art/steady job | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
big
...and 580 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614125
Today 4
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
art/steady job
 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2006-05-26 23:57 [#01907691]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



i was just thinking about this..

do you think someone with a regular job can create proper
art?

not because of lack of time or something, but simply because
you see world/life different when you don't have to deal
with something as pointless and stupid as your job and
'creative' society.


 

offline mimi on 2006-05-27 00:01 [#01907693]
Points: 5721 Status: Regular



dealing with something pointless and stupid is pretty
inspiring


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2006-05-27 00:04 [#01907695]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



i suppose so, but it shades ones view on things too i would
think..hmm


 

offline Gwely Mernans from 23rd century entertainment (Canada) on 2006-05-27 00:07 [#01907697]
Points: 9856 Status: Lurker



I've seen some of my friends completely change after getting
steady jobs. They're just drones now.


 

offline mimi on 2006-05-27 00:12 [#01907699]
Points: 5721 Status: Regular



i suppose it depends on what your job is then. by job do
you mean career, like a lawyer or a real estate agent or
something like working in a call center or waitering (is
that a word?)? I guess i can't really see Nancy Lawyer
going home after a long day of briefing and litigation and
then heading home to create some phat beatz on her laptop.
it probably depends on how engaged you are in your job.


 

offline Gwely Mernans from 23rd century entertainment (Canada) on 2006-05-27 00:15 [#01907701]
Points: 9856 Status: Lurker | Followup to mimi: #01907699



My friends do labour work, so they're just too exhausted to
make music now, to do anything infact. its sleep work eat
sleep work eat etc.. Sad..


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2006-05-27 00:17 [#01907702]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



oh right. yeah, i meant a career sort of thing there. dunno
any people who'd do mydonalds sort of jobs all their lifes.
that's more of a job you get at highschool/uni i
suppose..but yeah, i guess if you have a job that caries
none or mionimal responsibility, you can make proper art on
the side.


 

offline bogala from NYC (United States) on 2006-05-27 01:02 [#01907709]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular



How do you not do Mcdonalds jobs all your life if you are
complete shit at math? Im asking cause I'm total shit at
math and anything like it.


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2006-05-27 01:23 [#01907718]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker



depends on motivation and discipline, i guess. but people
persuiing (what's the word?) a career in the corporate world
are already performing another kind of art, which is pretty
involving all by itself (=draining all their
creativity/energy).


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2006-05-27 01:33 [#01907721]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker



I have a 40 hour a week job. I haven't been able to work on
music as much, but it takes some getting used to. When I
first started working full time, I worked on music about an
hour a week maximum. After I got used to it, and it became
more of a regular thing, I began to work on music more. I do
about two hours a night on work nights, and six hours a day
on weekends. I don't have time to do anything else. I see
most of my friends about once every two months or so, but I
spend a lot of time with my girlfriend. Its the way I like
to be.


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2006-05-27 01:33 [#01907722]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker | Followup to bogala: #01907709



95% of the world are shit at math. the other 5% are being
made fun of, unless they invent stuff which makes the lives
of the 95% much easier.

if you're shit at math, but a good communicator (tend to be
mutually exclusive) you can do MUCH better than mopping the
floor at McD's. business needs more good communicators than
people who know the math thing. if only to compensate the
stereotypical inability to communicate of the math-heads.


 

offline Dannn_ from United Kingdom on 2006-05-27 01:57 [#01907729]
Points: 7877 Status: Lurker



i dont know where this is coming from. of course you can
create art and have a serious job. why not? im never more
creative than when im busy. im studying up to ten hours a
day at the moment and ive made three tracks in a week,
compared to about 2 in the last year. it makes your
approach more relaxed, if you try too hard you always get
nowhere, or make something really generic or a ripoff. i
dont understand why responsibility in other areas has any
bearing on making art, do you think all great artists just
focused on that their whole life?


