Google is taking over. | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
big
recycle
...and 568 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614087
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Google is taking over.
 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2007-03-20 17:09 [#02064431]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict



What. the. fuck.


 

online big from lsg on 2007-03-20 17:12 [#02064433]
Points: 23727 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



good idea


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2007-03-20 17:13 [#02064434]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict



[biggiesmartypants] aphex twin is cool


 

online big from lsg on 2007-03-20 17:15 [#02064435]
Points: 23727 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



http://www.hyves.nl/index.php?l1=gr&group_id=19869


 

offline chaosmachine from Ottawa (Canada) on 2007-03-20 17:18 [#02064436]
Points: 2330 Status: Lurker



i use google mail for my own domain.. it's hard to beat.


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2007-03-20 17:20 [#02064438]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to chaosmachine: #02064436



Yeah, it's a lovely interface, and i love it for my personal
email.

But why should TCD sell out and suck the corporate cock? Why
should my college emails be handled by and stored on a
google server? Why have I had no choice in the matter?


 

online big from lsg on 2007-03-20 17:21 [#02064439]
Points: 23727 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



for me it's no different from using any other commercial
e-mail client


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2007-03-20 17:21 [#02064440]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



FAILED:
Final Recipient:
RFC822; James.Joyce@gmail.com
Status:
5.2.1 (Mailbox quota exceeded)
Last Attempt Date:
13 Jan 1941 19:38:50 -0700



 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2007-03-20 17:24 [#02064441]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to big: #02064439



We're not talking about personal emails here.. We're talking
about a university handing the reigns over to a corporation
in yet another part of administration.

Do you see nothing wrong with this? Not even in principle?


 

offline chaosmachine from Ottawa (Canada) on 2007-03-20 17:31 [#02064443]
Points: 2330 Status: Lurker | Followup to redrum: #02064441



i'd just have it forwarded to gmail anyway.. saves me the
effort.


 

online big from lsg on 2007-03-20 17:36 [#02064444]
Points: 23727 Status: Regular | Followup to redrum: #02064441 | Show recordbag



no, a corporation is not the devil or terrorists


 

offline i_x_ten from arsemuncher on 2007-03-20 17:38 [#02064445]
Points: 10031 Status: Regular | Followup to redrum: #02064441



much as i agree that this is pretty shit, i hope it doesnt
come as a suprise to you? everything that can be privatised
will be.


 

offline obara from Utrecht on 2007-03-20 17:39 [#02064446]
Points: 19377 Status: Regular



you have no choice


 

offline EVOL from a long time ago on 2007-03-21 01:11 [#02064534]
Points: 4921 Status: Lurker | Followup to redrum: #02064441



now now, easy there grandpa. remember to take your geritol.


 

offline cx from Norway on 2007-03-21 01:20 [#02064536]
Points: 4537 Status: Regular



university of arizona was the first uni to do this.
there are a few in the us who use gmail now, and a couple
other larger corporations too like ge.


 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2007-03-21 01:35 [#02064541]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



I really don't see a problem with this.

There's worse corporations they could've used to offer this
service. I think it's a good thing and pretty forward
thinking for a Uni. They're going to save a shitload of
money this way and relieve stress on their own equipment so
they can work on offering better service in other parts of
their IT department.


 

offline OK on 2007-03-21 09:25 [#02064650]
Points: 4791 Status: Lurker



who uses email anyway


 

offline xkejjer from Malta on 2007-03-21 09:45 [#02064663]
Points: 274 Status: Lurker



ah, the genitalia!


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2007-03-21 09:59 [#02064667]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to redrum: #02064441 | Show recordbag



My corporation runs large proportions of many colleges' IT
systems. By and large we handle the student's data with a
great deal more respect/care than most of the colleges do
themselves. Google are better than us, so I'd say you having
nothing to worry about. It's safer and cheaper than running
it in house.

Interestingly there are sort of legal quandries re: their
relationship to you as a data protection subject and their
own as data controllers/controller's agents. This sort of
outsourcing of IT has quite odd rules re: their data
protection obligations to you because it hasn't been around
long enough for the law to catch up.

I'm actually doing a project on the legalities of something
similar as part of my masters dissertation.


