internal investigation conducted by the police, so what
worth is it? It even says itself that Kerry had directed
that the student be allowed ask his question.

As for "what did you think was going to happen" ... Err,
anything but that. Anything but that would happen where I
come from, but obviously it's fairly normal in your society,
so perhaps that's why I'm more riled up about this than you
are. The very fact that you and others from over there see
nothing wrong with it almost pisses me off more than the
event itself.

What do you believe I'm missing?? Specify precisely.


 

offline johnl from Dublin (Ireland) on 2007-09-19 12:27 [#02121634]
Points: 172 Status: Lurker



It's a tricky issue.

That's not shitting on free speech-- that's controlling
events so shit like this doesn't happen.

So the whole event is basically meaningless then. We knew
that anyway, though. The event has to be controlled, because
the politicians don't want tricky questions. That's always
been the case. We're not going to pretend that a lecture or
talk or meeting like this is ever going to be 2-way. That's
beside the point.

Let's take Ceri apart.
If the police tried to march me out of a conference, I'd
be pissed off, but I wouldn't struggle/shout.

That's just a load of bollocks. All of us would struggle and
shout.
What did he think the best result would be? That the
police would say, "Go on then, have your little song and
dance, hog the mike, fill your boots."?!

If instead of being giving tasers, the police had actually
been trained to DEAL WITH PEOPLE, that's precisely what they
would have done. Let's assume that this guy was a crank (I'm
not saying he was, I've seen real cranks, and they always
use the word "singularity"). In that case, you just let him
give out for a bit, the person chairing the debate makes a
token gesture of an answer, the speaker briefly addresses
the point for his benefit, cracks a joke for the benefit of
the rest of the audience, and you move on.


 

offline johnl from Dublin (Ireland) on 2007-09-19 12:29 [#02121635]
Points: 172 Status: Lurker



If he'd walked out calmly with them, he'd still have put
egg on Kerry's face. I don't understand what thrashing about
on the floor and shouting until they tasered him into
submission achieved.

Why stop with one egg, when you can have a dozen? Why take
it in the ass and pretend that they're right? Maybe the
"right" thing to do is to go quietly, but when everything's
wrong around you, it's hard to do the "right" thing.
Anyone see the old chap get arrested under terrorism
charges shouting a question at a Labour conference last
year? That was much more upsetting than this. The old man
concerned wasn't some wanky dissident who snuck in to the
conference with the sole intention to make a scene, he had
been lifelong member of the party and was asking a serious
(albeit awkward) question.

Actually, no. Just no. With all due respect to the man, Mr
Wolfgang was actually trying to make a scene, he started
shouting in the conference. This guy was given the mike, and
was asking a question, which had been given permission to
ask. What does age have to do with any of this? This
incident is just as disgraceful as the one involving Mr
Wolfgang, with the important exception that terrorist
charges were slapped on Mr Wolfgang. Otherwise, the point is
the same.

I'm reminded of an unrelated story my dad told me last
night.
He was at a meeting where people were discussing SFI
(Science Foundation Ireland). There's been quite a bit of
controversy lately, with SFI apparently trying to influence
university appointments and job decisions. Some youngish guy
made the point that this hasn't ever happened in academia
before, that a government body has tried to intervene in
university apppointments to suit their policies.
An old German chemistry professor then interjected, "It
happened in my country in the 30's".
Silence.


 

offline johnl from Dublin (Ireland) on 2007-09-19 12:31 [#02121636]
Points: 172 Status: Lurker | Followup to elusive: #02121577



As for what elusive posted about the police report:
Okay, so he's an attention whore. But when he was
downstairs, there was probably no-one there but the police
officers, so why would he shout for help? I presume they
stopped tasering him when they brought him downstairs, so he
wouldn't be yelping from that either. Once there was someone
to shout at again, he'd start again.
That doesn't change the fact that he was tasered for no
reason. Why was he even being arrested in the first place?
I've dealt with cranks when I've been working the mike at
"big important "conference talks before, with "big
important" people. They ask interminable questions which
have nothing to do with the topic at hand. This guy was at
least on-topic, and his question was quite short, in
comparison with some of the bozos I've seen. And the way you
deal with them, is to pander to them. Let them ask their big
question, which they think is very important, about time and
space and singularities, and then the speaker deals with it
summarily, the person chairing the discussion cracks a joke
for the audience, and everyone moves on.
No taser. No arrest.


 

offline PORICK from fucking IRELAND on 2007-09-19 12:32 [#02121637]
Points: 1911 Status: Lurker



GAME
SET
MATCH


 

offline vlari from beyond the valley of the LOLs on 2007-09-19 12:38 [#02121644]
Points: 13915 Status: Regular | Followup to PORICK: #02121369



clearly you didnt see what she did there


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2007-09-19 13:10 [#02121654]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



Freedom of speech doesn't really guarantee you the right to
turn someone else's event into your own personal and
indefinitely drawn out soap box.

He was being escorted out for not following the format of
the event, not for what he was saying.

He should not have resisted the cops.

The cops probably should not have tazed him. Especially
once they already had him on the ground.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2007-09-19 13:16 [#02121655]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to johnl: #02121635 | Show recordbag



I got the distinct impression Mr Wolfgang really wanted a
serious question answered. The questions student jackass
really asked weren't serious ones: they amount to, "Mr.
Kerry, were you complicit in some scheme to get Bush into
power?" and "Are you a member of a sinister global elite
that rules from the shadows?". I got the distinct impression
student jackass just wanted to make a name for himself.
Elusive's link backs that up.

I also wouldn't try and resist arrest, despite you saying my
claiming this is "bollocks". Sure, I might run, I might even
fight with them, but try and stop them putting cuffs on me
when there were half a dozen of them pinning me n the floor?
No chance. The police love it when people do, it's an excuse
to put the boot in, I wouldn't give them the pleasure. Matey
boy was tazered because he wouldn't let them put the cuffs
on him. If the police try and cuff you, unless you're
confident you can actually fight them off and get away,
there's not a lot to be gained my resisting.

It's not like the rozzers walked up and tazered him
mid-question. They asked him to leave, tried to walk him
out, he walked away, they tried again, they grabbed him, he
continued to arrest etc.


 

offline rad smiles on 2007-09-19 13:18 [#02121656]
Points: 5608 Status: Lurker



i thought that was the point all along. they shouldnt have
tazed him.


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2007-09-19 13:27 [#02121662]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



Maybe they thought he was less likely to be hurt if he was
cuffed while limp from being tazed than if they kept trying
to fight him?

I don't think it was necessary. It looked like there were
plenty of cops there to subdue this guy. But, I'm also not
trained.


 

offline rad smiles on 2007-09-19 13:28 [#02121663]
Points: 5608 Status: Lurker



i think the first thing you're taught at pig school is: look
out for loudmouths brandishing paperback books.


 

offline rad smiles on 2007-09-19 13:30 [#02121664]
Points: 5608 Status: Lurker



greg palast books, nonetheless. dangerous!


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2007-09-19 13:39 [#02121670]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



Well, to be fair there's no way they could've known what
that guy was capable of.

The safest thing to do after he started trying to break free
was to contain him, and since he was resisting that, the
cops had to make a decision quickly how to subdue him
without him being able to hurt someone else, or himself. I
guess they chose to taze him. I don't think that was the
best way to do it. But, if they didn't taze him they may've
had to slam him around more or hit him, or put some kind of
pig choke move on him that they figured would cause more
damage than the tazer... crud i don't know.


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2007-09-19 13:50 [#02121677]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



don't get me wrong ... this whole taser-world scares me
too.

taser vs collapsible batons
hmm,


 


Messageboard index