an inconvenient truth! | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
recycle
...and 405 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614083
Today 3
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
an inconvenient truth!
 

offline Chihiro from twins land on 2007-03-28 03:10 [#02066886]
Points: 4650 Status: Regular



i think everyone ought to watch this


 

offline chambre noire from Iceland on 2007-03-28 03:21 [#02066887]
Points: 2515 Status: Lurker



i think everyone ought to watch this


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2007-03-28 03:28 [#02066888]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to chambre noire: #02066887 | Show recordbag



Indeed.

Also, have a read of "a convenient untruth". Gore's house
uses 20 times the national average amount of electricity.

It's true we're using up a fair whack of our petrol/fossil
fuels and ought to look at alternatives. It's also
completely untrue that we have anything more than a
negligible effect on the climate.


 

offline Chihiro from twins land on 2007-03-28 03:31 [#02066890]
Points: 4650 Status: Regular



just to be clear, im not fond of ANY political figure.
i just thought this was a good documentary


 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2007-03-28 03:33 [#02066891]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular



geological phenomena of planetary proportions...

humanoids can fix it alright


 

offline big from lsg on 2007-03-28 03:40 [#02066893]
Points: 23727 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



Global warming is scientific fact. I believe that part at
least of Gore's movie. All the serious studies show it is
real.
I intuitively believe the argument that the atmosphere with
it's 10 km height is very small in volume compared to the
earth and that's why we can easily affect it, also because i
believe it is a fine balance.
The scientists that say global warming isn't real
deliberately base themselves on old or wrong studies.
Saying global warming doesn't exist imo is stupid conspiracy
thinking.


 

offline chambre noire from Iceland on 2007-03-28 03:41 [#02066894]
Points: 2515 Status: Lurker | Followup to Chihiro: #02066890



it sure is as it's been hyped up immensly by the government
controlled media to get you ready to pay more taxes. just
wait and see. the thing is, that An inconvenient truth is
very good at showing you the wrong data in a fancy way.


 

offline chambre noire from Iceland on 2007-03-28 03:43 [#02066895]
Points: 2515 Status: Lurker



global warming is real (radiation from the sun has increased
several % over some years now!) but man is not to blame for
this.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2007-03-28 03:43 [#02066896]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to big: #02066893 | Show recordbag



Watch the great global warming swindle, then repeat that
with a straight face.


 

offline big from lsg on 2007-03-28 03:44 [#02066897]
Points: 23727 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



i think the documentary is awful because i get depressed by
this doomsday stuff
also i think it's dumb to focus so exclusively on global
warming and not other environmental issues: does throwing my
batteries in the trash affect global warming? no? great then
i'll go ahead and do so


 

offline big from lsg on 2007-03-28 03:47 [#02066898]
Points: 23727 Status: Regular | Followup to Ceri JC: #02066896 | Show recordbag



no i read the paper

i will look into it but i think it will be another Loose
Change: I don't have the knowledge to judge this is truth or
not, I will choose which scientists to believe.



 

offline big from lsg on 2007-03-28 03:47 [#02066899]
Points: 23727 Status: Regular | Followup to chambre noire: #02066895 | Show recordbag



that argument is rebutted in inconvenient truth


 

offline chambre noire from Iceland on 2007-03-28 03:50 [#02066900]
Points: 2515 Status: Lurker | Followup to big: #02066899



do yourself a favor and see the great global warming SWINDLE
:)


 

offline Ezkerraldean from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2007-03-28 03:55 [#02066901]
Points: 5733 Status: Addict



haven't seen either, and i'm certainly no climatologist. but
i've seen plenty of climatologists rip apart the GGWS
arguments.
apparently they claimed in it that volcanoes produce more
CO2 etc. than human activity does, which is blatant, total
bollocks.


 

offline big from lsg on 2007-03-28 04:09 [#02066905]
Points: 23727 Status: Regular | Followup to chambre noire: #02066900 | Show recordbag



jajaja i will tnx


 

offline J198 from Maastricht (Netherlands, The) on 2007-03-28 04:14 [#02066907]
Points: 7342 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



even if Al Gore is wrong, you deserve to be shot and stamped
upon if you do not start thinking about the fucking filth
you produce and how to be more responsible regarding energy
preservation.

this movie is a wake-up call and anyone telling you there's
no need to wake up, is still sleeping, obviously.

