 |
|
You are not logged in! F.A.Q Log in Register |
 |
|
 |
 (nobody)...and 87 guests Last 5 registered Oplandisks nothingstar N_loop yipe foxtrotromeo Browse members... |
 |
Members 8025Messages 2614116 Today 2 Topics 127542 |
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
It is largely the very peculiar kind of being that belongs to universals which has led many people to suppose that they are really mental. We can think of a universal, and our thinking then exists in a perfectly ordinary sense, like any other mental act. Suppose, for example, that we are thinking of whiteness. Then in one sense it may be said that whiteness is 'in our mind'. We have here the same ambiguity as we noted in discussing Berkeley in Chapter IV. In the strict sense, it is not whiteness that is in our mind, but the act of thinking of whiteness. The connected ambiguity in the word 'idea', which we noted at the same time, also causes confusion here. In one sense of this word, namely the sense in which it denotes the object of an act of thought, whiteness is an 'idea'. Hence, if the ambiguity is not guarded against, we may come to think that whiteness is an 'idea' in the other sense, i.e. an act of thought; and thus we come to think that whiteness is mental. But in so thinking, we rob it of its essential quality of universality. One man's act of thought is necessarily a different thing from another man's; one man's act of thought at one time is necessarily a different thing from the same man's act of thought at another time. Hence, if whiteness were the thought as opposed to its object, no two different men could think of it, and no one man could think of it twice. That which many different thoughts of whiteness have in common is their object, and this object is different from all of them. Thus universals are not thoughts, though when known they are the objects of thoughts. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
inverted qualia. bye. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
why didn't you just paste a link |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Because Id like to discuss this excerpt |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
to many, whiteness has similar connotations of purity if placed in a boxed in white room you are void of influence. the whiteness suggests blankness if darkness then began emerging from the corner of the room then one would fear this 'blackness' but, would a man seperate from our society, a man without prior influence of whiteness and darkness, would he fear the dark? or is this part natural? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
who cares. next subject: vh1's kept. |
||||||||
| Attached picture | |||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
can someone make a gif of that image with CUNT flashing over it? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Messageboard index
|
|||||||||
