How has the PS3 been received in Europe? | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (3)
big
recycle
belb
...and 555 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614087
Today 7
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
How has the PS3 been received in Europe?
 

offline dariusgriffin from cool on 2007-04-08 11:47 [#02070550]
Points: 12423 Status: Regular | Followup to Paco: #02070529



Are they really? If they really went with HD, then HD has
already won. Same as VHS.

OR IS IT? Now there's the Internet and all, will it make a
difference?

I don't know and probably not but I don't know.


 

offline Paco from Gothenburg (Sweden) on 2007-04-08 12:18 [#02070554]
Points: 2659 Status: Lurker | Followup to dariusgriffin: #02070550



Blue ray is too complicated and expensive apparently, for
quick "home" authoring. That's what some of the leading porn
industry buffs were saying in an interview I saw. The fact
that they are already working with HD and getting familiar
with the format could be bad for blue ray. As you said
though, maybe it doesn't matter anymore. Maybe it was just
back then when VHS and betamax fought it out.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-04-08 14:51 [#02070564]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Paco: #02070554 | Show recordbag



That wasn't the problem.. a porn company wouldn't do "home"
authoring anyway; they have to have a producer that can turn
out discs at a higher rate. The problem was that for some
reason, supposedly by sony order, the people with blu-ray
technology for large-scale production (in the usa) refused
to do the porn discs. Sony denied that they had anything to
do with it, but the people with the machines still refused
to do porn.


 

offline Oddioblender from Fort Worth, TX (United States) on 2007-04-09 09:42 [#02070746]
Points: 9601 Status: Lurker



i work at a game store, and i can say i'm lucky if i sell
one ps3 in a month, everyone wants the Wii and the DS though
- too bad Nintendo can't keep up with demand.


 

offline Oddioblender from Fort Worth, TX (United States) on 2007-04-09 09:46 [#02070747]
Points: 9601 Status: Lurker | Followup to w M w: #02070266



i can see where you're coming from. the problem is a lot of
developers are looking at what is selling, imitating it with
some carbon-copy storyline, and not giving people a reason
to come back. Licensed games have also reached plague-like
status, as it seems that every movie, cartoon or TV show has
some shit game for 50 bucks released with it, that people
will buy regardless of the developer's track record,
criticism or how well it is made. as long as you can kill
something, people buy it. Personally, Final Fantasy VI is
still one of my all time favorites, and it's on Super
Nintendo, and it still challenges me.

the problem is that games are too easy and that's it such a
big industry that more developers want money than they do a
quality title - because people buy shit, and as long as
people buy shit, shit will still be made. trust me, i know
this. then again, it's like this with all media, film,
books, music, what have you.


 

offline Silly Willy on 2007-04-10 06:45 [#02070913]
Points: 89 Status: Addict



The PS3 is a piece of junk. Original games? Don't make me
laugh. That launch line up consisted of games that had been
available on the 360 for about a year. Motorstorm was about
the only original game there and it was a fucking tech demo
at most. Nothing amazing.

Show me something groundbreaking on the PS3 to justify the
price tag.

The Wii however, at a party this weekend the Wii was a smash
hit. Everybody enjoyed playing on it and nobody was bored
even when just watching. It's a superb console. I'm looking
forward to the next generation of releases for the machine.
The current ones are good but I do have reservations about
their longevity. I'm hoping for a proper Star Wars tie in.
Red Steel didn't float my boat but there's still hope for
Star Wars fun using the force and fighting with a
lightsaber.

The 360. Good machine. Crackdown is an awesome game. Loving
that. Properly open ended too. So far I've just leapt about
the city collecting orbs so I can upgrade my abilities.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-04-10 07:18 [#02070916]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Silly Willy: #02070913 | Show recordbag



