|
|
nacmat
on 2002-03-07 10:47 [#00115372]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker
|
|
In the championship.nu mu ziq made it to the semifinals but BoC didnt cos they were in the middle of superpusher´s way... many of the BoC fans thought it was unfair that they had to fight against such a big rival while Mu ziq fought against the less powerfull Plaid... many think that the 1/4 finals should have neen BoC against U ziq and Pusher against PLaid... they think that way they would have reached the semifinals....well It is late now for BoC...but here you have your Unofficial Revenge.
Luck is very important in this championships... more than other things... but be sure that this was a 100% Fair championship... Woofer would have also prefered the other way... but the numbers said it had to be the way it was...
NOW IS YOUR CHANCE TO VOTE and see what could have happened.
----------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------
<<>>
.......or........
<>
|
|
nacmat
on 2002-03-07 10:48 [#00115375]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker
|
|
---------------------------------------------- -------BOC-------
-----MU ZIQ------ ----------------------------------------------
|
|
que
from vancouver (Canada) on 2002-03-07 10:49 [#00115378]
Points: 268 Status: Lurker
|
|
too late :)
|
|
Meho Krljic
from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-03-07 10:56 [#00115394]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict
|
|
Anyway: BoC
|
|
IronLung
from the 91fwy in soCAL (United States) on 2002-03-07 11:01 [#00115400]
Points: 8032 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
BoC.....
Let the domination begin.... All will bow before BoC
|
|
nacmat
on 2002-03-07 11:06 [#00115406]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker | Followup to que: #00115378
|
|
que: it is not too late were the BoC fans who requested this revenge so if you find its late then dont vote... but why are you always posting offtopic in this chapionships topics
cant you just vote or ignore them? do you really feel the need of being against this threads every now and then?
what is that you dont like about it? tell us...we want to know... cos it looks as if we were bothering you with our "crap"
|
|
nacmat
on 2002-03-07 11:14 [#00115414]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker | Followup to nacmat: #00115406
|
|
ok QUE forget about me... I am just having a bad day... so forget about what I sayed...I know you were just posting and there is no problem with you... it was me...I ll try to calm down....sorry
|
|
que
from vancouver (Canada) on 2002-03-07 11:29 [#00115431]
Points: 268 Status: Lurker
|
|
BoC
|
|
que
from vancouver (Canada) on 2002-03-07 11:30 [#00115432]
Points: 268 Status: Lurker
|
|
i dont like ü-ziq
|
|
Archrival
on 2002-03-07 12:14 [#00115482]
Points: 4265 Status: Lurker
|
|
BOC
|
|
shortcircuit
from Red Ends (Germany) on 2002-03-07 12:31 [#00115499]
Points: 424 Status: Lurker
|
|
definitly µ-ziq
|
|
nacmat
on 2002-03-07 16:18 [#00115809]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker
|
|
u ziq
|
|
nacmat
on 2002-03-07 16:19 [#00115812]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker
|
|
---------------------------------------------- -------BOC------- 4
-----MU ZIQ------2 ----------------------------------------------
|
|
nacmat
on 2002-03-07 16:40 [#00115858]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker
|
|
come on!!! I know we are all waiting for the great final...and this is not that exciting, but...well U ziq did such a bad semifinal (lost against aphex with no more than 4 points out of over 40) and then lost 27-9 in the fight for the 3rd position against AE... I thought you BoC fans were aangry for that...for thinking that BoC would have presented much more fight... but how if you dont support them?
cos I have to tell you that SquarePusher won BoC because many of you selfcalled boc fans didnt even vote... but then you start hundreds of topics about boc...come on ...
|
|
ViolentCaustics
from Huntsville (United States) on 2002-03-07 16:41 [#00115861]
Points: 61 Status: Lurker
|
|
u-ziq
I think he's got more range than BoC do. I like em both though. That's a toughy.
