[17/05/2007 - New Xltronic Weekly Poll] | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
recycle
...and 421 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614083
Today 3
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
[17/05/2007 - New Xltronic Weekly Poll]
 

offline WooferAttack from Milano (Italy) on 2007-05-17 10:26 [#02084855]
Points: 12920 Status: Lurker



This kind of party is not so funny as many newbie could
think.. no drinks... no girls... no drugs...

Don't you know what is an Xltronic ban party?
Read here

Which is your personal opinion about this hot argument?

Vote Now

\/\/.


 

offline WooferAttack from Milano (Italy) on 2007-05-17 10:27 [#02084856]
Points: 12920 Status: Lurker



Personally I totally agreed


 

offline Gwely Mernans from 23rd century entertainment (Canada) on 2007-05-17 11:41 [#02084887]
Points: 9856 Status: Lurker



the only member we wanted gone was valor.


 

offline _gvarek_ from next to you (Poland) on 2007-05-17 13:08 [#02084907]
Points: 4882 Status: Lurker



I'm agreed?

not really


 

offline Sido Dyas from a computer on 2007-05-17 13:31 [#02084913]
Points: 8876 Status: Lurker



well as i said earlier......

I LOVE THE SMELL OF B7 IN THE MORNING.

..............___________________
......................____/\____
......(-l-) === / 00 [ ¨ ]l___\_
....................\__ _[__]____ _]-
.......................
.................B7

...........B7

.

......b7

.

.
b7



 

offline swears from junk sleep on 2007-05-17 13:33 [#02084914]
Points: 6474 Status: Lurker



dog_belch and redrum will be back, either unbanned by mods
or as dupe accounts that the mods turn a blind eye to.


 

offline nacmat on 2007-05-17 14:20 [#02084919]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker



dog belch was banned?


 

offline swears from junk sleep on 2007-05-17 14:24 [#02084922]
Points: 6474 Status: Lurker | Followup to nacmat: #02084919



For having a dupe account, I thought.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2007-05-17 19:04 [#02084976]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



agreed or not agreed, that is the question. my personal
opinion says agreed.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2007-05-17 19:14 [#02084979]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker | Followup to Gwely Mernans: #02084887



With you there.


 

offline BabyMamaDrama on 2007-05-17 19:27 [#02084983]
Points: 21 Status: Regular



woofie eats alessandra mussolini's cunt for breakfast.

daily.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2007-05-17 19:34 [#02084984]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



lucky him i guess.


 

offline cuntychuck from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2007-05-18 05:03 [#02085070]
Points: 8603 Status: Lurker



"are you agreed?"

for fucks sake woofer, get you grammar right.

"Do you agree?"

Yes.


 

offline zoomancer from Kabul (Afghanistan) on 2007-05-18 05:18 [#02085077]
Points: 1215 Status: Regular



i am a dupe but for a valid reason i neither remember nor
want to my past...


 

offline uzim on 2007-05-18 06:06 [#02085082]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker



i'm hesitating for this one... i'm not usually one for
banning people, yet this time there was definitely annoying
behaviour. then again, Valor, among others, was trolling;
i'm not sure that everyone i saw banned was. i guess
i'll have to vote "dunno".

i also find myself caring less about this than i thought i
would... i don't feel like taking part in this messageboard
like i used to some time ago.


 

offline tridenti from Milano (Italy) on 2007-05-18 06:21 [#02085084]
Points: 14653 Status: Lurker



The board has been pretty cleaned up, there are a bit less
bollox threads so yes I'd agree.


 

offline cuntychuck from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2007-05-18 06:59 [#02085092]
Points: 8603 Status: Lurker | Followup to uzim: #02085082



what can i say that will make you post more? i mean, you
wouldn't mention that unless there was something i could do
about it right? that would have no point at all wouldn't
it?



 

offline Jarworski from The Grove (United Kingdom) on 2007-05-18 07:02 [#02085093]
Points: 10836 Status: Lurker | Followup to cuntychuck: #02085092



You could offer to stop posting. That would probably work


 

offline cuntychuck from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2007-05-18 07:18 [#02085096]
Points: 8603 Status: Lurker | Followup to Jarworski: #02085093



the only reason im still here is because you hate my posts.
so unless you leave, ill stay.


 

offline Jarworski from The Grove (United Kingdom) on 2007-05-18 07:46 [#02085102]
Points: 10836 Status: Lurker



I actually like your posts cunty, you don't talk much shit
and I especially like the way you without fail use the
follow up feature every single time. Btw I didn't
post for like eight months but I noticed you still were :P


 

offline cuntychuck from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2007-05-18 08:01 [#02085107]
Points: 8603 Status: Lurker | Followup to Jarworski: #02085102



okay, my argument isnt exactly bulletproof. ill give you
that.


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2007-05-18 08:49 [#02085127]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



''Dunno'', but at least the bannees may find something else
to do. Good for them.


 

offline Matvey from Kiev (Ukraine) on 2007-05-18 08:54 [#02085132]
Points: 6851 Status: Regular



i think i'm against the bans. lazy to think about the
arguments.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2007-05-18 08:56 [#02085133]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ophecks: #02085127



Yes, like sign up under different names.


 

offline WooferAttack from Milano (Italy) on 2007-05-21 03:42 [#02085927]
Points: 12920 Status: Lurker | Followup to Jarworski: #02085102



Nowadays I like cuntychuck posts too, he's also my pesonal
english teacher :-)


 

offline WooferAttack from Milano (Italy) on 2007-05-21 03:44 [#02085928]
Points: 12920 Status: Lurker



cunty, but why there are so many "are you agreed?" around
the web? click here, are you agreed?


 

offline pigster from melbs on 2007-05-21 03:52 [#02085931]
Points: 4480 Status: Lurker



note that you're in the top 3 : )


 

offline pigster from melbs on 2007-05-21 03:53 [#02085932]
Points: 4480 Status: Lurker



top 3 returns of a mere thousand, as opposed to the over a
million results for "do you agree"
don't you agreed?


 

offline WooferAttack from Milano (Italy) on 2007-05-21 07:01 [#02085951]
Points: 12920 Status: Lurker | Followup to pigster: #02085931



i'm proud to be in the "are you agreed" top3


 

online recycle from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2007-05-21 11:45 [#02086034]
Points: 40062 Status: Addict



Richie would want it this way


 


Messageboard index