Did anyone say original? I said innovative. Motorstorm isn't
innovative; it's a racing game. Neither are any of the games
I've seen for the other consoles.. What I've seen that seems
remotely innovative is that one with the fox and some
painting for the ps2 and little big planet for ps3. I don't
know of any other actually innovative games. Thing is,
though, all the Wii games brag about being innovative, but
then they're just normal games where you have to use the Wii
controller.. where's the innovation in that? And the
controllers themselves are hardly as revolutionary as people
make them out to be. And the launch lineup for the ps3 won't
be the reason why I'm buying it. The reason will be the
quality games that come later on like MGS4, Silent Hill,
Final Fantasy, etc. These aren't really too innovative in
themselves, but they are really really quality productions
where the producers didn't spend all their money on one
single feature (they're more unusual than innovative), but
rather are trying to produce something that is good as a
whole. Sure, there's one game that has better graphics than
the other, and there's one with a better gameplay, but for
these games, it's just all, as a whole, perfect; You need a
story to keep it together, you need gameplay and a gameworld
that is immersive, you need graphics to support this. It
won't do you any good to just develop some run-of-the-mill
shooter with better graphics. That's not a game, that's a
tech demo.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-04-10 07:24 [#02070917]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Crackdown looks really really really boring.. what's it
about? From the preview and review, it looks like it's just
a mod for quake2.


 

offline Chihiro from twins land on 2007-04-10 08:31 [#02070926]
Points: 4650 Status: Regular



ridiculous price


 

offline Silly Willy on 2007-04-10 09:34 [#02070945]
Points: 89 Status: Addict



Innovative and Original go hand in hand.


 

offline Silly Willy on 2007-04-10 09:34 [#02070946]
Points: 89 Status: Addict | Followup to Silly Willy: #02070945



Much like faggots.


 

offline Silly Willy on 2007-04-10 09:35 [#02070947]
Points: 89 Status: Addict | Followup to Silly Willy: #02070946



and straight people.


 

offline Silly Willy on 2007-04-10 09:35 [#02070948]
Points: 89 Status: Addict | Followup to Silly Willy: #02070947



Not Muslims though. They go Hook in Hook.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-04-10 09:47 [#02070949]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Silly Willy: #02070945 | Show recordbag



Not necessarily.

Original can be the first instance of something, but that
something doesn't need to be innovative. Like you said
"Original games? Don't make me laugh. That launch line up
consisted of games that had been available on the 360 for
about a year.
"

Being original doesn't make it innovative, and if the game
was truly innovative, it wouldn't make it less innovative if
it was released for one console first and then released for
another later.


 

offline Silly Willy on 2007-04-10 12:05 [#02070966]
Points: 89 Status: Addict | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #02070949



I'm not really not understanding what you're going on about.
You're just shoving definitions and quotes at me without
really stating anything of use.

All I wanted to say was that the PS3 currently has no
original properties and fuck all innovation.

I'll try again.

When they were released on the 360 they were "new and fresh"
which is, I think, a definition of original. When they were
released on the PS3 they weren't new or fresh.

We could push the analogy further as an original is the
first edition. Any subsequent versions are copies.

Fight Night Round 3 on 360 = Original
Fight Night Round 3 on PS3 = Copy (Port)

I can't be bothered to type about this any more. The PS3 is
a failure because Sony fucked up. The PS1 and 2 were great
machines with some awesome games. Shadow of Colossus anyone?
Amazing game, that was original and, in my mind, quite
innovative.

The PS3 console itself is nothing amazing. The Cell
processor? Technically sound and a great piece of technology
but for gaming? Waste of time. No developer is going to have
the resources to properly code for it. It's far too complex
for that. The developer kits Sony sent out are incomplete
and pretty shite by all accounts. They couldn't even be
bothered to do a new controller. The Dual-Shock is old and
tired. They shoe-horned in some remote control feature and
removed rumble. Rumble is the best fucking feature of a
console controller. Tactile feedback is where it's at. So
they bundled Blu-Ray? Great! Very few games are going to
fill that up.
What happened to all the promises of the PS3 too? There's a
fuck load of stuff missing from it that they said would be
on there. The PS3 is a train wreck of a console. They should
just apologise and recall the lot. Start from scratch and
remember why their previous consoles were such successes.

It seems I could be bothered to type.


 

offline Combo from Sex on 2007-04-10 12:06 [#02070968]
Points: 7540 Status: Regular



Video games are a lack of time.