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2006-05-27 02:17 [#01907738]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker | Followup to Dannn_: #01907729



i guess i made it appear much more black/white than
intended. of course it's healthy to focus on other things.
but it depends on what you want to achieve, i guess. for
instance in the context of sports, a sporter could focus on
more disciplines, but by doing that his achievements on each
individual discipline will be less than optimal. generallly
speaking, of course. in many olympic disciplines,
specializing is a necessity for winning.
and in the context of jobs, it acquires huge amounts of
energy to being or becoming a CEO. energy which could not be
put in the 'becoming a serious artist' area. the amount of
time and energy is limited, and studies have shown that the
level of achievement is a function of the amount of energy
that went into it (more energy = higher achievement). again,
this is generally speaking. it's not some dogma. there are
exceptions. there allways are. but in general...etc


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2006-05-27 02:25 [#01907741]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker | Followup to goDel: #01907738



ok, oyur post wasn't directed at a particular person, but i
nevertheless took it that way. nevermind
:s


 

offline Dannn_ from United Kingdom on 2006-05-27 03:10 [#01907753]
Points: 7877 Status: Lurker



youre looking at it as though to make 'proper art' as tolst
put it, you have to 'become a serious artist' somehow, but i
dont think there is any threshold level of seriousness that
makes someone's art more valid. in fact people who are not
involved with the society of people doing similar art will
be the most original


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-05-27 03:20 [#01907757]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



hanal makes good art


 

offline Ezkerraldean from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2006-05-27 03:21 [#01907759]
Points: 5733 Status: Addict | Followup to Dannn_: #01907753



i reckon you're right - artistic people from outside the art
community would probably have different influences. their
work would probably be quite different and unconventional,
i.e. better in my mind


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2006-05-27 03:33 [#01907761]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker | Followup to Dannn_: #01907753



in fact people who are not
involved with the society of people doing similar art will
be the most original
to me, this proves my point:
people who are not involved with (or in) anything else will
be the most original. i admit this is dancing with logic.
but it's just that art is such a difficult concept. Far more
difficult than sports for instance. Whether or not someone
is a good/proper runner is measurable, but what makes a good
artist? The amount of money he makes? The size of his
fanbase? The grades he gets from the critics? There probably
isn't a clearcut answer, and imo there doesn't need to be.
If you look at all the 'great' artists and the areas they
focus(sed) on in their lives, I think it's more common that
these people are almost obsessive, even self-destructive,
when it comes to putting energy in one specific area. And
even when they're focussing on something else, most of the
time it's meant as instrumental for that one big thing.

reading tolst's original post however, we're a bit on a
tangent here...


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2006-05-27 03:38 [#01907762]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker | Followup to goDel: #01907761



ehm...i'm on a tangent :S


 

offline Exaph from United Kingdom on 2006-05-27 03:43 [#01907763]
Points: 3718 Status: Lurker



if your shit at math then try and find something your into
and work at that. im shit a math but enjoy webdesign so
thats what i do and study all the time, even in my spare
time. the internet is a plentiful resource - loads of
tutorials on programs, or howto's etc. for almost anything
your into. also, its a process - you never know everything
your into, you just produce the best you can at any time,
but continuously get inspired and learn.


 

offline oyvinto on 2006-05-27 03:45 [#01907764]
Points: 8197 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



if you do enough drugs on your sparetime you would be
allright. seriously i also think there are lots of examples
of people having success in several ways in their lifes,
both with careers and art. it's possible. not having a job
and just "waste" time and hanging on messageboards and such
is great but isn't necessarily inspiring.


 

offline Exaph from United Kingdom on 2006-05-27 03:50 [#01907765]
Points: 3718 Status: Lurker | Followup to oyvinto: #01907764



it is if your shit at math and reading this post.


 

offline oyvinto on 2006-05-27 03:58 [#01907766]
Points: 8197 Status: Lurker | Followup to Exaph: #01907765 | Show recordbag



i'm not shit at math but i really didn't read the whole
thread, but replied to topic and the initial post.


 

offline Exaph from United Kingdom on 2006-05-27 04:04 [#01907768]
Points: 3718 Status: Lurker | Followup to oyvinto: #01907766



your sweet then.


