|
|
stefano_azevedo
from Pindorama (Brazil) on 2007-02-13 12:22 [#02049654]
Points: 4396 Status: Regular
|
|
terrific movie! pretty images and awesome characters there.
my children will watch movies like this instead of movies like harry potter. erm.. more or less.
|
|
stefano_azevedo
from Pindorama (Brazil) on 2007-02-13 12:22 [#02049655]
Points: 4396 Status: Regular
|
|
and it deserves it's own thread. discuss.
|
|
marlowe
from Antarctica on 2007-02-13 12:26 [#02049657]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker | Followup to stefano_azevedo: #02049654
|
|
Yes, have them watch a traumatic film influenced by war. Choice.
|
|
thatne
from United States on 2007-02-13 12:34 [#02049658]
Points: 3026 Status: Lurker
|
|
it was good but like someone said on watmm the best parts were trailered. i did like it better than the lion the witch and the wardrobe though; it was suit ably dark in tone instead of cotton- candyish. quite violent though indeed.
|
|
Zephyr Twin
from ΔΔΔ on 2007-02-13 13:08 [#02049667]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to stefano_azevedo: #02049654 | Show recordbag
|
|
I agree that most of the better parts in the movie were in the trailer, and I didn't think the movie was fantastical enough. It had a few interesting scenes and the rest was dominated by a war-time struggle plot, that although done well enough, was not what I expected (in the bad way).
|
|
SPD
from United States on 2007-02-14 02:45 [#02049854]
Points: 1090 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
|
Did the extreme foley work bug the fuck out of anyone else? They must have spend half the budget on it. Everything was so loud and squishy or creeky or whatever sound effect they could imagine turned to 11. It was actually distracting.
|
|
Taxidermist
from Black Grass on 2007-02-14 02:48 [#02049856]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker | Followup to SPD: #02049854
|
|
Maybe they just had the digital reverb turned up or even just the sound was too loud at your theatre. It sounded fine to me.
|
|
Taxidermist
from Black Grass on 2007-02-14 02:48 [#02049857]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker
|
|
I liked this movie quite a bit. Liked perfume much more though.
|
|
SPD
from United States on 2007-02-14 02:54 [#02049861]
Points: 1090 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
|
just seemed like the amount of it was overdone. I don't even hear sounds that exacting and punctuated in real life. That could be the point, but that doesn't make it right.
|
|
Jarworski
from The Grove (United Kingdom) on 2007-02-14 02:58 [#02049863]
Points: 10836 Status: Lurker
|
|
Didn't like it much. The civil war storyline was engrossing but mainly due to the constant threat of over the top violence, and the fantasy sequences I found visually ok but mawkish and insubstantial. For all the plaudits it's received when the end credits rolled I was left with a distinct feeling of "Is that it?"
|
|
Taxidermist
from Black Grass on 2007-02-14 03:13 [#02049868]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker
|
|
I think the whole fantasy element was supposed to simbolize her disconnection with the increasingly violent world she is becoming involved in, and the unrealistic sound design and over the top violence were only exclaimation points. Don't mean to sound like a wanker.
|
|
zero-cool
on 2007-02-14 03:46 [#02049878]
Points: 2720 Status: Lurker
|
|
it had to many useless violence
|
|
Brisk
from selling smack at the orphanage on 2007-02-14 05:29 [#02049917]
Points: 4667 Status: Lurker
|
|
I watched it last night. I knew nothing about it prior to watching and I must say it was quite superb. Excessively violent in places (the scene where the captain murdered that man reminded me a little of Irreversible) but absolutely stunning visually. The ambiguous ending is probably gonna leave a lot of people feeling somewhat disappointed, but I think it worked. Apparently, the director believes that her fantasy experience was real, but I like the fact we can make up our own minds.
|
|
entelechy
from Brisbane (Australia) on 2007-02-14 05:56 [#02049920]
Points: 157 Status: Lurker
|
|
Indeed, I enjoyed this very much. Definitely one of the more interesting movies of late. Unfortunately, my only reservation is the under use of fantasy elements. I wanted more Pale Man! Appart from that, I thought it was excellent.
|
|
Mertens
from Motor City (United States) on 2007-02-15 08:06 [#02050520]
Points: 2064 Status: Lurker | Followup to entelechy: #02049920
|
|
Haha, pale man sure plays one mean game of peekaboo!
