 |
|
You are not logged in! F.A.Q Log in Register |
 |
|
 |
 (nobody)...and 370 guests Last 5 registered Oplandisks nothingstar N_loop yipe foxtrotromeo Browse members... |
 |
Members 8025Messages 2613455 Today 1 Topics 127500 |
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I have shown some of Monoid's threads, but all of his are the same: every thread he makes is rubbish, always rubbish. But he still posts here! I am tired of reading his rubbish complaints and his crap ideas. He is a attention-seeker. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
no you should |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
You are ignoring my point, I am angry for a GOOD reason and I have put Monoid's threads on top for a GOOD reason, to show what a crappy idiot he is! But maybe I must stop, he probably likes all this attention he is getting, that is why he posts, just for ATTENTION. What a fool! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
| Attached picture | |||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Maybe when you hit the 100 post mark you can bray for other members to be banned. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
is that clark kent ? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Marcin?? No, it's Gregory Peck as Atticus Finch. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
who the fuck are you to say anything you filthy duplicate? YOU should be banned. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
after reading through all of his threads i haven't laughed so hard since the last time i laughed so hard reading through all his threads! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
do you really mean that? or are you just posting for the sake of posting? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i couldn't stand the damn guy either, he used to exasperate me. he's just not a compulsive whiner, he also said some truly obnoxious things (about people who have AIDS for example) that would definitely deserve a ban. but i think i finally got used to him now — maybe he's just a double account used by a mod or an admin... or maybe they just don't ban him because he's a part of xltronic now, some kind of "legend" if you want, even though it's because he's so miserable. he's a bit like an ugly decorative object someone put in a place where you live or work, and you can't get rid of it : at first it just makes you mad and you just want to smash the damn thing to pieces or throw it away or whatever, and after some time you're used to it and don't even notice it anymore. now if he were to be banned, it would definitely be for the better. after all, other xltronic "legends" were banned as well (some arguably deserving it less than Monoid). |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
what? i think they're fuckin hilarious! i'm not talking specifically about his topics or his posts in particular. i'm talking about everyone elses responses in his threads. people here are fuckin crazy mother fuckers and they say some pretty good shit in response to other peoples stupid replies. all together for what they're worth anyway... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
monoid makes me not want to be a part of xlt |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I know English isn't your first language, but for fucks sake, you've said it wrong so many times, it's really starting to piss me off. It's "AN attention seeker", not "a attention seeker". |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
theres never a good reason to be angry. you have choice in the matter as well, you could either open no monoid topics, or you could open 30 monoid topics. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
For fuck's sake |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
? There are many good reasons to be angry about lost of different things all the time. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
haha straight after I posted, I knew someone would pick me up for that :D |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
but anger, being our own reaction, is our own problem, not someone elses! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
You were probably angry when you were typing it. And I'm not picking you up, you naughty one. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Johnny is right - we have the choice to be angry or not, to get offended by things or not. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
All we have to do is give up our personalities. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
mono for mod! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
aha touche! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Not necessarily. Anger is directed, and for instance in moral cases, I'd say it's imperative that you allow your anger to be expressed as such. Of course, that doesn't mean you should use violence, but if I wasn't allowed to show disdain or anger towards people who do or say things that I find despicable, that would remove the entire basis for morality. I publicly, actively and expressively condemn those who use violence, those who refuse to take responsibility for their actions, those who believe it is ok to kill, etc, in short, all those who anger me. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
oh, btw, hi monoid, I have really enjoyed your pop vibe. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
. |
||||||||
| Attached picture | |||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Sure we have the choice, but having the choice doesn't imply never choosing the one path. On the contrary! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I'm actually not sure about the usage of "on the contrary" in this situation: can I use it like I would "au contraire!"? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
oh for fuck('s) sake! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
What, are they both wrong? I'd use "det er vel heller motsatt!" but that'd be kind of wasted. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
anger doesnt benefit oneself or others. its not a constructive means of dealing with an issue. we all know anger can be harmful. so it should be clear that to react with anger is never a good choice. there always constructive alternatives, good examples we can lead by, better choices. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
only the 'bad' bits! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
| Attached picture | |||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Anger is the energy fuelling critique. Just as you have a choice to be angry or not, you have the choice of how to relate to your anger; I'm relatively calm, and I usually choose to express anger by confronting people with arguments against their opinions. The energy in anger can be used constructively, and up until a certain point this energy will shine through if you put it up against someone who is cold and distanced. In a cheesy metaphor (I love those), ice doesn't freeze the sun; the sun melts the ice. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
you live in a dream world. yeah that would be great if everyone and everything was all hunky dory and peachy keen 110% of the time but then really who would wnt to be a robot? "you can only think about unicorns and fairies and rainbows and lollipops" one set of mental shackles in exchange for another more limiting set of mental shackles? "look there goes johnny with his perfectly straight teeth and his perfectly straight blond hair" "oh wait was that johnny or evol?" "i thought it was drunken mastah, ya know they're all the same with all there happy go lucky mindsets. how can anyone tell anyone else apart from each other?" just because you say one way is more right than another? who are you? like i said, dream world. sure it would be great no pain no suffering, but what how would you know pleasure when there is no pain? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
. |
||||||||
| Attached picture | |||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
why should anger be treated as a foundation? why dont we find the sun in our heart, a kindness and compassion toward people? i think its entirely possible to distinguish between good and bad actions without bouncing off anger or other negative emotions. in fact it would make more sense to me to suggest that we can make observations with much greater clarity without those negative emotions in the way. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
monoid's finest thread was 'do you eat your own cum?' That thread was a work of art and should never have been closed. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i dont consider myself to be ignorant of the imperfect nature of life. i definitely acknowledge the presence of gross and subtle levels of suffering. i think its important that we gradually learn to accept all of these things rather than continually pushing them away, and reacting in a way that is not constructive. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
or was it 'gak' as in to gak on a mouth full of cum? Pure class. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
There are many different energy manifestations (just to be clear, I'm not talking new-age star energy whatever, It's just a sort of metaphor for engagement with some extra implications). Kindness and compassion are both different kinds of energy manifestation from anger, and they all have their appropriate situations. It doesn't do you any good to use the energy of compassion towards your opponent in a debate. That's disrespectful towards him, it belittles him. It also belittles the true cases of compassion. If I were to love everyone, would it mean anything special that I loved my girl? No! Love is reserved for those worthy of it, anger is reserved for those worthy of it. I think I should probably note that there are also differences between anger and rage and frenzy. If you will, anger is the proper engaged position to take up for an argument. I don't find rage or frenzy appropriate for any situation, but that's because in most situations the situation will cease to exist once frenzy or rage is applied to it. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Unconditional acceptance isn't constructive. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Giving up your personality would be giving up your choice. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
obviuosly, i can see that i don't belong here so... goodbye! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
how can compassion be a disrespectful gesture? if anything it shows consideration! thoughts built on compassion are not condescending by default. should the debate be focused on some horrible event, i could forsee a person coming up with a constructive solution if they were focused on the benefit of all parties involved. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
He's not really French you know. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
well it is, because once you have accepted the nature of any problematic situation, you are best positioned to act constructively! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Not condescending by default, no, but condescending towards an adversary. If you were arguing with me, and you know my attitude towards you was one of "Deep awareness of the suffering of another coupled with the wish to relieve it. (See Synonyms at pity)," would you take that as me respecting you? Or would you take it as me thinking you're a retard for holding the views you hold, and that you don't deserve to be met with good arguments, but rather with an overbearing "grown-up-talking-to-a-child" tone? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Messageboard index
|
|||||||||
