|
|
AphexAcid
from Sweden on 2007-05-09 14:41 [#02081125]
Points: 2568 Status: Lurker
|
|
Enjoy
"Sahumamu"*, "LoEcL" and "Owl" have come to make you happy. Let them do their business and tell me what you think.
No head-phone-request this time, and be mindful of your ears.
* I can't be bothered to work with this track anymore. I feel it's incomplete, but we'll leave it at that.
|
|
CS2x
from London (United Kingdom) on 2007-05-10 10:28 [#02081492]
Points: 5079 Status: Lurker
|
|
good.
|
|
AphexAcid
from Sweden on 2007-05-10 13:21 [#02081594]
Points: 2568 Status: Lurker | Followup to CS2x: #02081492
|
|
"good."
Concise. Elegant.
I like it.
Thanks.
|
|
Drunken Mastah
from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-05-10 14:24 [#02081626]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
I don't like the instruments for the first one, but the melodies are good, and could sound even more powerful with better sounds. Especially if you make it sounds that cooperate in creating timbre.
Actually, the instruments seem to be the same for all of them. I'd stay off synth strings if I were you. It just doesn't interact with the other sounds in any way.. it sounds like it's just lying on top.
|
|
The_Shark
on 2007-05-10 14:41 [#02081630]
Points: 292 Status: Addict
|
|
We're not doing spam at the moment.
|
|
AphexAcid
from Sweden on 2007-05-10 14:43 [#02081632]
Points: 2568 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #02081626
|
|
Heh... I'm to fed up with that sahumamu-track to do anything more with it. It was mostly done when I only had 128 mb RAM, and it "ate" computer-power like it was no tommorow.
But thanks for the tips. It's appreciated.
Ah, heck, have another kitten.
:)
|
|
AphexAcid
from Sweden on 2007-05-10 14:51 [#02081635]
Points: 2568 Status: Lurker | Followup to The_Shark: #02081630
|
|
No spam? How about sharks? Are we doing sharks?
And how do we do sharks? Is "sharks" something to be done, perhaps? Is it a verb?
I was sharking a bit today, and then I saw an angry kitten.
I like you, mr. Shark. Don't you like me, too?
|
|
The_Shark
on 2007-05-10 15:07 [#02081643]
Points: 292 Status: Addict | Followup to AphexAcid: #02081635
|
|
Imagine that shark looking at you there and you meekly offering your three tracks, one of which you can't be bothered to finish. What the hell do you think that Shark would be thinking, even if it somehow understood what you were on about it?
Next time you make a track, make it for that Shark, not for some dweeb sitting at his computer in wet underpants, make it for The Shark. Make that Shark want to dance, make that Shark not want to rip you limb from fucking limb and toss you into a foaming swell of blood and saltwater. TRY THAT, THAT'S MY ADVICE.
|
|
Drunken Mastah
from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-05-10 15:24 [#02081651]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
Kittens are evil.. I used to slay them back in the days, using my special kung-fu style!
|
|
AphexAcid
from Sweden on 2007-05-10 15:41 [#02081655]
Points: 2568 Status: Lurker | Followup to The_Shark: #02081643
|
|
Allright, then, mr. Shark.
My next track's all for you.
I will call it The_Shark. And it will make all the sharks dance.
But just in case there's some confusion between us - I haven't mentioned that the track isn't finished. If that was the case, I reckon I wasn't clear enough as to my intent. I mentioned it 'felt incomplete' (as in "I could polish it up"), and that "I'm to fed up with (it) to do anything more with (it)", but it is finished as it is. And it's all for fun, anyway. It's entertainment.
And to retain some 'underground'-respectability, I don't spend hours by the computer fiddling with sounds just because I want to hear everyone's opinion of it. That's merely a, say, bonus.
First of all, it's because of my own interest in the 'medium'.
|
|
The_Shark
on 2007-05-10 16:10 [#02081660]
Points: 292 Status: Addict | Followup to AphexAcid: #02081655
|
|
I like your style.
Now, make love to me, you big fool.
|
|
w M w
from London (United Kingdom) on 2007-05-10 20:26 [#02081812]
Points: 21452 Status: Lurker
|
|
sahumamu- i guess pretty forgettable. imitates q ziq mostly
loecl- I liked it better than the 1st. fast stuf + slow stufff. this imates a rdj album track
owl- 1st part sounds like close encounters movie notes
|
|
The_Shark
on 2007-05-10 22:24 [#02081837]
Points: 292 Status: Addict | Followup to w M w: #02081812
|
|
Who gives a fuck what you think either way? Shut up, turd.
|
|
sneakattack
on 2007-05-10 22:31 [#02081840]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker | Followup to The_Shark: #02081837
|
|
By the same token, any of the rest of us should speak..?
|
|
The_Shark
on 2007-05-10 22:33 [#02081842]
Points: 292 Status: Addict | Followup to sneakattack: #02081840
|
|
No, have you ever thought it'd be better to keep your fucking precious bon mots to your fucking self satisfied smug little self?
|
|
sneakattack
on 2007-05-10 22:34 [#02081844]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker | Followup to The_Shark: #02081842
|
|
my point was lost on you, then.
|
|
The_Shark
on 2007-05-10 22:36 [#02081845]
Points: 292 Status: Addict | Followup to sneakattack: #02081844
|
|
NO, but what do you want me to say? Sure, everyone has the right yadda yadda, great. Tell that to the junkie bird you convinced is your girlfriend.
|
|
Messageboard index
|