|
|
goat boy
on 2007-03-14 05:17 [#02062069]
Points: 48 Status: Regular
|
|
....is just an 18 rated Lord of the Fucking Rings. A pure geekfest. Discuss.
|
|
zero-cool
on 2007-03-14 05:26 [#02062073]
Points: 2720 Status: Lurker
|
|
lets not
|
|
Ezkerraldean
from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2007-03-14 07:54 [#02062117]
Points: 5733 Status: Addict | Followup to goat boy: #02062069
|
|
probably just a ripoff of LOTR. historical epics are hot at the moment with t
|
|
Chihiro
from twins land on 2007-03-14 08:04 [#02062120]
Points: 4650 Status: Regular
|
|
looks terrible
|
|
obara
from Utrecht on 2007-03-14 19:27 [#02062382]
Points: 19377 Status: Regular
|
|
no no no
|
|
LuminousAphid
from home (United States) on 2007-03-14 19:29 [#02062383]
Points: 540 Status: Lurker
|
|
"A pure geekfest."
it was great for precisely that reason
|
|
magicant
from Canada on 2007-03-14 19:39 [#02062387]
Points: 2465 Status: Lurker | Followup to LuminousAphid: #02062383
|
|
300 looks homo-erotic...i think only gay men would go to see it
|
|
LuminousAphid
from home (United States) on 2007-03-14 19:45 [#02062391]
Points: 540 Status: Lurker | Followup to magicant: #02062387
|
|
lawl you made a funny!
|
|
magicant
from Canada on 2007-03-15 00:06 [#02062437]
Points: 2465 Status: Lurker | Followup to LuminousAphid: #02062391
|
|
r u gay?
|
|
cygnus
from nowhere and everyplace on 2007-03-15 00:07 [#02062439]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular
|
|
I thought that movie was very cool but I do not like the guy that played leonidus, he wasn't very believable
|
|
Atli
from ReykjavÃk (Iceland) on 2007-03-15 03:17 [#02062476]
Points: 1309 Status: Lurker
|
|
somehow these movies always turn out to be a historical suicide.
|
|
Wolfslice
from Bay Area, CA (United States) on 2007-03-15 05:22 [#02062502]
Points: 4909 Status: Regular | Followup to goat boy: #02062069
|
|
It does not even start to compare to LOTR.
It was a good movie and all but I doubt you'll be see it carry a serious fanbase for 50+ years.
|
|
thecrimsonguard
from ∞ (United States) on 2007-03-28 08:02 [#02066967]
Points: 1801 Status: Lurker
|
|
i saw the 300 for free, and i feel like the studio that made it owes me 10 bucks for watching it.
LOTR series is/are better if you read them b/c the movies were total rubbish
Anything shot via green/blue chroma key studio=shit.
|
|
melack
from barcielwave on 2007-03-28 10:06 [#02066997]
Points: 9099 Status: Regular
|
|
its not a bad film, pretty enjoyable, epics and aesthetics... the problem, as usual, the american comercial shit ---> everything that wasnt on the comic book (as someone told me) : the monsters, the romantic stuff, the bad jokes
|
|
redrum
from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2007-03-28 10:07 [#02066998]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict
|
|
hollywood
|
|
Gwely Mernans
from 23rd century entertainment (Canada) on 2007-03-28 10:15 [#02067006]
Points: 9856 Status: Lurker
|
|
I enjoyed it.
|
|
Ceri JC
from Jefferson City (United States) on 2007-03-29 02:41 [#02067249]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
|
I liked it. I won't get it on DVD, but I'm glad I saw it.
Personally, I found it more entertaing than LOTR (yes, it's less "high art" and won't win as many awards, but I don't see a film being just entertaining as a bad thing).
|
|
goDel
from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2007-03-29 07:05 [#02067323]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker
|
|
it's a good movie for 13 year old narcissistic boys with a bad temper.
|
|
retape
from http://retape.net (Norway) on 2007-03-29 07:24 [#02067325]
Points: 2355 Status: Lurker
|
|
why compare it to LoTR? that's gay. the film itself is good. entertaining and nothing more. lovely eye candy.
|
|
LuminousAphid
from home (United States) on 2007-03-29 20:01 [#02067588]
Points: 540 Status: Lurker | Followup to retape: #02067325
|
|
because they are both historical epics. clearly.
|
|
Chihiro
from twins land on 2007-03-29 20:03 [#02067589]
Points: 4650 Status: Regular | Followup to LuminousAphid: #02067588
|
|
in dreamland!!!!
|
|
pigster
from melbs on 2007-03-30 00:27 [#02067635]
Points: 4480 Status: Lurker
|
|
im considering seeing it just to check out the pretty production on the big screen. other than that it seems pretty silly (which isnt necessarily a bad thing), i'm just not all too sure how much i'll like i it judging from what i've heard.
tho. cant judge til i see it.
|
|
pachi
from yo momma (United States) on 2007-03-30 01:28 [#02067649]
Points: 8984 Status: Lurker
|
|
There was no shortage of action.
I was a bit cynical about it though. It's another one of those movies that depicts whities as the good guys and darker folks as the badguys, like in LotR. Plus, I didn't approve of the Spartan leader killing the Persian messenger. And how the hell did the Spartans kill off that lot of Persians in the initial battle and not lose a single man in the fray?
Anyway, I hope those who haven't seen the film yet haven't viewed this thread.
|
|
Messageboard index
|