dynamic range article | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
dariusgriffin
DADONCK
...and 317 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614109
Today 6
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
dynamic range article
 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2006-10-03 16:42 [#01981582]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular



http://www.austin360.com/xl/content/music/stories/xl/2006...

For the past 10 or so years, artists have been increasing
the overall loudness of pop and rock albums, using ever
increasing degrees of compression during mastering, altering
the properties of the music being recorded. Quiet sounds and
loud sounds are now squashed together, decreasing the
recording's dynamic range, raising the average loudness as
much as possible.

We're looking at the wave forms generated by a number of
modern albums. Sound waves should look like what they're
called: waves, with sharp peaks and valleys. But the music
we're looking at is all peak. It's like looking at a butte
or a brick.

"These square waves are a very unnatural occurrence,"
Wofford says. "It sounds wrong to the ear. You can't hear
detail."



 

offline swears from junk sleep on 2006-10-03 16:52 [#01981584]
Points: 6474 Status: Lurker



Square waves rule they sound a bit like a flute.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2006-10-03 16:52 [#01981585]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



Thank you, Waves L1/L2/L3, for this wonderful world of
MAXIMUM VOLUME YOU HAVE GIVEN US

WHAAAAAAT

WHAAAT WAAAS THAAAAAAT

I CAAAAANT HEEEEAAAAARRRRRR YYYYOOOOOOUUUUUUUU


 

offline chambre noire from Iceland on 2006-10-03 16:53 [#01981586]
Points: 2515 Status: Lurker



chris clark likes to compress


 

offline swears from junk sleep on 2006-10-03 16:53 [#01981587]
Points: 6474 Status: Lurker



And tri waves sound like a violin.


 

offline Laserbeak from Netherlands, The on 2006-10-03 16:58 [#01981592]
Points: 2670 Status: Lurker



I think it has to be loud to grab the attention of most
people, especially when competing with other loud music on
the radio.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2006-10-03 17:15 [#01981598]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to Laserbeak: #01981592



Read the article - stuff goes through a compressor / limiter
as it gets broadcast anyways, so stuff that's already had
the shit compressed out of it can sound even worse.

You know, I was listening to some of that new Dixie Chicks
album and I liked the songs but hell yes it was fatiguing to
listen to, it was so fucking loud. I would have bought it
otherwise.


 

offline hma from real life on 2006-10-03 18:14 [#01981602]
Points: 528 Status: Lurker



so this kinda explains why vinyl sounds better than digital
recordings...
...there were literal physical limitations to this
process when vinyl was the primary recording medium —
the music's dynamic range was naturally restricted by the
medium itself. During mastering, you could only compress so
far; if the sounds were too extreme, the needle would pop
out of the groove.



 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2006-10-03 18:42 [#01981604]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



Yeaqh but vinyl has all kinds of limitations. The sound has
to be passed through an eq called an RIAA curve. Vinyl
could sound just as nice or better except its potential for
abuse has been, er, abused.


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2006-10-03 19:34 [#01981617]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



I found this today in a "music" track and it's a mystery


Attached picture

 

offline izmarkie from Detroit (United States) on 2006-10-03 20:12 [#01981627]
Points: 7 Status: Regular | Followup to fleetmouse: #01981598



That's why you have to tape it off the radio.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-10-04 06:13 [#01981717]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



wasn't there some other article about a guy who had compared
the latest album of.. depeche mode? or something..? anyway,
he compared the vinyl and cd versions of the album in
waveform or something and you could tell just from that
there were large differences; the cd looked like a solid
block while the vinyl looked like a proper song with more
quiet parts and drums sticking out of the other stuff at
times, etc...


 

offline unabomber from Palma de Mallorca (Spain) on 2006-10-04 06:16 [#01981720]
Points: 3756 Status: Regular | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01981717



...I think I remember that atrticle...


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-10-04 06:17 [#01981721]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #01981604 | Show recordbag



what are you getting at there?