It makes me mad when people do everthing they can do keep on
living the lazy dirty life they are accustomed to.



 

offline big from lsg on 2007-03-28 04:18 [#02066908]
Points: 23727 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



i've believed in global warming almost all my live and
therefor longer than God. it must be a national culture
thing


 

offline ijonspeches from 109P/Swift-Tuttle on 2007-03-28 05:04 [#02066914]
Points: 7846 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



"About the Guy behind this (the great swindle)

Martin Durkin

In 1997 television producer Martin Durkin from the TV
company Kugelblitz made a series for Channel 4 called
Against Nature, which targeted environmentalists, presenting
them as 'the new enemy of science' and as comparable to the
Nazis."

i trust bush more than a man who says that environmentalists
are fascist enemies of science. what kind of bollocks ist
that?
Is solar energy against science? Is any alternative energy
against science, is improving houses to save energy against
science, is alternative fuel or electric cars against
science?

being stuck on fossil fuel is against science...



 

offline xkejjer from Malta on 2007-03-28 05:32 [#02066924]
Points: 274 Status: Lurker



yes, the great global warming swindle was basically
ridiculed and put to shame by a lot of international climate
experts.


 

offline big from lsg on 2007-03-28 05:44 [#02066927]
Points: 23727 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



from channel 4 link:

"According to a group of scientists brought together by
documentary-maker Martin Durkin, if the planet is heating
up, it isn't your fault and there's nothing you can do about
it."
It's Kyoto over again, why would i believe a couple of
scientist over hundreds of others?

"We've almost begun to take it for granted that climate
change is a man-made phenomenon. But just as the
environmental lobby think they've got our attention, a group
of naysayers have emerged to slay the whole premise of
global warming."
I don't believe the environmental lobby, i believe science


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-03-28 06:19 [#02066932]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



are you people stupid or are you joking?


 

offline big from lsg on 2007-03-28 06:39 [#02066937]
Points: 23727 Status: Regular | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #02066932 | Show recordbag



evil forces made this a left- or right-wing issue or
something


 

offline Ezkerraldean from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2007-03-28 06:44 [#02066938]
Points: 5733 Status: Addict | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #02066932



whats your view on this then, o master of philosophy (and
therefore climatology) ?


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2007-03-28 06:47 [#02066939]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to Ceri JC: #02066888



you must be fucking kidding.

I wonder which corporations funded that movie.


 

offline ijonspeches from 109P/Swift-Tuttle on 2007-03-28 06:49 [#02066940]
Points: 7846 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #02066932 | Show recordbag



destroy the evil forces !

destroy i say !

anyhow the conservative powers that be in germany,
all of a sudden are pro-environmentalism

finally one point i agree with them


 

offline big from lsg on 2007-03-28 06:53 [#02066942]
Points: 23727 Status: Regular | Followup to Chihiro: #02066890 | Show recordbag



gore isn't a politician imo
(wiki:Today, Gore is president of the American television
channel Current TV, chairman of Generation Investment
Management, a director on the board of Apple Inc., and an
unofficial adviser to Google's senior management.)


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-03-28 07:01 [#02066945]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to big: #02066937 | Show recordbag



Yeah, it's all a big conspiracy to make you drive your car
less because that's what socialists and scientists have to
do to make money.

This shouldn't be seen as a political issue (or it should,
but then political issues would have to go back to being
political issues (as opposed to economical, as they are
today)), but rather as an ethical issue. You are the person
doing this, you are the person doing bad. Do you want to be
that person?

And I think the fact that that it already is an ethical
issue is what makes so many people believe it isn't their
fault; the weight of guilt is heavy, but the only way of
truly lightening it is admitting it and repenting it (by
doing good, or rather, stopping doing the bad); moving the
responsibility elsewhere (natural variations, the big
corporations, wherever) is only a temporary solution, and it
will hit you in full weight when it comes back. Then you can
choose if you once more want to send it out to the field to
graze and put on more weight or if you want to actually
admit it, take the responsibility and do something.