|
|
nacmat
on 2002-03-07 16:43 [#00115864]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker
|
|
---------------------------------------------- -------BOC------- 4
-----MU ZIQ------3 ----------------------------------------------
If BoC fans keep their non supporting attitude, then U ziq will show he deserved getting to the semifinals... it is 4-3 now
|
|
Darth manchu
from Cambridge (United Kingdom) on 2002-03-07 16:44 [#00115867]
Points: 1897 Status: Regular
|
|
BoC. It may not last long, but its good when it does.
|
|
nacmat
on 2002-03-07 16:45 [#00115870]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker
|
|
---------------------------------------------- -------BOC------- 5
-----MU ZIQ------3 ----------------------------------------------
|
|
Cheffe1979
from fuck (Austria) on 2002-03-07 17:21 [#00115938]
Points: 4630 Status: Lurker
|
|
Boc
|
|
Ophecks
from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2002-03-07 17:24 [#00115943]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
|
I guess I have to vote BOC... but it's SO close, again... just by a hair.
|
|
lizard fister
from manchester (United Kingdom) on 2002-03-07 17:27 [#00115946]
Points: 142 Status: Lurker
|
|
u-ziq consistently good over a much longer period of time.
boc much more selective with releases which isn't a bad thing but when u-ziq is good it is awesome. much better live as well.
|
|
nacmat
on 2002-03-07 18:39 [#00116047]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker
|
|
---------------------------------------------- -------BOC-------7
-----MU ZIQ------4 ----------------------------------------------
|
|
que
from vancouver (Canada) on 2002-03-07 18:42 [#00116048]
Points: 268 Status: Lurker
|
|
im gonna change from BoC to u-ziq is that possible? thatd make it
BOC 6 U-ZIQ 5
|
|
corticalstim
from Canada on 2002-03-07 18:42 [#00116050]
Points: 3885 Status: Regular
|
|
mu ziq!
|
|
nacmat
on 2002-03-07 18:51 [#00116062]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker
|
|
---------------------------------------------- -------BOC-------6
-----MU ZIQ------6 ---------------------------------------------- why did you change que?
|
|
010101
from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-03-07 18:54 [#00116070]
Points: 7669 Status: Regular
|
|
boc
|
|
nacmat
on 2002-03-07 18:58 [#00116078]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker
|
|
---------------------------------------------- -------BOC-------7
-----MU ZIQ------6 ----------------------------------------------
NO CHANGES WILL BE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION FROM NOW ON, SO BE SURE OF WHAT YOU VOTE.
----------------------------------------------- I have to do it this way cos if not I would go crazy counting and besides People could change just to have fun changing the situation...
|
|
Sido Dyas
from a computer on 2002-03-07 18:58 [#00116079]
Points: 8876 Status: Lurker
|
|
MU ZIQ
|
|
nacmat
on 2002-03-07 19:05 [#00116086]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker
|
|
this is a great fight...they are tight after 14 votes... maybe it wasnt that unfair that boc didnt make it...
---------------------------------------------- -------BOC-------7
-----MU ZIQ------7 ----------------------------------------------
In the championship.nu mu ziq made it to the semifinals but
BoC didnt cos they were in the middle of superpusher´s way... many of the BoC fans thought it was unfair that they
had to fight against such a big rival while Mu ziq fought against the less powerfull Plaid... many think that the 1/4
finals should have neen BoC against U ziq and Pusher against
PLaid... they think that way they would have reached the semifinals....well It is late now for BoC...but here you have your Unofficial Revenge. Luck is very important in this championships... more than other things... but be sure that this was a 100% Fair championship... Woofer would have also prefered the other way... but the numbers said it had to be the way it was... NOW IS YOUR CHANCE TO VOTE and see what could have happened.
IF YOU THINK BOC WOULD HAVE FOUGHT HARDER THAN U ZIQ AGAINST APHEX AND AUTECHRE COME ON AND VOTE FOR THEM
IF YOU THINK THAT MU ZIQ IS BEING UNDERRATED AND HE OF COURSE DESERVED TO GET AS FAR AS HE GOT...THEN VOTE FOR HIM
|
|
que
from vancouver (Canada) on 2002-03-07 19:19 [#00116104]
Points: 268 Status: Lurker
|
|
mu ziq then please
|
|
nacmat
on 2002-03-07 19:20 [#00116109]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker | Followup to que: #00116104
|
|
I already counted your change...no more changes though
|
|
sgt growley
from Deal (United Kingdom) on 2002-03-07 19:27 [#00116124]
Points: 247 Status: Lurker
|
|
Oooooooooh, that's a tough one, but.....