 

offline jackeroffer from Aruba on 2007-04-10 12:09 [#02070970]
Points: 1038 Status: Lurker



yeah the PS3 is pretty much shit, it might make a comeback
at some point in the future but right now its like wtf?

i used to hate xbox and thought it was the shittiest PS2
clone ever.

boy did the xbox 360 change that fast, far far superior
library of games compared to the Ps3.


 

offline Combo from Sex on 2007-04-10 12:15 [#02070971]
Points: 7540 Status: Regular



I've heard it was good if u had a high resolution TV.


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2007-04-10 12:26 [#02070972]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Followup to Silly Willy: #02070966 | Show recordbag



Missing features indeed. The worst technical caveat for the
PS3 is the lack of a properly functioning internal scaler.
Unforgiveable oversight, although it did force me to sell my
CRT HDTV and go digital.

The only thing the PS3 really has on the 360 is 100%
backwards compatibility. But even then, it doesn't even
scale the games up to HD, like the 360 does, which I thought
was going to be a feature. Compared to the PS2, which was
easily the best console ever, the PS3 is indeed a
clusterfuck. But I think it will mature into a great cult
platform.


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2007-04-10 12:30 [#02070974]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Followup to Combo: #02070971 | Show recordbag



Only if you have the right kind. Sony dropped the ball
there, as well. Which is hilarious considering Microsoft did
it right THE YEAR BEFORE.


 

offline Silly Willy on 2007-04-10 13:20 [#02070983]
Points: 89 Status: Addict | Followup to Ophecks: #02070972



Well I'm in Europe so if I bought a PS3 I'd be fucked over
on the backwards compatibility. Seeing as they swapped out
the hardware components and changed it to a software
emulator. That's right. They'll charge us more for less!
Fuck you Sony. FUCK. YOU.


 

offline Silly Willy on 2007-04-10 13:24 [#02070985]
Points: 89 Status: Addict | Followup to Combo: #02070971



Been playing the 360 on a nice 40" HD Samsung and the
improvement over the previous TV is pretty fucking amazing.
I really didn't expect that much difference but it has made
a big change. They should have a sticker on the box saying
"Don't bother if you don't have a 1080i capable TV. It won't
look that next gen."

Sony should have that on PS3 too.


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2007-04-10 13:42 [#02070993]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Followup to Silly Willy: #02070985 | Show recordbag



HD is very important. And not just for looks, but for
gameplay. I've had to play Ghost Recon AW2 for 360 on a
standard def TV the last week and I have trouble
distinguishing far away enemies, where they're facing,
making them out amongst foilage and background details, etc.
In HD, it's much more playable and intuitive, details are
more important than ever. And of course it looks hot.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-04-10 14:12 [#02070997]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



haha, awesome!

The University of Bergen just bought five ps3s because of
their awesome processing power! For the price, the
processors are awesomely good, and since they can link more
than one machine together and get the processing power of
both, the five of them together make up the most powerful
computer at the university. They will be used for crunching
numbers and ocean modelling in the first place, but probably
also for other kinds of things in the future. According to
the article (in norwegian), many universities have done this
because of the cost/processing power ratio.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-04-10 14:18 [#02070999]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Silly Willy: #02070966 | Show recordbag



Shadow of the colossus, yes, that's another innovative game.
I forgot that one. There are probably more, but recently
there haven't been too many.

And when it comes to the processing power. As I just said,
there are more uses for it, but also, as you said, not many
producers are going to take the time to code for it
properly. That's a shame, but I also know that some
producers (konami) will, and I know that the games
they're going to put out (MGS4) are going to be the pinnacle
of gaming and a standard for years and years after the
game's release, maybe only beaten by the next installment
(MGS5? I can only hope).

The reason for not doing a new controller is because the one
they have is so awesome, and all their users were outraged
at that new design they came up with.. and I don't actually
think that was because of the design in itself, but rather
that it wasn't the good old controller! Honestly, I think
the ps controller is the best one, everything is kind of
intuitive, but I also know that that probably just boils
down to habit.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-04-10 14:20 [#02071001]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to jackeroffer: #02070970 | Show recordbag



I'd actually like a list of good games for the 360. I
haven't tried any yet, but then all I've tried is that god
damned lego star wars and gears of war and they were both
fun for a minute or so and then they got boring. Same ol',
same ol', and not even done right.