 

offline Dannn_ from United Kingdom on 2006-05-27 04:04 [#01907769]
Points: 7877 Status: Lurker | Followup to goDel: #01907762



now were getting into what makes good art which is a
horrible debate every time it happens. i dont think
qualifications or measurements are applicable to art in any
sense, I think the successfulness is defined by parameters
set out by the artist, which can include critical acclaim. I
think the 'great artists' tend to be people who can fullfil
a certain criteria; a large quantity of work seems to be one
of them, the kind of work that fits in a gallery nicely. I
don't know where I'm going with this anymore. Im just
thinking about Einstein and the whole story of him coming up
with all his clever stuff while doing some shit day job. If
someone in that situation had painted Guernica instead would
it have been as great, or famous? Theres too much context in
art. I dunno, like whatever, and stuff


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2006-05-27 08:28 [#01907850]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to tolstoyed: #01907691



do you think someone with a regular job can create proper
art?


the answer is yes. there's no debate. it's been done by
most great artists.


 

offline Clic on 2006-05-27 08:33 [#01907854]
Points: 5232 Status: Regular



"Proper" art?


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2006-05-27 09:12 [#01907870]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker | Followup to Clic: #01907854



as in "not dirty", or "clean"


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2006-05-27 09:24 [#01907872]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



i think godel is the only one here who probably knows what i
meant, at least to a point :)
i didn't mean someone can't make art because job takes too
much of their time, nor because it exaust them too much..but
if they do both, they are either schizophrenic, live in
denial or don't care about their job one bit, but i suppose
this later is a bit difficult if not impossible
nowdays..ofcourse there are some proffesions that allow one
to be both, a career person and an artist at the same time
and be good at both.


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2006-05-27 09:37 [#01907873]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker | Followup to tolstoyed: #01907872



:-)

another factor i thought you could be aiming at, is
personality. if there were certain personality traits
required to be an artist, could a person with this
personality traits have a normal career? or something along
those lines.
in case you are wondering, studies have shown that people
who are really/extremely good at a particular field (sports,
science or art) tend to have either extreme personality
traits (whatever those might be), or are in the extreme
middle of the personality matrix (extremely normal). the
rest of the crowd (>65% of the population) are "normal"
people. and "normal" could mean being good at multiple
disciplines at the same time.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2006-05-27 09:42 [#01907876]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to goDel: #01907873



that doesn't surprise me really..it probably explains what i
meant to some poit too. there must ne something different
about them i suppose :)


 

offline nacmat on 2006-05-27 09:51 [#01907879]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker



the real artist can deal with anything and situation


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2006-05-27 09:52 [#01907880]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



haha


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2006-05-27 09:56 [#01907881]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker | Followup to nacmat: #01907879



teh kung-fu mastah artist!


 

offline Sclah from Freudian Slipmat on 2006-05-27 11:55 [#01907912]
Points: 3121 Status: Lurker



It seems a lot of people, including artists themselves, have
this notion that you must have a really eccentric and
extravagant personality in order to be a great artist. So a
lot of artists will exaggerate those personality traits to
fit in with that stereotype.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2006-05-27 12:02 [#01907914]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to Sclah: #01907912



wait, are you talking about britney spears?


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2006-05-27 12:07 [#01907915]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator



I can only speak for myself ofcourse, but from my
perspective when writing - to write anything that comes
close to possibly being good takes a lot of time. which
means I need a lot of time, which means there is less time
for another job.

and I do get the schizoid-thing you're referring to, Goran -
for me it is really hard to switch between projects. each
project has its own mindset. at the moment I'm very busy,
I'm translating a play into English, writing an essay and I
also have to write a play of my own.
it takes a lot of time and energy having to constantly
switch between these projects.

so in my case I do think it would be best if it was the main
thing I'd be doing, simply because it would fit my personal
process and it would be the best circumstances for me to
write something that isn't shit. :)


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2006-05-27 12:16 [#01907920]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to qrter: #01907915



well, that's the time arrangement aspect. it works for some,
and doesn't work for others i suppose. havin to do more
stuff at once is stressing and takes a lot of effort. it's
surely one of the bigger factors, but what i was thinking is
that you just can't combine common society pattern (job
unfortunatelly being the biggest part of it) and artistic
expression because these two things couldn't be more appart.
ofcourse there's art and there's art.. :)


 

offline Dannn_ from United Kingdom on 2006-05-27 13:25 [#01907951]
Points: 7877 Status: Lurker | Followup to tolstoyed: #01907920



why is art so separate from a 'common society pattern'? why
would it be separate from anything? I don't think I see your
point at all t-dog


 

offline hanal from k_maty only (United Kingdom) on 2006-05-27 13:31 [#01907953]
Points: 13379 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



i agree with dannn_ on this one toysolsyoedtoyed.