BOC, yeah definately
Royal astromony was fantastic album, but geogaddi just gets better and better and just beats it by gnat's eyelash...
|
|
nacmat
on 2002-03-07 22:51 [#00116513]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker
|
|
---------------------------------------------- -------BOC-------8
-----MU ZIQ------7 ----------------------------------------------
|
|
whitehead
from Nicaragua on 2002-03-07 22:53 [#00116517]
Points: 384 Status: Lurker
|
|
BoC
|
|
010101
from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-03-07 22:57 [#00116525]
Points: 7669 Status: Regular
|
|
boc 9 u-ziq 7
|
|
aron
from saskatoon (Canada) on 2002-03-07 23:00 [#00116530]
Points: 3756 Status: Lurker
|
|
man, this is a tough one. u-ziq has put out a ton of wicked stuff. but i've been listening to boc alot more lately, so i'm gonna have to say boc.
|
|
whitehead
from Nicaragua on 2002-03-07 23:02 [#00116532]
Points: 384 Status: Lurker
|
|
When's U-ziq coming out of retirement?
|
|
E-man
from Rixensart (Belgium) on 2002-03-07 23:12 [#00116540]
Points: 3000 Status: Regular
|
|
µ-ZIK !!!! this guy rocks sooooo much more than the pair of BoC...
|
|
aron
from saskatoon (Canada) on 2002-03-07 23:13 [#00116541]
Points: 3756 Status: Lurker
|
|
i think he's working on a new album that should be out this year, but don't take my word for it, 'cos i'm not sure about that.
|
|
nacmat
on 2002-03-07 23:28 [#00116554]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker
|
|
---------------------------------------------- -------BOC-------10
-----MU ZIQ------8 ----------------------------------------------
|
|
LeCoeur
from the outer edge of the universe (United States) on 2002-03-07 23:34 [#00116560]
Points: 8249 Status: Lurker
|
|
Boards of CANADA!!! yes yes yes
|
|
corngrower
from the fertile grounds of Iowa, w (United States) on 2002-03-08 00:05 [#00116604]
Points: 4404 Status: Lurker
|
|
That's a real tough one for me.... hmmmm...
gotta go with BOC
|
|
nacmat
on 2002-03-08 00:13 [#00116613]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker
|
|
---------------------------------------------- -------BOC-------12
-----MU ZIQ------8 ----------------------------------------------
|
|
Mr_Flappypants
from Louisville (United States) on 2002-03-08 00:26 [#00116634]
Points: 2796 Status: Addict
|
|
BOC!
oh no, 13 is an unlucky number...
|
|
Mr_Flappypants
from Louisville (United States) on 2002-03-08 00:27 [#00116636]
Points: 2796 Status: Addict
|
|
wow, nacmat, you're only 350 away from 2000 points!
|
|
korben dallas
from nz on 2002-03-08 00:34 [#00116652]
Points: 4605 Status: Regular
|
|
'tis a toughy this one innit ?
|
|
IronLung
from the 91fwy in soCAL (United States) on 2002-03-08 01:45 [#00116732]
Points: 8032 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
as planned...BoC will reign supreme...In this universe and EVERY universe here and there.
|
|
AMinal
from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-03-08 01:55 [#00116739]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular
|
|
pfffft.. easy: BOC!!!
|
|
GIR
from Easton on 2002-03-08 02:21 [#00116774]
Points: 828 Status: Addict
|
|
U-ziq you motherfuckers,u-ziq is the man...
props to boc too...but they arent as great.
|
|
Ophecks
from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2002-03-08 02:25 [#00116780]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
|
This battle is a lot closer than I thought... with all the Geogaddi madness lately, I thought it was a no-brainer...
|
|
Messageboard index
|