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2007-03-28 07:03 [#02066946]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #02066945



OH BUT WHAT YOU'RE DOING AS A PERSON IS HAVING ABSOLUTELY NO
EFFECT


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-03-28 07:07 [#02066947]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ezkerraldean: #02066938 | Show recordbag



It's man made. Not all of it, some is natural variations,
and I can't say with certainty how much of it is us, but
what is us is solely our responsibility and we need to ask
ourselves, as I said, not "can we afford this," but rather
"do we want to be the people who did this?" Even if the
impact was, as ceri seems to believe, negligible (which I
don't believe. I believe it to be significant), not doing
something where we can is a true sin.

My dad is a meteorologist/geophysicist, and I talk to him
about it quite a bit, so I bet I have more knowledge about
it than you. I also worked for a year at the geophysical
institute here in bergen, where the Bjerknes centre for
climate research also lies, and I read up a bit on their
stuff whenever I didn't have anything to do. Don't ask me
about numbers, though, I can't even remember my own
birthday.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-03-28 07:11 [#02066949]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to redrum: #02066946 | Show recordbag



Yeah, people can keep telling themselves that.

When you get in your car in the morning, it's the air planes
doing the polluting, when you fly to oslo (instead of taking
the train), it's the industry, or you justify it with "I
don't have the time to spend six hours on a train," when you
buy the stuff that is produced by "industry," it's not that
particular industry, it's china and their coal power plants,
please china do something!!! THE GLOBAL COMMUNITY MUST ACT!
*drives off in a hummer* What, the shopping bags are heavy,
ok?

Bah.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-03-28 07:19 [#02066951]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



I also read an article by a psychologist a while back.. he'd
done some research on how people perceived the threat of
global warming, and, basically, if you told them how to deal
with it, they perceived it as moralizing or paternalistic
and closed their ears to it. We are a bunch of grown up
babies, and you know what the problem is? Fucking
individualism and liberalism, but even with the capitalist
notion that "no matter where you're born, what you're born
to, if you don't make it, don't strike it big, no-one's to
blame but you," putting all responsibility (for ones
economical situation) on each and every one of us, no-one
seems to be able to figure out that pollution is a personal
problem; Consumers are part of the industrial pollution.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-03-28 07:20 [#02066954]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



I am angry, will have an ice cream. There's close to 20
degrees in bergen in march!


 

offline Ezkerraldean from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2007-03-28 07:20 [#02066955]
Points: 5733 Status: Addict | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #02066947



i am naturally dubious of claims against artificial global
warming but i'm definitely not all that knowledgable in the
field. but it does really interest me.

ceri: what claims did they make in the GGWS documentary and
how did they support them?


 

offline hedphukkerr from mathbotton (United States) on 2007-03-28 20:43 [#02067180]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular



global warming is very real and quite scary, but i really
fucking hate al gore for making a movie about himself
instead.


 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2007-03-28 22:37 [#02067203]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular



a reply to "the great global warming swindle"


 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2007-03-28 22:38 [#02067204]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular



oops, wrong link

a reply to the great global warming swindle

ignore last link!


 

offline RussellDust on 2007-03-28 22:40 [#02067205]
Points: 16078 Status: Regular



it's nice to see how influenced you all are. i can't see any
ot you as an idividual. it's fun to be anti, you just feel
so alive. oh ceri just get a farm and use your bike to the
fullest and why bother? chin ching! me me me


 

offline avart from nomo' on 2007-03-29 01:21 [#02067227]
Points: 1764 Status: Lurker



well, at least something happens.


 

offline big from lsg on 2007-03-29 02:09 [#02067237]
Points: 23727 Status: Regular | Followup to : #02067232 | Show recordbag



that's a great principle. it should be applied to the
creationists as well, who harm the public by dumbing it



 

offline big from lsg on 2007-03-29 02:10 [#02067238]
Points: 23727 Status: Regular | Followup to big: #02067237 | Show recordbag



puting faulty science into their heads


 

offline ijonspeches from 109P/Swift-Tuttle on 2007-03-29 02:20 [#02067239]
Points: 7846 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



theres really no problem with creationists,
the idea of creation is quite nice actually

and sometimes they are SO FUNNY,
so i like em

each to his own on that issue


 

offline big from lsg on 2007-03-29 02:22 [#02067242]
Points: 23727 Status: Regular | Followup to ijonspeches: #02067239 | Show recordbag



yea i saw the peanutbutter video


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2007-03-29 02:28 [#02067244]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



50 years from now, (if I'm not dead and if I am, it'll be
from something other than climate change) I'll look back on
this and be amused. People will either of quietly dropped
it, or the enviros will still be banging on about this great
cataclysm that will happen "in the next ten years". My
parents lived through this the first time it came up, 40
years ago. All the very same panic about the end of the
world and guilt at using a car was popular material back in
the 70s. Guess what? It didn't happen. 40 years, on they
still want us to believe it's imminent.