 

offline Silly Willy on 2007-04-10 15:10 [#02071014]
Points: 89 Status: Addict | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #02070999



That's because the new design was shit.

I remember hearing so much shit about the size of the xbox
when it first came out. Now check out the size of the PS3! I
swear I saw that thing in the opening scene of 2001.

Why have Sony bothered to put in the SixAxiS thing?
Palindrome fans or something. It's pointless. They
should've stuck with rumble.

Good 360 games:

Dead Rising
Crackdown
Fight Night Round 3 (Now on PS3)
Test Drive Unlimited
Viva Pinata
Gears of War

Off the top of my head that's all I can think of. I haven't
done Xbox Live Arcade. I enjoy all of those games
immensely.

I have yet to play on a PS3 but what I've seen just hasn't
made me want to place down £425 of my money just for the
console. Especially not when I could buy a 360 and a Wii and
still have enough left over for a porno mag.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-04-10 15:33 [#02071022]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Silly Willy: #02071014 | Show recordbag



They're going to have both rumble and sixaxis. They just had
some trouble with the company making the rumble stuff.

I haven't seen any games that'd make me want to buy any of
the consoles yet, to be honest.. The Wii has convinced me I
won't be getting it, but the two others still have
some potential, they just haven't used it yet. However, the
trailers indicate that MGS4 will change that. I still won't
be able to afford a ps3, but MGS will make me actually want
one.

I'll look into those games. Can't play them, as I have no
360, but trailers and reviews usually give a good enough
picture (reviewers these days don't seem to know what
they're talking about, though.. they were all "yeah, gears
of war, bets game ever yaeh!" and then I played it and I was
"where's the best game ever? This is a normal shoot em up.
Disappointed." Igns "top all super games of ever!" list was
also quite.. weird.. I couldn't even compile a top25 list,
though.. I'd have to stop at 5 or 10 or something...).
Crackdown looked like utter boredom. Test drive.. I never
understood people who want to play simulators..
racing games, flight games, whatever.. it's awesomely
boring! Same goes for sports games, excluding fight night.
Normal boxing?

Halo3 might deliver, but only as a multiplayer co-op game.


 

offline Silly Willy on 2007-04-10 15:44 [#02071024]
Points: 89 Status: Addict | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #02071022



I found the Halo games interminably boring. Dead Rising is
the best game ever simply because you get to heat up a
frying pan and push it against a zombies face. There is no
greater pleasure in life than that. Well there is actually,
whacking the cunt to death (second death?) with it as well.
Or maybe using a sledgehammer to bludgeon some more zombies.
A Katana sword? A saw? A piece of wood? Another zombies leg?
Great fun!

Crackdown does look a bit boring but I decided to give it a
whirl and I'm really enjoying it. Fantastic game. I hate
collecting things in games but this game has me collecting
fucking green orbs to upgrade my abilities. I'm happy though
because it's a great challenge. First I have to find them
and then I have to work out how to get to them. They can be
in quite easy to reach places or way up on top of an aerial
on the highest building. I need to work out a route to the
top just to get this little orb. It's great fun. Especially
when you leap off the building again crunch down onto the
pavement and leave yourself with barely enough health to do
anything more for a bit. At the moment my agility is nearing
max in the game but everything else is lagging. I'm having
too much fun leaping around.


 

offline Indeksical from Phobiazero Damage Control (United Kingdom) on 2007-04-10 16:00 [#02071030]
Points: 10671 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



Dead Rising and Crackdown are two very good reasons to own a
360. i have to say mastah that i thought your comment about
MGS4 'I know that the games they're going to put out
(MGS4) are going to be the pinnacle of gaming and a standard
for years and years after the game's release...'
was a
joke at first. the hamfisted story telling of the last two
was awful. MGS3 was pretty close to tedium in my opinion and
quite far away from being innovative to any great degree
(the camoflague was a nice touch though).

In regards to the PS3. i havent seen a single store that has
sold out and im not surprised. its an enormous pricetag for
a console with no truly interesting games in its launch line
up and only one or two over the next year. its definately
not something i am even considering buying, for a year or
two at least.


