| 
          | 
        
        
         | 
                     
	  |           
        
        
           cygnus
             from nowhere and everyplace on 2006-10-03 16:42 [#01981582]
         Points: 11923 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
 http://www.austin360.com/xl/content/music/stories/xl/2006...
  For the past 10 or so years, artists have been increasing  the overall loudness of pop and rock albums, using ever  increasing degrees of compression during mastering, altering  the properties of the music being recorded. Quiet sounds and  loud sounds are now squashed together, decreasing the  recording's dynamic range, raising the average loudness as  much as possible.
 
  We're looking at the wave forms generated by a number of  modern albums. Sound waves should look like what they're  called: waves, with sharp peaks and valleys. But the music  we're looking at is all peak. It's like looking at a butte  or a brick.
 
  "These square waves are a very unnatural occurrence,"  Wofford says. "It sounds wrong to the ear. You can't hear  detail."
 
 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           swears
             from junk sleep on 2006-10-03 16:52 [#01981584]
         Points: 6474 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Square waves rule they sound a bit like a flute.
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           fleetmouse
             from Horny for Truth on 2006-10-03 16:52 [#01981585]
         Points: 18042 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Thank you, Waves L1/L2/L3, for this wonderful world of  MAXIMUM VOLUME YOU HAVE GIVEN US
 
  WHAAAAAAT
  WHAAAT WAAAS THAAAAAAT
  I CAAAAANT HEEEEAAAAARRRRRR YYYYOOOOOOUUUUUUUU
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           chambre noire
             from Iceland on 2006-10-03 16:53 [#01981586]
         Points: 2515 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
chris clark likes to compress
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           swears
             from junk sleep on 2006-10-03 16:53 [#01981587]
         Points: 6474 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
And tri waves sound like a violin.
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Laserbeak
             from Netherlands, The on 2006-10-03 16:58 [#01981592]
         Points: 2670 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
I think it has to be loud to grab the attention of most  people, especially when competing with other loud music on  the radio. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           fleetmouse
             from Horny for Truth on 2006-10-03 17:15 [#01981598]
         Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to Laserbeak: #01981592
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Read the article - stuff goes through a compressor / limiter  as it gets broadcast anyways, so stuff that's already had  the shit compressed out of it can sound even worse.
 
  You know, I was listening to some of that new Dixie Chicks  album and I liked the songs but hell yes it was fatiguing to  listen to, it was so fucking loud. I would have bought it  otherwise. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           hma
             from real life on 2006-10-03 18:14 [#01981602]
         Points: 528 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
so this kinda explains why vinyl sounds better than digital  recordings...
  ...there were literal physical limitations to this  process when vinyl was the primary recording medium —  the music's dynamic range was naturally restricted by the  medium itself. During mastering, you could only compress so  far; if the sounds were too extreme, the needle would pop  out of the groove. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           fleetmouse
             from Horny for Truth on 2006-10-03 18:42 [#01981604]
         Points: 18042 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
Yeaqh but vinyl has all kinds of limitations. The sound has  to be passed through an eq called an RIAA curve. Vinyl  could sound just as nice or better except its potential for  abuse has been, er, abused. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           dog_belch
             from Netherlands, The on 2006-10-03 19:34 [#01981617]
         Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Show recordbag
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
I found this today in a "music" track and it's a mystery
 
  
         
	  | 
        
         | Attached picture | 
	
	 | 
	  | 
	 
	  
  
