 |
|
You are not logged in! F.A.Q Log in Register |
 |
|
 |
 Now online (1)big ...and 288 guests Last 5 registered Oplandisks nothingstar N_loop yipe foxtrotromeo Browse members... |
 |
Members 8025Messages 2614116 Today 2 Topics 127542 |
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
by |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I like Bertrand Russell |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
im just human, just barely |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
fucking hippies get high and think about how al queda is your friend.<--thats a fake ass american |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I have ADD so I can't read the wh |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I read this essay a few years ago...... can't remember any details but I do remember being impressed by hiseven nature, if that makes any sense. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
blessed are the sick. my raps be the shit. your whole crew is counterfeit. kid i know you aint down to flip |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
That looks like a pretty good start for a Spawn episode. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Hey glasse, I have been enjoying teh Pisgah, especially tracks 2, 3, 4 |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
glasse=faggy brit frontin like he's american Gay new fags ons his cornrows |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Thanks I am glad you enjoy it. I am not in that band anymore, although I still release on Metanoia. I am going to do a release of material from those same sessions though, kind of like a remix/outtake thing. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Your mom = faggy brit that is why she smokes all those fags plus their penises |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
sandal wearin flip floppin terrorist lovin kerry votin israel hatin mo fuckah |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
no more running people's threads (smacks hand on the black side) |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
anyone see stevo get punked by raekwon at rock the bells |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
whoa dude what if he is none of those things? you are still an idiot? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
when u have a black DICK u cant keep the hoes off u and u dont want to |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
this writer singer explained the book job to me he said it's not a justification of us having to take crap from god (over a bet with satan) but on the contrary it's a protest of man against the ways of god. singer said we're perfectly entitled to be pissed at god. this view is much better than just believing 'the lord works in mysterious ways' which means you have to take crap because you you're dumb and don't understand anyway. you don't have to be that way and you don't have to feel repentant all the time either |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Bertrand Russell was a fucking paradox. For instance russell's paradox spurned many advancements in set theory (the move was already on..), and his solution was type theoretic. HOT |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
YOU GOT ME OUT OF BED TO READ *THIS*?! *spits in your face. :D I'll read it anyway. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
:D |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Argh this is just like my A-level Philosophy of Religion module and I presume just like my degree. He presents some interesting points, but nothing groundbreaking or too original I don't think. I feel that he could've strengthened his arguments by using some more original ideas, although it is given in an easy to understand, digestable way, which makes it a good lecture |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
he also seems to have failed in refuting the natural law and argument from design arguments |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
hey come on, there's no god |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
enjoyed that |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
ill read it laters |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Imho this text is not wortha lot of time. There are much better texts which have been written about on religion. Eg: Theologico-political treaty by Spinoza. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
but it's from 79 years ago.. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
ill read some sartre i dled maybe instead |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I lived in Bertrand Russell in university. No really. Our tower blocks were named after philosophers. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
A bit better, yeah. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I'm afraid to admit that by the time I'd got to that bit I'd got bored so just skim read the rest. Sorryyy. But upon further reading, yes you are correct, he just kind of sweeps it under the carpet more than anything else. Big: don't be silly |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
don't be silly? i was going to raise that point. :O I think it's valid.. Unless there are some philosophers with the same views as he who lived a *considerable* time before Russell. Drunken Mastah: Why do you say that? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
He was a very nice person, kinda Chomsky's antecessor... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
The section on the natural-law argument is slightly vague, i'll have to re-read it some day when i've actually slept the night before, but the section on the argument from design hits the nail on the head.. Lifeforms adapt to their surroundings. Read Voltaire's remark which he quotes again. I think it sums the inanity of the intelligent design argument up perfectly. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
like, you just believe that |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
also being an atheist was still a big deal then, so a lecture about it was relevant because it advanced this new idea or at least the arguments behind it |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
yeah |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
well, that's dumb |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
You can't prove can God exists or not ; but the fact is it doesn't. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i was just kidding you may believe in your non existing god |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
yeah, you may also believe in father christmas |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
"On The Unveiling (the final track of the Shangri-La album), Insane Clown Posse revealed that the Dark Carnival is none other than God Himself." DOH! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
OKAY i will |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Bertrand Russell is great, one of the few guys i read at uni and really enjoyed! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Well duuuuhhh.... Welcome to the 20th century, you guyzzz!!1!! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
the problem with the natural law argument is that he says that if god gave the natural laws on a whim, he is not subject to law, and as something, then, isn't subject to natural law, your "train of natural law is interrupted" without that actually making any impact to the argument one way or the other. He then, when handling the argument that god made everything to create the best world, he says that this would require god to use reason, and thus be subject to some law, but reason isn't in itself an external force or law; there are no universal guidelines for reason and even if there were, his statement that you gain nothing from having god in the equation misses the target, as you'd still need an actuator. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
and in the argument from design part, he tries to dismiss it because the world isn't perfect, but who said it's built to be perfect, and who said that humans weren't given a control over themselves? the way I seem to remember it, the world is a place where he put humans and gave them free will to see if they were willing to live good lives or something. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
thanx much love |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Messageboard index
|
|||||||||