 

online big from lsg on 2007-03-21 11:09 [#02064694]
Points: 23727 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



it's funny to think about how they could use the
information. besides marketing crap to people in the ads
they could secretely combine newly discovered and
communicated insights from academic fields that
traditionally won't interact and come up with new
groundbreaking scientific insights


 

offline chaosmachine from Ottawa (Canada) on 2007-03-21 11:14 [#02064695]
Points: 2330 Status: Lurker



if you're paranoid, just use gpg.


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2007-03-21 11:15 [#02064696]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to big: #02064694



or, since they're in bed with the american government, could
provide information on who's doing what in various
controversial or subversive university societies.


 

offline dave_g from United Kingdom on 2007-03-21 12:00 [#02064709]
Points: 3372 Status: Lurker



boo hoo. No big deal, this is the same as them farming it
out to any other private company. I'd imagine google would
do a better job than a few IT bods at the university and
probably a few It companies too.

I hate to pop your ego, but I doubt the US government really
cares about you enough to worry if you joined the socialism
society because they were giving away free Che T-shirts,
etc

Your comment about having choice is laughable. My university
had an internal system, but didn't offer me the choice of
anyhting else. the bastards!



 

offline horsefactory from 💠 (United Kingdom) on 2007-03-21 12:02 [#02064710]
Points: 14867 Status: Regular



WHEN U R READING THIS DONT STOP OR SOMETHING BAD WILL HAPPEN
MY NAME IS SUMMER I AM 15 YEARS OLD i have BLONDE HAIR ,
SCARS no NOSE OR EARS I AM DEAD IF U DONT COPY THIS JUS LIKE
FROM THE RING COPY N POST THIS ON 5 MORE SITES OR I WILL
APPEAR ONE CREEPY NIGHT WEN UR NOT ExPECTING IT BY YOUR BED
WITH A NIFE AND KILL U THIS IS NO JOKE SUMMET ING GOOD WILL
HAPPEN TO U IF YOU POST THIS ON 5 MORE FLASH BOXES


 

online big from lsg on 2007-03-21 12:15 [#02064713]
Points: 23727 Status: Regular | Followup to redrum: #02064696 | Show recordbag



shit, that's really bad


 

online big from lsg on 2007-03-21 12:17 [#02064715]
Points: 23727 Status: Regular | Followup to big: #02064713 | Show recordbag



was ment to be follow-up to horsefactory


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2007-03-21 12:30 [#02064718]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to dave_g: #02064709



you've missed the point by your second sentence. congs


 

offline OK on 2007-03-21 13:08 [#02064735]
Points: 4791 Status: Lurker | Followup to redrum: #02064696



if i remember correctly google opposed to giving the
government access to their users emails.

also i remember that the senate denied an initiative by
google to provide an entire city with free internet access?

how is it that they're in bed with the us government
exactly?

google is sinister because it seems like their plan is to
take over the internet.

conspiracy thinking can be so dumb sometimes.


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2007-03-21 13:56 [#02064747]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



I bypass all this corporate bullshit like gmail and just use
good, honest to goodness Hotmail. It's like email but on the
Internet, so it's free and only you can look at it.

I give it a Tech_Belch Rating of 5 Thetas
ΘΘΘΘΘ



 

offline epohs from )C: on 2007-03-21 14:43 [#02064752]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



i miss checking my university email with telnet and pine.

:(


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2007-03-21 14:47 [#02064754]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



also, i'd pay a couple hundred dollars to still have access
to all of those emails.


 

offline mimi on 2007-03-21 21:58 [#02064852]
Points: 5721 Status: Regular



hahah, because universities aren't businesses that make
money

oh and your subversive university circles are really
threatening, i bet


 

offline Oddioblender from Fort Worth, TX (United States) on 2007-03-21 23:18 [#02064873]
Points: 9601 Status: Lurker



most computer techs i've seen working at a college are
incompetent and incapable of maintaining a stable internet
server, not to mention all the red tape and bureaucracy to
deal with. e-mail isn't something meant to enhance learning
experiences, it's used to keep communication between
students and faculty.

i understood your sentiment, redrum, but i doubt your
teachers will be replaced by cost-efficient robots or that
you'll be reading books you wrote yourself on elm bark. and
besides, considerating how education funding is where i'm
at, i'd rather my school put the money where it counted,
into things that would work.


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2007-03-21 23:21 [#02064874]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker



there's a lot wrong with people who think that corporations
are wrong IN PRINCIPLE. i don't know where to start.

again, just an observation


 

offline EVOL from a long time ago on 2007-03-22 01:30 [#02064881]
Points: 4921 Status: Lurker



omg! something happened! then, as time went by you forgot
about it and 50 years after the fact, you died w/o incident.
big deal.