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2007-04-10 16:04 [#02071033]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Followup to Silly Willy: #02071024 | Show recordbag



Yeah, Dead Rising was a blast.

DM- The 360 had a banner first year or so, but if you aren't
into strategic squad/cover-based shooters like Rainbow
Six/Gears of War/Ghost Recon, and online gaming, don't
bother. That's the dominant genre nad it's not your style (I
fucking love it, Gears of War on Hardcore and Insane is not
a ''normal shooter'' at all, it's a refined evolution of the
stop-and-pop style). The more ambitious fare is coming
later, but right now it's definitely a shooter-heavy
console, as the first Xbox was.


 

offline jackeroffer from Aruba on 2007-04-10 16:13 [#02071036]
Points: 1038 Status: Lurker



not to sidetrack the discussion but when buying HDTVs what
kind are the best with the least pixelation effect? I
notice that a lot of the hd tvs i see at stores seem way too
high contrasty and makes the mpeg compression very visible,
much more than a normal TV. If im going to spend upwards of
1,000 on a tv i want to do this shit right. Im also
debating whether i should get the hd-dvd addon for my 360 or
get a blue-ray player instead. Are all the film companies
doing one or the other (blueray vs hd-dvd)?


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2007-04-10 16:15 [#02071039]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Followup to Indeksical: #02071030 | Show recordbag



Indek- Metal Gear is definitely not for everyone. It has
elements
of sci-fi, Tom Clancy, Hollywood, anime, real-world politics
and history, the supernatural, extreme melodrama, weird
post-modern philosophy, cyberpunk, etc in a really fucked up
mish mash, so naturally there's always something in there
that's going to turn people off. I like to keep my tongue
firmly planted in my cheek when I play it. I agree that it's
''hamfisted'', but for me, that's a good thing. The games
themselves have their tongues in their cheeks, you can tell
by all the running jokes and gags in them.



 

offline Indeksical from Phobiazero Damage Control (United Kingdom) on 2007-04-10 16:18 [#02071041]
Points: 10671 Status: Regular | Followup to Ophecks: #02071039 | Show recordbag



i agree mgs is tongue-in-cheek and i do take it lightly but
the last half of 2 and all of 3 were crap for me. the first
was such a sublime game.


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2007-04-10 16:20 [#02071042]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Followup to jackeroffer: #02071036 | Show recordbag



Keep in mind that TVs in store often don't even display HD
content anyway, and if they do, the settings are all out of
whack to make the picture ''stand out'' in that kind of
environment. It's called ''torch mode'' and it sucks.

CRT will handle most resolutions the best, it handles almost
everything natively. Conversely, you play 480i/p content on
an LCD, and you're going to get bad pixelation, the kind
you're seeing on those in-store display. But I've grown to
prefer digital, I sold my CRT. Sharper picture on digital,
my 360 looks much better on LCD than the CRT I had. Worse
black levels but I don't really care about that.

It depends on what you're going to use your TV for most,
really.


 

offline jackeroffer from Aruba on 2007-04-10 16:28 [#02071043]
Points: 1038 Status: Lurker



well since i already have a nice standard TV id probably
mostly want to use my hd tv for HD content, like playing my
360, watching hd-dvd movies and watching hd channels.


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2007-04-10 16:30 [#02071044]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Followup to Ophecks: #02071042 | Show recordbag



It depends on what you're going to use your TV for most,
really.


To wit, the poor black levels on LCDs make them bad choices
for movie watching. You'd be better off with plasma, and
especially CRT. But I mostly use my TV for HD gaming, 720p
is native for Xbox, so LCD is perfect for that. Case by case
basis, you know.