	  | 
	
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           izmarkie
             from Detroit (United States) on 2006-10-03 20:12 [#01981627]
         Points: 7 Status: Regular | Followup to fleetmouse: #01981598
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
That's why you have to tape it off the radio.
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Drunken Mastah
             from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-10-04 06:13 [#01981717]
         Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
wasn't there some other article about a guy who had compared  the latest album of.. depeche mode? or something..? anyway,  he compared the vinyl and cd versions of the album in  waveform or something and you could tell just from that  there were large differences; the cd looked like a solid  block while the vinyl looked like a proper song with  more  quiet parts and drums sticking out of the other stuff at  times, etc... 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           unabomber
             from Palma de Mallorca (Spain) on 2006-10-04 06:16 [#01981720]
         Points: 3756 Status: Regular | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01981717
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
...I think I remember that atrticle...
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Drunken Mastah
             from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-10-04 06:17 [#01981721]
         Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #01981604 | Show recordbag
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
what are you getting at there?
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Laserbeak
             from Netherlands, The on 2006-10-04 07:45 [#01981783]
         Points: 2670 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #01981598
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
"Read the article - stuff goes through a compressor /  limiter
  as it gets broadcast anyways, so stuff that's already had the shit compressed out of it can sound even worse. "
  True, but compressors are not all the same When you can compress in the studio you have much better  control on how it is compressed and you don't rely as much  on radio station's compressors since their compressors have  a much bigger effect on relatively uncompressed material  because there's more difference with radio station's  compressor-thresholds. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Drunken Mastah
             from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-10-04 07:58 [#01981791]
         Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Laserbeak: #01981783 | Show recordbag
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
what's your point?
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Laserbeak
             from Netherlands, The on 2006-10-04 08:13 [#01981798]
         Points: 2670 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01981791
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
"what's your point?" point: listeners = impressed by loud tunes - radio stations --> compress tunes to death-->general  compressors not tuned for specific tune by audio expert
  - studios -->compress for radio using specialised and tuned  compressors so radio station's compressor has less effect =  best of  2 evils 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Drunken Mastah
             from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-10-04 08:27 [#01981800]
         Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Laserbeak: #01981798 | Show recordbag
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
did you read the article?
  1: it says that in many cases, a loud album will just turn  the listener off it after only ~three songs. This is  something that I, while I haven't actively thought about it  when listening to cds, believe is true, due to the fact that  I find many of my friends cds close to unlistenable (they  themselves have also gotten more into mp3s where they just  switch relentlessly around never listening to an entire  album)
 
  2: it doesn't say that mastering compression is bad, it just  says that people have had a tendency, lately, to  overcompress their stuff, going against the sound engineers  better judgement.
 
  3: the article also says that it isn't necessary to  overcompress your album for loudness if you want it to be  played a lot on the radio because the radio will apply  compression anyway. you also couldn't just say "yeah, we'll  take the mastering compression instead and then you radio  people can stop compressing" because the reason the radio  people do it is that if they play a song with a low volume  and then one with a higher volume, they don't have to have a  guy sitting at the volume knob turning itup and down for  each song so that listeneres won't blow their stereo when  the loud song comes on.  
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Anus_Presley
             on 2006-10-04 08:35 [#01981810]
         Points: 23472 Status: Lurker
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
funny 'cause it's trrue
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Anus_Presley
             on 2006-10-04 08:36 [#01981813]
         Points: 23472 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01981800
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
I find many of my friends cds close to unlistenable
  yeah rright, wherre have i hearrd that one beforre. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Laserbeak
             from Netherlands, The on 2006-10-04 08:41 [#01981817]
         Points: 2670 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01981800
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
yes I've read the article
  1: you and your friends aren't like most people, most people  like music to be very loud otherwise studios wouldn't  compress the music so much, they are not stupid.
 
  2: that's just their opinion and apparently not the opinion  of most people
 
  3: radio stations don't use the slow volume gain veriety you  are describing, they use the pumping compressor variety that  destroys dynamics within the song (at least the radio  stations here do that) 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Drunken Mastah
             from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-10-04 08:44 [#01981821]
         Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Anus_Presley: #01981813 | Show recordbag
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
I don't know. where?
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
           Drunken Mastah
             from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-10-04 08:58 [#01981826]
         Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Laserbeak: #01981817 | Show recordbag
  | 
| 
 
     
 
   | 
well, my friends seem to be pretty close to most people what  with ipods selling so well and people using itunes and  ripping their albums (or buying them through music store) so  that they can listen through their entire playlist at  "random" and STILL skip most of the tunes it comes up with.  I can't stand that adhd music thing, and I mostly buy vinyl  and listen to entire albums.  record companies also seem to  be going more and more towards lots and lots of singles  instead of albums these days; that elephunk album by the  black eyed peas was almost entirely released as singles and  most of them were pretty high up on the charts... I don't  know the figures, and I doubt single sales are more  profitable than albums as of now, but when you have an album  with 12 songs and you sell it for 149 kroner (I can't be  bothered to convert it into $, but the figures will show the  main point anyway.. 149 is close to normal price for a new  album), but then you relese all tracks as singles costing 20  kroner each, you can theoretically have someone pay 12x20 =  240 kroner for what you get in the album. this very very  loud mastering may be indicative of a turn towards more and  more.. compilations instead of albums where the "albums" are  just all the singles collected.. this is also something that  can be linked to the mp3 adhd culture.
 
  over here.. well, I stopped listening to radio because  theres so much crap music all the time, but I know that I  can leave my volume knob where it is if I have set it once  for a radio channel (except for if you count commercials);  it won't suddenly blast you, and you won't have to pump the  volume up for the low songs.. they're all equally loud. 
 
  
         
	  | 
        
        
         | 
           
	  | 
        
        
         
         
Messageboard index 
              
         
	 
	  |