|
|
Combo
from Sex on 2007-02-15 09:36 [#02050587]
Points: 7540 Status: Regular
|
|
I prefer I.E.
|
|
epohs
from )C: on 2007-02-15 09:42 [#02050591]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to Jarworski: #02049863
|
|
I liked it, but I agree with your critiques.
|
|
Fuckwagon
from Dallas (United States) on 2007-02-15 09:44 [#02050593]
Points: 1304 Status: Lurker
|
|
one of my fav films of the year. great story. well executed.
|
|
glasse
from Harrisburg (United States) on 2007-02-15 17:23 [#02050806]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
|
|
Yea I thought the movie was great. All I had seen by him was the more commercial stuff (Hellboy, Blade II). I thought it was interesting how you are never sure whether or not what the girl was experiencing was real. Some people complained that this was too slow, but I don't mind a fantasy/horror that focuses more on drama rather than action and thrills. Dark Water was another example of a movie like this that I enjoyed but others were critical of.
|
|
B123
from The wicked underbelly (Australia) on 2007-02-18 08:45 [#02051830]
Points: 1361 Status: Lurker
|
|
it had some nice imagery agreed. most if the elemets of the film have been covered already.
<2cents> I felt it lacked actual drama/suspense 2cents>
|
|
Rostasky
from United States on 2007-02-18 08:46 [#02051831]
Points: 1572 Status: Lurker
|
|
I haven't seen the trailer, so looks like Im set.
|
|
kid
from mum (United Kingdom) on 2007-02-18 13:14 [#02051880]
Points: 551 Status: Regular
|
|
i thought it was 'ok'. not great nor rubbish.
|
|
retape
from http://retape.net (Norway) on 2007-02-18 20:18 [#02051936]
Points: 2355 Status: Lurker
|
|
i wanna see it :[
|
|
tragedy
from Gloucester (United States) on 2007-02-18 20:22 [#02051937]
Points: 4423 Status: Lurker
|
|
i loved this movie. definately a 10.
|
|
Wolfslice
from Bay Area, CA (United States) on 2007-02-19 05:22 [#02052034]
Points: 4909 Status: Regular
|
|
terrific film... afteward's my friends and I got into a debate about whether or not the fantasy aspect was Dream or Reality (within the context of the story). I'm in the Reality camp, but would agree there is no clear answer.
|
|
Anus_Presley
on 2007-03-31 08:38 [#02067985]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker | Followup to SPD: #02049854
|
|
yep, i agrree.
|
|
xkejjer
from Malta on 2007-03-31 09:06 [#02067988]
Points: 274 Status: Lurker
|
|
i think its on a par with tim burton's very best work.. a great piece of work by a man whose spanish language films had never impressed me before.
|
|
Gwely Mernans
from 23rd century entertainment (Canada) on 2007-03-31 09:17 [#02067990]
Points: 9856 Status: Lurker
|
|
overhyped, overrated, which made my standards for it too high, watching it was like going to see a mediocre film. children of men was much better.
|
|
pachi
from yo momma (United States) on 2007-03-31 19:01 [#02068127]
Points: 8984 Status: Lurker
|
|
I thought it was good.
Some scenes were pretty grotesque though. Plus El Capitan was a cunt.
|
|
retape
from http://retape.net (Norway) on 2007-04-01 08:08 [#02068250]
Points: 2355 Status: Lurker
|
|
i liked it. awesome visuals.
|
|
isnieZot
from pooptown (Belgium) on 2007-04-01 09:12 [#02068259]
Points: 4949 Status: Lurker | Followup to SPD: #02049861
|
|
haha I had the EXACT same feeling when I saw that bug. didn't make sense whatsoever.
it was an allright movie. noting super special though.
|
|
trentee
from Berlin (Germany) on 2007-04-01 17:22 [#02068362]
Points: 1081 Status: Lurker
|
|
very poor visuals, cheesy blue nights and oh-happy gold daylights, pathetic scenes deep in the forest with sun shining and rain falling only for the "blueish" effect. stupid violent shit, probably the worst movie I have ever seen. violence was so aesthetically overdosed that almost made me puke.