It's not even like traditional "end of the world" zealots.
At least they have the courtesy to set a date they reckon
it's all going to kick off. Then, when the date passes, we
can all have a laugh and they can either be quiet, or look
even more stupid and go "well, I got it wrong, actually it's
9 years and 234 days from now." This is effectively what the
enviros have done since the inital claims in the 70s. So, my
challenge is this: Put your head on the line, give a date it
will definately of all gone tits-up by, if we carry
on as we do. If we get to that date and it hasn't, you're
not allowed to bring it up again. I bet you the dates would
suddenly not be quite so close, instead of 10 years, it'll
be 20, or 50.

I think it is massive egotism on the part of humans that:
a) We somehow consider ourselves different to any other
animal.
b) Think our actions, in the grand scheme of things will
dramatically effect the planet for any real length of time.

As an aside, I don't grasp how people are unable to seperate
the two distinct issues of using up fossil fuel (which I
think is worth looking at) from that of global warming. I
also don't understand how the same people who discredit GGWS
on the grounds those involved in it may have vested
interests, fail to see how the same applies to those who
make a living out of global warming.

http://www.oism.org/oism/s32p31.htm is hardly "a couple" is it?


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2007-03-29 02:30 [#02067245]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Ceri JC: #02067244 | Show recordbag



Whoops, linked like a n00b there.

17,000 scientists (many who hold pHDs) reckon it's
bunk. Hardly "a few dozen" who are being payed off by oil
companies, is it?


 

offline big from lsg on 2007-03-29 02:49 [#02067252]
Points: 23727 Status: Regular | Followup to Ceri JC: #02067244 | Show recordbag



right, but temperatures are rising rapidly and polar
icecaps melting.


 

offline E-man from Rixensart (Belgium) on 2007-03-29 02:50 [#02067253]
Points: 3000 Status: Regular



i'll just say it's foolish to not think we have a great
impact on climate, just how much is the tricky part

the problem is it's just so complicated a science plus we
never had a situation like now so there is no anticipation
possible based on data
so, in fact, NOBODY can really tell what will happen next

it's a whole new situation for humanity and that's why there
is so much panic, misinformation and misunderstanding

we just don't know for now



 

offline ijonspeches from 109P/Swift-Tuttle on 2007-03-29 02:54 [#02067256]
Points: 7846 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



i gladly welcome every reason to cut down pollution,
because it stinks and is unhealthy

and receiving my electricity out of renewable ressources,
that dont have any co2 output doesnt cost me more

middleclass people can even make a profit out of it by
having solar panels on their houses producing more energy
than they need. and its a benefit for all

factories can save much money by investing in new generators
that work more effectively, decreasing their electricity
bills

using up the fossil fuel more efficently would probably do
no harm either. we all know it will be used up anyway and in
the long run the small people will pay more and more for it,
so why not develop alternatives soon enough so that people
still can afford their own vehicles in the upcoming decades?


 

offline avart from nomo' on 2007-03-29 03:35 [#02067261]
Points: 1764 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #02067244



you're a truly inspiring induhvidual.


 

offline E-man from Rixensart (Belgium) on 2007-03-29 03:39 [#02067262]
Points: 3000 Status: Regular | Followup to Ceri JC: #02067245



i've read a bit of that, and it gives argumentation that is
totally refuted by the ipcc, which honestly seems highly
reliable as a source of information
i'll read it in detail later and try to compare the
arguments to really see what is going on
but by initial reading it uses false argumentation


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2007-03-29 03:44 [#02067264]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to avart: #02067261 | Show recordbag



Your assumption that I'm stupid, because I disagree with
your point of view, only serves to discredit your argument.


 


Messageboard index