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2006-05-27 13:41 [#01907961]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to tolstoyed: #01907920



I think you might have a romantic view of The Artist, as in:
the individualist that places himself outside of normal
society.

sure, there are artists like that, but there are many more
not like it.

fact is, making any art is just bloody hard work, if you
want to make something good that is. or at least that's my
own experience and the experience of the people I'm involved
with.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2006-05-27 14:16 [#01907993]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to Dannn_: #01907951



because you can't find sense in both i suppose..dunno, just
thoughts going through my head really..

i suppose i have a bit of romantic view on this matter, but
it makes perfect sense to me. i just can see how someone can
accept both, i just can't see it as genuine art, more like
faking it maybe. then again art is a very very broad term so
i suppose it's hard to define :)


 

offline Q4Z2X on 2006-05-27 15:01 [#01908024]
Points: 5264 Status: Lurker



When you really think about it, working a job is no
different than going to the store to buy a canvas,
stretching the canvas, mixing paint, cleaning your brushes,
etc..
It may not 'directly' lead to the work of art, but it makes
that artwork possible.. working to support creativity is in
a way similar to cleaning your brushes, etc... you don't
need to clean them to be an artist, it has no artistic
relevance, but is a required chore if that hobby is to
continue.
Most of the time it is just neccesity.. If a musican's
instrument is broken and the musician can't afford a
replacement and stops playing, the general public assumes
they are not a musician, and eventually it becomes true.
They might have potential, but the actual execution of their
creativity often largely depends on non-artistic
motivation.
Also, if an artist works a non-artist job they can gain
insight into the average person's life, as most people's
lives largely consist of working. they can bring that into
their artwork often, and it would seem to me that
inspiration/meaning behind the art would likely be more
universal than the usual 24/7 artiste's 'art for art sake'
mentality.


 

offline Exaph from United Kingdom on 2006-05-27 15:14 [#01908032]
Points: 3718 Status: Lurker



dedication is the key


 

offline glasseater from Switzerland on 2006-05-27 15:20 [#01908036]
Points: 531 Status: Regular



Its really a matter of time for me. See I'm drawing and
writting when I can and lately (because of my job) I didnt
have the time to get involved. But its not a matter of
different point of view in my case, because all people at my
jobs got mostly the same vision as me about world and
capitalism and stuff. So its really time and tired bodyfor
me (I do regret it but thats the way it is) :)


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2006-05-27 16:08 [#01908054]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to Q4Z2X: #01908024



"working to support creativity is in
a way similar to cleaning your brushes, etc..."

depends on what sort of work it is i'd say.


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2006-05-27 16:19 [#01908057]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker | Followup to tolstoyed: #01908054



Well, I wouldn't use that metaphor. I think its more basic.
You are working to afford your art. I find myself more
inspired with gear. I learn gear very quickly, and get bored
with things faster than most. In order for me to practice my
art, I need to spend a lot of money on it to keep me
interested. Its like I am buying really expensive paints for
my art, but instead of using a canvas, I am making a canvas
out of pre-existing layers of paint that I laid down on a
canvas that has disappeared.


 

offline rockenjohnny from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2006-05-27 22:28 [#01908224]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker



art for me was a lifestyle. now my job is a lifestyle,
working 12 hour shifts. which is fine because its a job i
really like. i dont disagree with the role of the
professional artist, but unfortunately in my case art was a
gap filler, something to give meaning to my life, rather
than any real sort of reaching out and contributing to the
world.

i watched some cabaret voltaire videos on youtube last night
and they kicked my ass. brought me back to where i wanted to
be with art years ago, but didnt quite have the committment
to follow up.


 

offline axion from planet rock (Sweden) on 2006-05-27 22:34 [#01908225]
Points: 3114 Status: Addict | Followup to mimi: #01907699



i think i love you : )



 

offline axion from planet rock (Sweden) on 2006-05-27 22:40 [#01908226]
Points: 3114 Status: Addict | Followup to mimi: #01907699



dont take me so serious btw.if you dont want to : )


 


Messageboard index