I guess some pretty fucked up, perverse, sick fuck directed this useless, nonsense crap.
|
|
Matvey
from Kiev (Ukraine) on 2007-04-02 03:12 [#02068437]
Points: 6851 Status: Regular
|
|
i liked this movie. surprised to read it is possible to dislike.
the creature sitting at the table was, say, cool (weird, eerie, scary)
nice to see Marybel Verdu again (i liked her from the y tu mama tambien film)
to stefano_azevedo: harry potter movies suck just a priori; they are fucking crap, or something like that, "can't find the word".
|
|
B123
from The wicked underbelly (Australia) on 2007-04-02 21:11 [#02068742]
Points: 1361 Status: Lurker
|
|
eyes in your hands is such a disadvantage to a monstar.
|
|
Neto
from Ecatepec (Mexico) on 2007-04-02 22:39 [#02068749]
Points: 2461 Status: Lurker
|
|
interesting movie, probably I'll see it someday
|
|
uzim
on 2007-04-07 10:02 [#02070160]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker
|
|
why did they call the english version "Pan's Labyrinth"? the original title was "El laberinto del fauno"... no mention of Pan...
anyway— i liked it. maybe not the absolute masterpiece i had heard it was, but still very good... i loved the ending. the faun & the "Pale man" (as well as the red/creepy decor in which the "pale man" was, with silenthill-like corridor) were really cool too; a shame the golden palace was quite kitsch, especially compared to the general classiness of the other "magic" characters & places. and i liked Mercedes' character very much as well.
|
|
tolstoyed
from the ocean on 2007-06-05 18:27 [#02090952]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator
|
|
"hy did they call the english version "Pan's Labyrinth"? the original title was "El laberinto del fauno"... no mention of Pan... "
pan is a greek name for faun apperantly..
i thought it was nice..something i'd play to my kids if i had them.
|
|
optimus prime
on 2007-06-05 18:29 [#02090955]
Points: 6447 Status: Lurker
|
|
i thought this topic was going to be about the critically-panned labyrinth starring david bowie's crotch.
|
|
recycle
from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2007-06-05 18:36 [#02090959]
Points: 40062 Status: Addict
|
|
i liked to white dude who had eyes on his hands, dont eat the food part, that could totally be eleborated
|
|
uzim
on 2007-06-06 07:01 [#02091051]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker | Followup to tolstoyed: #02090952
|
|
"hy did they call the english version "Pan's Labyrinth"? the original title was "El laberinto del fauno"... no mention of Pan... "
pan is a greek name for faun apperantly..
> Pan is actually a greek god, who happens to be (or at least look like) a faun. it's not just any faun.
|
|
Barcode
from United Kingdom on 2007-06-06 08:03 [#02091058]
Points: 1767 Status: Lurker
|
|
Good movie, but I hope he doesn't really subject his children to such sadistic violence - not good fatherhood.
|
|
tolstoyed
from the ocean on 2007-06-06 08:35 [#02091061]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to uzim: #02091051
|
|
right, i thought you might have missed that..you know english people..they have to have it their way : )
sergi lopez always gets these agressive, sadistic parts..it suits him.
|
|
Drunken Mastah
from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-06-06 12:32 [#02091100]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to uzim: #02091051 | Show recordbag
|
|
faun c.1374, from L. Faunus, a god of the countryside, worshipped especially by farmers and shepherds, equivalent of Gk. Pan. Formerly men with goat horns and tails, later with goat legs, which caused them to be assimilated to satyrs. The plural is fauni.
|
|
Drunken Mastah
from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-06-06 12:36 [#02091101]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
On the movie, I actually saw it just a few days ago. It was ok, it had some nice visuals, and I liked the characters, but the part where she isn't supposed to eat the grapes.. I mean, that was too stereotypical and out of character.
|
|
uzim
on 2007-06-08 14:30 [#02091728]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #02091100
|
|
ok, my mistake then.
|
|
fleetmouse
from Horny for Truth on 2007-06-08 14:38 [#02091730]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker
|
|
Saw it recently and liked it a lot. It left me both saddened and exhilarated, which is a good thing for a movie to do.
|
|
optimus prime
on 2007-06-08 14:40 [#02091731]
Points: 6447 Status: Lurker
|
|
man, i really gotsta see this.
|
|
Messageboard index
|