Record Companies vs File Sharing | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 79 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2609022
Today 6
Topics 127236
  
 
Messageboard index
Record Companies vs File Sharing
 

offline sgt growley from Deal (United Kingdom) on 2002-03-06 19:42 [#00114579]
Points: 247 Status: Lurker



Those greedy, scumbag record companies are taking Morpheus
and Kazaa to court, just like they did with Napster.
Even if they shut down every single site, i still wouldn't
buy the records because i can't afford them all, and i will
not pay huge amounts of money for something without knowing
of it's any good.
Jesus, how much money do these people want?...


 

offline Peter File from the future!!! Ooooh chase me! on 2002-03-06 19:44 [#00114587]
Points: 2020 Status: Lurker | Followup to sgt growley: #00114579



What about audiogalaxy? Are they being taken to court by
anybody?

It's just a cycle, though; one file-sharing site goes down,
seven spring up.


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2002-03-06 19:46 [#00114593]
Points: 10979 Status: Regular



AG is still da best......except maybe for SLSK !


 

offline mortsto-x from Trondheim/Bodø (Norway) on 2002-03-06 19:48 [#00114599]
Points: 8062 Status: Lurker



But how can these sites be up when Napster was closed? Isn't
it pretty much the same deal?


 

offline sgt growley from Deal (United Kingdom) on 2002-03-06 19:49 [#00114602]
Points: 247 Status: Lurker



No AG is safe because they kind of compromise by blocking
tracks if requested to do so by record companies, but they
can only block if the full artist and song name are there,
so you can still get most stuff by being sneaky and putting
part of the song name in!...


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-03-06 19:52 [#00114610]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular



i will always get music off the internet...

the way i see it, im not steeling if nobody is loosing
anything
i would'nt buy the record anyway, so nobody is missing out
on anything!

of course, if the artist IS good, then i will buy the
record..


 

offline mortsto-x from Trondheim/Bodø (Norway) on 2002-03-06 19:53 [#00114612]
Points: 8062 Status: Lurker



But, when I use AG I search for the full artist AND song
name... That works.


 

offline sgt growley from Deal (United Kingdom) on 2002-03-06 20:00 [#00114629]
Points: 247 Status: Lurker



As peter sez, one dies and loads more spring up. The demand
is so high. The only way the record co's will stop it is by
competing with a similar service but that's so good people
will pay for it. Like really high quality files, fast
downloads, cover artwork to download and print.


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-03-06 20:02 [#00114631]
Points: 21386 Status: Regular



It should be up to the artists themselves whether they want
their stuff mass shared without anyone paying for it. I
sorta think it's wrong, artists should be given extra
incentive to create beautiful things... just like patents
are given to inventors... maybe there are some fantastic
artists who don't share their ingenious ground breaking work
because why should they if they'll just get screwed? Or
maybe they could have people pay like 5 cents a download to
each artist, I'd pay that, I wonder how much money, say,
otto von schirach would make that way....


 


Messageboard index