 

offline Laserbeak from Netherlands, The on 2006-10-04 07:45 [#01981783]
Points: 2670 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #01981598



"Read the article - stuff goes through a compressor /
limiter
as it gets broadcast anyways, so stuff that's already had
the shit compressed out of it can sound even worse. "

True, but compressors are not all the same
When you can compress in the studio you have much better
control on how it is compressed and you don't rely as much
on radio station's compressors since their compressors have
a much bigger effect on relatively uncompressed material
because there's more difference with radio station's
compressor-thresholds.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-10-04 07:58 [#01981791]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Laserbeak: #01981783 | Show recordbag



what's your point?


 

offline Laserbeak from Netherlands, The on 2006-10-04 08:13 [#01981798]
Points: 2670 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01981791



"what's your point?"
point:
listeners = impressed by loud tunes
- radio stations --> compress tunes to death-->general
compressors not tuned for specific tune by audio expert
- studios -->compress for radio using specialised and tuned
compressors so radio station's compressor has less effect =
best of 2 evils


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-10-04 08:27 [#01981800]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Laserbeak: #01981798 | Show recordbag



did you read the article?

1: it says that in many cases, a loud album will just turn
the listener off it after only ~three songs. This is
something that I, while I haven't actively thought about it
when listening to cds, believe is true, due to the fact that
I find many of my friends cds close to unlistenable (they
themselves have also gotten more into mp3s where they just
switch relentlessly around never listening to an entire
album)

2: it doesn't say that mastering compression is bad, it just
says that people have had a tendency, lately, to
overcompress their stuff, going against the sound engineers
better judgement.

3: the article also says that it isn't necessary to
overcompress your album for loudness if you want it to be
played a lot on the radio because the radio will apply
compression anyway. you also couldn't just say "yeah, we'll
take the mastering compression instead and then you radio
people can stop compressing" because the reason the radio
people do it is that if they play a song with a low volume
and then one with a higher volume, they don't have to have a
guy sitting at the volume knob turning itup and down for
each song so that listeneres won't blow their stereo when
the loud song comes on.


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2006-10-04 08:35 [#01981810]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker



funny 'cause it's trrue


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2006-10-04 08:36 [#01981813]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01981800



I find many of my friends cds close to unlistenable

yeah rright, wherre have i hearrd that one beforre.


 

offline Laserbeak from Netherlands, The on 2006-10-04 08:41 [#01981817]
Points: 2670 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01981800



yes I've read the article

1: you and your friends aren't like most people, most people
like music to be very loud otherwise studios wouldn't
compress the music so much, they are not stupid.

2: that's just their opinion and apparently not the opinion
of most people

3: radio stations don't use the slow volume gain veriety you
are describing, they use the pumping compressor variety that
destroys dynamics within the song (at least the radio
stations here do that)


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-10-04 08:44 [#01981821]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Anus_Presley: #01981813 | Show recordbag



I don't know. where?


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-10-04 08:58 [#01981826]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Laserbeak: #01981817 | Show recordbag



well, my friends seem to be pretty close to most people what
with ipods selling so well and people using itunes and
ripping their albums (or buying them through music store) so
that they can listen through their entire playlist at
"random" and STILL skip most of the tunes it comes up with.
I can't stand that adhd music thing, and I mostly buy vinyl
and listen to entire albums. record companies also seem to
be going more and more towards lots and lots of singles
instead of albums these days; that elephunk album by the
black eyed peas was almost entirely released as singles and
most of them were pretty high up on the charts... I don't
know the figures, and I doubt single sales are more
profitable than albums as of now, but when you have an album
with 12 songs and you sell it for 149 kroner (I can't be
bothered to convert it into $, but the figures will show the
main point anyway.. 149 is close to normal price for a new
album), but then you relese all tracks as singles costing 20
kroner each, you can theoretically have someone pay 12x20 =
240 kroner for what you get in the album. this very very
loud mastering may be indicative of a turn towards more and
more.. compilations instead of albums where the "albums" are
just all the singles collected.. this is also something that
can be linked to the mp3 adhd culture.

over here.. well, I stopped listening to radio because
theres so much crap music all the time, but I know that I
can leave my volume knob where it is if I have set it once
for a radio channel (except for if you count commercials);
it won't suddenly blast you, and you won't have to pump the
volume up for the low songs.. they're all equally loud.


 


Messageboard index