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2007-03-22 06:30 [#02064913]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to mimi: #02064852



i didn't fucking say they were, but it's my fucking
information if they are or not, and nobody else's.

OK: i say that because my semantics lecturer showed me a
newspaper article regarding a deal done between Google and
NASA to provide datamining software, so they'd be able to
search through their banks of information on space travel
technology.

we both concluded - he first - that it was very
questionable, since NASA would have to already have had
datamining software and algorithms of a comparable quality
and efficiency to google's, and that this was just a
foot-in-the-back-door for the NSA and co.


 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2007-03-22 06:34 [#02064916]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



That's just conjecture though. There's really nothing to say
that's definitely what's happening.


 

offline OK on 2007-03-22 16:25 [#02065072]
Points: 4791 Status: Lurker



Yes I agree with giginger. in fact you made one conjecture
and a very questionable logic deduction.


 

offline obara from Utrecht on 2007-03-22 17:13 [#02065083]
Points: 19377 Status: Regular



you have no choice


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2007-03-23 04:34 [#02065219]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Right...so an educational establishment, supposedly
educating some of the brightest minds in the country, where
one would think innovative ideas are swapped and discussed
and research is undertaken is throwing all of this data and
information open to a third party commercial company who
have links with various government agencies.

I agree with redrum, this is bollocks and shouldn't be
allowed.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2007-03-23 09:31 [#02065285]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



This objection is only really reasonable if the alternative
people administering it (the college's internal IT team)
are: competent, honest and care about the privacy of
student's data.

I've met literally hundreds of members of IT staff at scores
of different colleges. A few were like that, the vast
majority were not. Most are underpaid, underskilled and
generally fairly pissed off and apathetic. I think you're
far more likely to find one of them selling your secret info
(which as mimi says, sorry to piss on your parade, most
people in the real world don't give a toss about) than some
corporation who is managing it for them and potentially
stands to lose a great deal more than a private individual
would.

The notion that the government/government agencies shouldn't
be able to steal all the wonderful research that allegedly
goes on at universities (and a lot of university's research
output is actually pretty wank and exists only to get
funding, even at supposedly very prestigious sites) also
falls down on account of who is paying for it. Universities
are effectively bankrolled by the government (even those who
pay full whack tuition fees are still only paying 15-20%)
who tend to take whatever they damn well please of the
research findings anyway and are quite upfront about doing
so.

As an aside, the fact that google works with government
agencies on other projects doesn't mean a lot. Any firm that
deals with decent sized IT projects eventually runs
government projects (as most large projects involve the
government in some capacity). This doesn't mean they are a
branch of the government. As it happens, Google are actually
fairly leftist as big companies go. They really don't
fulfill the cyberpunk stereotype of some big evil faceless
corporation who only care about $$$s.

As to having a choice in the matter, why should you? Do you
get a say in who does the cleaning of the building? Or the
security?

The government pay for your education and the students union
isn't very powerful at all these


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2007-03-23 09:38 [#02065290]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Ceri JC: #02065285 | Show recordbag



...days. It's not like they have any real weight at all and
in any event, do most of your peers have a problem with
this? When I was in full time education, our email system
was a joke. Tiny mailbox that could be overfilled (at which
point you couldn't send email and it would bounce recieved
emails back) by literally one email containing the whole uni
address book in the "to" field (the didn't bother to set up
groups you see). All it needed was one cretin to mail
everyone a "phone for sale" email with a couple of .bmp
images in it and the whole thing came to a halt for days at
a time.

This resulted in a friend missing a work placement (the
company tried emailing him for an interview, but when the
mail was returned, emailed the second person on the list
instead). Other people got penalised for handing coursework
in late as a result. All sorts of Chaos. I complained about
this situation on several occassions. 5 years on, I'm
informed this is still the case and now no one uses the
internal email (they use gmail/yahoo).

I'd far rather a working system that was run externally than
an internal one that was at best flakey. Even if this means
"loosing my privacy" it's not like I'm going to email mates
anything risque on a college email addy anyway.


