an inconvenient truth! | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 552 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614087
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
an inconvenient truth!
 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-03-30 09:55 [#02067799]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #02067798 | Show recordbag



Ooops. here it is.

too much studying today, I need some food.


Attached picture

 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2007-04-06 08:50 [#02069907]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker



For the people interested:
Climate change is here now, says major report

The IPCC reports are widely considered to be the most
authoritative written on climate change. They consider the
latest scientific evidence and are written and reviewed by
thousands of the world's leading climate scientists. Their
conclusions are then discussed and finalised by
representatives of 190 national governments.



 

offline epohs from )C: on 2007-04-06 09:51 [#02069917]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



i hate this debate more and more every time i see it.

it's so full of ad hominem attacks by both sides that it is
almost impossible to even tell what the important points
are, much less debate them on their merit.

for instance, the swindle guy compares the environmentalists
to nazis, and alludes to the politician's political agendas.
And redrum counters with "I wonder which corporations
funded that movie."
. both points might be valid, but
neither even begin to address the factual truth of the
debate.

(below are hypotheticals used solely to illustrate my
point)

Al Gore may very well be using his movie as part of an
interest generating ploy for an upcoming presidential
campaign. But, that just can not be used as proof
that the facts in the movie are wrong.

Conversely, the swindle documentary could be funded in its
entirety by Exxon, and that wouldn't be conclusive evidence
that its conclusions are incorrect.

Both of those could and should be considered when looking at
the facts of the debate skeptically, but too often those
types of points become the sole basis of the debate. Which
is very frustrating to me, and ultimately makes me not even
care.


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2007-04-06 10:34 [#02069925]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker



Ceri, you'rre offit


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2007-04-06 10:37 [#02069927]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker | Followup to epohs: #02069917



NAZIS


 

offline Valor on 2007-04-06 10:46 [#02069930]
Points: 594 Status: Addict



the real danger is hail.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-04-06 11:08 [#02069949]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



I still haven't got a proper reply to my question about
what, exactly, is being doubted. You can say that you doubt
that we are having such a large effect on the environment,
but on what basis do you doubt this? Do you believe
greenhouse gases to not have the effect they supposedly do?
Do you believe we release less than we supposedly do?
What is it you doubt?


 

offline obara from Utrecht on 2007-04-06 11:11 [#02069952]
Points: 19377 Status: Regular



THIS is the REAL danger:


Attached picture

 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-04-06 11:31 [#02069955]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to obara: #02069952 | Show recordbag



OMG!!!!


 

offline Combo from Sex on 2007-04-07 11:49 [#02070213]
Points: 7540 Status: Regular | Followup to The_Funkmaster: #02067795



Anyway, if only one person tried and changes its lifestyle
in order to prevent global warming, it would already be a
good thing.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-04-08 08:14 [#02070517]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



A new report released with the effects that have already
been observed. It's probably available at your local
newspapers homepage, I can only link a norwegian article.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-04-08 08:15 [#02070518]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Also, will the sceptics answer my question?


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2007-04-08 08:17 [#02070519]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker | Followup to goDel: #02069907



There's a link to the pdf in the linked page...


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2007-04-08 08:18 [#02070520]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #02070518



they're still crying. it's hard to face the facts


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-04-08 08:29 [#02070522]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to goDel: #02070520 | Show recordbag



Ah, so their tears are clouding their vision so they can't
read the reports.


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2007-04-08 08:37 [#02070523]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #02070522



yeah, it's pretty emotional so i wouldn't make fun of it if
i were you


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-04-08 08:52 [#02070526]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to goDel: #02070523 | Show recordbag



Oops, sorry. I hope didn't step on anyone's toes. Unless
they're jews or niggers of course.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-04-09 06:05 [#02070649]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



answers?!


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-04-09 06:09 [#02070650]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Actually, I'd like to add another question.

First, to reiterate the first one: What, exactly, is it you
doubt? The effect of greenhouse gases? The amount of these
gases released by humans? What?

Now, then... Why do you think I believe we are the cause?
And what do you think I would say if you asked me "Why do
you think I don't believe we are the cause?"


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-04-09 06:19 [#02070652]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



God damned, why do they drop off the now online list
whenever I bump?


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2007-04-09 06:30 [#02070654]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #02070652



don't push it. you're getting on everybody's nerves. let
them come to their own senses. if they want to reply, they
will. this is not a debating contest.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-04-09 06:33 [#02070655]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to goDel: #02070654 | Show recordbag



I'm just bumping to catch their attention. This topic kind
of died for a while so they could be unaware of its
resurrection.

And no, it isn't a contest, but this is the only place I'm
likely to get a proper reply to that particular question,
which I kind of need...


 


Messageboard index