 

offline QRDL from Poland on 2007-04-10 16:39 [#02071045]
Points: 2838 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ophecks: #02071039



Do the stories in MGS have similar vibe to them as
Fahrenheit a.k.a. The Indigo Prophecy? I quite enjoyed
playing that game, but the plot made me feel sordid after.
It was a green, slimy cliche more on the "lets make bucks on
ufos and the paranormal" than on the "conscious pop-culture"
side.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-04-10 16:58 [#02071047]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Indeksical: #02071030 | Show recordbag



mgs3 wasn't really all to innovative (innovative games can
be crap too (just look at those weird-ass japanese games
coming out), I was just making a case about everyone going
"ooh! aah! wii games are soo innovative!" when they aren't),
but it was really well made. They thought about
"everything," you had to make sure you ate well, that you
treated your wounds, all while avoiding detection and
keeping up. The story was pretty well played, imo. Not
better than MGS1 of course, but still pretty good.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-04-10 17:04 [#02071049]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ophecks: #02071033 | Show recordbag



I didn't like the first rainbow six games, but I understand
they've changed a bit lately. Anyway, I like some tactical
shooter co-op games, but maybe in a different style. I loved
playing through Commandos2 with a mate, for instance,
because there you have people with different skills that
HAVE to work together. That's what I loved about the co-op
for that one Splinter Cell game, too; you couldn't do it
with two people running around on each their place (like you
can in halo, even though halo works anyway (only on co-op))
doing their own thing, you have to work together and use
everyone's skills. It's also very tactical.. you take your
time to analyse the routes of the soldiers patrolling, you
set up your men and then you attack. It's just so much more
satisfying when you're doing it with someone else and the
plan you made works on the first go!


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-04-10 17:10 [#02071052]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to QRDL: #02071045 | Show recordbag



Depends on what part of Fahrenheit you mean. Now that you
mention it, that was another enjoyable game, and slightly
innovative in the.. combination? Weird with the sudden
rhythmic-button-mashing sessions to do the action, but still
enjoyable. The story was pretty much straightforward and on
the shallow side, but still enough to keep the game
together.

Dead rising looks like another mindless boring game. I can't
stand "duurr, empty head" games.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-04-10 17:18 [#02071053]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Oh, and about not using the blu-ray technology for games..
it's coming out for both consoles, but that enemy territory:
quake wars game (which seems boring in other respects) which
seems to have textures that take 6gb! If that isn't going to
fill up a dvd in no time, I don't know what will, and with
the xbox not having HD-DVD, people will have to get the
external drive to get games with similar features in the
future.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-04-10 17:19 [#02071054]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #02071053 | Show recordbag



That was very bad English, but you get the gist.


 

offline Indeksical from Phobiazero Damage Control (United Kingdom) on 2007-04-10 17:26 [#02071056]
Points: 10671 Status: Regular | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #02071053 | Show recordbag



6gb of textures?! fucking hell.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-04-10 17:31 [#02071058]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Indeksical: #02071056 | Show recordbag



That's only one texture, I think. It's a bit vague. There's
an interview with the producer at gametrailers.com.


 

offline QRDL from Poland on 2007-04-10 18:00 [#02071071]
Points: 2838 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #02071053



Why oh why doesn't it have a HD-DVD is beyond my
comprehension. Besides cutting down the costs I can think of
only one reasonable explanation. Maybe Microsoft suspected
that console players won't be patient enough to stand long
loading times caused by the extreme size of textures.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-04-10 18:09 [#02071076]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to QRDL: #02071071 | Show recordbag



I think it's because they wanted the box itself to cost
less, so while the ps3 comes with blu-ray and costs more,
xbox comes without hd-dvd and costs less. I'm betting load
times aren't going to be a problem.. watch the interview.
The guy says that even though the texture is 6gb, it doesn't
take more than 30mb ram, meaning there's probably something
fancy going on.


 

offline Indeksical from Phobiazero Damage Control (United Kingdom) on 2007-04-10 18:23 [#02071080]
Points: 10671 Status: Regular | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #02071076 | Show recordbag



the trailer for that enemy territory looks a bit shit.


 

offline QRDL from Poland on 2007-04-10 21:03 [#02071103]
Points: 2838 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #02071076



Later, withour watching the trailer I think that he meant
that it is not taking more than 30mb of video memory at a
time.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-04-11 02:00 [#02071127]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Indeksical: #02071080 | Show recordbag



I know. It's just another boring "shoot! SHOOT!" game where
you don't really do anything. It's probably fun on drunken
multiplayer until everyone realises it's boring.


 


Messageboard index