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2007-03-23 09:52 [#02065295]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to Ceri JC: #02065290



our email system works perfectly. i've been at tcd for 3
years now and my inbox has only 20MB out of 60MB full, and
i've not deleted a single email. People don't send around
emails such as the one you've mentioned - indeed, it's only
the graduates and academics who are able to email the
mailing lists, so it all works perfectly well.

so, that serves as an example not only of how our email
system works, but how it works well, and so i must conclude
that the people administering it are competent (they
definitely are) and honest. Whether or not they care about
peoples' privacy isn't as easily verifiable, but I'd be much
more inclined to trust them than a multinational
corporation. you say an MNC has a lot more to lose if
they're lax about security or if they abuse peoples'
privacy, but I don't think that's the case. Look at the case
where AOL accidentally disclosed (or were hacked, i can't
remember) hundreds of thousands of searches that were made
on their website. Do people still use AOL? Sure they do.

I'm not saying people would stop going to TCD if there was
an IT security breech, but TCD would have their name and
honour tarnished, which is something they certainly do NOT
want.

This is just a case of cost-cutting. That's all. They're
just trying to save money and will skimp on anything
possible, even our privacy.


 

offline dave_g from United Kingdom on 2007-03-23 10:03 [#02065297]
Points: 3372 Status: Lurker



Ok, just organise yourself and the other students to pay for
an internal email system or stop moaning about cost cutting.


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2007-03-23 10:08 [#02065299]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to dave_g: #02065297



Why should it be up to us to pay? Why isn't the government
providing the money, instead of wasting 50 million euro on
evoting machines that haven't been used and (hopefully)
never will be?

Also, that'd be quite impossible. Do you really think the
college IT staff would allow us to set up an alternative
email system, side-by-side with the google system? It'd be a
technical nightmare for them, the amount of things that
could go wrong.

And in any event, it wouldn't achieve anything, since the
emails will still be stored on google servers when
correspondence takes place between a person on our network
and another on the google network.


 

offline OK on 2007-03-23 10:15 [#02065307]
Points: 4791 Status: Lurker



o good then encrypt the shit out of everything you do


 

offline dave_g from United Kingdom on 2007-03-23 10:16 [#02065308]
Points: 3372 Status: Lurker | Followup to redrum: #02065299



It should be up to YOU to pay, because YOU have the problem
with it. Governments always waste money, get over it. But
now they can save a bit of money by using google and you
don't like it?!??

Anyway, why are you so worried about your emails? Never
heard of PGP? I somehow doubt uncle sam is interested in
you.

I never suggested two systems at once. If google is so
outrageous then surely all of the students will refuse to
use it and demand it is scrapped and replaced with a new
internal system, thus safe guarding all their important
emails from facebook and the like.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2007-03-23 10:18 [#02065310]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to redrum: #02065295 | Show recordbag



In that case I'd say you're one of the lucky ones, most
university's IT departments are much worse.

Just be grateful they've not outsourced their whole IT dept.
to a 3rd party. Some universities and colleges have RM in to
run the show and do nothing themselves. I draw the line at
that and find the idea of not having anyone directly
employed by the university having any administrative
capacity at all, quite worrying.

IT is one area where I think it (generally) makes sense for
unis to outsource EG on Monday, I was working as a DBA for a
college that was big enough to need a DBA, but not big
enough to be able to afford one full time in house. It's not
really the sort of job where you're likely to find enough
people locally who want to do it as a jobshare or part time,
so without relying on a 3rd party, they basically couldn't
have one. In that sort of situation it's a nice solution.

I do dislike the idea of outsourcing every last thing
though, so the university really is run just like a
(stereotypically evil) corporation though. Guess how much
one of the coffee shops (not even the main one- just a small
one in the ground floor of one of the 30-odd buildings) at
my old college made? £1,000,000 per month (profit) not
turnover. That's for a small, 2-3 members of staff at a
time, shop. It wasn't hard to see why, the prices of it were
akin to something in a capital city, but because of where
the campus was, it'd be a brisk 25 minute walk to go to the
alternative cheaper coffee shop down in the town. As a
result, if you wanted to get a coffee/sandwich between 2
classes, it was the only real option. I'd of far rather
there was a cheaper union one in its place that was run at
little above cost (offering cut prices to the students) and
the surplus was re-invested in the uni, or given to the rag
charity, than that monstrosity..


 

offline sofa king from the sofa on 2007-03-23 14:08 [#02065366]
Points: 91 Status: Addict



Google is the big brother


 

offline OK on 2007-03-24 17:31 [#02065747]
Points: 4791 Status: Lurker



not yet but it will


 


Messageboard index